|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, New York, NY 10010, USA
* corresponding author, yz21{at}nyu.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: porcelain-veneered structures contact fatigue fracture ceramic crowns
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The continued search for strong and tough ceramic core materials has led to the integration of yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) into restorative dentistry. Y-TZP offers high flexural strength and toughness, approximately twice that of alumina core materials. Clinical studies on the longevity of veneered Y-TZP crowns are not yet available, but anecdotal reports indicate that these zirconia cores are very fracture-resistant, but that fracture of the porcelain veneer is still problematic (Donovan, 2005).
We undertook this investigation to establish critical conditions for lifetime-limiting damage in porcelain-based crown-like layer structures. Controlled indentation fatigue testing with spheres on flat-layer specimens has been used to simulate the basic elements of occlusion on a restorative structure. Previous studies on single-cycle loading of porcelain/metal/polymer (Zhao et al., 2000, 2001, 2002) and porcelain/ceramic/polymer (Miranda et al., 2003) systems have identified and quantified several damage modes (Fig. 1
): near-contact occlusal-surface fracture modes, including outer Hertzian cone cracks (Hertz, 1896) and median-radial cracks (Gurney and Hunt, 1967; Kim et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2000). The outer cone cracks initiate just outside the indenter contact area, where the maximum Hertzian field tensile stress occurs, and have an angle
~ 22° relative to the specimen surface (Fig. 1
). Quasi-plastic deformation occurs beneath the indenter, producing grain boundary microcracks, which coalesce and evolve into occlusal-surface median-radial cracks (Fischer-Cripps and Lawn, 1996a,b). Far-field veneer lower-surface radial cracks (Fig. 1a
, porcelain/metal system) or cementation internal-surface radial cracks (Fig. 1b
, porcelain/ceramic system) result from tensile stresses generated during loading from yield of metal substructure or tooth dentin support, respectively.
|
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
20 x 0.5 mm) (LAVA, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA) were veneered with LAVA porcelain by the manufacturer. The lower surface of the zirconia core was roughened with 600-grit SiC abrasive paper and cemented (Rely X, ARC, St. Paul, MN, USA) to a Z100 block. The porcelain surface was polished to a 1 µm finish. The final dimension of the P/Zr specimens was
20 x 1.2 mm. The cemented structures were aged 10 days in water before being tested.
Fatigue Tests
Fatigue loading was delivered with a spherical tungsten carbide (WC) indenter (r = 3.18 mm) and a mouth-motion simulator (Elf 3300, EnduraTEC Division of Bose, Minnetonka, MN, USA) in water with a controlled stroke profile: maximum load (biting force), Pm = 200 N; loading and unloading rates, 1000 N/sec; and a chewing frequency ~ 1.5 Hz. Each load cycle consisted of the indenter coming into contact with the specimen, loading to a maximum, holding for 0.2 sec, unloading, and lifting off (0.5 mm), completely unloading the specimen. Fatigue tests were interrupted after a prescribed number of loading cycles, and the specimen was inspected for damage, from the top surface, with the use of a 3D polarized specular reflection microscope (Edge R400, Micro Science Technologies, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA), focusing from the occlusal-surface down into the translucent interior. The specimen was then indexed and re-introduced to the mouth-motion machine for continued testing. Fatigue tests were stopped at 10,000, 15,000, 25,000, 50,000, 75,000, 100,000 cycles, etc. A minimum of 3 specimens was used for each material system for the prescribed loading cycles. We sectioned selected specimens to evaluate the extent of subsurface damage (Mikosza and Lawn, 1971).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fig. 3a
shows damage sustained in the P/Zr system following 550,000 loading cycles. Outer cone cracks formed after several cycles, and inner cone cracks formed at ~ 103 cycles. Although inner cone cracks reached the veneer/core interface at ~ 50,000100,000 cycles, they remained contained after 550,000 cyclesneither penetrating the Y-TZP core nor propagating along the porcelain/Y-TZP interface (Fig. 3a
). There was no evidence of radial cracking at the lower surface of either the porcelain veneer or the Y-TZP core. In fact, no radial cracks were observed even after prolonged fatigue-loading at 600 N. These findings were similar to the fracture development observed in the P/Pd system (Fig. 2d
), but differed from the veneered alumina, where both contact-induced occlusal surface fracture (outer and inner cone cracking) and flexure-induced cementation surface bulk fracture (radial cracking) were evident (Stappert et al., unpublished observations). The radial cracking initiated at the lower surface of the alumina core and propagated into the porcelain veneer in 90% of the specimens tested in the fatigue load range between ~ 180 and 230 N (Stappert et al., unpublished observations).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several measures can be proposed to suppress inner cone crack propagation:
In the metal-ceramic systems, far-field radial fractures at the lower surface of the porcelain veneer could occur with yield of the metal substructure, facilitating flexure of the overlying porcelain veneer. Yield of the metal substructure is primarily determined by its hardness (yield strength of metal is ~ 1/3 of its hardness value). A high-modulus metal can have counterproductive effects on the radial fracture in porcelain: It will shield the compliant dentin support and thus hinder further radial cracking; however, it will also increase the flexure of the metal substructure, and hence facilitate radial cracking (Zhao et al., 2002). Therefore, a hard metal substructure can prevent radial fracture at the lower surface of a porcelain veneer. In the all-ceramic systems, the hard, stiff ceramic core provides support to the veneer, and with yield of the tooth dentin support, the tensile stresses are now transferred to the lower surface of the core. With dentin support yield, the strength of the ceramic core becomes most critical, since strength is the resistance to crack initiation. This explains why the hard, stiff, but relatively low-strength, alumina core is vulnerable to cementation surface radial cracking. Radial cracks, both at the lower surface of a porcelain veneer and at the ceramic core, are oriented normal to the plate surface and are susceptible to flexural tensile stresses generated during function. Hence, once initiated, radial cracks propagate sideward and upward, ultimately leading to failure (Kelly, 1999).
We acknowledge that dental crowns have a complex geometry. Thus, the flat specimens utilized in the present study have limitations in demonstrating other fracture modes, such as margin fracture. Preliminary studies of single-cycle loading on curved structures have shown that, once the radial cracks form, they have a strong tendency to propagate to the margin (Qasim et al., 2005, 2006), similar to those observed clinically (Figs. 3b, 3c
; images supplied by Susanne Scherrer). In addition, occlusion involves enamel-porcelain or porcelain-porcelain antagonistic contacts at various loads and locations. The current contact fatigue tests were performed with hard spherical indenters, which provided a worst-case occlusal scenario (while preserving the indenter), while not applying lateral loads, as would be experienced clinically.
As to the design of veneered crowns, in the case of porcelain/metal crowns, high-hardness metal cores have better resistance to yield. A thick porcelain layer (~ 1 mm) offers necessary protection to the metal substructure from yield. A hard, stiff ceramic core clearly has an advantage in preventing radial fracture of porcelain. However, this makes the ceramic cores vulnerable to cementation internal surface radial fracture, particularly when the total thickness is thin, leading to so-called bulk fracture. Hence, the stronger Y-TZP cores have better resistance to bulk fracture than do their alumina counterparts.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received April 12, 2006; Last revision August 3, 2006; Accepted October 6, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chai H, Lawn BR (2005). Hydraulically pumped cone fracture in brittle solids. Acta Mater 53:42374244.
Coornaert J, Adriaens P, DeBoever J (1984). Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 51:338342.[ISI][Medline]
Creugers NH, Kayser AF, von t Hof MA (1994). A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 22:448452.[ISI][Medline]
Donovan TE (2005). Metal-free dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 17:141143.[Medline]
Fischer-Cripps AC, Lawn BR (1996a). Indentation stress-strain curves for "quasi-ductile" ceramics. Acta Mater 44:519527.
Fischer-Cripps AC, Lawn BR (1996b). Stress analysis of contact deformation in quasi-plastic ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 79:26092618.
Gurney C, Hunt J (1967). Quasi-static crack propagation. Proc R Soc Lond Series A, Math Phys Sci 299:508524.
Hertz H (1896). Miscellaneous papers. London: Macmillan.
Kelly JR (1999). Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 81:652661.[ISI][Medline]
Kelly JR (2004). Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 48:513530.
Kim DK, Jung Y-G, Peterson IM, Lawn BR (1999). Cyclic fatigue of intrinsically brittle ceramics in contact with spheres. Acta Mater 47:47114725.
Kim JW, Bhowmick S, Hermann I, Lawn BR (2006). Transverse fracture of brittle bilayers: relevance to failure of all-ceramic dental crowns. J Biomedic Mater ResB Appl Biomater 79:5865.
Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP (2001). Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: a review. J Prosthet Dent 86:495510.[ISI][Medline]
Lawn BR, Deng Y, Miranda P, Pajares A, Chai H, Kim DK (2002). Overview: damage in brittle layer structures from concentrated loads. J Mater Res 17:30193036.
Lee KS, Jung YG, Peterson IM, Lawn BR, Kim DK, Lee SK (2000). Model for cyclic fatigue of quasi-plastic ceramics in contact with spheres. J Am Ceram Soc 83:22552262.
Mikosza AG, Lawn BR (1971). Section-and-etch study of Hertzian fracture mechanics. J Appl Phys 42:55405545.
Miranda P, Pajares A, Guiberteau F, Deng Y, Zhao H, Lawn BR (2003). Designing damage-resistant brittle-coating structures: II. Trilayers. Acta Mater 51:43574365.
Qasim T, Bush MB, Hu X, Lawn BR (2005). Contact damage in brittle coating layers: influence of surface curvature. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73:179185.[Medline]
Qasim T, Ford C, Bush MB, Hu X, Lawn BR (2006). Effect of off-axis concentrated loading on failure of curved brittle layer structures. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Bioomater 76:334339.
Zhang Y, Bhowmick S, Lawn BR (2005a). Competing fracture modes in brittle materials subject to concentrated cyclic loading in liquid environments: monoliths. J Mater Res 20:20212029.
Zhang Y, Song JK, Lawn BR (2005b). Deep penetrating conical cracks in brittle layers from hydraulic cyclic contact. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73:186193.[Medline]
Zhao H, Hu X, Bush MB, Lawn BR (2000). Contact damage in porcelain/Pd-alloy bilayers. J Mater Res 15:676682.
Zhao H, Hu X, Bush MB, Lawn BR (2001). Cracking of porcelain coatings bonded to metal substrates of different modulus and hardness. J Mater Res 16:14711478.
Zhao H, Miranda P, Lawn BR, Hu X (2002). Cracking in ceramic/metal/polymer trilayer systems. J Mater Res 17:11021111.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-W. Kim, J.-H. Kim, V.P. Thompson, and Y. Zhang Sliding Contact Fatigue Damage in Layered Ceramic Structures J. Dent. Res., November 1, 2007; 86(11): 1046 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |