|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |

1 Department of Oral Biology, Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK; and
2 Centre for Self Organising Molecular Systems, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, UK
* corresponding author, J.Kirkham{at}leeds.ac.uk
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: biomimetic self-assembly peptides scaffolds hydroxyapatite remineralization
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Once assembled, these fibrillar networks can form scaffold-like structures that mirror the biological macromolecules found in extracellular matrices, including those of the mammalian skeleton, where (predominantly anionic) matrix proteins are known to control the deposition and growth of hydroxyapatite crystals (Boskey, 2003). Dental enamel is a biological ceramic and the most highly mineralized of the skeletal tissues. In contrast to bone, its extracellular organic matrix is degraded and removed from the tissue prior to tooth eruption. During enamel development, enamel matrix proteinsthemselves known to form self-assembling supramolecular structuresare believed to control the disposition and morphology of the hydroxyapatite crystals, ultimately determining the physicomechanical properties of the mature tissue (Simmer and Fincham, 1995; Wen et al., 1999; Kirkham et al., 2002).
Enamel caries is probably the most common of all skeletal tissue pathologies, presenting as progressive subsurface demineralization (mineral loss) and ultimately resulting in mechanical failure and cavitation (Robinson et al., 2000). The fundamentally invasive treatment strategy for enamel restoration has changed little over the years, despite advances in dental materials themselves. The long-term goal of this work is to offer a new generation of bioactive materials which recapitulate normal histogenesis by providing biomimetic scaffolds capable of inducing mineral deposition in situ.
The specific aim of this study was to determine the effects of a rationally designed self-assembling anionic peptide, P11-4 (Fig. 1c
), on the de- and remineralization behavior of caries-like lesions of enamel under simulated intra-oral conditions.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) of Peptide Gels
P11-4 samples (15 mg/mL in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) were diluted with water to a peptide concentration of 20 µM immediately before direct application to carbon-coated, 400-hexagonal-mesh copper grids. The grids were stained with uranyl acetate solution (4% w/v in water) for 20 sec and examined under a Phillips CM10 TEM. Gels prepared and incubated in "mineralizing" solution as described below, for the investigation of hydroxyapatite nucleation, were removed from the mineralizing solution, washed briefly in deionized water, fixed in 3% phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde solution (pH 7.3), and embedded in Lowicryl K4M resin according to the manufacturers instructions. Ultrathin sections were deposited on 300-mesh carbon/formvar copper grids, stained with 3% methanolic uranyl acetate, and viewed in the Philips 400T TEM at an accelerating voltage of 80 KV.
Preparation of Lesions and pH Cycling
To test whether application of monomeric peptide affected remineralization and demineralization behavior of caries-like lesions, we used a previously published oscillating pH model (Robinson et al., 1992). Caries-like lesions were prepared in human permanent premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes at Leeds Dental Institute. All teeth were used with the individuals written consent in fulfillment of the requirements of the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and were used in accordance with standard protocols. Teeth were brushed clean under running water, but the natural surfaces were left intact. Following removal of the roots, a window of sound enamel, approximately 0.75 cm2, was delineated by the application of 2 coats of acid-resistant nail varnish on the buccal surfaces. The crowns were then immersed in acidified gelatin gel, pH 4.8, for 6 wks (Silverstone, 1966), and then washed in hot water to remove the gelatin for immediate use. This resulted in the production of subsurface lesions of approximately 100-µm depth. We treated the caries-like lesions by applying 10 µL of either (a) a solution of 5 mg/mL monomeric P11-4 in distilled water, titrated to pH 8 using dilute NaOH, or (b) the same solution without P11-4, directly to the surface using a paintbrush. The crowns were then left for 30 min at room temperature to allow the solution to soak into the lesion. From 46 treated crowns were then sequentially cycled through chemically defined solutions for 5 days in a pH-cycling model at 35°C (Robinson et al., 1992). Each 24-hour period included 3 x 20 min exposures to acid [demineralizing solution: 1.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.9 mM KH2PO4, 50 mM acetic acid, pH 4.8], with incubation in remineralizing solution [1.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.9 mM KH2PO4, 130 mM KCl, 60 mM Tris, pH 7.4) for the intervening periods. The degree of saturation (DS) with respect to hydroxyapatite for each solution (calculated according to a previously published algorithm (Shellis, 1988) ) was 0.29 and 14.06, respectively. After cycling, mineral loss or gain by the lesions was calculated following spectrophotometric determination of P in the incubation solutions (Chen et al., 1956). Exposed areas were calculated by image analysis, and results expressed as µg P/mm2 of exposed enamel. Control and experimental data were then compared by analysis of variance, based on the results obtained from 8 separate pH-cycling runs for both control and experimental lesions.
De novo Precipitation of Hydroxyapatite in vitro
To determine whether the peptide in its assembled form was capable of nucleating mineral crystals de novo, we prepared a birefringent P11-4 gel by mixing 15 mg P11-4 in 1 mL of 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. We prepared gelatin gels of the same concentration by mixing gelatin (SIGMA, Poole, UK) with the same buffer, heating to 60°C, and cooling to room temperature. The gels were then incubated in 10 mL of "mineralizing" solution (120 mM NaCl, 22 mM NaHCO3, 3.75 mM CaCl2, 1.67 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4, DS with respect to hydroxyapatite = 26.86) for 7 days at 35°C. Gels were then removed from the incubation solutions, washed in distilled water (pH 7.4), and embedded for TEM. Thin sections were viewed, unstained, in a Philips 400T TEM fitted with an EDAX 9100 EDX spectrometer. Electron diffraction and elemental analysis of electron-dense deposits were then carried out.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The responsiveness of the peptide to external triggers is a key property to potential applications, offering the possibility for application as a monomeric fluid and subsequent in situ-triggered assembly/gelation inside areas of tissue porosity, including caries lesions and exposed dentin. A further opportunity is for precise control of the surface properties of the peptide aggregates by appropriate peptide design, resulting in not only optimal interactions with the enamel surface, but also spatially determined de novo nucleation of hydroxyapatite crystals on the scaffold surface itself.
Previous work has systematically characterized P11-4 assembly under a range of different environmental conditions. At pH > 8.0 and low ionic strength, P11-4 forms a Newtonian fluid comprised of monomeric, random coil peptides over a wide range of peptide concentrations, due to intermolecular electrostatic repulsions among the 3 negatively charged side-chains at Glu5, Glu7, and Glu9 (Aggeli et al., 2003). When the pH of the solution is decreased below 8.0, P11-4 spontaneously self-assembles to produce 3D gels comprising ß-sheet aggregates, due to the partial neutralization of the negative charges. Solution salt concentration (including Ca++ ions) also promotes self-assembly and gelation of P11-4, due to screening of the electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged Glu side-chains. We therefore predict that in the present study, the peptide would be in its monomeric form when originally applied to the lesions surfaces in the pH-cycling experiments, but would be rapidly driven to self-assembly following exposure to the tissue and experimental conditions.
Our results clearly demonstrate an effect for P11-4 on the de- and remineralization behavior of caries-like lesions under conditions of oscillating pH in vitro. Treatment with monomeric solutions of P11-4 resulted in a significant net mineral gain by the lesions after 5 days of cycling, compared with untreated controls. A single application of P11-4 to the lesion surface resulted in significant net mineral gain on each of the 5 days of pH cycling, suggesting a sustained or incremental effect on tissue repair under these conditions.
The mechanism(s) underpinning these effects is not yet known. Two broad mechanisms are possible and are not necessarily mutually exclusive. If the predicted transition from low-viscosity isotropic liquid to elastomeric nematic gel is triggered in situ within the lesion pores, the peptide would be expected to form a fibrillar gel within the pores of the lesion. The anionic groups of the side-chains would attract Ca++ ions, potentially inducing de novo precipitation of calcium phosphate salts from the supersaturated supernatant solutions in a regular array on the fibrils surface. TEM of the pre-assembled gels revealed fibrils arranged in bundles, thus producing periodic surfaces of aligned fibrils that may further facilitate hydroxyapatite precipitation over and above that of an isotropic gel network containing randomly positioned fibrils. The results obtained in vitro following incubation of the assembled P11-4 in "mineralizing" solutions indicated the presence of needle-like electron-dense deposits, which electron diffraction and EDX suggested to be poorly crystalline hydroxyapatite. It is therefore possible that the observed increase in mineral gain by the lesions was due to precipitation of mineral within an assembled scaffold in situ. This remains to be confirmed, since no analysis of mineral within the lesions themselves has yet been carried out.
However, our results also demonstrated that the increase in net mineral gain by the treated lesions following pH cycling was due to a significant decrease in demineralization during exposure to acid. Increase in remineralization at neutral pH was also apparent, but this was not statistically significant, due to the greater variability. The structure of P11-4 suggests that it would bind to mineral. Our results could therefore be reflecting a stabilization of the mineral surfaces, due to the presence of the peptide. Both this and the above effects could contribute toward the observed net increase in mineral gain by the treated lesions after cycling.
Taken together, our results suggest that self-assembling peptides offer a potentially exciting route to "smart" dental biomaterials, though much work remains to be carried out. We do not yet know, for example, whether the peptides are susceptible to proteolytic degradation, which might limit their use, especially as a surface treatment. Further work is also clearly required to clarify the precise mechanism(s) of their observed actions, in longer-term in situ and in vivo studies.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
queries re self-assembling peptides, a.aggeli{at}leeds.ac.uk Received August 7, 2006; Last revision November 25, 2006; Accepted December 31, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aggeli A, Bell M, Boden N, Keen JN, McLeish TCB, Nyrkova I, et al. (1997b). Engineering of peptide beta-sheet nanotapes. J Mater Chem 7:11351145.
Aggeli A, Fytas G, Vlassopoulos D, McLeish TC, Mawer PJ, Boden N (2001a). Structure and dynamics of self-assembling beta-sheet peptide tapes by dynamic light scattering. Biomacromolecules 2:378388.[ISI][Medline]
Aggeli A, Nyrkova IA, Bell M, Harding R, Carrick L, McLeish TC, et al. (2001b). Hierarchical self-assembly of chiral rod-like molecules as a model for peptide beta-sheet tapes, ribbons, fibrils, and fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1185711862.
Aggeli A, Bell M, Carrick LM, Fishwick CW, Harding R, Mawer PJ, et al. (2003). pH as a trigger of peptide beta-sheet self-assembly and reversible switching between nematic and isotropic phases. J Am Chem Soc 125:96199628.[ISI][Medline]
Behravesh E, Zygourakis K, Mikos AG (2003). Adhesion and migration of marrow-derived osteoblasts on injectable in situ crosslinkable poly(propylene fumarate-co-ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels with a covalently linked RGDS peptide. J Biomed Mater Res A 65:260270.[Medline]
Boskey AL (2003). Biomineralization: an overview. Connect Tissue Res 44(Suppl 1):59.[ISI][Medline]
Chang S, Chen H, Liu J, Wood D, Bentley P, Clarkson B (2006). Synthesis of a potentially bioactive, hydroxyapatite-nucleating molecule. Calcif Tissue Int 78:5561.[ISI][Medline]
Chen PS Jr, Toribara TY, Warner H (1956). Microdetermination of phosphorus. Anal Chem 28:17561758.
Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI (2001). Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 294:16841688.
He G, Dahl T, Veis A, George A (2003). Nucleation of apatite crystals in vitro by self-assembled dentin matrix protein 1. Nat Mater 2:552558.[ISI][Medline]
Jo S, Park K (2000). Surface modification using silanated poly(ethylene glycol)s. Biomaterials 21:605616.[ISI][Medline]
Kirkham J, Brookes SJ, Shore RC, Wood SR, Smith DA, Zhang J, et al. (2002). Physicochemical properties of crystal surfaces in matrix-mineral interactions during mammalian biomineralisation. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 7:124132.
Meegan JE, Aggeli A, Boden N, Brydson R, Brown AP, Carrick L, et al. (2004). Designed self-assembled beta-sheet peptide fibrils as templates for silica nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater 14(1):3137.
Nyrkova IA, Semenov AN, Aggeli A, Boden N (2000a). Fibril stability in solutions of twisted beta-sheet peptides: a new kind of micellization in chiral systems. Eur Phys J B 17:481497.
Nyrkova IA, Semenov AN, Aggeli A, Bell M, Boden N, McLeish TCB (2000b). Self-assembly and structure transformations in living polymers forming fibrils. Eur Phys J B 17:499513.
Robinson C, Kirkham J, Baverstock AC, Shore RC (1992). A flexible and rapid pH cycling procedure for investigations into the remineralisation and demineralisation behaviour of human enamel. Caries Res 26:1417.[ISI][Medline]
Robinson C, Shore RC, Brookes SJ, Strafford S, Wood SR, Kirkham J (2000). The chemistry of enamel caries. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11:481495.
Shellis RP (1988). A microcomputer program to evaluate the saturation of complex solutions with respect to biominerals. Comput Appl Biosci 4:373379.
Silverstone LM (1966). The primary translucent zone of enamel caries and of artificial caries-like lesions. Br Dent J 120:461471.[Medline]
Simmer JP, Fincham AG (1995). Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6:84108.[Abstract]
Sofia S, McCarthy MB, Gronowicz G, Kaplan DL (2001). Functionalized silk-based biomaterials for bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res 54:139148.[ISI][Medline]
Wen HB, Moradian-Oldak J, Leung W, Bringas P Jr, Fincham AG (1999). Microstructures of an amelogenin gel matrix. J Struct Biol 126:4251.[ISI][Medline]
Yang XB, Roach HI, Clarke NM, Howdle SM, Quirk R, Shakesheff KM, et al. (2001). Human osteoprogenitor growth and differentiation on synthetic biodegradable structures after surface modification. Bone 29:523531.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |