|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
Division of Oromaxillofacial Regeneration, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
* corresponding author, ono{at}dent.osaka-u.ac.jp
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: jaw clenching tooth tapping chewing cerebral blood flow transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) muscle
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (Aaslid et al., 1982) is an easy-to-use non-invasive monitoring method of cerebral blood flow that has the advantage of continuous, real-time recording. This method measures the velocity of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery, which supplies blood to about 80% of the cerebral hemisphere, including the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes and the basal ganglia (Keith and Aaslid, 1992). Changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity measured by a transcranial Doppler device are reported to reflect accurately the activated areas observed during Xe-enhanced computed tomography (Friedman et al., 1991), positron emission tomography (Sitzer et al., 1994), and single-photon-emission computed tomography (Dahl et al., 1992, 1994; Borbely et al., 2003). To date, however, few transcranial Doppler ultrasound studies have investigated the characteristics of task-induced change in cerebral blood flow during jaw movement, with the exception of a few studies on chewing (Sugiyama et al., 1999; Lin et al., 2002).
Task-induced change in cerebral blood flow during exercise is multifactorial and can be influenced by the cardiovascular response and the change in peripheral circulation due to muscle activity, as well as by task-specific neural activity. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound revealed that middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity contralateral to the performing side increased during hemispheric-specific tasks, such as hand exercise (Jørgensen et al., 1993; Pott et al., 1997; Ide et al., 1999), indicating that it has sufficient sensitivity to detect task-specific neural activity. In the case of jaw movement, however, the influence of muscle contraction intensity on changes in cerebral blood flow might differ, because of the adjacency of the jaw muscles to the brain. In the present study, to test our hypothesis that the pattern and intensity of muscle contraction during jaw movement influence task-induced change in cerebral blood flow, we performed simultaneous recordingduring clenching, gum chewing, and tooth tappingof the following parameters: bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities, heart rate, bilateral electromyography of the masseter muscles, and transcutaneous partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide. The working side was limited to the right side. Task-induced change in each parameter was analyzed statistically by means of the random-effects model.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data Recordings
Right and left middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities were continuously and simultaneously monitored by means of the Multi Dop-T system (DWL Elektronische System GmbH, Sipplingen, Germany). We initiated transcranial Doppler ultrasound from the localized cranial window, to ensure that the ultrasonic beam could penetrate without being excessively damped. Probes were fixed on the temporal bone above the zygomatic arch with a probe holder (Marc 600, Spencer Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA) (Fig. 1
). Then, to identify the middle cerebral artery, we selected a depth of the ultrasonic beam to expose the transverse portion of the middle cerebral artery distal to the carotid bifurcation, and to maximize signal intensity (4860 mm) (Aaslid, 1987). Sample volumes were fixed at 10 mm in diameter. Data were captured at each change in heart rate and recorded on a personal computer.
|
We performed bilateral electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles using an evaluation system of mandibular movement (K6-I, Myo-Tronics, Taren Point, Australia) and surface electrodes (Duo-trode; interelectrode distance, 19.5 mm; Myo-Tronics) placed parallel to the masseter muscle fibers. EMG data were recorded at a sampling rate of 240 Hz and were amplified at a time constant of 0.06 sec. Analogue data from K6-I were converted by means of an A/D converter (AD12-8, Contec, Osaka, Japan), then full-wave-rectified and integrated for evaluation on a personal computer. The ratio of integrated EMG activity during each task to that during clenching with maximum effort for 2 sec (%MVC) was calculated for each volunteer as an index of muscle activity.
Tasks
Volunteers were seated in an upright position, with their heads stabilized by the chair headrest to maintain the Frankfort plane parallel to the floor, and their eyes masked. They were instructed to rest their arms on the chair armrest and keep their eyes closed. Each person performed the following 3 tasks, in which the working side was limited to the right side. A metronome was used for task frequency.
Clenching: Volunteers performed clenching for 45 sec with a bite plane that covered the maxillary dentition of the working side, so as to avoid interjaw contact on the non-working side during the task.
Gum chewing: Volunteers chewed 2 pieces of chewing gum (Free Zone, Lotte, Tokyo, Japan) for 5 min on the working side at a rhythm of 1.0 Hz.
Tooth tapping: Volunteers performed tooth tapping for 3 min at a rhythm of 1.0 Hz with a bite plane on the maxillary dentition of the working side.
The data series recorded for each volunteer for each of the consecutive tasks consisted of 3 min of preceding rest (pre-task), the task (on-task), and subsequent rest with the same duration as the task (post-task). Each volunteer participated in recording of the 3 tasks once a day at the same time over 3 consecutive days. Each task was randomized in a Latin-square design. All measurements were performed in a quiet, dimly lit room at constant ambient temperature (25°C).
