|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
Paffenbarger Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building 224, Room A-153, Stop 8546, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8546, USA.
* corresponding author, hockin.xu{at}nist.gov
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: dental composite nano-particles whisker reinforcement tooth caries inhibition Ca and PO4 ion release
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the Ca-PO4 fillers did not reinforce the resin as do glass fillers (Söderholm et al., 1984; Goldberg et al., 1994; Bayne et al., 1998; Ferracane et al., 1998; Drummond and Bapna, 2003). Ca-PO4 composites had flexural strengths half that of unfilled resin (Skrtic et al., 1996b). Such low strengths were "inadequate to make these composites acceptable as bulk restoratives" (Skrtic et al., 2000).
Whiskers were used as fillers to reinforce dental composites (Xu, 1999). Silica nano-particles were fused onto the whiskers to facilitate silanization and enhance retention in the resin. These composites possessed strength and toughness nearly two-fold greater than those of several commercial composites (Xu et al., 2002a).
Calcium phosphate nano-particles were recently developed and incorporated into resins (Chow et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2006). A recent study investigated the effects of different resins/cure conditions with a single filler level (Xu et al., 2006). In the present study, two hypotheses were tested: (1) DCPA-whisker composites with filler levels from 075% would possess strengths matching/exceeding those of a commercial non-releasing, stress-bearing composite; and (2) the Ca-PO4 release would be proportional to the DCPA nano-particle filler level in the resin. The first hypothesis was tested because low filler levels could be envisioned for Ca-PO4-releasing sealant applications, medium filler levels for Ca-PO4 flowable composites, and high filler levels for stress-bearing and caries-inhibiting restorations. The purpose of the second hypothesis was to establish a relationship between release and volume fraction, to guide the tailoring/processing of composites.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Silicon-nitride whiskers (ß-Si3N4, UBE, New York, NY, USA) with diameters of 0.1-2 µm (mean = 0.4 µm) and lengths of 230 µm (mean = 5 µm) were mixed with silica (Aerosil-OX50, Degussa, Ridgefield, NJ, USA; diameter = 40 nm) at a whisker:silica mass ratio of 5:1. The mixture was heated in a furnace at 800°C for 30 min to fuse the silica onto the whiskers. The powder was silanized with 4% 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and 2% n-propylamine (mass fractions) (Xu, 1999).
A monomer consisting of 48.975% Bis-GMA (bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate), 48.975% TEGDMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate), 0.050% 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, and 2.000% benzoyl peroxide formed part I, the initiator, of a two-part chemically activated resin. Part II, the accelerator resin, consisted of 49.5% Bis-GMA, 49.5% TEGDMA, and 1.0% N,N-dihydroxyethyl-p-toluidine.
The fillers consisted of nano-silica-fused whiskers and nano-DCPA at a DCPA:whisker mass ratio of 1:1 (Xu et al., 2006). The (DCPA+whiskers)/(DCPA+whiskers+resin) mass fractions were: 0%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 65%, 70%, and 75%. Filler levels
80% resulted in a dry paste. Equal masses of parts I and II were mixed and filled into 2x2x25 mm3 molds. The specimens were incubated at 37°C and 50% humidity for 24 hrs prior to being tested.
A hybrid composite (TPH, Caulk/Dentsply, Milford, DE, USA) was used as a non-releasing control. It consisted of 0.8-µm silicate fillers at 78% level in a urethane-modified Bis-GMA-TEGDMA resin. The specimens were photo-cured (Triad-2000, Dentsply, York, PA, USA).
Flexural Strength and Nano-indentation
Flexural strength was measured by a three-point test with a 10-mm span at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min on a Universal Testing Machine (5500R, MTS, Cary, NC, USA) at approximately 25°C and 50% relative humidity. Nano-indentation (Nano-Instruments, Knoxville, TN, USA) was used to measure elastic modulus and hardness at a peak-load of 1 N (Xu et al., 2002a).
Ca and PO4 Release
A NaCl solution (133 mmol/L) buffered with 50 mmol/L HEPES (pH = 7.4; 37 C) was used. Following a previous study (Xu et al., 2006), we immersed 3 specimens of approximately 2x2x12 mm3 in 50 mL of solution, yielding specimen volume/solution = 2.9 mm3/mL. This was similar to the specimen volume/solution of approximately 3.0 mm3/mL in a previous study (Skrtic et al., 1996b). The concentrations of Ca and PO4 released from the specimens were measured vs. immersion time (in days): 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, and 56. At each time period, aliquots of 0.5 mL were removed and replaced by fresh solution. The aliquots were analyzed with a spectrophotometer (DMS-80 UV-visible, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) according to established standards and calibration methods (Skrtic et al., 1996b; Dickens et al., 2003).
Potential Diagram
The remineralization potential of a Ca- and PO4-releasing composite can be described via a potential diagram (Dickens et al., 2003). For a solution saturated with respect to hydroxyapatite [Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2], the solubility constant relationship, KSP = (Ca2+)10(PO43)6(OH)2, applies (Chow and Brown, 1984). Rearranging the equation leads to:
![]() | (1) |
where KW = (H+)(OH) is the dissociation constant of water. Taking log of both sides and rearranging the equation lead to:
![]() | (2) |
where K = (1/6)(logKSP+9logKW) is a constant. Eq. (2) shows that, for a solution saturated with respect to hydroxyapatite, the logarithms of the activities of H3PO4 and Ca(OH)2 are linearly related. The activities (H+)3(PO43) and (Ca2+)(OH)2 for a solution can be calculated from the pH, the measured Ca-PO4 concentrations, and the ionic strength. Hence, a solution can be represented as a point in the potential diagram. Solutions located to the left of the hydroxyapatite line (e.g., Fig. 8, Dickens et al., 2003) are undersaturated, and those to the right are supersaturated, with respect to hydroxyapatite.
The extent of this supersaturation can be quantified via the saturation ratio. The saturation index is (Margolis et al., 1999):
![]() | (3) |
where q is the number of ions in the ion activity product expression (for hydroxyapatite, q = 10+6+2 = 18). IAP = (Ca2+)10 (PO43)6(OH)2 is the ion activity product, which can be calculated from the measured concentrations with specific software (Chemist, Micromath Research, St. Louis, MO, USA). The saturation ratio
![]() | (4) |
where SR < 1 means that the solution is undersaturated, and SR > 1 means that the solution is supersaturated, with respect to hydroxyapatite (Margolis et al., 1999).
Furthermore, the Gibbs free energy can be used to quantify the thermodynamic driving force for remineralization (Dickens et al., 2003):
![]() | (5) |
where R is the ideal gas constant, and T is absolute temperature.
We performed one- and two-way ANOVA to detect the significant effects of the variables. We used Tukeys multiple-comparison test to compare the measured data at a p value of 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Ca and PO4 Release
The release increased with time and then started to plateau (Figs. 2A, 2B
). At 56 days, the Ca concentration in mmol/L (mean ± SD; n = 3) was (0.65 ± 0.02) with 75% fillers, significantly higher than (0.59 ± 0.02) with 70% fillers, and (0.39 ± 0.03) with 65% fillers (p < 0.05). The corresponding PO4 concentrations were (2.29 ± 0.07), (1.92 ± 0.14), and (1.26 ± 0.09), significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
|
G0 (Fig. 3C
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous Ca-PO4 composites released PO4 to concentrations of 0.10.7 mmol/L, and Ca to 0.31.0 mmol/L, measured with a similar method (Skrtic et al., 1996b; Dickens et al., 2003). These composites remineralized tooth lesions in vitro (Skrtic et al., 1996a; Dickens et al., 2003). The nano-DCPA-whisker composites released PO4 with concentrations up to 2.2 mmol/L, and Ca up to 0.65 mmol/L (at 75% total fillers), even when half of the fillers were non-releasing whiskers. This was likely because the DCPA nano-particles had a high surface area, A = 18.6 m2/g (Xu et al., 2006).
In a previous study (Dickens et al., 2003), the DCPA particle size, d, was 1.1 µm and the TTCP (tetracalcium phosphate) particle size was 16 µm. The density,
, is 2.89 g/cm3 for DCPA and 3.07 g/cm3 for TTCP. Hence, A = 6/(
d) = 1.9 m2/g for DCPA, and A = 0.12 m2/g for TTCP. These traditional particles had surface areas 12 orders of magnitude less than the new DCPA nano-particles. As a result, these traditional composites needed to be fully filled with Ca-PO4 fillers to have significant release. Replacing part of these Ca-PO4 fillers with reinforcing fillers would substantially reduce the release. Even if only 10% of the ACP fillers had been replaced by reinforcing fillers, the Ca-PO4 release would have been decreased from about 0.75 to only 0.1 mmol/L (Skrtic et al., 1996b). Therefore, there was little room left in traditional Ca-PO4 composites for reinforcement fillers without diminishing the ion release capability.
In contrast, with nano-DCPA, high release could be achieved with less filler, thus making room available in the resin for reinforcement fillers. This synergistic releasing-filler/reinforcing-filler approach helped achieve a flexural strength of 110 MPa for the Ca-PO4-releasing composites, matching that of a commercial stress-bearing, non-releasing composite.
Effect of Nano-DCPA Volume Fraction
The masses used in making the composites and the density were used to calculate the volume fraction of DCPA in the composite. The density of DCPA, dDCPA, is 2.89 g/cm3. The density of the unfilled resin was measured to be dresin = (1.19 ± 0.04) g/cm3. The density of silicon nitride whiskers is 3.34 g/cm3 (manufacturers data), and dfumed-silica = 2 g/cm3. Hence, dsilica-fused-whisker = 2.97 g/cm3 at a whisker:silica ratio of 5:1. At total filler mass fractions of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 65%, 70%, and 75%, the volume fraction VDCPA was calculated to be 0.075, 0.108, 0.147, 0.192, 0.218, 0.247, and 0.279, respectively.
There appear to be two main factors influencing Ca-PO4 release: (1) the amount of the source of release, VDCPA, with the amount of release expected to increase with increasing VDCPA; and (2) the resin polymerization conversion. Increasing the filler level usually decreases the polymerization conversion (Xu, 1999), because a higher concentration of air in the heavily filled composite may adversely affect the conversion. In addition, the fillers may partially absorb the heat of polymerization, thereby moderating the exotherm of polymerization. Therefore, with higher VDCPA in the composite, there is not only more DCPA for release, but also the diffusion of water and ions through the resin may be somewhat enhanced, due to the decreased polymerization conversion. If only factor (1) had been operative, the relationship between VDCPA and Ca-PO4 release might have been simply linear. However, these two factors may both be operative. Hence, the release may increase with increasing VDCPA at a rate faster than linear. Based on these reasons, the following empirical relationships are proposed:
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
where Ca and PO4 (mmol/L) are concentrations, and k and
-
are coefficients. Fitting the above equations to the measured data (at 56 days) yielded the equations in Fig. 4
.
|
The dimensional change of the composite with time is another issue that needs to be investigated. Previous studies on a Ca- and F-releasing composite (Ariston pHc) for buffering the local pH in plaque retention areas showed considerable enamel cracks after 2 yrs, which were related to the water-expansion of the restorations (Braun et al., 2001; van Dijken, 2002; Krämer et al., 2005). Ariston was completely covered with cracks after 24 mos (Frankenberger et al., 2005). It exhibited the highest dimensional expansion among the materials immersed for 2 mos (Martin et al., 2003), and a high wear-rate (Manhart et al., 2000). These failure phenomena may be related to its hydrophilic monomer (Table I, Manhart et al., 2000) and the formation of calcium carbonates with an expanding effect (van Dijken, 2002). One advantage of the new nano-composite was that it released high levels of Ca-PO4 without the use of a hydrophilic monomer. The Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin for the nano-composite was similar to the resin in previous composites, showing no significant degradation in thermal-cycling and water-aging for 2 yrs (Xu et al., 2002b; Xu, 2003). However, studies are needed to evaluate the long-term performance of the new nano-composites in vitro and in vivo.
In summary, we developed novel nano-composites using DCPA nano-particles with Ca-PO4 release to combat dental caries. The effects of nano-DCPA filler level were systematically investigated and correlated with Ca-PO4 release for the first time. The Ca-PO4 release from DCPA-whisker composites matched/exceeded those of previous composites known to remineralize tooth lesions, while the strengths of the DCPA-whisker composites were two-fold those of previous Ca-PO4 composites. Relationships between Ca-PO4 release and nano-DCPA volume fraction, VDCPA, were established: Ca = 4.46 VDCPA1.6, and PO4 = 66.9 VDCPA2.6. This suggests that the filler volume fraction is a key factor, and the release increases with VDCPA at a rate greater than linear. The new nano-composites, with substantial Ca and PO4 release, possessed mechanical properties matching those of a commercial stress-bearing, non-releasing composite. Hence, the nano-DCPA-whisker composites may have both stress-bearing and caries-inhibiting capabilities, a combination not yet available in current dental materials.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Certain commercial materials and equipment are identified to specify the experimental procedure. This does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST or ADAF, or that the material or equipment identified is necessarily the best available for the purpose. The standard uncertainty of the flexural strength measurement was estimated to be 1%. The standard uncertainty for the Ca and PO4 release measurements was estimated to be 3%. Unless otherwise specified in the paper, one standard deviation was used as the estimated standard uncertainty of the measurements.
Received June 2, 2006; Last revision November 21, 2006; Accepted November 24, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M (1998). A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567577.[Abstract]
Braun AR, Frankenberger R, Krämer N (2001). Clinical performance and margin analysis of Ariston pHc versus Solitaire I as posterior restorations after 1 year. Clin Oral Investig 5:139147.[Medline]
CDC (Center for Disease Control). www.cdc.gov/OralHealth/factsheets, Dental amalgam use and benefits. December, 2005.
Chow LC, Brown WE (1984). A physicochemical bench-scale caries model. J Dent Res 63:868873.
Chow LC, Sun L, Hockey B (2004). Properties of nanostructured hydroxyapatite prepared by a spray drying technique. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 109:543551.
Dickens SH, Flaim GM, Takagi S (2003). Mechanical properties and biochemical activity of remineralizing resin-based Ca-PO4 cements. Dent Mater 19:558566.[ISI][Medline]
Dickens SH, Flaim GM, Floyd CJE (2004). Effect of resin composition on mechanical and physical properties of calcium phosphate filled bonding systems. Polymer Prepr 45:329330.
Drummond JL, Bapna MS (2003). Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 19:226231.[ISI][Medline]
Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR (1998). In vitro aging of dental composites in watereffect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 42:465472.[ISI][Medline]
Frankenberger R, García-Godoy F, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2005). Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations. Am J Dent 18:2327.[ISI][Medline]
Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G, García-Godoy F (1999). Effect of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid-modified composite resins ("compomers"). Dent Mater 15:196201.[ISI][Medline]
Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ, Hadjinikolaou I, Jancar J (1994). Screening of matrices and fibers for reinforced thermoplastics intended for dental applications. J Biomed Mater Res 28:167173.[ISI][Medline]
Jokstad A, Bayne S, Blunck U, Tyas M, Wilson N (2001). Quality of dental restorations. FDI Commision Project 295. Int Dent J 51:117158.[ISI][Medline]
Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Frankenberger R (2005). Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: In vivo investigations. Am J Dent 18:7581.[ISI][Medline]
LeGeros RZ (1991). Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. Chapters 34. Myers HM, editor. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger.
Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R (2000). Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 53:353361.[ISI][Medline]
Margolis HC, Zhang YP, Lee CY, Kent RL Jr, Moreno EC (1999). Kinetics of enamel demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 78:13261335.
Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM, Fisher AC (2003). Hygroscopic expansion and solubility of composite restoratives. Dent Mater 19:7786.[ISI][Medline]
Sakaguchi RL (2005). Review of the current status and challenges for dental posterior restorative composites: clinical, chemistry, and physical behavior considerations. Summary of discussion from the Portland Composites Symposium (POCOS), June 1719, 2004, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Dent Mater 21:36.[Medline]
Sarrett DC (2005). Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 21:920.[ISI][Medline]
Skrtic D, Hailer AW, Takagi S, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED (1996a). Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of amorphous calcium phosphate/methacrylate composites in remineralizing caries-like lesions artificially produced in bovine enamel. J Dent Res 75:16791686.
Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED (1996b). Improved properties of amorphous calcium phosphate fillers in remineralizing resin composites. Dent Mater 12:295301.[ISI][Medline]
Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED, Eichmiller FC, Schumacher GE (2000). Physicochemical evaluation of bioactive polymeric composites based on hybrid amorphous calcium phosphates. J Biomed Mater Res 53:381391.[ISI][Medline]
Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M (1984). Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 63:12481254.
van Dijken JW (2002). Three-year performance of a calcium-, fluoride-, and hydroxyl-ions-releasing resin composite. Acta Odontol Scand 60:155159.[ISI][Medline]
Xu HH (1999). Dental composite resins containing silica-fused ceramic single-crystalline whiskers with various filler levels. J Dent Res 78:13041311.
Xu HH (2003). Long-term water aging of whisker-reinforced polymer-matrix composites. J Dent Res 82:4852.
Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Antonucci JM, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC (2002a). Dental resin composites containing silica-fused whiskerseffects of whisker-to-silica ratio on fracture toughness and indentation properties. Biomaterials 23:735742.[ISI][Medline]
Xu HH, Eichmiller FC, Smith DT, Schumacher GE, Giuseppetti AA, Antonucci JM (2002b). Effect of thermal cycling on whisker-reinforced dental resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:875883.[ISI][Medline]
Xu HH, Sun L, Weir MD, Antonucci JM, Takagi S, Chow LC, et al. (2006). Nano DCPA-whisker composites with high strength and Ca and PO(4) release. J Dent Res 85:722727.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |