JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Häkkinen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Csiszar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Häkkinen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Csiszar, A.
J Dent Res 86(1):25-34, 2007
© 2007 International and American Associations for Dental Research


REVIEW
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE

Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: Characteristics and Novel Putative Pathogenic Mechanisms

L. Häkkinen*, and A. Csiszar

University of British Columbia, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Laboratory of Periodontal Biology, 2199 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3;

* corresponding author, lhakkine{at}interchange.ubc.ca


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) is a rare condition that can occur as an isolated disease or as part of a syndrome or chromosomal abnormality. In severe cases, the gingival enlargement may cover the crowns of teeth and cause severe functional and esthetic concerns. Histological and cell culture studies have uncovered some of the molecular and cellular changes associated with HGF. However, the pathogenesis of the disease is still largely unknown. Recent studies about the genetic characteristics of HGF have provided novel clues about the potential pathogenic mechanisms. In particular, mutation in the son-of-sevenless (SOS-1) gene has been associated with one form of the disease. However, HGF displays genetic heterogeneity, and mutations in other genes are also likely involved. This review outlines the current knowledge about the histological, cellular, and genetic characteristics of HGF. In addition, the potential role of the SOS-1 molecule and related novel intracellular signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of HGF will be discussed.

KEY WORDS: gingiva • overgrowth • hereditary • pathogenesis • SOS-1


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Gingival fibromatosis, otherwise known as gingival hyperplasia or gingival overgrowth, may occur as a result of systemic medications or systemic conditions, or it may be hereditary. Medications such as cyclosporine A, phenytoin, and nifedipine are the most common causes of gingival overgrowth. Cyclosporine A is used to prevent rejection of organ transplants and to treat autoimmune diseases; phenytoin is used for seizure disorders, and nifedipine for angina and hypertension. The prevalence of gingival overgrowth ranges, in different studies, from 8–81% with cyclosporine A, 0–100% with phenytoin, and 0.5–83% with nifedipine (Marshall and Bartold, 1999; Kataoka et al., 2005). Both genetic and phenotypic polymorphisms have been identified in certain metabolizing enzymes, which predispose some patients to the effects of certain medications resulting in gingival overgrowth (Daly et al., 1993). Gingival overgrowth can also be a manifestation of systemic conditions, including leukemic infiltrates (Vural et al., 2004). In rare cases (1 in 750,000 people), the overgrowth can be hereditary (Fletcher, 1966), and the disorder is referred to as hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF; synonymous with idiopathic gingival overgrowth or hereditary gingival overgrowth). HGF can occur as an isolated disease affecting only gingiva, or as part of a syndrome or chromosomal abnormality, and both autosomal-dominant and -recessive forms of this disorder have been described (Gorlin et al., 1990; Seymour et al., 1996). The syndromic forms of HGF have been reported in Zimmerman-Laband syndrome, Cross syndrome, Rutherford syndrome, Ramon syndrome, infantile systemic hyalinosis, juvenile hyaline fibromatosis, François syndrome, Jones Syndrome, Schinzel-Giedion syndrome, Costello syndrome, Ectro-amelia syndrome, neurofibromatosis type I, hypertrichosis, and mental retardation (Araiche and Brode, 1959; Horning et al., 1985; Gorlin et al., 1990; Morey and Higgins, 1990; Lynch et al., 1994; Fryns, 1996; Hart et al., 1998; Sardella et al., 1998; Kondoh et al., 2001; Hennekam, 2003; Kasaboglu et al., 2004; Doufexi et al., 2005). HGF has also been associated with a family with hearing loss, hypertelorism and supernumerary teeth, cherubism, histopathologic pre-malignancy involving epithelial dysplasia, growth hormone deficiency, and generalized aggressive periodontitis (Ramon et al., 1967, Redman et al., 1985; Wynne et al., 1995; Bhowmick et al., 2001; Casavecchia et al., 2004). It is not known whether the coexistence of HGF and generalized aggressive periodontitis represents a new syndromic form of the disease. In the present review, we will describe the characteristics of hereditary gingival overgrowth and discuss the involvement of recently discovered genetic mutations in the disease process.


   CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
HGF is a rare condition, and, therefore, most information about its characteristics is based on case reports. HGF develops as a slowly progressive, benign, localized or generalized enlargement of keratinized gingiva that, in severe cases, may cover the crowns of the teeth (Fig. 1Go). Localized forms of HGF usually affect the maxillary tuberosities and the labial gingiva around the mandibular molars. However, the symmetric generalized form of HGF that affects the labial, lingual, and palatal gingiva is the most common (Baptista, 2002; Kelekis-Cholakis et al., 2002). Males and females are affected equally. Unlike drug-induced gingival overgrowth, HGF is not influenced by plaque, and the incidence and severity of the disease appear to depend on the penetrance of the mutated gene (Hart et al., 1998; Xiao et al., 2001; Ye et al., 2005). Enlarged gingiva may be normal in color or erythematous, and consists of dense fibrous tissue that feels firm and nodular on palpation. Although the alveolar bone is usually unaffected, gingival excess results in pseudopocketing and periodontal problems, due to difficulties in daily oral hygiene. The overgrowth may also result in functional and esthetic concerns, create diastemas, impede or delay tooth eruption, and create changes in facial appearance as a result of lip protrusion. Severe overgrowth can result in crowding of the tongue, speech impediments, and difficulty with mastication, and can prevent normal closure of lips (Shafer, 1983; Lynch et al., 1994).


Figure 1
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Clinical (A,B) and histological (C–F) characteristics of hereditary gingival fibromatosis (B,D,F), as compared with healthy gingiva (A,C,E). Clinical picture of gingiva from a young healthy adult (A) and from a 7-year-old patient with hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) (B). (C,D) Hematoxylin and eosin staining. In HGF, epithelium is thickened and displays narrow, elongated rete pegs that penetrate deep into the connective tissue (D), while in normal marginal gingiva, the epithelium is thin and rete pegs are shorter (C). In addition, cell density in the connective tissue in HGF appears lower (D) as compared with normal tissue (C). Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained samples examined under a microscope equipped with a UV light source and rhodamine filter are shown in E and F. Typical basket-weave organization of collagen is noted in the normal gingiva (E), while in HGF, collagen is organized into thick parallel fiber bundles (F). Fig. 1B was kindly provided by Dr. Hannu Larjava, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. E, epithelium; CT, connective tissue. Magnification bar, 50 µm.

 
The onset of gingival overgrowth usually coincides with the eruption of the permanent incisors, or, at times, with the eruption of the primary dentition. In vary rare cases, it can also be present at birth (Anderson et al., 1969). Since HGF has not been reported in edentulous patients, it appears that the presence of dentition is necessary for overgrowth to develop. In some situations, only the interdental papilla is affected, although, in the majority of cases, the marginal gingiva also becomes involved (Flaitz and Coleman, 1995). Thus, HGF may result as an expansion of interdental papilla tissue, suggesting that interdental papilla is predisposed to overgrowth. The reason for this is not known, but may involve inherently unique expressions of key molecules or unique properties of cells in the interdental papilla.


   HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Not all forms of HGF, particularly some syndromic forms, have been characterized histologically. In the reported cases, HGF usually involves moderate hyperplasia of a dense, hyperkeratotic epithelium with elongated rete ridges (Sakamoto et al., 2002; Araujo et al., 2003; Doufexi et al., 2005) (Fig. 1Go). Epithelial hyperplasia can also occur as a consequence of acanthosis, but this was found only in areas of chronic inflammation in HGF (Farrer-Brown et al., 1972; Raeste et al., 1978). Characteristic of fibrosis, the connective tissue in HGF exhibits an accumulation of excess collagen, and elastic and oxytalan fibers, but has relatively few fibroblasts and blood vessels (Chavrier and Couble, 1979; Hart et al., 2000; Baptista, 2002; Sakamoto et al., 2002; Doufexi et al., 2005) (Fig. 1Go). Enlarged fibroblasts appear to alternate with thin and thick collagen fibrils. Unlike in normal gingiva, the collagen fiber bundles are oriented mostly parallel to one another (Kelekis-Cholakis et al., 2002; Casavecchia et al., 2004) (Fig. 1Go). Although a rare finding, small osseous calcifications and abundant neurovascular bundles may also be present (Gunhan et al., 1995; Kelekis-Cholakis et al., 2002). HGF does not usually involve inflammation, and local accumulation of inflammatory cells can be found only in cases where pseudo-pocketing resulted in plaque accumulation (Shafer, 1983). Diagnosis of HGF is based on medical history and clinical examination, since there are currently no specific immunohistochemical markers available.


   CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Histological characteristics suggest that the expansion of gingival tissue in HGF results mostly from increased extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation, since the tissue is rich in collagen, but has relatively few fibroblasts. In addition, increased proliferation of the epithelial cells may account for the formation of elongated rete ridges. To date, most cell culture studies have attempted to confirm these findings and to find mechanisms for the altered cell function.

Phenotypically Different Fibroblast Subpopulations
Some studies suggest that predominance of certain "active" fibroblast subpopulations may explain the susceptibility of certain individuals to gingival overgrowth. Phenotypically and functionally distinct gingival fibroblast subpopulations co-exist within and between individuals (Häkkinen and Larjava, 1992; Hassell, 1993). The correlation between onset of HGF and tooth eruption implies that selection or activation of fibroblasts by inflammatory cells, or as a result of trauma, may initiate gingival overgrowth. Cell culture studies have suggested that fibroblasts from fibrotic tissues remain activated, even in the absence of continuous stimulation (Hassell et al., 1976; Duncan and Berman, 1987; Tipton et al., 2004). Therefore, fibroblasts in HGF could remain active after tooth eruption, possibly due to selective growth of active cell subpopulations that contribute to excess ECM production. This process is similar to wound healing, although, in HGF, this process would be continuously ’turned on’ (Häkkinen et al., 2000).

Cell Proliferation
It is not clear whether increased cell proliferation contributes to HGF. Histologically, HGF shows reduced fibroblast density, and there is no increase in the expression of the proliferation markers PCNA or Ki-67 in fibroblasts as compared with normal tissue (Wright et al., 2001; Martelli-Junior et al., 2005). In contrast, fibroblasts from HGF appear to proliferate faster than normal cells in culture (Tipton et al., 1997; Coletta et al., 1998), although a reduced proliferation rate has also been described (Shirasuna et al., 1988). Recent studies have attempted to uncover some of the molecular mechanisms involved in growth regulation of HGF fibroblasts. The increased proliferation rate of HGF fibroblasts was associated with increased fatty acid synthase (FAS) expression, and the inhibition of FAS reduced proliferation rates to normal levels (Almeida et al., 2005). Elevated c-myc expression was also associated with an increased DNA synthesis rate (Tipton et al., 2004). C-myc is a nuclear proto-oncogene that is expressed by proliferating cells, and its increased expression has been associated with deregulated cell growth (Secombe et al., 2004). Increased proliferation of HGF fibroblasts was also linked to autogenous transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), since neutralizing antibodies to TGF-ß1 reduced proliferation of HGF fibroblasts (de Andrade et al., 2001). However, such an effect for blocking autogenous TGF-ß was not found in another study (Tipton and Dabbous, 1998). The conflicting results regarding fibroblast proliferation in HGF are likely due to genetic heterogeneity of HGF, small sample size, inherent phenotypical heterogeneity of fibroblasts, and different culture conditions.

In contrast to fibroblasts, HGF epithelial cells show an increased frequency of immunostaining of the proliferation markers PCNA or Ki-67, as compared with healthy tissue in vivo (Martelli-Junior et al., 2005). Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) are important regulators of epithelial cell proliferation (Harris et al., 2003; Jorissen et al., 2003), and they co-localize with PCNA at the tips of rete pegs in HGF (Araujo et al., 2003). Thus, over-expression of EGF or EGFR by the epithelial cells in HGF may have a stimulatory effect on epithelial cell proliferation, resulting in deep rete pegs that extend into the underlying stroma. However, the fact that EGF and EGFR expression was higher in health than in HGF when all epithelial layers were taken into account, and yet their localization was not associated with epithelial cell proliferation, suggests that other mechanisms are also involved (Araujo et al., 2003).

Expression of Transforming Growth Factor-ß and its Receptors
The TGF-ß family of cytokines stimulates fibroblast proliferation and deposition of ECM. TGF-ßs also regulate various functions of epithelial cells, including cell migration, proliferation, and gene expression. There are 3 isoforms of TGF-ß (TGF-ß1, TGF-ß2, and TGF-ß3) that are expressed in humans. The effects of TGF-ß can be exerted in an autocrine or a paracrine fashion by 3 different TGF-ß cell-surface receptors (TGF-ß-RI, TGF-ß-RII, TGF-ß-RIII). The functions of different TGF-ß isoforms are distinct, since TGF-ß1, and possibly TGF-ß2, is involved in the development of fibrosis, while TGF-ß3 appears to prevent it (Verrecchia and Mauviel, 2002; Govinden and Bhoola, 2003; Schiller et al., 2004). Based on immunostaining, all 3 isoforms of TGF-ß can be found in human gingiva, where they are expressed by epithelial cells, inflammatory cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. In HGF, there is a significant proportional increase in fibroblasts expressing TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3, while the proportion of cells expressing TGF-ß2 is decreased as compared with healthy tissue. In addition, the proportion of TGF-ß-RI/II-positive cells is significantly increased in HGF (Wright et al., 2001). It is not known whether the increase in TGF-ß accounts for biologically active or latent TGF-ß. Most TGF-ß is produced in a latent form that must be activated by mechanisms involving partial proteolysis or conformational changes (Nunes et al., 1998; Sheppard, 2005). Thus, the mechanisms that activate TGF-ß may also play a key role in HGF. Furthermore, ECM contains molecules that inhibit the activity of TGF-ß. For example, the small leucine-rich proteoglycans decorin, biglycan, and fibromodulin, which are also present in human gingiva (Larjava et al., 1992; Häkkinen et al., 1993; Alimohamad et al., 2005; Matheson et al., 2005), can inhibit TGF-ß activity (Hildebrand et al., 1994). Nothing is known about the abundance of these molecules in HGF.

Cell culture experiments have also indicated that HGF fibroblasts produce increased levels of TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß2, which results in increased ECM deposition by an autocrine mechanism specific to HGF fibroblasts (Tipton and Dabbous, 1998; Coletta et al., 1999; Martelli-Junior et al., 2003; Trackman and Kantarci, 2004). In gingival fibroblasts, TGF-ß1 also induces an autocrine expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (Hong et al., 1999; Leivonen et al., 2005). CTGF may play a role in HGF, since it mediates most of the pro-fibrotic effects of TGF-ß1, and its expression is up-regulated in various fibrotic conditions (Blom et al., 2002).

Extracellular Matrix Production and Degradation
In addition to providing mechanical support, ECM is an important regulator of cell functions. Furthermore, ECM molecules serve as storage for various growth factors and participate in the regulation of their activation (Häkkinen et al., 2000; Li et al., 2003; Midwood et al., 2004). Thus, altered abundance or composition of ECM may play an active part in the pathogenesis of HGF. The hallmark of HGF is the accumulation of excess ECM. Accordingly, production of type I collagen—along with heat-shock protein 47 (Hsp47, a molecular chaperone involved in collagen secretion), glycosaminoglycan, and fibronectin—is increased in cultured HGF fibroblasts (Shirasuna et al., 1988; Tipton et al., 1997; Coletta et al., 1999; Martelli-Junior et al., 2003). The role of TGF-ß in this process is of interest, because expression of TGF-ß is up-regulated in HGF.

TGF-ß can promote ECM accumulation by increasing ECM synthesis. It can also inhibit ECM breakdown by down-regulating matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression, and by increasing expression of tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP). TIMPs inhibit MMP activity, and a high ratio of TIMPs to MMPs results in excess collagen accumulation (Steffensen et al., 2001). Exogenous or autocrine TGF-ß1 up-regulates type I collagen and down-regulates MMP-1 (the major collagenase in fibroblasts) expression in gingival fibroblasts (Ravanti et al., 1999a; Leivonen et al., 2002; Ala-aho and Kähäri, 2005). However, expression of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 has been reported to be down-regulated or unaltered in HGF fibroblasts (Coletta et al., 1999; Martelli-Junior et al., 2003). Thus, it is possible that fibroblasts in HGF, inherently or as a response to elevated TGF-ß activity, produce less MMPs and more ECM proteins as compared with normal cells, resulting in ECM accumulation. Interestingly, HGF may also involve altered cross-linking of collagen, resulting in increased resistance to degradation (Pallos et al., 1997).

MMP-mediated collagen degradation is an important mechanism for ECM turnover in wound healing and inflammation (Steffensen et al., 2001). However, collagen phagocytosis by fibroblasts is one of the major mechanisms of collagen turnover during tissue maintenance. Fibrotic lesions, especially in the absence of inflammation, may arise from a reduction in the proportion of fibroblasts that degrade collagen intracellularly. For example, nifedipine-treated fibroblasts show a dose-dependent decrease in the percentage of phagocytic cells, suggesting that aberrant collagen phagocytosis plays a role in drug-induced gingival overgrowth (McCulloch and Knowles, 1993; McCulloch, 2004). Interestingly, the ECM molecule decorin potently blocks collagen phagocytosis by gingival fibroblasts (Bhide et al., 2005). Thus, changes in the composition of ECM may affect the phagocytic ability of the cells in HGF. Collagen internalization and lysosomal degradation are also mediated by an endocytotic process that involves the cell-surface receptor Endo180 (also called CD280 or urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein, uPARAP) (East and Isacke, 2002; Behrendt, 2004). Endo180 is expressed by various human gingival cells, including fibroblasts (Honardoust et al., 2006), but its expression and function in HGF have not been studied in detail.


   GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of the genetic mutations involved in HGF would provide novel aids for disease diagnosis, uncover targets for novel treatment modalities, and improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying HGF and other fibrotic processes. Patients with HGF display differences in the mode of inheritance, time of onset, and severity of the disease. HGF can also present as an isolated disease or as part of a syndrome. Thus, it is likely that HGF is genetically heterogenous. Accordingly, several chromosomes and chromosomal regions that may contain mutated genes have been associated with HGF (TableGo). Several studies have pointed out mutations in chromosome 2 as a possible cause of HGF. Originally, the region of 2p13-p21 in chromosome 2 was associated with a syndromic form of HGF (Fryns, 1996). The affected locus was later refined to encompass the region 2p13-2p16 (Shashi et al., 1999). This region was different from the HGF1 locus 2p21-p22 found in a Brazilian family with an autosomal-dominant, non-syndromic HGF (Hart et al., 1998). In the Brazilian family, the HGF1 locus was confined to a candidate interval, and sequencing of the 16 genes found in this region revealed a mutation in a gene that codes for a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor, son-of-sevenless-1 (SOS-1) (Hart et al., 2002). To determine the generality of the HGF1 locus, these investigators examined another Brazilian family with autosomal-dominant HGF. Interestingly, the findings suggested the presence of another mutation in this region (Hart et al., 2000). Data from four Chinese families mapped a dominant HGF locus also to the region 2p21-2p22 in chromosome 2 (Xiao et al., 2000). In contrast to the Brazilian family, where recombination suppression was found (Hart et al., 1998), similar characteristics were not found in the Chinese families. Furthermore, the SOS-1 locus was likely not affected in the Chinese families, suggesting a different genetic background (Xiao et al., 2000; Hart et al., 2002). Recently, non-syndromic, autosomal-dominant HGF was also linked to yet another region in chromosome 2 (HGF3 or GINGF3, 2p22.3-p23.3). This region contains more than 70 known genes, but specific mutations have not been reported (Ye et al., 2005). In addition, analysis of another Chinese family with autosomal-dominant HGF revealed still another novel locus, HGF2 (GINGF2), in chromosome 5 (5q13-q22), but the specific gene mutation in this region has not been defined (Xiao et al., 2001). Additional chromosomes and gene mutations are associated with syndromic forms of HGF (TableGo). Thus, HGF is genetically heterogenous and may involve several genes. Remarkably, different forms of HGF display relatively similar histological outcomes, suggesting that the mutations affect different levels of the same cellular or molecular pathways. Discovery of the mutation in SOS-1 will allow investigators, for the first time, to uncover some of the signaling mechanisms involved in HGF.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Chromosomal Localization of Genes Associated with HGF
 

   SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Growth factors elicit their functions through binding to their specific cell-surface receptors. Many of these receptors (e.g., EGF-, PDGF-, and TGF-ß receptor) possess intrinsic kinase activity (Hashimoto, 2000; Munaron, 2002). Binding of the growth factor induces phosphorylation of the receptors’ cytoplasmic domain and subsequent activation of intracellular signaling cascades. The major mechanism of signal transduction by growth factor receptors involves downstream activation of the small GTPases Ras and Rac. SOS-1 is a bifunctional guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) that regulates the activity of Ras and Rac (Fig. 2AGo). SOS-1 is essential for normal development, since SOS-1 knock-out mice embryos die at mid-gestation (Wang et al., 1997; Qian et al., 2000). Biochemical analyses and cell culture experiments have shown that, upon growth factor stimulation, SOS-1 activates Ras indirectly by facilitating the exchange of GTP for GDP on Ras (Shapiro, 2002). When bound to GDP, Ras is inactive, while binding to GTP leads to its activation and phosphorylation of ERK1/2 of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. This pathway is one of the key mechanisms for the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, gene expression, and differentiation. The effect of the Ras-ERK1/2 pathway is cell-type-specific and also depends on the duration and intensity of the activation (Agell et al., 2002). Ras can also activate downstream molecules involved in other signaling pathways, including phosphoinositide-3 kinases (PI3Ks), phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C{varepsilon} (PLC{varepsilon}), and the Ral nucleotide exchange factor (RalGDS) family. These pathways have multiple functions in the regulation of cell proliferation, cytoskeletal re-organization, and gene transcription (Cullen and Lockyer, 2002).


Figure 2
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Function, structure, and expression of SOS-1 in human gingiva. (A) Schematic representation of the major intracellular signaling pathways regulated by SOS-1. In unstimulated cells, SOS-1 associates preferentially with the adaptor molecule Grb2. Binding of a growth factor to its receptor induces autophosphorylation of the growth factor receptor’s cytoplasmic tail. The SOS-1/Grb2 complex is translocated to the activated receptor, where it associates with Ras and promotes formation of GTP from GDP and activates Ras. Activated Ras induces phosphorylation of ERK1/2 of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway that regulates various key cell functions. The activated MAPK can phosphorylate SOS-1, leading to dissociation of the SOS-1/Grb2 complex (dashed lines). In the stimulated state, SOS-1 can also form a complex with the adaptor molecules E3b1 and Eps8 instead of Grb2. Formation of this trimolecular complex is not affected by phosphorylation of SOS-1 by the MAPK pathway. The trimolecular complex promotes association of SOS-1 with the small GTPase Rac and causes Rac activation by inducing nucleotide exchange from GDP to GTP. Activated Rac regulates re-organization of cytoskeletal actin and the cell functions that are regulated by this process. The activation of Ras by growth factors is usually short-lived, while the activation of Rac is sustained. (B) Structural comparison of the wild-type and mutant SOS-1 present in HGF1. SOS-1 is a multidomain protein. Together, the DH (Dbl homology) domain and the PH (pleckstrin homology) domain are involved in the activation of Rac. The Ras exchanger motif (Rem) domain and the Cdc25 domain are both needed for the interaction with Ras. The last C-terminal domain contains several proline-rich motifs that serve as a docking site for the src homology 3 (SH3) domain present in the adaptor molecules Grb2 and E3b1. In HGF1, there is a single cytosine insertion at codon 1083 (proline) in exon 21 that results in a frame-shift mutation and an early termination of the protein. The mutant protein also has a 22-amino-acid missense addition at the C-terminus. (C) Expression of SOS-1 in human gingiva. SOS-1 was immunolocalized in healthy human marginal gingiva with a polyclonal antibody against SOS-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), with the ABC avidin-peroxidase reagent (Vectastain Elite kit, Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) and the VIP substrate (Vector Laboratories Inc.). SOS-1 localizes in the basal and spinous layers of the epithelium and in connective tissue cells (a). In the connective tissue, SOS-1 is expressed by blood vessels (arrowheads) and fibroblasts (arrows) (b). In the rete ridges of the epithelium, the strongest expression of SOS-1 localizes in the cytoplasm of the basal cells (c). In the connective tissue papilla area, the strongest immunoreactivity for SOS-1 localizes at the basal cell membrane, facing the basement membrane (d; arrowheads). A set of representative tissue sections from five different individuals is shown. E, epithelium; CT, connective tissue. Magnification bar = 50 µm.

 
SOS-1 also functions as a GEF for Rac when it forms a complex with the adaptor molecules E3b1 and Eps8 (Fig. 2AGo). Activation of Rac regulates the actin remodeling and cytoskeletal organization that is critical for the transport of signaling molecules inside the cell, cell adhesion, and migration. Whether SOS-1 will function as a Ras or Rac exchange factor is dictated by its C-terminal proline-rich region, which contains binding sites for SH3 domains present in both adaptor proteins Grb2 and E3b1 (Nimnual et al., 1998; Scita et al., 1999; Nimnual and Bar-Sagi, 2002; Sondermann et al., 2004). It appears that Grb2 and E3b1 share the same binding site on the SOS-1 molecule. Therefore, competition between these two adaptor proteins for binding to SOS-1 may determine whether the Ras or the Rac pathway gets activated (Li et al., 1993; Cussac et al., 1994; Scita et al., 1999; Innocenti et al., 2002). Phosphorylation of SOS-1 on tyrosine residues by the MAPK pathway does not affect the stability of the SOS-1/E3b1/Eps8 complex, but it disrupts the SOS-1/Grb2 complex (Corbalan-Garcia et al., 1996; Sini et al., 2004). Hence, phosphorylation of SOS-1 provides a mechanism to balance signaling between the Ras and Rac pathways (Sini et al., 2004). In addition to growth factor receptors, certain integrin-type ECM receptors also regulate the Ras and Rac pathways through SOS-1 (Wary et al., 1996, 1998; Mettouchi et al., 2001). Thus, SOS-1 plays a key role in both ECM and growth factor signaling.

Individuals with HGF1 have a single-cytosine insertion in exon 21 of the SOS-1 gene, leading to a frame-shift mutation and an early termination of the protein (Fig. 2BGo). This mutation results in ~ 20% of the SOS-1 gene being deleted and includes the proline-rich Grb2 and E3b1-binding domain and the 5 MAPK phosphorylation sites (Hart et al., 2002). Interestingly, a similarly engineered shortened SOS-1 protein has enhanced activity as compared with the wild-type molecule in vitro, and in cells engineered to express the mutated protein, the MAPK pathway is continuously active (Wang et al., 1995). This suggests that, in HGF1, mutated SOS-1 is constantly in an activated state, which may increase the activity of the MAPK pathway. A transgenic mouse with constitutively active SOS-1 was also developed. In these mice, the active SOS-1 was expressed in the epithelium under the control of the cytokeratin-5 promoter and resulted in the development of skin tumors, multiple papillomas, and hyperplastic skin (Sibilia et al., 2000). Interestingly, these mice also developed thickening of the tongue epithelium, but it is not known whether they also displayed gingival overgrowth.


   PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE RAS-MAPK PATHWAY IN GINGIVAL OVERGROWTH
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
SOS-1 is expressed in various tissues and cells, including human gingiva (Chardin and Mattei, 1994; Hart et al., 2002), where it localizes in epithelial cells and various stromal cells (Fig. 2CGo). Interestingly, the Sos-1-Ras-ERK1/2 pathway appears to be a central modulator of expression of the key molecules that are involved in fibrosis and HGF (Fig. 3Go). For example, activation of this pathway up-regulates the expression of type I collagen, CTGF, TGF-ß, and TIMPs, while it down-regulates the expression of MMPs (Benbow and Brinckerhoff, 1997; Ravanti et al., 1999a,b; Mulder, 2000; Chen et al., 2002; Hall et al., 2003; Leask et al., 2003; Ohnishi et al., 2004; Leivonen et al., 2005; Mulsow et al., 2005). The up-regulation of TGF-ß expression by this pathway is of interest, since TGF-ß is up-regulated in HGF, and it activates the Ras-ERK1/2 pathway. In addition, the induction of the pro-fibrotic molecules by the Ras-ERK1/2 pathway occurs in collaboration with the Smad pathway induced by TGF-ß. For example, co-expression of Smad3 with constitutively active MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK1) induces the expression of CTGF in gingival fibroblasts (Leivonen et al., 2005). Thus, increased activation of the ERK1/2 pathway by constitutively active SOS-1 could drive the fibrosis in HGF. Expression of the key pro-fibrotic molecules is also regulated in collaboration with the Ras-ERK1/2 and Smad pathways at the transcriptional level, where both pathways activate the transcription-factor-activating protein-1 (AP-1) (Yates and Rayner, 2002; Hall et al., 2003) (Fig. 3Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Simplified model of integration between the Ca2+ and SOS-Ras-ERK1/2 and Smad signaling pathways as a putative mechanism for gingival overgrowth. As a response to, e.g., growth factor stimulation, intracellular Ca2+-ion concentration can locally increase as a result of the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (endoplasmic reticulum or mitochondria), or by changes in the function of cell-membrane ion pumps (e.g., NCX1) that regulate Ca2+ influx and efflux. Local Ca2+ transients can induce SOS-1/Grb2-mediated activation of Ras, leading to phosphorylation and activation of downstream signaling pathways, including ERK1/2 of the MAPK pathway. Ca2+ can also bind to calmodulin (CaM), and this complex down-regulates Ras-mediated ERK1/2 activation and the TGF-ß-regulated Smad pathway in fibroblasts. CaM/Ca2+ can also induce activation of Ras and calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaMKs), including CaMKIV. Neurofibromin (NF) accelerates inactivation of GTP-bound Ras. Activation of the TGF-ß-receptor by TGF-ß activates the Smad and Ras-ERK1/2 pathways. At the transcriptional level, CaMKIV through p300/CBP (CREB-binding protein), ERK1/2 through AP-1 (activating protein-1), and Smads collaborate to regulate pro-fibrotic gene expression and cell proliferation in fibroblasts.

 
Calcium ions (Ca2+) function inside the cells as universal second messengers. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration is regulated by delicate mechanisms that modulate Ca2+ influx through the cell membrane and its release from the intracellular stores (endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and Ca2+-binding proteins). For example, hormones, growth factors, and cytokines can induce an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels. Ca2+ can act directly on target molecules, or its effects can be mediated by intracellular Ca2+-binding proteins (Fig. 3Go). Hundreds of Ca2+-binding proteins have been identified, including protein kinases (e.g., calmodulin-dependent protein kinases or CaMKs) and protein phosphatases (e.g., calcineurin). In addition, Ca2+ binds to proteins (e.g., calmodulin) that do not have intrinsic kinase or phosphatase activity, but which, upon binding with Ca2+, regulate functions of calmodulin-binding proteins, Ca2+-dependent enzymes, and ion channels. Ca2+ ions or their interactions with the binding proteins subsequently regulate multiple cell functions, including gene transcription, cell proliferation, development, motility, and secretion (Stull, 2001; Agell et al., 2002; Kahl and Means, 2003). Phenytoin, nifedipine, and cyclosporine A, medications that cause gingival overgrowth, perturb intracellular Ca2+-signaling pathways, suggesting that abnormal Ca2+ signaling is involved in gingival overgrowth (Marshall and Bartold, 1999). Interestingly, the region at 5q13-q22 associated with HGF2 encompasses the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV) gene that is expressed in gingiva (Xiao et al., 2001). In addition, genes for sodium/calcium exchanger (NCX1) and calmodulin-2 reside within the chromosome 2p21 interval that co-segregates with HGF (Shieh et al., 1992; Berchtold et al., 1993; Hart et al., 1998). NCX1 is one of the ion channels that regulates intracellular Ca2+ transients, which, in turn, modulate signaling pathways, including Ras, directly or indirectly through Ca2+-binding proteins (Iwamoto, 2004) (Fig. 3Go). Calmodulins (CaM-1, CaM-2, and CaM-3) are the best-characterized Ca2+-binding proteins. Different CaMs are structurally identical, and their functional specificity is likely regulated by differential spatial expression. Interestingly, CaM down-regulates TGF-ß signaling by interacting with Smad1 and Smad2. It also reduces ERK1/2 activation necessary for growth-factor-induced fibroblast proliferation (Zimmerman et al., 1998; Scherer and Graff, 2000; Agell et al., 2002). CaM also phosphorylates CaMKIV, leading to activation of the transcription factor p300/CBP (CREB-binding protein). The p300/CBP acts as a molecular coordinator that regulates the activity of various transcription factors, including AP-1 and Smads (Kamei et al., 1996; Ghosh et al., 2000; Impey et al., 2002; Conkright and Montminy, 2005). For example, p300/CBP enhances Smad-mediated up-regulation of type I collagen expression in fibroblasts (Ghosh et al., 2000). MAPK pathway also potentiates the function of p300/CBP (Janknecht and Nordheim, 1996). Thus, the Sos-Ras-ERK1/2, Smad, and Ca2+ signaling pathways are integrated in fibroblasts and regulate genes that are abnormally expressed in HGF and involved in fibrosis. It is tempting to speculate that perturbation at any level of this signaling cascade, which leads to the increased expression of pro-fibrotic genes, promotes development of gingival overgrowth (Fig. 3Go). Interestingly, in neurofibromatosis type I, which involves loss-of-function of the neurofibromin that normally down-regulates Ras activation, and in Costello syndrome, which is caused by gain-of-function mutation of H-Ras (a member of the Ras family), some individuals also have gingival overgrowth (TableGo). Both of these mutations induce activation of the Ras pathway (Bekisz et al., 2000; Hennekam, 2003; Aoki et al., 2005; Scarano et al., 2005; Bentires-Alj et al., 2006). Capillary morphogenetic protein 2 (CMG2), which is mutated in juvenile hyaline fibromatosis, and also involves gingival overgrowth (Sciubba and Niebloom, 1986; Hanks et al., 2003), is a cell membrane, integrin-like molecule that regulates cell adhesion to laminin and type IV collagen (Bell et al., 2001). The signaling pathways regulated by CMG2 are not known in detail, but cell adhesion conveys signals to the SOS-Ras-ERK1/2 pathway, potentially linking CMG2 to the same pathway. Therefore, whether other tissues or only gingiva will be affected likely depends on the importance of each of the mutated genes in the given cells and tissues.


   DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
As more information becomes available about the specific gene mutations in various forms of HGF, it will be important to study the functions of these genes in more detail. First, it is important to correlate the clinical, histological, and cellular changes to the specific gene mutations, molecular changes, signaling pathways, and cellular processes involved in each case. Novel methods to modulate the expression of target genes in cells and animals will provide additional tools for studying the importance of the target pathways in HGF. Second, the non-syndromic HGF manifests only in gingiva, while other tissues do not show any fibrosis, suggesting that the signaling pathways that induce this form of HGF are uniquely regulated in gingival cells. Therefore, it will be important to study the key pathways in more detail, specifically in gingival cells. Finally, previous studies about HGF have focused mostly on connective tissue cells, although interaction between epithelium and fibroblasts is also involved in fibrosis (Beer et al., 2000; Häkkinen et al., 2004; Yamaguchi et al., 2005). In HGF, gingival keratinocytes are activated as they form the long rete ridges that penetrate deep into the connective tissue, suggesting that the epithelium, connective tissue, or both, may drive the development of HGF. It is important to address the role of the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in HGF in future studies. To this end, novel animal and cell culture models can be used to target appropriate gene mutations in either epithelial or connective tissue cells. The information about distinct signaling pathways involved in HGF will provide not only novel methods for disease diagnosis and targets for disease prevention and treatment, but also important information about the functions of the target genes in other disease processes.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Received February 10, 2006; Accepted June 5, 2006


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
 CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CHANGES
 GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS
 SOS-1 GENE MUTATION
 PUTATIVE ROLE OF THE...
 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
 REFERENCES
 
Agell N, Bachs O, Rocamora N, Villalonga P (2002). Modulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by Ca(2+), and calmodulin. Cell Signal 14:649–654.[ISI][Medline]

Ala-aho R, Kähäri VM (2005). Collagenases in cancer. Biochimie 87:273–286.[Medline]

Alimohamad H, Habijanac T, Larjava H, Häkkinen L (2005). Colocalization of the collagen-binding proteoglycans decorin, biglycan, fibromodulin and lumican with different cells in human gingiva. J Periodontal Res 40:73–86.[ISI][Medline]

Almeida JP, Coletta RD, Silva SD, Agostini M, Vargas PA, Bozzo L, et al. (2005). Proliferation of fibroblasts cultured from normal gingiva and hereditary gingival fibromatosis is dependent on fatty acid synthase activity. J Periodontol 76:272–278.[ISI][Medline]

Anderson J, Cunliffe WJ, Roberts DF, Close H (1969). Hereditary gingival fibromatosis. Br Med J 3:218–219.[ISI][Medline]

Aoki Y, Niihori T, Kawame H, Kurosawa K, Ohashi H, Tanaka Y, et al. (2005). Germline mutations in HRAS proto-oncogene cause Costello syndrome. Nat Genet 37:1038–1040.[ISI][Medline]

Araiche M, Brode H (1959). A case of fibromatosis gingivae. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 12:1307–1310.[Medline]

Araujo CS, Graner E, Almeida OP, Sauk JJ, Coletta RD (2003). Histomorphometric characteristics and expression of epidermal growth factor and its receptor by epithelial cells of normal gingiva and hereditary gingival fibromatosis. J Periodontal Res 38:237–241.[ISI][Medline]

Baptista IP (2002). Hereditary gingival fibromatosis: a case report. J Clin Periodontol 29:871–874.[ISI][Medline]

Beer HD, Gassmann MG, Munz B, Steiling H, Engelhardt F, Bleuel K, et al. (2000). Expression and function of keratinocyte growth factor and activin in skin morphogenesis and cutaneous wound repair. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 5:34–39.

Behrendt N (2004). The urokinase receptor (uPAR) and the uPAR-associated protein (uPARAP/Endo180): membrane proteins engaged in matrix turnover during tissue remodeling. Biol Chem 385:103–136.[ISI][Medline]

Bekisz O, Darimont F, Rompen EH (2000). Diffuse but unilateral gingival enlargement associated with von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis: a case report. J Clin Periodontol 27:361–365.[ISI][Medline]

Bell SE, Mavila A, Salazar R, Bayless KJ, Kanagala S, Maxwell SA, et al. (2001). Differential gene expression during capillary morphogenesis in 3D collagen matrices: regulated expression of genes involved in basement membrane matrix assembly, cell cycle progression, cellular differentiation and G-protein signaling. J Cell Sci 114:2755–2773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Benbow U, Brinckerhoff CE (1997). The AP-1 site and MMP gene regulation: what is all the fuss about? Matrix Biol 15:519–526.[ISI][Medline]

Bentires-Alj M, Kontaridis MI, Neel BG (2006). Stops along the RAS pathway in human genetic disease. Nat Med 12:283–285.[ISI][Medline]

Berchtold MW, Egli R, Rhyner JA, Hameister H, Strehler EE (1993). Localization of the human bona fide calmodulin genes CALM1, CALM2, and CALM3 to chromosomes 14q24-q31, 2p21.1-p21.3, and 19q13.2-q13.3. Genomics 16:461–465.[ISI][Medline]

Bhide VM, Laschinger CA, Arora PD, Lee W, Häkkinen L, Larjava H, et al. (2005). Collagen phagocytosis by fibroblasts is regulated by decorin. J Biol Chem 280:23103–23113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bhowmick SK, Gidvani VK, Rettig KR (2001). Hereditary gingival fibromatosis and growth retardation. Endocr Pract 7:383–387.[Medline]

Blom IE, Goldschmeding R, Leask A (2002). Gene regulation of connective tissue growth factor: new targets for antifibrotic therapy? Matrix Biol 21:473–482.[ISI][Medline]

Casavecchia P, Uzel MI, Kantarci A, Hasturk H, Dibart S, Hart TC, et al. (2004). Hereditary gingival fibromatosis associated with generalized aggressive periodontitis: a case report. J Periodontol 75:770–778.[ISI][Medline]

Chardin P, Mattei MG (1994). Chromosomal localization of two genes encoding human ras exchange factors: SOS1 maps to the 2p22-->p16 region and SOS2 to the 14q21-->q22 region of the human genome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 66:68–69.[ISI][Medline]

Chavrier C, Couble ML (1979). Ultrastructure of the connective corium in hereditary gingival hyperplasia. J Biol Buccale 7:191–203.[ISI][Medline]

Chen Y, Blom IE, Sa S, Goldschmeding R, Abraham DJ, Leask A (2002). CTGF expression in mesangial cells: involvement of SMADs, MAP kinase, and PKC. Kidney Int 62:1149–1159.[ISI][Medline]

Coletta RD, Almeida OP, Graner E, Page RC, Bozzo L (1998). Differential proliferation of fibroblasts cultured from hereditary gingival fibromatosis and normal gingiva. J Periodontal Res 33:469–475.[ISI][Medline]

Coletta RD, Almeida OP, Reynolds MA, Sauk JJ (1999). Alteration in expression of MMP-1 and MMP-2 but not TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 in hereditary gingival fibromatosis is mediated by TGF-beta 1 autocrine stimulation. J Periodontal Res 34:457–463.[ISI][Medline]

Conkright MD, Montminy M (2005). CREB: the unindicted cancer co-conspirator. Trends Cell Biol 15:457–459.[ISI][Medline]

Corbalan-Garcia S, Yang SS, Degenhardt KR, Bar-Sagi D (1996). Identification of the mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites on human Sos1 that regulate interaction with Grb2. Mol Cell Biol 16:5674–5682.[Abstract]

Cullen PJ, Lockyer PJ (2002). Integration of calcium and Ras signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:339–348.[ISI][Medline]

Cussac D, Frech M, Chardin P (1994). Binding of the Grb2 SH2 domain to phosphotyrosine motifs does not change the affinity of its SH3 domains for Sos proline-rich motifs. EMBO J 13:4011–4021.[ISI][Medline]

Daly AK, Cholerton S, Gregory W, Idle JR (1993). Metabolic polymorphisms. Pharmacol Ther 57:129–160.[ISI][Medline]

de Andrade CR, Cotrin P, Graner E, Almeida OP, Sauk JJ, Coletta RD (2001). Transforming growth factor-beta1 autocrine stimulation regulates fibroblast proliferation in hereditary gingival fibromatosis. J Periodontol 72:1726–1733.[ISI][Medline]

Doufexi A, Mina M, Ioannidou E (2005). Gingival overgrowth in children: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and complications. A literature review. J Periodontol 76:3–10.[ISI][Medline]

Duncan MR, Berman B (1987). Persistence of a reduced-collagen-producing phenotype in cultured scleroderma fibroblasts after short-term exposure to interferons. J Clin Invest 79:1318–1324.[ISI][Medline]

East L, Isacke CM (2002). The mannose receptor family. Biochim Biophys Acta 1572:364–386.[Medline]

Farrer-Brown G, Lucas RB, Winstock D (1972). Familial gingival fibromatosis: an unusual pathology. J Oral Pathol 1:76–83.[Medline]

Flaitz CM, Coleman GC (1995). Differential diagnosis of oral enlargements in children. Pediatr Dent 17:294–300.[Medline]

Fletcher JP (1966). Gingival abnormalities of genetic origin: a preliminary communication with special reference to hereditary generalized gingival fibromatosis. J Dent Res 45:597–612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fryns JP (1996). Gingival fibromatosis and partial duplication of the short arm of chromosome 2 (dup(2)(p13-->p21)). Ann Genet 39:54–55.[ISI][Medline]

Ghosh AK, Yuan W, Mori Y, Varga J (2000). Smad-dependent stimulation of type I collagen gene expression in human skin fibroblasts by TGF-beta involves functional cooperation with p300/CBP transcriptional coactivators. Oncogene 19:3546–3555.[ISI][Medline]

Gorlin R, Cohen MM, Levis LS (1990). Syndromes of the head and neck. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Govinden R, Bhoola KD (2003). Genealogy, expression, and cellular function of transforming growth factor-beta. Pharmacol Ther 98:257–265.[ISI][Medline]

Gunhan O, Gardner DG, Bostanci H, Gunhan M (1995). Familial gingival fibromatosis with unusual histologic findings. J Periodontol 66:1008–1011.[ISI][Medline]

Häkkinen L, Larjava H (1992). Characterization of fibroblast clones from periodontal granulation tissue in vitro. J Dent Res 71:1901–1907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Häkkinen L, Oksala O, Salo T, Rahemtulla F, Larjava H (1993). Immunohistochemical localization of proteoglycans in human periodontium. J Histochem Cytochem 41:1689–1699.[Abstract]

Häkkinen L, Uitto VJ, Larjava H (2000). Cell biology of gingival wound healing. Periodontol 2000 24:127–152.

Häkkinen L, Koivisto L, Gardner H, Saarialho-Kere U, Carroll JM, Lakso M, et al. (2004). Increased expression of beta6-integrin in skin leads to spontaneous development of chronic wounds. Am J Pathol 164:229–242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hall MC, Young DA, Waters JG, Rowan AD, Chantry A, Edwards DR, et al. (2003). The comparative role of activator protein 1 and Smad factors in the regulation of Timp-1 and MMP-1 gene expression by transforming growth factor-beta 1. J Biol Chem 278:10304–10313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hanks S, Adams S, Douglas J, Arbour L, Atherton DJ, Balci S, et al. (2003). Mutations in the gene encoding capillary morphogenesis protein 2 cause juvenile hyaline fibromatosis and infantile systemic hyalinosis. Am J Hum Genet 73:791–800.[ISI][Medline]

Harris RC, Chung E, Coffey RJ (2003). EGF receptor ligands. Exp Cell Res 284:2–13.[ISI][Medline]

Hart TC, Pallos D, Bowden DW, Bolyard J, Pettenati MJ, Cortelli JR (1998). Genetic linkage of hereditary gingival fibromatosis to chromosome 2p21. Am J Hum Genet 62:876–883.[ISI][Medline]

Hart TC, Pallos D, Bozzo L, Almeida OP, Marazita ML, O’Connell JR, et al. (2000). Evidence of genetic heterogeneity for hereditary gingival fibromatosis. J Dent Res 79:1758–1764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hart TC, Zhang Y, Gorry MC, Hart PS, Cooper M, Marazita ML, et al. (2002). A mutation in the SOS1 gene causes hereditary gingival fibromatosis type 1. Am J Hum Genet 70:943–954.[ISI][Medline]

Hashimoto K (2000). Regulation of keratinocyte function by growth factors. J Dermatol Sci 24(Suppl 1):S46–S50.

Hassell TM (1993). Tissues and cells of the periodontium. Periodontol 2000 3:9–38.

Hassell TM, Page RC, Narayanan AS, Cooper CG (1976). Diphenyl-hydantoin (dilantin) gingival hyperplasia: drug-induced abnormality of connective tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2909–2912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hennekam RC (2003). Costello syndrome: an overview. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 117:42–48.[Medline]

Hildebrand A, Romaris M, Rasmussen LM, Heinegard D, Twardzik DR, Border WA, et al. (1994). Interaction of the small interstitial proteoglycans biglycan, decorin and fibromodulin with transforming growth factor beta. Biochem J 302:527–534.

Honardoust H, Jiang G, Koivisto L, Wienke D, Isacke C, Larjava H, et al. (2006). Expression of Endo180 is spatially and temporally regulated during wound healing. Histopathology 49:634–648.[Medline]

Hong HH, Uzel MI, Duan C, Sheff MC, Trackman PC (1999). Regulation of lysyl oxidase, collagen, and connective tissue growth factor by TGF-beta1 and detection in human gingiva. Lab Invest 79:1655–1667.[ISI][Medline]

Horning GM, Fisher JG, Barker BF, Killoy WJ, Lowe JW (1985). Gingival fibromatosis with hypertrichosis. A case report. J Periodontol 56:344–347.[ISI][Medline]

Impey S, Fong AL, Wang Y, Cardinaux JR, Fass DM, Obrietan K, et al. (2002). Phosphorylation of CBP mediates transcriptional activation by neural activity and CaM kinase IV. Neuron 34:235–244.[ISI][Medline]

Innocenti M, Tenca P, Frittoli E, Faretta M, Tocchetti A, Di Fiore PP, et al. (2002). Mechanisms through which Sos-1 coordinates the activation of Ras and Rac. J Cell Biol 156:125–136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Iwamoto T (2004). Forefront of Na+/Ca2+ exchanger studies: molecular pharmacology of Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitors. J Pharmacol Sci 96:27–32.[ISI][Medline]

Janknecht R, Nordheim A (1996). MAP kinase-dependent transcriptional coactivation by Elk-1 and its cofactor CBP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 228:831–837.[ISI][Medline]

Jorissen RN, Walker F, Pouliot N, Garrett TP, Ward CW, Burgess AW (2003). Epidermal growth factor receptor: mechanisms of activation and signalling. Exp Cell Res 284:31–53.[ISI][Medline]

Kahl CR, Means AR (2003). Regulation of cell cycle progression by calcium/calmodulin-dependent pathways. Endocr Rev 24:719–736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kamei Y, Xu L, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Kurokawa R, Gloss B, et al. (1996). A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell 85:403–414.[ISI][Medline]

Kasaboglu O, Tumer C, Balci S (2004). Hereditary gingival fibromatosis and sensorineural hearing loss in a 42-year-old man with Jones syndrome. Genet Couns 15:213–218.[ISI][Medline]

Kataoka M, Kido J, Shinohara Y, Nagata T (2005). Drug-induced gingival overgrowth—a review. Biol Pharm Bull 28:1817–1821.[ISI][Medline]

Kelekis-Cholakis A, Wiltshire WA, Birek C (2002). Treatment and long-term follow-up of a patient with hereditary gingival fibromatosis: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 68:290–294.

Kerr B, Delrue MA, Sigaudy S, Perveen R, Marche M, Burgelin I, et al. (2006). Genotype-phenotype correlation in Costello syndrome: HRAS mutation analysis in 43 cases. J Med Genet 43:401–405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kondoh T, Kamimura N, Tsuru A, Matsumoto T, Matsuzaka T, Moriuchi H (2001). A case of Schinzel-Giedion syndrome complicated with progressive severe gingival hyperplasia and progressive brain atrophy. Pediatr Int 43:181–184.[ISI][Medline]

Larjava H, Häkkinen L, Rahemtulla F (1992). A biochemical analysis of human periodontal tissue proteoglycans. Biochem J 284:267–274.

Leask A, Holmes A, Black CM, Abraham DJ (2003). Connective tissue growth factor gene regulation. Requirements for its induction by transforming growth factor-beta 2 in fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 278:13008–13015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leivonen SK, Chantry A, Häkkinen L, Han J, Kähäri VM (2002). Smad3 mediates transforming growth factor-beta-induced collagenase-3 (matrix metalloproteinase-13) expression in human gingival fibroblasts. Evidence for cross-talk between Smad3 and p38 signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 277:46338–46346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leivonen SK, Häkkinen L, Liu D, Kähäri VM (2005). Smad3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 coordinately mediate transforming growth factor-beta-induced expression of connective tissue growth factor in human fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 124:1162–1169.[ISI][Medline]

Li J, Zhang YP, Kirsner RS (2003). Angiogenesis in wound repair: angiogenic growth factors and the extracellular matrix. Microsc Res Tech 60:107–114.[ISI][Medline]

Li N, Batzer A, Daly R, Yajnik V, Skolnik E, Chardin P, et al. (1993). Guanine-nucleotide-releasing factor hSos1 binds to Grb2 and links receptor tyrosine kinases to Ras signalling. Nature 363:85–88.[Medline]

Li Y, O’Connell P, Breidenbach HH, Cawthon R, Stevens J, Xu G, et al. (1995). Genomic organization of the neurofibromatosis 1 gene (NF1). Genomics 25:9–18.[ISI][Medline]

Lynch M, Brightman VJ, Greenberg MS (1994). Burke