Data Analysis
To compare the pre-task, on-task, and post-task periods, we averaged data on the tracing at five-second intervals for the following parameters: area under effect curve (AUEC), maximum value (Emax), and time of maximum value (Tmax) (Fig. 2
). The means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the AUEC and Emax for the on-task and post-task periods were then determined by the random-effects model with replication data. For Tmax, the median and CIs were calculated. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Gum Chewing
Bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and heart rate peaked 145 sec and 125 sec, respectively, after the task began. On-task bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities were significantly higher than in the pre-task and post-task periods (left and right sides, P < 0.0001), with no side-to-side difference. Heart rate in the on-task and post-task periods was significantly higher than in the pre-task period (P < 0.0001). Masseter muscle activity peaked immediately after the task began (right side, 44.1% MVC; left side, 40.2% MVC), then decreased over the time-course, showing higher values on the working (right) side (P = 0.0173).
Tooth Tapping
Bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and heart rate peaked 82100 sec and 92 sec, respectively, after the task began. While there was no difference in bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities between the pre-task and on-task periods, heart rate in the on-task and post-task periods was significantly higher than in the pre-task period (P < 0.0001). Masseter muscle activity showed a constant low level (right side, 10.1% MVC; left side, 9.8% MVC; no significant side-to-side difference).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation in cerebral blood flow was demonstrated quantitatively by a significant increase in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during both clenching (high muscle activity) and gum chewing (moderate muscle activity); however, no such increase was observed for tapping (low muscle activity). These results suggest that pattern and intensity of muscle contraction during jaw movement influence activation in cerebral blood flow. In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) has revealed larger numbers of activated pixels during clenching than during tapping or gum chewing (Tamura et al., 2003). Taken together, these findings suggest that activation of the entire cortical area that contributes to programming and execution of jaw movement influences task-evoked change in cerebral blood flow. In contrast, task-induced change in general circulation appeared to have less influence on cerebral blood flow than other factors, because heart rate increased significantly in the on-task and post-task periods of each jaw movement.
It was noteworthy that cerebral circulation was activated by gum chewing, a relatively weak exercise, and that it was semi-automatically controlled by the pattern generator. Increased sensory input during chewing might influence the neural activity controlling the chewing system. In this regard, Onozuka et al.(2002) reported that regional increase in brain neural activity caused by gum chewing was related to the hardness of the gum. Hence, many problems remain to be clarified in the relationship between cerebral blood flow and factors affecting chewing.
Continuous recording of bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity revealed a remarkable difference in (a) the time to reach peak velocity and (b) laterality of cerebral blood flow between clenching and gum chewing. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first findings on jaw-movement-induced changes in cerebral blood flow. Clenching is a jaw exercise characterized by intensive isometric contraction of the masseter muscle, while gum chewing is one that involves repeated masseter contraction and relaxation. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and blood pressure are reported to rise immediately after the start of exercises involving intensive isometric contraction during weight-lifting (Dickerman et al., 2000) and static exercise (Panerai et al., 2001). The significant difference between clenching and gum chewing with respect to the time until peak middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and heart rate might be caused by the pattern and intensity of muscle contraction.
In our experimental setting, we insulated afferent information from the periodontal ligament on the non-working (left) side by placing a bite plane on the working side. This condition might allow for activation of neurons on the non-working side, based on the assumption that processing of afferent information in the sensory areas was due to reverse hemispheric dominance. In addition, EMG activity of the masseter muscle during clenching and gum chewing was greater on the working side than on the non-working side. Our evaluation using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, however, revealed a bilateral increase in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during both clenching and gum chewing. Furthermore, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity on the working side exceeded that on the non-working side during clenching. These observations suggest that side-to-side differences in cerebral blood flow during jaw movement could not be fully accounted for by hemispheric dominance of the sensory and motor control system, as is the case for hand exercises (Jørgensen et al., 1993; Pott et al., 1997; Ide et al., 1999).
In summary, the results of the present study confirmed that pattern and intensity of muscle contraction during jaw movements influenced the task-induced change and side-to-side difference in cerebral blood flow when the working side was limited to one side of the jaw. Our experimental set-up and methodology for analyzing task-induced change in cerebral blood flow during jaw movement could also prove advantageous to future researchers examining hemispheric dominance of cerebral blood flow by comparing the middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity on the same side during a task with different working sides.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received May 31, 2005; Last revision August 4, 2006; Accepted October 5, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H (1982). Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg 57:769774.[ISI][Medline]
Aaslid R, Lindegaard KF, Sorteberg W, Nornes H (1989). Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans. Stroke 20:4552.
Borbely K, Gjedde A, Nyáry I, Czirják S, Donauer N, Buck A (2003). Speech activation of language dominant hemisphere: a single-photon emission computed tomography study. Neuroimage 20:987994.[ISI][Medline]
Dahl A, Lindegaard KF, Russell D, Nyberg-Hansen R, Rootwelt K, Sorteberg W, et al. (1992). A comparison of transcranial Doppler and cerebral blood flow studies to assess cerebral vasoreactivity. Stroke 23:1519.
Dahl A, Russell D, Nyberg-Hansen R, Rootwelt K, Bakke SJ (1994). Cerebral vasoreactivity in unilateral carotid artery disease. A comparison of blood flow velocity and regional cerebral blood flow measurements. Stroke 25:621626.[Abstract]
Dickerman RD, McConathy WJ, Smith GH, East JW, Rudder L (2000). Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in elite power athletes during maximal weight-lifting. Neurol Res 22:337340.[ISI][Medline]
Friedman DB, Friberg L, Mitchell JH, Secher NH (1991). Effect of axillary blockade on regional cerebral blood flow during static handgrip. J Appl Physiol 71:651656.
Giller CA, Giller AM, Cooper CR, Hatab MR (2000). Evaluation of the cerebral hemodynamic response to rhythmic handgrip. J Appl Physiol 88:22052213.
Ide K, Horn A, Secher NH (1999). Cerebral metabolic response to submaximal exercise. J Appl Physiol 87:16041608.
Jørgensen LG, Perko G, Payne G, Secher NH (1993). Effect of limb anesthesia on middle cerebral response to handgrip. Am J Physiol 264(2 Pt 2):H553H559.
Keith A, Aaslid R (1992). Anatomy and freehand examination techniques. In: Transcranial Doppler. Newell DW, Aaslid R, editors. New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 955.
Kubota K, Momose T, Abe A, Narita N, Ohtomo K, Minaguchi S, et al. (2003). Nuclear medical PET-study in the causal relationship between mastication and brain function in human evolutionary and developmental processes. Ann Anat 185:565569.[ISI][Medline]
Lin SK, Chang YJ, Ryu SJ, Chu NS (2002). Cerebral hemodynamic responses to betel chewing: a Doppler study. Clin Neuropharmacol 25:244250.[ISI][Medline]
Markwalder TM, Grolimund P, Seiler RW, Roth F, Aaslid R (1984). Dependency of blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery on end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressurea transcranial ultrasound Doppler study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 4:368372.[ISI][Medline]
Momose I, Nishikawa J, Watanabe T, Sasaki Y, Senda M, Kubota K, et al. (1997). Effect of mastication on regional cerebral blood flow in humans examined by positron-emission tomography with 15O-labelled water and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Oral Biol 42:5761.[ISI][Medline]
Moraine JJ, Lamotte M, Berre J, Niset G, Leduc A, Naeije R (1993). Relationship of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity to intensity during dynamic exercise in normal subjects. Eur J Appl Occup Physiol 67:3538.
Onozuka M, Fujita M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Niwa M, Nishiyama K, et al. (2002). Mapping brain region activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res 81:743746.
Onozuka M, Fujita M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, Niwa M, Nishiyama K, et al. (2003). Age-related changes in brain regional activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res 82:657660.
Panerai RB, Dawson SL, Eames PJ, Potter JF (2001). Cerebral blood flow velocity response to induced and spontaneous sudden changes in arterial blood pressure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280:H2162H2174.
Pott F, Ray CA, Olesen HL, Ide K, Secher NH (1997). Middle cerebral artery blood velocity, arterial diameter and muscle sympathetic nerve activity during post-exercise muscle ischaemia. Acta Physiol Scand 160:4347.[ISI][Medline]
Shinagawa H, Ono T, Honda E, Sasaki T, Taira M, Iriki A, et al. (2004). Chewing-side preference is involved in differential cortical activation patterns during tongue movements after bilateral gum-chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res 83:762766.
Sitzer M, Knorr U, Seitz RJ (1994). Cerebral hemodynamics during sensorimotor activation in humans. J Appl Physiol 77:28042811.
Sugiyama K, Okumura T, Watanabe S (1999). Validation of transcranial Doppler method to evaluate the effects of mastication on cerebral blood flow. Kango Kenkyu 32:473482.
Tamura T, Kanayama T, Yoshida S, Kawasaki T (2002). Analysis of brain activity during clenching by fMRI. J Oral Rehabil 29:467472.[ISI][Medline]
Tamura T, Kanayama T, Yoshida S, Kawasaki T (2003). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human jaw movements. J Oral Rehabil 30:614622.[ISI][Medline]
Woolsey TA, Rovainen CM (1991). Whisker barrels: a model for direct observation of changes in the cerebral microcirculation with neural activity. In: Alfred Benzon symposium No. 31. Brain work and mental activity. Lassen NA, Ingvar DH, Raichle M, Friberg L, editors. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, pp. 189200.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |