|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, UNICAMP, Av. Limeira 901, 13414-903, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; and
2 Paffenbarger Research Center, ADA Foundation, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
* corresponding author, jcury{at}fop.unicamp.br
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: Fluid biofilm sucrose calcium phosphorus fluoride demineralization remineralization
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Analysis of the Biofilm and Fluid
Each biofilm was collected with the use of a plastic spatula and immediately placed inside an oil-filled centrifuge tube (Vogel et al., 1997). After determination of the sample weight (± 10 µg), the tube was centrifuged for 10 min (21,000 g) at 4°C to separate the fluid from the biofilm solids. The fluid was recovered with oil-filled capillary micropipettes and deposited under mineral oil on the bottom of a plastic Petri dish until the analyses. The tip of the centrifuge tube was then cut (Vogel et al., 1997), and the remaining biofilm was centrifuged into a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube containing 0.5 M HCl (0.5 mL/10 mg of biofilm wet weight) for extraction of acid-soluble whole biofilm Ca, Pi, and F (Cury et al., 1997, 2000). The samples were agitated by being rotated in a blood agitator at 30 rpm for 3 hrs at room temperature and centrifuged, and the supernatant was collected. The supernatant was then neutralized with NaOH and kept frozen until analyses. TISAB III (Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA, USA) was then added (1:10) just before analysis.
For analyses of total Ca and Pi in the biofilm fluid, quartz nanoliter volume pipettes (Vogel et al., 1990) were used to deposit standardized volumes of the samples or standards into Ca- or Pi-sensitive colorimetric reagents (Vogel et al., 1983). The absorbance of the mixtures, after being mixed, was then read with the use of a 50-µL micro-cuvette (Hellma, 105.202, Müllheim, Germany) in a Beckman DU-70 spectrophotometer. For the analyses of total Ca and Pi in the whole biofilm, the standards also contained TISAB III. The F analysis of all the samples was done on the surface of an oil-covered inverted F electrode with the use of a microscope and micro-reference electrode, held in a micromanipulator, to close the circuit (Vogel et al., 1997). Biofilm fluid samples were diluted with TISAB III (1:10) on the surface of the F electrode by means of micropipettes (Vogel et al., 1997).
Statistical Analyses
The statistical analysis was done with SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., version 8.01, Cary, NC, USA), with a significance level fixed at p < 0.05. We used an ANOVA to test the null hypothesis of no difference among the treatments, for each variable, considering the volunteers as statistical blocks. The assumptions of equality of variances and normal distribution of errors were checked for each variable, and when assumptions were violated, the data were transformed (Box et al., 1978). Tukeys test was then used for post-ANOVA comparisons. For comparisons between the conditions of fasting vs. post-sugar challenge or fasting vs. reversal of treatments, paired tests were used with each treatment fixed. When the normality requirement for the t test was not satisfied, non-parametric signed tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank or sign test) were used.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
With respect to the biofilm fluid, Ca and F values were higher in the sucrose and glucose+fructose groups, compared with the negative control, but the difference was significant only for Ca in the sucrose group (Table
). After the sugar challenge, Ca concentration increased and Pi decreased significantly in the biofilm fluid of each group, but the post-sugar values did not differ statistically. For F in the biofilm fluid, no significant post-sugar changes were observed, but the sucrose group had a higher concentration when compared with that of the negative control. After the reversal of treatments, a decrease in F values for the glucose+fructose and sucrose groups was observed, which was significant only for the glucose+fructose group.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4.4.
Since only the sucrose group induced EPS formation, the similar Ca, Pi, and F in the glucose+fructose and sucrose groups demonstrated that an increase in biofilm-insoluble EPS (Cury et al., 2000; Aires et al., 2006; Tenuta et al., 2006) was not responsible for the decrease in whole biofilm mineral ions. This decrease is in agreement with previous studies showing that pH cycling of the biofilms greatly reduced the concentration of these mineral ions in the whole biofilm (Cury et al., 1997, 2000, 2003; Pearce et al., 2002). In fact, biofilms formed during exposure to a substrate of lower acidogenic potential such as starch (Ribeiro et al., 2005), or to low sucrose concentrations (Aires et al., 2006), showed an increase in the fasted biofilm Ca, Pi, and F concentrations when tested against the sucrose concentration used here. The significant decrease in the concentrations of mineral ions in the whole biofilms for the glucose+fructose and sucrose treatments during the pH drop (Table
), and the decrease in Ca and Pi during the 24 hrs of exposure of the negative control group to sucrose, are consistent with the low-pH-mediated increase in these ions in plaque fluid (below), which would facilitate their loss to saliva. Finally, it should also be noted that our previous study (Cury et al., 2003), unlike the data presented here, showed no significant changes in mineral ion concentrations when the distilled water and sucrose treatments were reversed (Table
). We believe that these different results are due, as discussed in our earlier publication (Cury et al., 2003), to the difference in the ages of the biofilms (28 days vs. 14 days).
The lower baseline pH found in the glucose+fructose and sucrose biofilms (Table
) could be related to the residual production of acids by bacteria during fasting (Marsh and Martin, 1992), due to bacterial consumption of intracellular polysaccharide (Tenuta et al., 2006). During the sugar challenge, the lower pH observed for glucose+fructose and sucrose groups, when compared with the negative control, could be due to the high percentage of lactobacilli in these biofilms (Ribeiro et al., 2005; Tenuta et al., 2006), as well as the much higher concentration of Pi, and hence phosphate buffering, in the distilled water biofilm. The higher Ca concentration in the fluid of the fasted biofilm formed under exposure to sucrose, compared with the control, is in accordance with its lower baseline pH. Similarly, the higher F concentration in the post-sugar sucrose biofilm fluid may be due to its lower pH.
The decrease in Pi concentration in the fluid after the sugar challenge has been observed in other studies (Margolis and Moreno, 1992) and may be due to the uptake of Pi by fermenting bacteria. In fact, an increase in phosphate in fluid has been observed after an in vitro acid treatment, when no utilization of phosphate by bacteria was expected (Vogel et al., 2000b). A dilution effect due to the applied sugar solution could also have played a role in the decreased concentration (Vogel et al., 2001). Similarly, and in accord with other studies done in the absence of F rinse or dentifrices, no significant increase in post-sugar biofilm F was observed (Pearce et al., 1999; Tanaka and Margolis, 1999; Vogel et al., 2002). Such a result may also be due to uptake by bacteria during the pH fall (Hamilton, 1990) or by enamel (Tanaka and Margolis, 1999; ten Cate et al., 2003).
Although the initial and post-sugar pHs of the distilled water group were higher than those of the other groups, a similar or larger increase in the biofilm fluid Ca was observed (Table
). This suggests that some of the increased Ca in this biofilm reservoir is being released by a modest pH change. It should be noted in this regard that the total Ca concentration in the distilled water control biofilm greatly exceeded the Ca-binding capacity of oral bacteria (Rose et al., 1993), which suggests that some of this increase can be accounted for by Ca mineral reservoirs. Increases in whole biofilm mineral ions following the administration of Ca and Pi (Vogel et al., 2000a) or Ca, Pi, and F supplements (Pearce et al., 1999) have generally not produced increases in biofilm fluid concentrations, at least in fasted plaque, suggesting the existence of equilibrium or a homeostatic mechanism that maintains ion concentration in the fluid, regardless of its concentration in the whole biofilm. Mobilization of Ca to the fluid during an acidogenic challenge, however, has been observed in mineral-supplemented biofilms (Pearce et al., 1999; Vogel et al., 2000a). In the current study, the higher pH of the high-mineral distilled water group militates against the observation of such an effect.
In conclusion, the findings suggest that a carbohydrate-mediated reduction in the accumulation of Ca, Pi, and F in biofilms may not result in a reduction of the concentrations of these ions in the biofilm fluid, in either resting or challenged plaque. It appears that other factors, such as equilibrium processes in the biofilms, as well as differences in pH, may be more relevant.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
DISCLAIMER
Certain commercial materials and equipment are identified in this paper to specify the experimental procedure. In no instance does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or the American Dental Association Foundation, or that the material or the equipment identified is necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Received October 19, 2005; Last revision May 15, 2006; Accepted May 26, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978). Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Carey CM, Gregory TM, Rupp NW, Tatevossian A, Vogel GL (1986). The driving forces in human dental plaque fluid for demineralization and remineralization of enamel mineral. In: Factors relating to demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Leach SA, editor. Oxford: IRL Press, pp. 163173.
Cury JA, Rebello MA, Del Bel Cury AA (1997). In situ relationship between sucrose exposure and the composition of dental plaque. Caries Res 31:356360.[ISI][Medline]
Cury JA, Rebello MA, Del Bel Cury AA, Derbyshire MT, Tabchoury CP (2000). Biochemical composition and cariogenicity of dental plaque formed in the presence of sucrose or glucose and fructose. Caries Res 34:491497.[ISI][Medline]
Cury JA, Marques AS, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA (2003). Composition of dental plaque formed in the presence of sucrose and after its interruption. Braz Dent J 14:147152.[Medline]
Gao XJ, Fan Y, Kent RL Jr, Van Houte J, Margolis HC (2001). Association of caries activity with the composition of dental plaque fluid. J Dent Res 80:18341839.
Hamilton IR (1990). Biochemical effects of fluoride on oral bacteria. J Dent Res 69(Spec Iss):660667.
Kaufman HW, Kleinberg I (1973). X-ray diffraction examination of calcium phosphate in dental plaque. Calcif Tissue Res 11:97104.[ISI][Medline]
Margolis HC, Moreno EC (1992). Composition of pooled plaque fluid from caries-free and caries-positive individuals following sucrose exposure. J Dent Res 71:17761784.
Margolis HC, Moreno EC (1994). Composition and cariogenic potential of dental plaque fluid. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 5:125.
Marsh P, Martin M (1992). Oral microbiology. 3rd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
Paes Leme AF, Dalcico R, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, Rosalen PL, Cury JA (2004). In situ effect of frequent sucrose exposure on enamel demineralization and on plaque composition after APF application and F dentifrice use. J Dent Res 83:7175.
Pearce EI, Margolis HC, Kent RL Jr (1999). Effect of in situ plaque mineral supplementation on the state of saturation of plaque fluid during sugar-induced acidogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 107:251259.[ISI][Medline]
Pearce EI, Sissons CH, Coleman M, Wang X, Anderson AS, Wong L (2002). The effect of sucrose application frequency and basal nutrient conditions on the calcium and phosphate content of experimental dental plaque. Caries Res 36:8792.[ISI][Medline]
Pecharki GD, Cury JA, Paes Leme AF, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, Rosalen PL, et al. (2005). Effect of sucrose containing iron (II) on dental biofilm and enamel demineralization in situ. Caries Res 39:123129.[ISI][Medline]
Ribeiro CC, Tabchoury CP, Del Bel Cury AA, Tenuta LM, Rosalen PL, Cury JA (2005). Effect of starch on the cariogenic potential of sucrose. Br J Nutr 94:4450.[ISI][Medline]
Rose RK, Dibdin GH, Shellis RP (1993). A quantitative study of calcium binding and aggregation in selected oral bacteria. J Dent Res 72:7884.
Rose RK, Shellis RP, Lee AR (1996). The role of cation bridging in microbial fluoride binding. Caries Res 30:458464.[ISI][Medline]
Sullivan RJ, Charig A, Blake-Haskins J, Zhang YP, Miller SM, Strannick M, et al. (1997). In vivo detection of calcium from dicalcium phosphate dihydrate dentifrices in demineralized human enamel and plaque. Adv Dent Res 11:380387.[Abstract]
Tanaka M, Margolis HC (1999). Release of mineral ions in dental plaque following acid production. Arch Oral Biol 44:253258.
ten Cate JM, Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF, Fejerskov O (2003). Chemical interactions between the tooth and oral fluids. In: Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM, editors. Copenhagen: Blackwell Munksgaard, pp. 4969.
Tenuta LM, Ricomini Filho AP, Del Bel Cury AA, Cury JA (2006). Effect of sucrose on the selection of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in dental biofilm formed in situ. Caries Res (accepted).
Vogel GL, Chow LC, Brown WE (1983). A microanalytical procedure for the determination of calcium, phosphate and fluoride in enamel biopsy samples. Caries Res 17:2331.[ISI][Medline]
Vogel GL, Carey CM, Chow LC, Tatevossian A (1990). Micro-analysis of plaque fluid from single-site fasted plaque. J Dent Res 69:13161323.
Vogel GL, Mao Y, Carey CM, Chow LC (1997). Increased overnight fluoride concentrations in saliva, plaque, and plaque fluid after a novel two-solution rinse. J Dent Res 76:761767.
Vogel GL, Zhang Z, Carey CM, Ly A, Chow LC, Proskin HM (2000a). Composition of plaque and saliva following use of an alpha-tricalcium-phosphate-containing chewing gum and a subsequent sucrose challenge. J Dent Res 79:5862.
Vogel GL, Zhang Z, Chow LC, Carey CM, Schumacher GE, Banting DW (2000b). Effect of in vitro acidification on plaque fluid composition with and without a NaF or a controlled-release fluoride rinse. J Dent Res 79:983990.
Vogel GL, Zhang Z, Chow LC, Schumacher GE (2001). Effect of a water rinse on "labile" fluoride and other ions in plaque and saliva before and after conventional and experimental fluoride rinses. Caries Res 35:116124.[ISI][Medline]
Vogel GL, Zhang Z, Chow LC, Schumacher GE (2002). Changes in lactate and other ions in plaque and saliva after a fluoride rinse and subsequent sucrose administration. Caries Res 36:4452.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.L. Vogel, G.E. Schumacher, L.C. Chow, S. Takagi, and C.M. Carey Ca Pre-rinse Greatly Increases Plaque and Plaque Fluid F J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 466 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.F. P. Leme, H. Koo, C.M. Bellato, G. Bedi, and J.A. Cury The role of sucrose in cariogenic dental biofilm formation--new insight. J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 878 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |