|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Orthodontic Science, Department of Orofacial Development and Function, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan; and
2 Division of Integrative Sensory Physiology, Department of Developmental and Reconstructive Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
* corresponding author, yabushita-t.orts{at}tmd.ac.jp
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: masseter muscle muscle spindle occlusal vertical dimension adaptation rat
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Muscle spindles play a role in maintaining the posture of the mandible (Brill and Tryde, 1974; Broekhuijsen and van Willigen, 1983). Under dynamic conditions, the input from the muscle spindles has been shown as important in stabilizing the position of the mandible during movements of the body (Lund and Olsson, 1983). Therefore, jaw-muscle spindles could be the receptors responsible for the perception and maintenance of the occlusal vertical dimension (OVD). In addition, jaw-muscle spindles play an important role in the control of jaw movements during normal masticatory function (Lund, 1991).
Although some studies suggest the OVD to be strictly controlled (Yagi et al., 2003), and that this control would be exerted, at least in part, by inputs from jaw-muscle spindles (Zhang et al., 2003), we have recently demonstrated that masseter muscle spindles already start to show some degree of functional plasticity 5 days after the establishment of an increased OVD (iOVD) condition (Yabushita et al., 2005); i.e., some parameters of muscle-spindle function, particularly those related to the receptors sensitivity, were affected by changes in OVD. In this study, we tested for the possibility of functional recovery in masseter muscle spindles following longer periods of observation after iOVD.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal Preparation
Thirty-five female Wistar albino rats (13 wks old) were used. Rats were randomly divided into Control (n = 10) and iOVD (n = 25) groups. All rats were lightly anesthetized with thiamylal sodium (Isozol®, Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan; 60 mg/kg i.p.), and those in the iOVD group had the dimension between the maxillary and mandibular molars increased by 2.0 mm with a resin build-up to the maxillary molars. The occlusal surfaces of lower molars were coated with fluid resin to prevent reduction of molar height due to abrasive movement of the mandible. The animals were then returned to their cages and allowed to recover from anesthesia. Electrophysiological recordings were obtained 1 day, 2, 4, 6, and 8 wks later (n = 5, in each group). The body weights of rats in both the Control and iOVD groups were monitored during the entire experimental period, for assessment of general health status.
Stimulation and Recording
For electrophysiological recordings, the animals were again anesthetized with thiamylal sodium (80 mg/kg i.p.). We monitored the level of anesthesia by checking pupil size, flexion and corneal reflexes, and heart rate. Additional thiamylal sodium (5 mg/kg i.p.) was administered when a firm pinch applied between the toe pads resulted in increased respiration and heart rate. With their bodies in a prone position, the animals were placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (models SN-2 and SM-15M, Narishige Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). For masseter muscle stimulation, one extreme of the cotton thread was fixed to the mandibular symphysis and the other to an automatic pulling machine. The maximum jaw-opening distance was set at 7.0 mm (ramp duration of 4.5 sec and hold duration of 4.0 sec) (Yabushita et al., 2005).
To allow for the introduction of the recording electrode, the scalp was incised at the midline, and a small aperture about 3 mm wide was prepared in the skull with a stereotaxic microengine. Monopolar tungsten microelectrodes (250-µm-diameter shaft with 8° tapered tip, 5 M
of AC impedance; A-M Systems, Inc., Carlsborg, WA, USA) were used to record single-unit activities of the masseter muscle-spindle afferents. Recording electrodes were inserted into the caudal, triangular part of the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus following stereotaxic coordinates as previously reported (Paxinos and Watson, 1998). This nucleus contains the cell bodies of two types of neurons, i.e., primary muscle-spindle afferents of ipsilateral jaw-closing muscles and mechanoreceptor afferents of ipsilateral maxillary and mandibular teeth (reviewed in Lund, 1991). The caudal part of the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus holds 60% of the nucleus cells (Rakhawy et al., 1972). Afferent units responding to gentle surface pressure applied with a rod to different areas of the masseter, but not to pushing of the teeth with the mandible fixed, were identified as masseter muscle spindle afferents. Identification of muscle afferent was complemented by electrical stimulation of the masseter nerve. The masseter nerve was exposed in the infratemporal fossa by lateral reflection of the temporalis muscle. The unit responses evoked in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus followed high-frequency stimulation (> 200 Hz) (Ro and Capra, 1999). Spike signals were amplified by a differential amplifier (DAM-80, WPI, Sarasota, FL, USA; x1000 gain, 300 Hz and 3 KHz for low and high filters, respectively). The responses were averaged after three consecutive trials.
Spindle afferents were classified as primary and secondary based on the response to stretch stimulation (Edin and Vallbo, 1990). In our pilot study, after standardized ramp-and-hold stretches (7.0 mm amplitude at 3.0 mm/sec speed), two types of response were observed. One type, characteristic of primary endings, exhibited a high dynamic peak (the discharge frequency at the end of the ramp phase) (73 ± 3.7 Hz) and a pause in the discharge during the stretch release. The other type of response, characteristic of secondary endings, exhibited a lower dynamic peak value (38 ± 6.5 Hz) and a continuous discharge during the stretch release.
After each unit was recorded, the electrode position was marked (50 µA negative current for 10 sec), and at the end of the experiment, the rats brain was removed under deep anesthesia for histological sectioning (50-µm frozen sections, cresyl violet staining). The electrode positioning was checked histologically, based on the electrolytic markings and signs of electrode penetration (Fig. 1
).
|
For units showing an initial burst of response at the onset of stretch, we assessed the dynamic index to examine speed-sensitivity, and the static index to examine length-sensitivity. The dynamic index was calculated as the difference between the peak instantaneous frequency of the ramp-stretch and the frequency at 0.5 sec of the hold phase of stimulation (Crowe and Matthews, 1964). The static index was calculated as the average firing frequency in the interval of 0.5 to 1 sec during the hold phase of stimulation.
Statistical Analysis
Data from all groups and subgroups were compared with repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by Scheffés post hoc test (5% significance level). The software Statview for Windows, version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), aided in statistical analysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Typical examples of masseter muscle spindle-afferent activity recorded from the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus are shown in Fig. 2
. One hundred and 32 units responded with a high dynamic peak followed by a pause in discharge during release from stretch, and were thus classified as primary endings. Analyses were performed with masseter muscle spindle-afferent activity by 3 consecutive ramp-and-hold stretches from each unit. In the iOVD group, 270 responses were recorded from 90 units (25 rats), while in the control, 126 responses were recorded from 42 units (10 rats). Electrical stimulation of the masseter nerve evoked unit responses in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus with a latency of 0.5 ± 0.05 ms (± SD). With the conduction distance from the site of stimulation to the recording electrode in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus estimated at 20 mm, the mean conduction velocity of the recorded afferents was 40.3 ± 3.9 m/s (± SD).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the muscles throughout the body, primary endings are more predominant (Edin and Vallbo, 1990; Johansson et al., 1991; Ribot-Ciscar et al., 2000). Likewise, in the masseter muscle, primary endings were found to be nearly twice as frequent as secondary ones (Yabushita et al., 2005). The discharge of a primary ending indicates both muscular length changes (static sensitivity) and velocity of length changes (dynamic sensitivity), whereas the discharge of a secondary ending provides mainly information about length changes (McCloskey, 1978). In the present study, we needed information about the changes in speed- and length-sensitivity after long-term bite-raising; therefore, we chose to analyze further the responses of primary endings only.
In this study, the recording method was different from that used in our previous study (Yabushita et al., 2005). This time, we recorded muscle spindle afferents from the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus, whereas we had previously recorded, from the masseteric nerve, the activity of muscle spindles that were de-efferented during recording. Therefore, with the recording method used in this study, the gamma motoneurons (Lund et al., 1979) remained intact. The sensitivity to both length and velocity can be altered by the CNS via activity in the fusimotor system, the static gamma system controlling length sensitivity, and the dynamic gamma system controlling velocity sensitivity (Hunt, 1990). Nevertheless, the results of this study were similar to those of our previous study in the change of spindle sensitivity. In both studies, the decrease of masseter muscle spindle-sensitivity up to 2 wks after establishment of an iOVD condition was significant. The changes in spindle function may be attributed to one or more of the following: (1) increased muscle stretch changing the responsiveness of the units per se, (2) stimulation of intra-oral (e.g., periodontal) afferent input by the occlusal resin build-up, or (3) changes in occlusal function producing changes in CNS masticatory controls.
We assessed the dynamic index to examine speed-sensitivity, and the static index to examine length-sensitivity. In the iOVD groups, the dynamic index returned to the original value (the value obtained at 1 day of iOVD) earlier than did the static index, suggesting that the adaptability of length-sensitivity could be higher than that of speed-sensitivity. However, both the dynamic index and the static index of masseter muscle spindles were able to recover to their original values in 4 to 6 wks of iOVD. Since the information from jaw-muscle spindles in general is also used in recognizing movement and position of the mandible, the recovery of jaw-muscle spindle sensitivity under long-term iOVD may indicate that these receptors are able to adapt to changes in occlusal vertical dimension, and, in turn, provide adaptability to the cognitive faculty of mandibular movement.
It has been repeatedly suggested that inputs from jaw muscle spindles would be involved in the physiological mechanism of OVD regulation (e.g., Yagi et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2003). Thus, sensory feedback from the jaw muscle could be blamed for the instability and relapse of occlusal treatments. Nevertheless, in this study there was no significant difference between the properties of muscle-spindle sensitivity of normal rats and and those of long-term iOVD rats. This result suggests that masseter muscle spindles may ultimately adapt to iOVD, and thus supports the idea that, clinically, the relapse of occlusal treatments would not be dependent on peripheral receptors.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received December 8, 2004; Last revision April 6, 2006; Accepted May 24, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Broekhuijsen ML, van Willigen JD (1983). Factors influencing jaw position sense in man. Arch Oral Biol 28:387391.[ISI][Medline]
Crowe A, Matthews PB (1964). The effects of stimulation of static and dynamic fusimotor fibers on the response of stretching of the primary endings of muscle spindles. J Physiol 174:109131.
Dahlström L, Haraldson T (1985). Bite plates and stabilization splints in mandibular dysfunction. A clinical and electromyographic comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 43:109114.[ISI][Medline]
Edin BB, Vallbo AB (1990). Dynamic response of human muscle spindle afferents to stretch. J Neurophysiol 63:12971306.
Hellsing E (1990). Increased overbite and craniomandibular disordersa clinical approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98:516522.[ISI][Medline]
Hunt CC (1990). Mammalian muscle spindle: peripheral mechanisms. Physiol Rev 70:643663.
Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P (1991). Fusimotor reflex profiles of individual triceps surae primary muscle spindle afferents assessed with multi-afferent recording technique. J Physiol (Paris) 85:619.[Medline]
Lennartsson B (1980). Number and distribution of muscle spindles in the masticatory muscles of the rat. J Anat 130:279288.[ISI][Medline]
Lund JP (1991). Mastication and its control by the brain stem. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2:3364.
Lund JP, Olsson KA (1983). The importance of reflexes and their control during jaw movement. Trends Neurosci 6:458463.
Lund JP, Smith AM, Sessle BJ, Murakami T (1979). Activity of trigeminal alpha- and gamma-motoneurons and muscle afferents during performance of a biting task. J Neurophysiol 42:710725.
Mays KA (2003). Reestablishing occlusal vertical dimension using a diagnostic treatment prosthesis in the edentulous patient: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 12:3036.[Medline]
McCloskey DI (1978). Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev 58:763820.
Paxinos G, Watson C (1998). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 4th ed. New York: Academic Press.
Proske U, Wise AK, Gregory JE (2000). The role of muscle receptors in the detection of movements. Prog Neurobiol 60:8596.[ISI][Medline]
Rakhawy MT, Shehata SH, Badawy ZH (1972). Experimental and histological study of the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth cranial nerve and its relation to the muscles of mastication in the rat. Acta Anat (Basel) 81:586601.
Ribot-Ciscar E, Rossi-Durand C, Roll JP (2000). Increased muscle spindle sensitivity to movement during reinforcement manoeuvres in relaxed human subjects. J Physiol 523(Pt 1):271282.
Ro JY, Capra NF (1999). Physiological evidence for caudal brainstem projections of jaw muscle spindle afferents. Exp Brain Res 128:425434.[ISI][Medline]
Yabushita T, Zeredo JL, Toda K, Soma K (2005). Role of occlusal vertical dimension in spindle function. J Dent Res 84:245249.
Yagi T, Morimoto T, Hidaka O, Iwata K, Masuda Y, Kobayashi M, et al. (2003). Adjustment of the occlusal vertical dimension in the bite-raised guinea pig. J Dent Res 82:127130.
Yoshimura A, Fujitsuka N, Sokabe M, Naruse K, Nomura K, Diwan FH, et al. (1990). Classification of the intrafusal muscle fibres in the frog muscle spindle: histochemical and immunofluorescent studies. J Anat 172:89101.
Zhang W, Kobayashi M, Moritani M, Masuda Y, Dong J, Yagi T, et al. (2003). An involvement of trigeminal mesencephalic neurons in regulation of occlusal vertical dimension in the guinea pig. J Dent Res 82:565569.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |