JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lü, F.X.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, R.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lü, F.X.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, R.S.
J Dent Res 86(3):216-226, 2007
© 2007 International and American Associations for Dental Research


REVIEW
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE

Oral Mucosal Immunity and HIV/SIV Infection

F.X. Lü1,2,*, and R.S. Jacobson2

1 California National Primate Research Center and Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; and
2 Greer Laboratories Inc., 639 Nuway Circle, PO Box 800, Lenoir, NC 28645, USA

* corresponding author, fblu{at}greerlabs.com


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) transmission through genital and rectal mucosa has led to intensive study of mucosal immune responses to HIV and to the development of a vaccine administered locally. However, HIV transmission through the oral mucosa is a rare event. The oral mucosa represents a physical barrier and contains immunological elements to prevent the invasion of pathogenic organisms. This particular defense differs between micro-compartments represented by the salivary glands, oral mucosa, and palatine tonsils. Secretory immunity of the salivary glands, unique features of cellular structure in the oral mucosa and palatine tonsils, the high rate of oral blood flow, and innate factors in saliva may all contribute to the resistance to HIV/Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) oral mucosal infection. In the early stage of HIV infection, humoral and cellular immunity and innate immune functions in oral mucosa are maintained. However, these particular immune responses may all be impaired as a result of chronic HIV infection. A better understanding of oral mucosal immune mechanisms should lead to improved prevention of viral and bacterial infections, particularly in immunocompromised persons with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and to the development of a novel strategy for a mucosal AIDS vaccine, as well as vaccines to combat other oral diseases, such as dental caries and periodontal diseases.

KEY WORDS: oral mucosa • saliva • salivary glands • palatine tonsil • HIV/SIV


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
The mucosal immune system in the oral cavity is part of an extensive and specialized compartmentalized mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) (McGhee et al., 1984; McGhee and Kiyono, 1993; Czerkinsky et al., 1999). Oral MALTs consist of buccal mucosa, salivary glands, Waldeyer’s ring (comprised of palatine tonsils and adenoids), and pharyngeal lymphoid tissues. Oral MALTs act as a physical barrier against the invasion of pathogenic organisms as a result of the following:

  1. Oral mucosa, a stratified squamous epithelium, has the ability to produce inflammatory cytokines and express adhesion molecules.
  2. Oral mucosal tissues and submandibular salivary glands contain a broad range of functional immune cells.
  3. Saliva possesses several innate and specific factors that inhibit the infectivity of viruses.
  4. The oral mucosa and salivary glands have a high blood flow rate.
  5. Submandibular salivary glands are anatomically surrounded by the lymphatic draining system.
  6. The tonsils have a typical composition of lymphocyte subsets and dendritic cells, and play an important role in immunologic surveillance and resistance to infection in the upper aerodigestive tract (Bernstein et al., 2005).

The factors listed above may result in a lowering of the concentration of infectious HIV-1 in saliva, making the oral cavity a rare site for HIV transmission. However, persistence of HIV/SIV infection results in susceptibility of the oral mucosa to opportunistic infections (Candida albicans, Herpes simplex virus, and cytomegalovirus). The mechanism by which HIV infects different cell types within the oral mucosa is not clear. The mucosal immunity in the female reproductive tract and the rectal mucosa has been intensively investigated for the development of a mucosal AIDS vaccine for the past 15 years (McGhee et al., 1992, 1994; Miller et al., 1993, 1996, 1997; Lu et al., 1998; Miller and Lu, 2003). Both routes are effective sites for HIV and SIV transmission (Miller et al., 1989, 1993, 1997; Mestecky et al., 1994a; Lu et al., 1998). However, HIV transmission through the intact oral mucosa has not been documented. Previous studies have shown that oral mucosal immunization with recombinant protein or plasmid DNA immunogen induced oral and systemic humoral and cellular immune responses (Etchart et al., 1997, 2001; Desvignes et al., 1998; Cui and Mumper, 2002; Lundholm et al., 2002). Thus, oral mucosa may provide a site for possible vaccination. This evidence leads to the suggestion that the oral mucosa possesses a protective type of immunity that may be superior to that of other mucosal sites.


   PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SALIVA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
The principal glands of salivation are the parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands; in addition, there are many small minor salivary glands within the mucosa of the tongue, lips, palate, and other mucosal areas of the oral cavity. The daily secretion of saliva normally ranges between 800 and 1500 mL in adults (average value, 1000 mL). The flow of saliva itself helps wash away pathogenic bacteria and viruses as well as the food particles that provide their metabolic support. Persons with significant xerostomia have a high prevalence of dental caries and Candida infections (Jansma et al., 1988; Torres et al., 2002). Saliva contains two major types of protein secretions: (1) a serous secretion that contains an {alpha}-amylase, which is an enzyme for digesting starches; and (2) a mucus secretion that contains mucins for lubricating mucosal surfaces. The parotid glands produce only serous secretions, while the submandibular and sublingual glands secrete both the serous and mucus types. Finally, the minor salivary glands secrete predominantly mucus. Salivary glands are the most important source of secretory IgA (S-IgA) antibodies (Abs) in the upper respiratory and gastrointestinal (GI) tracts. However, it is not clear which salivary glands are the major source of S-IgA in whole saliva. IgA predominates in whole and parotid saliva, and whole saliva has been shown to contain higher levels of IgA, IgM, IgG than does parotid saliva in healthy humans (Crama-Bohbouth et al., 1984). This suggests that a portion of the Igs in whole saliva is derived from a source other than parotid salivary glands. However, measurement of the antigen-specific-activity Ab has shown that IgG-specific activity is significantly higher in the parotid saliva than in whole saliva of older individuals (Butler et al., 1990). In persons with AIDS, the anti-Candida albicans Ab levels are lower in parotid saliva as a result of a decrease in the rates of the Ab secretion (Coogan et al., 1994). It has been shown that the minor salivary glands produce from 30 to 35% of the IgA that enters the oral cavity, and that the S-IgA concentration in the minor salivary gland secretions is four times higher than that in parotid gland secretions (Crawford et al., 1975). The S-IgAs are synthesized by plasma cells associated with salivary glands. The IgA plasma cells in the salivary glands originate from IgA-committed B-cells migrating from Peyer’s patches (O’Sullivan et al., 2001; Lamm and Phillips-Quagliata, 2002; Zuercher et al., 2002b). There may also be some contribution from nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) (Jackson et al., 1981; Childers et al., 2002; Zuercher et al., 2002a; Yoshino et al., 2004). Saliva contains elements derived from the capillary bed beneath the oral mucosa, including that referred to as gingival crevicular fluid, which flows through the crevice between the gingiva and the tooth. The Ig composition of crevicular fluid is similar to that of plasma (Brandtzaeg et al., 1970; Grbic et al., 1995), but once mixed with salivary gland secretions, it becomes diluted. Maintenance of high levels of IgA in crevicular fluid may afford protection against periodontal attachment loss (Grbic et al., 1999). When bleeding in gingival crevices occurs, saliva also contains a transudate of plasma components. Evaluation of hemoglobin in saliva is an indicator of whether gingival bleeding has occurred (Piazza et al., 1994). Thus, saliva is a mixture of water, electrolytes, glycoproteins (immunoglobulins), enzymes, and other organic compounds. Salivary water and electrolyte concentrations are approximately equal to those of plasma. However, the total protein concentration in saliva is approximately one-tenth of that in plasma.

The major characteristics of saliva are: (1) its large volume relative to the mass of the salivary glands; (2) its high potassium concentration; (3) its low osmolarity (hypotonic); (4) its commensal micro-organisms, such as Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans; and (5) specialized organic materials, such as glycoproteins (immunoglobulins) and enzymes ({alpha}-amylase, lysozyme, lingual lipase, and proteolytic enzymes released from micro-organisms).


   SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO HIV INFECTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
Unlike other mucosal sites, the oral cavity is rarely a site of HIV transmission. This could be because of the low concentration of HIV-1 in saliva (Cohen et al., 2000). Saliva samples from HIV-positive individuals are often positive for HIV RNA, measured by polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) assay (Shugars et al., 2001), but only rarely are they positive for infectious virus by culture (Goto et al., 1991; Barr et al., 1992; Coppenhaver et al., 1994). Another possible explanation for inefficient oral transmission may be that HIV-1 in the oral cavity is inhibited by the endogenous salivary anti-HIV factors, such as innate secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI), which may inhibit infectivity of saliva by interacting with host cells (Shugars, 1999; Shine et al., 2002). The specific salivary proteins that appear to inhibit infectivity by interaction with virus include salivary mucins (Bergey et al., 1994), thrombospondin (Crombie et al., 1998), proline-rich proteins (Robinovitch et al., 2001), salivary lactoferrin (van der Strate et al., 2001), and salivary agglutinin (Nagashunmugam et al., 1998; Shugars et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2003). The hypotonicity of saliva has been proposed as a non-specific antiviral factor capable of causing lysis in HIV-infected cells (Baron et al., 1999).


   ORAL MUCOSA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
The oral mucosa is a stratified squamous epithelium supported by the underlying lamina propria. Intra-epithelial dendritic cells are antigen-presenting cells (APCs), which can process and present antigen to prime naïve helper cells (Th) in the draining lymph nodes. Oral epithelial cells produce a range of cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, TNF-{alpha}, granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Yamamoto et al., 1994), TGF-ß, and their receptors (Vernier et al., 1996; Okada and Murakami, 1998; Sandros et al., 2000; Steele and Fidel, 2002; Schaller et al., 2004). Bacteria and Candida albicans often serve as stimuli for epithelial cells to produce cytokines and chemokines; for example, IL-1ß, exodus-2, P-selectin, GM-CSF, and TNF-{alpha} are stimulated by C. albicans (Schaller et al., 2002; Steele and Fidel, 2002). Oral epithelial cells produce IL-8, considered to be a chemokine, which is stimulated by Viridans streptococci (Vernier et al., 1996). Following antigen priming in the oral mucosa of transgenic mice, 3 chemokine ligand genes—CCL12, CCL19, and CCL25 [thymusexpressed chemokine (TECK)]—were significantly up-regulated in oral tissues (Otten et al., 2003). The mucosa-associated epithelial chemokine, MEC (CCL28), which is expressed by epithelia in diverse mucosal tissues, including the oral cavity, is selectively chemotactic for IgA Ab-secreting cells (ASC) from both intestinal and non-intestinal lymphoid and effector tissues (Lazarus et al., 2003). Within the oral epithelium, APCs and T-cells are the predominant immune cells. Macrophages, fibroblasts, mast cells, and intra-epithelial lymphocytes in the buccal mucosa can also produce a broad range of cytokines, such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-10. Thus, oral epithelia are not merely mechanical barriers, but are also important elements of the innate immune system (Sandros et al., 2000).


   ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW, LYMPHOCYTE TRANSMIGRATION, XEROSTOMIA, AND ORAL LESIONS DURING HIV/SIV INFECTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
Oral Mucosal Blood Flow and Lymphocyte Transmigration
Under physiological conditions, the rate of blood flow in the oral mucosa and the salivary glands is significantly higher than that in facial skin and muscle; for example, the rate of blood flow through resting salivary tissue is approximately 20 times greater than that of blood flow through muscle (Canady et al., 1993). The volume of blood flow through the salivary glands is proportional to their weight. The most likely explanation for the high blood flow rate is the more abundant capillary supply in oral mucosa and salivary glands when compared with that in skin and muscle (Canady et al., 1993). The capillaries in salivary glands are quite permeable, which allows for rapid movement of water, which facilitates the transport of large quantities of mucin glycoproteins and other small molecules across their basement membranes into the external secretions. The transudating systemic immunity helps to prevent infectious microbial entry of many pathogens (Underdown, 2005). In addition, the abundant oral mucosal blood circulation and permeable capillaries may facilitate the migration and ’homing’ of circulating lymphocytes to the oral mucosa during local infection or inflammation, which may play a major role in preventing pathogenic viral and bacterial infections.

The clinical stage of HIV infection at which oral mucosal immunity fails is, by definition, when opportunistic infection occurs (clinical progression to Stage IV of the disease, namely, AIDS). However, detailed knowledge on the etiology of this oral immune failure is lacking. Based upon hemoglobin levels in saliva, HIV-infected intravenous drug abusers and persons with AIDS-related complex have a high incidence of oral mucosal bleeding when compared with asymptomatic individuals (Piazza et al., 1994). The bleeding causes the release of systemic immune components into the oral cavity. This observation has led to the suggestion that the blood flow rate in oral mucosa, with the exception of the salivary glands, may be greatly increased as a result of the systemic route of HIV infection and/or local inflammation.

The transmigration of activated lymphocytes from blood to oral mucosal tissues requires that the lymphocytes express membrane receptor integrins such as L-selectin, CLA (cutaneous lymphocyte antigen), or {alpha} 4{alpha}7 to bind vascular endothelial ligands such as GlyCAM-1 (glycosylation-dependent adhesion-molecule) or MAdCAM-1 (mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule) (Viney et al., 1996; Kantele et al., 1999; Rott et al., 2000; Galkina et al., 2003). It is interesting that, when compared with oral immunization, systemic immunization induces ASCs with different homing receptor phenotypes: Systemic antigen exposure results in a higher incidence of specific ASCs that express L-selectin, whereas oral exposure results in a higher incidence of specific ASCs that express agr; 4{alpha}7 (Lamm and Phillips-Quagliata, 2002; Rott et al., 2000; Youngman et al., 2005). Once tethered, the lymphocytes then roll along the endothelial surface attached by integrins such as VLA-4 (very late antigen) to fibronectin and VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule) expressed by blood vessels. In the second phase of lymphocyte trafficking, the beta 2-integrin LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associated molecule) on the non-villous surfaces of lymphocytes becomes activated and adheres to ligands expressed on endothelium, ICAM-1 (CD54), a cell-surface protein with 5 Ig-like domains, and ICAM-2 (CD102), a molecule with 2 Ig-like domains. The ICAM-1 could be more important in the adhesion to inflamed tissues, whereas the ICAM-2 could predominantly mediate interactions of lymphocytes with non-activated endothelial cells (Lehmann et al., 2003). Finally, the binding of LFA-1-ICAM-1 to PECAM-I (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule) is involved in the diapedesis of lymphocytes between endothelial cells as they exit the vessel (Springer, 1990; Walker, 2004).

Xerostomia and Oral Lesions Associated with HIV/AIDS
Dryness of the mouth is frequently observed in HIV-positive individuals (Foltyn, 1993; Younai et al., 2001; Ohmit et al., 2003; Okunseri et al., 2003). In comparison with those with an undetectable viral load, individuals having a viral mRNA load of more than 100,000/mm3 copies are much more likely to report dry mouth (Younai et al., 2001). It has been shown that HIV+ persons have a significantly decreased salivary flow rate in the early stages of HIV infection (CD4+ > 200 cell/µL) (Lin et al., 2003). Similar results have suggested that xerostomia may be the initial presentation of HIV-1 infection (Ooi et al., 2005). Analysis of these data suggests that immunosuppressive drugs must be used cautiously in xerostomic individuals, and that screening for HIV is mandatory in the differential diagnosis of persons with xerostomia (Ooi et al., 2005). The prevalence of xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction, associated with immunosuppression measured by CD4+ cell counts, is significantly higher in HIV-1-positive women when compared with a group of at-risk seronegative women (Navazesh et al., 2000). In addition, infection with HIV-1 may be associated with enlargement of the major salivary glands (Schiødt et al., 1989; Pinto and De Rossi, 2004). Furthermore, not only is the secretory function of salivary glands reduced in HIV+ individuals, but the composition of saliva is altered as well (Lin et al., 2003). The nature of salivary gland dysfunction in early HIV/SIV infection warrants further investigation.

Oral lesions—such as candidiasis, oral hairy leukoplakia, Kaposi’s sarcoma, aphthous ulcers, and herpes simplex viral infections—are most common in HIV-infected persons (et al., 1994; Anil and Challacombe, 1997; Patton et al., 2002) and SAIDS retrovirus serotype-1 (SRV-1)-infected macaques (Schiødt et al., 1988). Oral candidiasis, particularly the pseudomembranous type, has been consistently reported as the most prevalent HIV-1-associated oral lesion in all ages (Gillespie and Marino, 1993; Espinoza et al., 2003; Pinto and De Rossi, 2004). Oral candidiasis is more common in HIV-1-infected children with higher caries experience, gingival inflammation, and plaque accumulation (Chen et al., 2003; Pinto and De Rossi, 2004). However, more than 50% of older persons with AIDS present one or more oral mucosal lesions, and denture use leads to a three-fold increase in the probability of mucosal lesions (Espinoza et al., 2003). Oral hairy leukoplakia and Kaposi’s sarcoma appear to be associated with male-to-male HIV-1 transmission risk behaviors (Patton et al., 2002). Sublingual ranula is considered another HIV/AIDS-associated lesion, especially in children (Chidzonga and Rusakaniko, 2004). Persons with oral candidiasis or multiple oral lesions have significantly lower numbers of CD4 lymphocyte counts and lower ratios of CD4/CD8 lymphocytes than those without any oral lesions (Glick et al., 1994; Chiang et al., 1998). Oral mucosal lesions are common in both young and elderly people, are more prevalent among those with advanced HIV diseases, and may appear in the early phase of HIV infection, suggesting the necessity for an improvement in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these lesions.


   THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF SALIVARY GLANDS AND POTENTIAL REGULATORY FACTORS FOR SALIVA FLOW
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
In mouse salivary glands, IgA-plasma cells are present near acinar and ductal epithelial cells (Jackson et al., 1981; Kawahara et al., 1985). The minor and major salivary glands from normal and sialadenitis dogs have IgA-plasma cells in the interlobular connective tissue; IgA is present in the secretory acinar epithelial cells and in the duct epithelium, as revealed by immunohistochemical staining. However, IgG- and IgM-plasma cells are confined to the interstitial tissue of salivary glands; IgG and IgM are undetectable by epithelial staining (Sozmen et al., 1996). Escherichia coli-specific IgA-plasma cells have been detected in salivary glands of pigs orally infected with E. coli (De Buysscher and Dubois, 1978). Submandibular salivary glands from HIV-1-gp120 immunized macaques contain a significantly higher frequency of IgA ASCs and cytokine-secreting CD4+ Th1- and Th2-T-type cells (Yoshino et al., 2004).

Studies of the human salivary gland show that IgA-plasma cells are present in HLA-DR+ epithelium that surrounds the duct (Thrane et al., 1992). Further, human salivary glands can produce IgA under in vitro culture conditions (Hurlimann and Zuber, 1968). Salivary gland output and composition of saliva have been reported to be altered as a result of HIV infection (Lin et al., 2003).

Anatomically, human salivary glands are surrounded by the lymphatic system, which is linked to the thoracic duct and blood. The human parotid gland is spatially covered by anterior auricular and intraglandular parotid lymph nodes and superficial lymph nodes, whereas the submandibular gland is surrounded by submandibular and submental lymph nodes. Salivary glands are surrounded by lymphoid tissues and process plasma cells, T-cells, and APCs. Salivary glands may serve as inductive and effector sites for eliciting immune responses in oral mucosa and systemic lymphoid tissues (Sankar et al., 2002; Tucker et al., 2004).

The parasympathetic nerve signals that induce copious saliva flow cause moderate dilation of the blood vessels. In addition, saliva flow itself directly dilates the blood vessels, and thus provides the increased nutrition that is needed by the secreting cells. Part of this additional vasodilator effect is caused by kallikrein secreted by the activated ductal cells of the parotid and the sublingual salivary glands (Ørstavik et al., 1982), which in turn acts as an enzyme to split one of the blood proteins, an {alpha}2-globulin, to form bradykinin, a strong vasodilator peptide, which results in increased blood flow to the secreting glands (Emmelin and Gjørstrup, 1973; Hibino et al., 1994). The major bradykinin B2 receptors are prominent in the perivascular smooth-muscle cells of the tunica media, which are within the small arterioles of salivary glands of both rats and humans (Figueroa et al., 2001). HIV infection results in dry mouth or changes the blood flow rate of the interlobular connective tissue, and this may be mediated by the kallikrein-kinin system. It is possible that HIV replication may affect vascular endothelial cells and cause the obstruction of the capillary bed that supplies blood to the salivary gland secreting cells. Consequently, it may cause a low salivary secretion rate, xerostomia, and an increased susceptibility to oral co-infections or lesions.


   THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF PALATINE TONSILS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
The fundamental immunological functions of the palatine tonsils are similar to those of other lymph nodes (Perry, 1994; Nave et al., 2001). The palatine tonsil is strategically located in the oropharynx at the entrance to the upper respiratory and GI tracts. The palatine tonsils play an important role in immunologic surveillance and resistance to infection in the upper aerodigestive tract (Bernstein et al., 2005). The immunological process, both humoral and cellular, is initiated in the crypt epithelium, lymphoid follicles, and extrafollicular regions of palatine tonsils. Each compartment has a characteristic composition of lymphocytes and dendritic cell subsets (Nave et al., 2001). The crypt epithelium in the tonsil is predominantly infiltrated by CD4+ T-cells and {gamma}{delta} TCR+ T-cells (Salles and Middleton, 2000). Thirty-five percent of the crypt epithelial cells are microfold or M cells (Gebert, 1997), which play an important role in the uptake of luminal antigens to initiate immune responses (Gebert, 1997). CD8+ T-cells and {gamma}{delta} TCR+ T-cells in the lymphoid follicles of the tonsils increase significantly in human tonsillitis (Olofsson et al., 1998). Studies in normal children’s palatine tonsils have demonstrated that the density of dendritic cells is the highest in the extrafollicular T-cell areas, where CD4+ T-lymphocytes are especially abundant (Noble et al., 1996). Numerous macrophages can be found in all compartments (Gorfien et al., 2001). Both dendritic cells and macrophages capture, process, and present antigen to T-lymphocytes, which is a critical step in the early immune response (Gorfien et al., 2001). Functional analysis of ASCs has revealed that the number of S. pyogenes-specific IgA-ASCs increased in individuals with recurrent tonsillitis when compared with those with a tonsillar hypertrophy (Kerakawauchi et al., 1997). Intra-tonsillar vaccination with tetanus toxoid in humans induced IgG- and IgA-ASCs that are highly restricted to the immunized tonsils, while a few ASCs were disseminated through the blood stream and to distant organs (Quiding-Jarbrink et al., 1995). In vitro cultures of human tonsil tissues have been proposed as a model for the study of HIV-1 pathogenesis (Glushakova et al., 1995). Human palatine tonsils obtained from tonsillectomies were cultured ex vivo and infected with semen from HIV-positive donors. HIV infection was transferred into tonsillar lymphocytes, but the progression from virus binding to primary infection was dramatically reduced when the lymphocytes were protected by an intact mucosal surface (Maher et al., 2004, 2005). These results suggest that the intact oral mucosa plays an important role in limiting HIV oral primary infection. In palatine tonsils taken from individuals chronically infected with HIV-1, the infected cells were not found in the stratified squamous epithelium adjacent to the pharynx; instead, the infected lymphocytes were localized on the surface of the tonsillar crypt epithelium (Frankel et al., 1997). The interaction of T-cells and dendritic cells in the surface of tonsillar tissue under in vitro culture may support HIV-1 replication. HIV-1 replicates actively in the crypt epithelium of tonsils or adenoids taken from asymptomatic HIV-1-infected individuals (Frankel et al., 1996). Adult macaques exposed to cell-free simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) through the oral route become infected and developed simian AIDS (Baba et al., 1996). Thus, Waldeyer’s ring, the palatine tonsils, and adenoids may serve as potential sites of entry for HIV-1 and SIV.


   HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE CELLS IN THE ORAL MUCOSA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
ASCs in Buccal Mucosa and Submandibular Salivary Glands
It has been shown that murine oral mucosa contains both effector and regulatory cells required for the development and expression of local Ab responses (Deslauriers et al., 1985). Compared with parotid saliva, a considerably high level of S. mutans serotype c specific IgA Ab has been detected in the secretions of minor salivary glands in humans (Krasse et al., 1978). SIgA is the predominant Ig in labial minor salivary gland secretions (Crawford et al., 1975). Immunofluorescent and immunoperoxidase studies of frozen tissue sections have shown that IgA-, IgM-, and IgG-containing cells are closely associated with the minor salivary glands of the oral mucosa (Moro et al., 1984; Matthews et al., 1985). Plasma cells of the IgA isotype predominate over IgG-secreting cells in salivary glands (Mega et al., 1995) and in oral mucosa (Deslauriers et al., 1985). A comparison of immunoglobulin-secreting cell (ISC) frequencies in the oral mucosa and salivary glands of SIVmac239-infected and normal rhesus macaques had not been shown until now. To establish this, we noted a significant high frequency of IgA-secreting cells (mean number: 5910/106 mononuclear cells) in the oral mucosa when compared with IgG-secreting cells (mean number: 938/106 mononuclear cells) in SIV-infected macaques (p < 0.011). However, this type of significant difference was not seen in normal macaques. In normal monkeys, the mean frequency of IgG-secreting cells in the oral mucosa was 2155/106 mononuclear cells, while the mean frequency of IgA-secreting cells was 2916/106 mononuclear cells. The frequencies of IgG- and IgA-secreting cells were not significantly different between SIV-infected and normal monkeys. The predominant frequency of IgA-secreting cells in the oral mucosa of SIV-infected macaques suggests a selective IgA plasma cell activation in the oral mucosa; S-IgA Abs in saliva are mainly locally produced (Fig. 1AGo). Thus, oral mucosa is an effective site for the induction of S-IgA Abs. SIVmac239 mucosal infection results in a high infiltration of IgA-secreting plasma cells in the oral mucosa. Similar to the oral mucosa, SIV-infected macaques have an apparent high frequency of IgA-secreting cells (mean number: 596/106 mononuclear cells) and IgG-secreting cells (mean number: 231/106 mononuclear cells) in submandibular salivary glands, when compared with that of normal monkeys (35/106 mononuclear cells for IgG-secreting cells and 44/106 mononuclear cells for IgA-secreting cells). However, the difference was not statistically significant, due to the small sample size (Fig. 1BGo).


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The frequency of Ig-secreting cells in the oral mucosa and submandibular salivary glands of SIV-infected and normal rhesus macaques. (A) The frequency of Ig-secreting cells in the buccal mucosa of SIV-infected and normal rhesus macaques. (B) The frequency of Ig-secreting cells in the submandibular salivary glands of SIV-infected and normal macaques. The data were expressed as Ig-forming cells (ISCs) per million mononuclear cells (MNC). The bars represent the mean and one standard error. The unpaired t test was used to compare a significant difference between the frequency of ISCs in SIV-infected and normal rhesus macaques, and between isotypes of ISCs in the same tissues. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant, and is labeled on the top of the bar. The frequency of IgAsecreting cells was predominant over that of IgG-secreting cells in the buccal mucosa and the submandibular glands. SIVmac239 infection resulted in a significantly increased frequency of IgA-secreting cells in the buccal mucosa when compared with the frequency of IgG-secreting cells (p < 0.011). Significant differences in ISCs frequency were not found between SIV-infected and normal monkeys in either the buccal mucosa or the submandibular glands. Results were derived from MNCs isolated from the cheek mucosa and submandibular glands of 6–8 SIV-infected or normal rhesus macaques.

 
Cytokine-secreting Cells in Oral Mucosa and Submandibular Salivary Glands
The cytokine-secreting cells in oral mucosa and submandibular salivary glands of 5 normal monkeys were examined by ELISPOT assay, with freshly isolated mononuclear cells. The TNF-{alpha}-secreting cells were predominant when compared with IL-10-secreting cells in oral mucosa and submandibular salivary glands (Figs. 2A, 2BGo). A low frequency of IL-6-secreting cells and small numbers of IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells were present in both tissues. IL-2-secreting cells were undetectable (Figs. 2A, 2BGo). Again, the oral mucosa had at least a 10-fold-higher frequency of TNF-{alpha}-, IL-10-, IL-6-, and IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells when compared with the submandibular glands (Fig. 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. The frequency of cytokine-secreting cells in the oral mucosa and the submandibular salivary glands of normal rhesus macaques. (A) The frequency of cytokine-secreting cells in the buccal mucosa of normal macaques. (B) The frequency of cytokine-secreting cells in the submandibular salivary glands of normal monkeys. The bars represent the mean ± standard error. The numbers of TNF-{alpha}-secreting cells were predominant over other types of cytokine-secreting cells examined. The buccal mucosa contained a high frequency of TNF-{alpha}-, IL-10-, IL-6-, and IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells, which were about 10 times as high as that of submandibular glands. Results were obtained from fresh mononuclear cells isolated from the cheek mucosa and submandibular glands of 5 normal rhesus macaques.

 
CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells, and Langerhans Cells in Oral Mucosal Epithelium
A constant population of non-epithelial immunocompetent cells, lymphocytes, and Langerhans cells exists in the oral epithelium (Burkhardt, 1992). The relationship between the immunocompetent cells and the epithelium of the oral mucosa suggests the presence of a mucosal immunologic defense barrier (Reibel et al., 1985). The oral epithelium and lamina propria contain granulocytes and a broad range of T-cells, including CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T-cells, as well as Langerhans cells and HLA-DR-bearing cells. In contrast to the skin, T-lymphocytes in the oral mucosa are more or less randomly distributed on both sides of the basement membrane. The epithelium of the oral mucosa contains about 37 times as many T-lymphocytes as the epidermis of normal skin (van Loon et al., 1989). CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets are equally present in the epithelium of the oral mucosa, and the helper/inducer T-lymphocytes play a more important role (van Loon et al., 1989).

Human Langerhans cells in the oral epithelium are more effective at stimulating allergenic T-cells in vitro than are Langerhans cells from skin (Hasséus et al., 2004). Further, it has been shown that CD36+ dendritic cells are physiologic components of the oral mucosa, and that HIV infection does not change in terms of numbers of CD36+ dendritic cells, but negatively affects the dendritic cell expression of HLA-DR, particularly in the area of hairy leukoplakia (Pimpinelli et al., 1991). Similarly, it has been reported that systemic infection of rhesus monkeys with either simian retrovirus-1 or SIV does not significantly change the numbers of Langerhans cells in the oral mucosal epithelium (Hämmerle et al., 1993). One study, by immunohistochemical analysis, showed that human oral biopsies at 2 days post-oral immunization with HIV-1 DNA induced increased numbers of granulocytes and T-cells, as well as expression of HLA-DR (Lundholm et al., 2002). The role of CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells in the oral mucosa has not been fully investigated. The above results suggest that the oral mucosa is capable of eliciting specific mucosal immune responses by boosting immunocompotent Langerhans cells and T-cells. Oral immunization can increase the numbers of T-cells and HLA-DR expression on Langerhans cells that play a major role in antigen presentation to naïve T-cells in local and distal tissues.

HIV-targeted Oral Mucosal Cells
The mechanism by which HIV infects cells, either mucosal epithelial cells or Langerhans cells in the oral mucosa, is not clear. Studies on biopsies of oral hairy leukoplakia lesions of HIV-infected persons have shown that oral mucosal Langerhans cells are the target of HIV infection (Chou et al., 2000). However, SIV may infect oral lymphoid tissue through the antigen-transporting crypt epithelium, rather than through Langerhans cells (Cohen et al., 2000). Recent evidence has shown that oral epithelial cells are infected by CXCR4-tropic HIV strains through a galactosylceramide receptor and the CXCR4 chemokine co-receptor (Liu et al., 2003). Another study showed the absence of CD4+ glycoprotein, Fc gamma receptors, and HLA class II antigen expression in oral epithelium, and a paucity of Langerhans cells expressing the V1 domain of CD4 (Hussain and Lehner, 1995). Further, transcytosis of HIV can occur from the mucosal to the submucosal surface and vice versa (Leigh et al., 1998). It is still not clear which cell types and receptors in the oral mucosa are first targeted by HIV/SIV. Nevertheless, HIV-induced alterations of oral epithelial cells, together with impairment of mucosal CD4+ T-cells and the lack of Th1-type cytokines in whole saliva of HIV chronic infected individuals (Leigh et al., 1998), may contribute to oral opportunistic infections.


   ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
The oral mucosa, an intact prototype of stratified squamous mucosal epithelium, contains a network of directly accessible MHC class II+ epithelial dendritic cells, similar to skin Langerhans cells. Repeated topical application of a soluble antigen to the simian labial mucosa resulted in the appearance of ASCs in the interacinar connective tissue of minor salivary glands (Nair and Schroeder, 1983). However, enteric and gut priming with the same antigen failed to reveal an anamnestic response in the labial mucosa (Nair and Schroeder, 1983). This result suggests that a local immune response of the oral mucosa is independent of systemic involvement. It has been shown that a single oral immunization with measles virus nucleoprotein induces a protective class-I-restricted specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response in vivo (Etchart et al., 2001). The plasmid DNA administered into the oral cheeks of mice by jet injection elicits high levels of HIV-specific IgA (Lundholm et al., 1999). Oral immunization with plasmid DNA encoding S. mutans surface antigens protected rats from caries (Fan et al., 2002). In addition, a single oral injection with recombinant DNA induced a measles virus hemagglutinin-specific CTL response in the PBMC (Etchart et al., 1997). Immunization through the oral mucosa, which allows for antigen presentation by epithelial dendritic cells for priming class-I-restricted CD8+ CTLs, may be a valuable approach for single-dose mucosal vaccination (Desvignes et al., 1998). Thus, considerable attention has been given to the possibility of oral mucosal immunization against HIV (Thibodeau et al., 1991; Bukawa et al., 1995; Lagranderie et al., 1998; Lundholm et al., 2002). A long-term salivary IgA and serum Ab responses can be induced in rats with bio-adhesive degradable starch microparticales as a vehicle to deliver antigen and cytokine to the oral cavity (Montgomery and Rafferty, 1998). Furthermore, oral mucosal immunization with novel muco-adhesive bilayer films containing plasmid DNA has elicited antigen-specific IgG and unique splenocyte proliferative immune responses, compared with those elicited by subcutaneous protein injection in rabbits (Cui and Mumper, 2002). The above studies demonstrated that immunization via the oral mucosa is both feasible and effective. Plasmid DNA delivered through the oral mucosa successfully boosts both the oral mucosa and the systemic immune system, and both B- and T-cells are activated. Thus, oral mucosa may serve as a potential accessible site for antigenic stimulation. Minor salivary glands, epithelial dendritic cells, and local T- and B-cells may be an important source of the immune factors involved in the regulation of immune responses in the oral environment.


   ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES SPECIFIC TO HIV/SIV INFECTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
Anti-HIV Abs have been detected in saliva of HIV-infected persons (Archibald et al., 1986, 1987; et al., 1994; Lu, 2000a,b). The HIV1gp160specifc IgG Ab levels are significantly higher than those of IgA Ab in saliva (Mestecky et al., 1994b; Lu, 2000a). In contrast, salivary LPS- and Streptococcus sobrinus-specific IgA Ab levels are significantly higher than those of IgG Abs in identical HIV-infected individuals analyzed (et al., 1994). The ultimate origin of salivary IgG Ab is unclear, and some reports, including ours, have provided evidence for both transudation and local synthesis of IgG Abs in parotid and sublingual saliva (et al., 1994; Lu, 2000a; Wu and Jackson, 2000). Salivary IgA Abs are mainly produced locally (et al., 1994; Lu, 2000a,b). We suggest that an active oral mucosal transudation of plasma IgG Abs after HIV infection may occur. However, locally produced HIV-specific IgA and IgG Abs may also play a major role. Other studies have shown that HIV infection correlates with decreased salivary IgA Ab levels, although a dichotomy between IgA concentrations in saliva and serum has been reported (Sweet et al., 1995). In the early stages of HIV infection, oral mucosal Ab responses seem to be maintained, and the HIV/SIV may be inhibited, by oral neutralizing S-IgA and IgG Abs within epithelial cells, and there is evidence that S-IgA Abs neutralize different HIV strains (Lamey et al., 1996; Hocini et al., 1997; Montefiori et al., 2003; Richman et al., 2003). The previous studies, including ours, showed that HIV-1 gp160 Abs can be detected with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in saliva from HIV-1-infected persons (Archibald et al., 1986; et al., 1994).

Saliva samples may be used for monitoring seroconversion after HIV infection and for the evaluation of vaccine-induced oral mucosal immune responses (et al., 1993). Thus, whole saliva can be used as a diagnostic specimen and is a good alternative to blood samples in epidemiological studies of HIV prevalence in high-risk groups (van den Akker et al., 1992; et al., 1994; Lu, 2000a,b). The diagnosis of HIV infection can be established within 10 minutes by a salivary rapid test system (et al., 1993, 1994). The use of saliva samples rather than serum is advantageous, because it offers a means of preventing needle-stick injuries. In addition, collection of saliva samples is simple and does not need specially trained laboratory personnel. Furthermore, handling of saliva samples is safer than serum, because infectious virus in oral samples is rare. It has also been suggested that testing for HIV-1 Abs in saliva specimens is cost-effective and suitable for screening. Saliva samples should be particularly considered for population-based collections, in pediatrics, and when compliance in giving a blood specimen is low.


   CONCLUDING REMARKS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
Compared with the risks of becoming infected with HIV through unprotected vaginal and rectal intercourse, the risk of oral-route HIV transmission is relatively low. Mucosal immunity of the salivary glands, unique features of cellular structure in the oral mucosa and palatine tonsils, the high rate of oral blood flow, and innate factors in saliva may all contribute to the resistance to HIV/SIV oral mucosal infection. The pathogenesis of HIV/SIV infection in the cellular and molecular functions of the salivary glands, oral mucosa, and tonsils requires more in-depth study. The immune system of the mouth exerts a primary function in protecting salivary glands, gingivae, teeth, tonsils, and buccal mucosa against pathogenic viral and bacterial infections. However, the particular advantages of oral mucosal immunity are not sufficiently persistent to combat chronic HIV/SIV infection. Apparently, humoral, cellular, and innate immune mechanisms, as well as lymphocyte-epithelial interactions, may all be impaired in the oral mucosa as a result of the persistence of HIV infection. The depletion of CD4+ T-cells due to HIV infection correlates with the susceptibility of individuals with AIDS to oral opportunistic infections by Candida albicans, Herpes simplex virus, and cytomegalovirus. A better understanding of oral immune mechanisms should lead to improved prevention of retroviral and bacterial infections. Particularly, in immunocompromised persons with AIDS, it is important to prevent oral opportunistic bacterial and fungal infections. Therefore, additional study of the inductive type of oral immunity could lead to the development of a novel strategy for producing a mucosal AIDS vaccine, perhaps followed by vaccines to combat other oral diseases, such as dental caries and periodontal diseases.

Received December 16, 2005; Accepted September 8, 2006


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PHYSIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLANDS...
 SALIVARY INNATE FACTORS AND...
 ORAL MUCOSA
 ORAL MUCOSAL BLOOD FLOW,...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 THE IMMUNE FUNCTION OF...
 HIV TARGETING OF IMMUNE...
 ORAL MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION
 ORAL MUCOSAL AB RESPONSES...
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 REFERENCES
 
Anil S, Challacombe SJ (1997). Oral lesions of HIV and AIDS in Asia: an overview. Oral Dis 3(Suppl 1):S36–S40.

Archibald DW, Zon L, Groopman JE, McLane MF, Essex M (1986). Antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) in saliva of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients and in persons at risk for AIDS. Blood 67:831–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Archibald DW, Barr CE, Torosian JP, McLane MF, Essex M (1987). Secretory IgA antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus in the parotid saliva of patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex. J Infect Dis 155:793–796.[ISI][Medline]

Baba TW, Trichel AM, An L, Liska V, Martin LN, Murphey-Corb M, et al. (1996). Infection and AIDS in adult macaques after nontraumatic oral exposure to cell-free SIV. Science 272:1486–1489.[Abstract]

Baron S, Poast J, Cloyd MW (1999). Why is HIV rarely transmitted by oral secretions? Saliva can disrupt orally shed, infected leukocytes. Arch Intern Med 159:303–310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barr CE, Miller LK, Lopez MR, Croxson TS, Schwartz SA, Denman H, et al. (1992). Recovery of infectious HIV-1 from whole saliva. J Am Dent Assoc 123:36–48.[Abstract]

Bergey EJ, Cho MI, Blumberg BM, Hammarskjold ML, Rekosh D, Epstein LG, et al. (1994). Interaction of HIV-1 and human salivary mucins. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 7:995–1002.

Bernstein JM, Baekkevold ES, Brandtzaeg P (2005). Immunobiology of the tonsils and adenoids. In: Mucosal immunology. 3rd ed. Mestecky J, Bienenstock J, Lamm ME, Mayer L, McGhee JR, Strober W, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press, pp. 1547–1572.

Brandtzaeg P, Fjellanger I, Gjeruldsen ST (1970). Human secretory immunoglobulins. I. Salivary secretions from individuals with normal or low levels of serum immunoglobulins. Scand J Haematol Suppl 12:3–83.[Medline]

Bukawa H, Sekigawa K, Hamajima K, Fukushima J, Yamada Y, Kiyono H, et al. (1995). Neutralization of HIV-1 by secretory IgA induced by oral immunization with a new macromolecular multicomponent peptide vaccine candidate. Nat Med 1:681–685.[ISI][Medline]

Burkhardt A (1992). Intraepithelial lymphocytes and Langerhans cells in the oral mucosa—dynamic aspects. J Dent Assoc S Afr 47:200–203.[Medline]

Butler JE, Spradling JE, Peterman JH, Joshi KS, Satam M, Challacombe SJ (1990). Humoral immunity in root caries in an elderly population. 1. Oral Microbiol Immunol 5:98–107.[ISI][Medline]

Canady JW, Johnson GK, Squier CA (1993). Measurement of blood flow in the skin and oral mucosa of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) using laser Doppler flowmetry. Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol 106:61–63.[Medline]

Chen JW, Flaitz CM, Wullbrandt B, Sexton J (2003). Association of dental health parameters with oral lesion prevalence in human immunodeficiency virus-infected Romanian children. Pediatr Dent 25:479–484.[Medline]

Chiang CP, Chueh LH, Lin SK, Chen MY (1998). Oral manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 97:600–605.[ISI][Medline]

Chidzonga MM, Rusakaniko S (2004). Ranula: another HIV/AIDS associated oral lesion in Zimbabwe? Oral Dis 10:229–232.[ISI][Medline]

Childers NK, Tong G, Li F, Dasanayake AP, Kirk K, Michalek SM (2002). Humans immunized with Streptococcus mutans antigens by mucosal routes. J Dent Res 81:48–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chou LL, Epstein J, Cassol SA, West DM, He W, Firth JD (2000). Oral mucosal Langerhans’ cells as target, effector and vector in HIV infection. J Oral Pathol Med 29:394–402.[ISI][Medline]

Cohen MS, Shugars DC, Fiscus SA (2000). Limits on oral transmission of HIV-1. Lancet 356:272.[ISI][Medline]

Coogan MM, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ (1994). Immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgA1, and IgA2 antibodies to Candida albicans in whole and parotid saliva in human immunodeficiency virus infection and AIDS. Infect Immun 62:892–896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Coppenhaver DH, Sriyuktasuth-Woo P, Baron S, Barr CE, Qureshi MN (1994). Correlation of nonspecific antiviral activity with the ability to isolate infectious HIV-1 from saliva. N Engl J Med 330:1314–1315.[ISI][Medline]

Crama-Bohbouth G, Lems-van Kan P, Weterman IT, Biemond I, Pena AS (1984). Immunological findings in whole and parotid saliva of patients with Crohn’s disease and healthy controls. Dig Dis Sci 29:1089–1092.[ISI][Medline]

Crawford JM, Taubman MA, Smith DJ (1975). Minor salivary glands as a major source of secretory immunoglobin A in the human oral cavity. Science 190:1206–1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crombie R, Silverstein RL, MacLow C, Pearce SF, Nachman RL, Laurence J (1998). Identification of a CD36-related thrombospondin 1-binding domain in HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120: relationship to HIV-1-specific inhibitory factors in human saliva. J Exp Med 187:25–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cui Z, Mumper RJ (2002). Bilayer films for mucosal (genetic) immunization via the buccal route in rabbits. Pharm Res 19:947–953.[ISI][Medline]

Czerkinsky C, Anjuere F, McGhee JR, George-Chandy A, Holmgren J, Kieny MP, et al. (1999). Mucosal immunity and tolerance: relevance to vaccine development. Immunol Rev 170:197–222.[ISI][Medline]

De Buysscher EV, Dubois PR (1978). Detection of IgA anti-Escherichia coli plasma cells in the intestine and salivary glands of pigs orally and locally infected with E. coli. Adv Exp Med Biol 107:593–600.[Medline]

Deslauriers N, Neron S, Mourad W (1985). Immunobiology of the oral mucosa in the mouse. Immunology 55:391–397.[ISI][Medline]

Desvignes C, Esteves F, Etchart N, Bella C, Czerkinsky C, Kaiserlian D (1998). The murine buccal mucosa is an inductive site for priming class I-restricted CD8+ effector T cells in vivo. Clin Exp Immunol 113:386–393.[ISI][Medline]

Emmelin N, Gjørstrup P (1973). On the function of myoepithelial cells in salivary glands. J Physiol 230:185–198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Espinoza I, Rojas R, Aranda W, Gamonal J (2003). Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in elderly people in Santiago, Chile. J Oral Pathol Med 32:571–575.[ISI][Medline]

Etchart N, Buckland R, Liu MA, Wild TF, Kaiserlian D (1997). Class I-restricted CTL induction by mucosal immunization with naked DNA encoding measles virus haemagglutinin. J Gen Virol 78(Pt 7):1577–1580.[Abstract]

Etchart N, Desmoulins PO, Chemin K, Maliszewski C, Dubois B, Wild F, et al. (2001). Dendritic cells recruitment and in vivo priming of CD8+ CTL induced by a single topical or transepithelial immunization via the buccal mucosa with measles virus nucleoprotein. J Immunol 167:384–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fan M, Bian Z, Peng Z, Guo J, Jia R, Chen Z (2002). DNA vaccine encoding Streptococcus mutans surface protein protected gnotobiotic rats from caries. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 37:4–7.[Medline]

Figueroa CD, Marchant A, Novoa U, Forstermann U, Jarnagin K, Scholkens B, et al. (2001). Differential distribution of bradykinin B(2) receptors in the rat and human cardiovascular system. Hypertension 37:110–120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foltyn P (1993). Dry mouth in HIV infection. Med J Aust 159:355.[ISI][Medline]

Frankel SS, Wenig BM, Burke AP, Mannan P, Thompson LD, Abbondanzo SL, et al. (1996). Replication of HIV-1 in dendritic cell-derived syncytia at the mucosal surface of the adenoid. Science 272:115–117.[Abstract]

Frankel SS, Tenner-Racz K, Racz P, Wenig BM, Hansen CH, Heffner D, et al. (1997). Active replication of HIV-1 at the lymphoepithelial surface of the tonsil. Am J Pathol 151:89–96.[Abstract]

Galkina E, Tanausis K, Preece G, Tolaini M, Kioussis D, Florey O, et al. (2003). L-selectin shedding does not regulate constitutive T cell trafficking but controls the migration pathways of antigen-activated T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 198:1323–1335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gebert A (1997). M cells in the rabbit palatine tonsil: the distribution, spatial arrangement and membrane subdomains as defined by confocal lectin histochemistry. Anat Embryol (Berl) 195:353–358.[Medline]

Gillespie GM, Marino R (1993). Oral manifestations of HIV infection: a Panamerican perspective. J Oral Pathol Med 22:2–7.[ISI][Medline]

Glick M, Muzyka BC, Lurie D, Salkin LM (1994). Oral manifestations associated with HIV-related disease as markers for immune suppression and AIDS. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 77:344–349.[ISI][Medline]

Glushakova S, Baibakov B, Margolis LB, Zimmerberg J (1995). Infection of human tonsil histocultures: a model for HIV pathogenesis. Nat Med 1:1320–1322.[ISI][Medline]

Gorfien JL, Noble B, Brodsky L (2001). Comparison of the microanatomical distributions of macrophages and dendritic cells in normal and diseased tonsils. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:173–182.[ISI][Medline]

Goto Y, Yeh CK, Notkins AL, Prabhakar BS (1991). Detection