|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Laboratoire IMEB-ERT 30, Faculté dOdontologie, Université de la Méditerranée, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13355 Marseille Cedex 05, France; and
2 INSERM U559, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France
* corresponding author, Imad.About{at}odontologie.univ-mrs.fr
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: Angiogenesis pulp fibroblasts endothelial cells reparative dentinogenesis
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dental pulp is a highly vascularized tissue, and exposed cavity preparations result in subsequent injury to pulp tissue, including blood vessels and pulp fibroblasts. It has been well-established that injured endothelial cells release signaling molecules to initiate inflammatory reactions and the healing process. Previous studies have shown that the dental pulp has a high regenerative potential. After surgical pulp amputation, healing can occur, with hard-tissue formation in germ-free animals, independently of a local acidic environment (Tsuji et al., 1987; Inoue and Shimono, 1992). In agreement with these studies, we have shown that progenitor pulp cells can be activated in their tissue of origin after pulp amputation (Tecles et al., 2005), and these cells migrate to the injury site in response to injury to endothelial cells (Mathieu et al., 2005). Many studies have been devoted to the study of reparative dentin secretion and have demonstrated the role played by growth factors and signaling molecules from the dentin and enamel in this process (Goldberg and Smith, 2004). However, after pulp amputation, complete pulp healing requires not only reparative dentin production but also neoangiogenesis and nerve fiber growth. Pulp cells express VEGF in healthy and pathological situations such as irreversible pulpitis, suggesting a role for pulp cells in angiogenesis (Artese et al., 2002). The aim of this work was to investigate the interaction of pulp fibroblasts with the vascular system by a study of the possible role of pulp cells in angiogenesis, particularly after injury.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture and Transduction
Human pulp fibroblasts were prepared from immature third molars as described previously (About et al., 2000). Briefly, the teeth were obtained from 16-year-old adolescents in compliance with French legislation (informed patients and parents consent, and Institutional Review Board approval of the protocol used). After extraction, the teeth were washed and the apical portions removed. The extirpated dental pulp was minced, and explants were cultured in 100-mm-diameter culture dishes (Becton Dickinson Labware, Lincoln Park, NJ, USA). Confluent cultures were collected by trypsinization and subcultured. The cells were cultured in minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 UI/mL penicillin, 100 µm streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin B (Fungizone). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells from a single donor were routinely cultured in EBM-2 medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum and growth factors at 37°C in a 95% air plus 5% CO2 atmosphere until 8 passages.
Human pulp fibroblasts and the L929 fibroblastic cell line (NCTC, Paisley, UK) were fluorescence-labeled by transduction with Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein as reported previously (Naldini et al., 1996; Mathieu et al., 2004). Similarly, endothelial cells were labeled with Discosoma Red Fluorescent Protein-2.
Effect of Direct Contact between Pulp Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells
Matrigel (250 µL) was poured into a 24-well culture plate and allowed to solidify (37°C, 1 hr). Human pulp fibroblasts or L929 fibroblasts were co-cultured with endothelial cells at a ratio of 80%/20% on a Matrigel extracellular matrix in EGM-2 Bullet Kit medium supplemented with 0.5% fetal bovine serum. Angiogenesis was examined under a fluorescence-equipped phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss Axiovert200, Göttingen, Germany).
Effect of Indirect Contact between Pulp Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells
For studies of indirect contact, pulp fibroblasts were cultured in EGM-medium without fetal bovine serum. Injuries to fibroblasts were performed mechanically, with sterile scalpels used to disrupt the fibroblast monolayer. The conditioned media obtained after a contact period of 5 hrs with intact or injured cells were then used for the culture of endothelial cells on Matrigel extracellular matrix. The culture medium without contact with pulp fibroblasts was used as control. Endothelial cells (4 x 105 cells/well) were seeded on the Matrigel and cultured in the conditioned media described above. After incubation with these media, the endothelial cell organization was observed with a phase-contrast microscope and quantitatively evaluated by measurement of the tubular perimeters in 30 fields of view per group (Salani et al., 2000). To eliminate the pitfalls associated with the use of this assay, we applied random selection of the fields for analysis. Tubular perimeters were analyzed with Scion Image (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD, USA) software.
Neutralizing Assays
Two neutralizing antibodies (R&D Systems, Lille, France) at a final concentration of 20 µg/mL (determined by R&D Systems to give a minimum of 50% neutralization) were used: anti-human vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and anti-human basic fibroblast growth factor (anti-FGF-2). Neutralizing antibodies were added to the conditioned media, either separately or together, from injured pulp fibroblasts. This conditioned medium was then used for the culture of endothelial cells as described above. The medium obtained from injured pulp fibroblasts without neutralizing antibodies was used to indicate the baseline value. The effect of pre-incubating this medium with neutralizing antibodies on tubular perimeters was expressed as a percentage of this baseline value.
Immunohistochemistry
Pulp fibroblasts (5 x 105 cells/mL) were cultured in four-well culture chambers (Falcon, Meylan Cedex, France). Injuries were made with scalpels on confluent cultures as described above. After a five-hour culture period, the slides were fixed in ethanol 70% solution for 1 hr at 4°C. Permeabilization was achieved with 0.5% Triton for 15 min.
Immunohistochemistry was performed on cultured cells in the chambers with anti-FGF-2 and anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (R&D Systems, Lille, France). Primary antibodies were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. Incubation with primary antibodies (10 µg/mL) was performed overnight at 4°C. Immunostaining was revealed with the use of a labeled streptavidin-biotin kit (LSAB, Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA, USA), according to the manufacturers instructions. We created controls by omitting primary antibodies or incubating with unrelated primary antibodies (cytokeratin 19). Blocking experiments were also performed by pre-incubation of anti-FGF-2 and anti-VEGF antibodies with the polypeptides used for immunization. All controls were negative.
Statistical Analysis
For quantitative tubular perimeter analysis, 30 view-fields per group were analyzed. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and each experiment was reproduced at least 3 times. Error bars reflect the standard deviation, and probability values were assessed by the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
FGF-2 and VEGF Expression in Human Dental Pulp Fibroblasts Increases after Injury
Immunohistochemistry showed that both FGF-2 (Fig. 4A
) and VEGF (Fig. 4B
) were expressed at a low level in human pulp fibroblasts. This expression increased after injury (Figs. 4D, 4E
). Control experiments performed on intact (Fig. 4C
) or injured cells (Fig. 4F
) showed negative immunoreactivity.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Co-cultures of pulp fibroblasts with endothelial cells induced tubular organization of endothelial cells, while this was not observed in co-cultures of L929 fibroblasts and endothelial cells. This indicates that pulp fibroblasts express angiogenic signals that can act on endothelial cells.
In an attempt to understand if this direct contact was necessary for promoting angiogenesis, we cultured endothelial cells alone with conditioned media obtained from intact or injured pulp cells. The results showed that angiogenesis promotion was due to soluble factors secreted by pulp fibroblasts. This angiogenic effect was obtained with conditioned culture media after relatively brief contact with intact pulp fibroblasts, and was more dramatic if the medium was obtained after contact with injured cells. The observation of angiogenesis with the conditioned medium from cell cultures without injury is in agreement with that of the co-cultures of both cell types and the immunohistochemical results. The increase of angiogenesis after injury is a very important event for pulp healing, and it is in agreement with the release of angiogenic growth factors from the pulp following orthodontic force (Derringer et al., 1996; Derringer and Linden, 2004).
Immunohistochemistry revealed the expression of VEGF and FGF-2 in pulp fibroblasts. The expression increased shortly after injury (5 hrs), indicating a very rapid response, suggesting a role directly linked to the injury. A confirmation of this angiogenic effect came from neutralizing antibody experiments: Neutralizing antibodies decreased the angiogenic effects of the soluble factors in the conditioned medium from injured pulp fibroblasts. This neutralizing effect was appreciable and was observed with the neutralizing antibodies used separately, indicating that both were released and played a role in angiogenesis. This agrees with the well-known synergistic effects of FGF-2 and VEGF on endothelial cells, in which FGF-2 potentiates the action of VEGF by inducing the expression of VEGF, which in turn increases VEGF receptor expression (Hata et al., 1999). The persistence of angiogenesis after neutralization of FGF-2 and VEGF may be due to the fact that pulp cells secrete other angiogenic signals that remain to be identified.
A previous study has showed that human pulp fibroblasts from healthy and inflamed tissues express VEGF (Artese et al., 2002). VEGF expression and secretion have recently been reported in MDPC-23 cells in response to adhesive resins (Mantellini et al., 2006) or lipoteichoic acid application, suggesting increased expression of this growth factor under pathological conditions (Telles et al., 2003). This growth factor, together with FGF-2, is sequestered in dentin (Roberts-Clark and Smith, 2000), suggesting a role for these molecules in angiogenesis under caries lesions. The release of such factors due to dentin dissolution in caries lesions or after trauma may potentiate the effects seen in this study.
Our work provides clear evidence that human pulp fibroblasts express both FGF-2 and VEGF, and shows that these molecules exert their angiogenic effects as soluble factors. The release of these factors is very rapid and corresponds well to the pathological changes in the pulp following injury. After pulp injury, the odontoblast progenitor cell migration to the injury site may require newly formed blood vessels. These can be initiated by the secretion of angiogenic growth factors by dental pulp fibroblasts, as demonstrated. Additionally, it has been shown that FGF-2 stimulates adult rat dental pulp cells proliferation (Nakao et al., 2004).
Thus, in addition to reparative dentin secretion, pulp cells are involved in angiogenesis. This study contributes to our understanding of the pathophysiology of the dental pulp and the mechanisms responsible for tooth pulp repair. It opens another research orientation concerning the engineering of vascularized dental pulp tissue.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received December 16, 2005; Last revision May 31, 2006; Accepted June 1, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Artese L, Rubini C, Ferrero G, Fioroni M, Santinelli A, Piattelli A (2002). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in healthy and inflamed human dental pulps. J Endod 28:2023.[ISI][Medline]
Derringer KA, Linden RW (2004). Vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor 2, platelet derived growth factor and transforming growth factor beta released in human dental pulp following orthodontic force. Arch Oral Biol 49:631641.
Derringer KA, Jaggers DC, Linden RW (1996). Angiogenesis in human dental pulp following orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 75:17611766.
Ferrara N (1996). Vascular endothelial growth factor. Eur J Cancer 32(A):24132422.
Folkman J, Shing Y (1992). Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 267:1093110934.
Gerwins P, Skoldenberg E, Claesson-Welsh L (2000). Function of fibroblast growth factors and vascular endothelial growth factors and their receptors in angiogenesis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 34:185194.[ISI][Medline]
Goldberg M, Smith AJ (2004). Cells and extracellular matrices of dentin and pulp: a biological basis for repair and tissue engineering. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15:1327.
Hata Y, Rook SL, Aiello LP (1999). Basic fibroblast growth factor induces expression of VEGF receptor KDR through a protein kinase C and p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway. Diabetes 8:11451155.
Inoue T, Shimono M (1992). Repair dentinogenesis following transplantation into normal and germ-free animals. Proc Finn Dent Soc 88(Suppl 1):183194.
Kubota Y, Kleinman HK, Martin GR, Lawley TJ (1988). Role of laminin and basement membrane in the morphological differentiation of human endothelial cells into capillary-like structures. J Cell Biol 107:15891598.
Mantellini MG, Botero T, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Hanks CT, Nör JE (2006). Adhesive resin and the hydrophilic monomer HEMA induce VEGF expression on dental pulp cells and macrophages. Dent Mater 22:434440.[ISI][Medline]
Mathieu S, Prorok M, Benoliel AM, Uch R, Langlet C, Bongrand P, et al. (2004). Transgene expression of alpha(1,2)-fucosyltransferase-I (FUT1) in tumor cells selectively inhibits sialyl-Lewis x expression and binding to E-selectin without affecting synthesis of sialyl-Lewis a or binding to P-selectin. Am J Pathol 164:371383.
Mathieu S, El-Battari A, Dejou J, About I (2005). Role of injured endothelial cells in the recruitment of human pulp cells. Arch Oral Biol 50:109113.
Nakao K, Itoh M, Tomita Y, Tomooka Y, Tsuji T (2004). FGF-2 potently induces both proliferation and DSP expression in collagen type I gel cultures of adult incisor immature pulp cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 325:10521059.[ISI][Medline]
Naldini L, Blomer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, et al. (1996). In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science 272:263267.[Abstract]
Roberts-Clark DJ, Smith AJ (2000). Angiogenic growth factors in human dentine matrix. Arch Oral Biol 45:10131016.[ISI][Medline]
Salani D, Taraboletti G, Rosano L, Di Castro V, Borsotti P, Giavazzi R, et al. (2000). Endothelin-1 induces an angiogenic phenotype in cultured endothelial cells and stimulates neovascularization in vivo. Am J Pathol 157:17031711.
Smith AJ, Lesot H (2001). Induction and regulation of crown dentinogenesis: embryonic events as a template for dental tissue repair? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 12:425437.
Tecles O, Laurent P, Zygouritsas S, Burger AS, Camps J, Dejou J, et al. (2005). Activation of human dental pulp progenitor/stem cells in response to odontoblast injury. Arch Oral Biol 50:103108.
Telles PD, Hanks CT, Machado MA, Nör JE (2003). Lipoteichoic acid up-regulates VEGF expression in macrophages and pulp cells. J Dent Res 82:466470.
Tsuji T, Takei K, Inoue T, Shimono M, Yamamura T (1987). An experimental study on wound healing of surgically exposed dental pulps in germ-free rats. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 28:3538.[Medline]
Tziafas D, Smith AJ, Lesot H (2000). Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy. J Dent 28:7792.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Gandia, A. Arminan, J. M. Garcia-Verdugo, E. Lledo, A. Ruiz, M D. Minana, J. Sanchez-Torrijos, R. Paya, V. Mirabet, F. Carbonell-Uberos, et al. Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells Improve Left Ventricular Function, Induce Angiogenesis, and Reduce Infarct Size in Rats with Acute Myocardial Infarction Stem Cells, March 1, 2008; 26(3): 638 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |