JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Figure 2. Periapical bone resorption caused by endodontic infection. (A) Micro CT image showing the pivot section of a mandibular first left molar and the area of resorption (outlined in white). (B) Comparison of areas (expressed in mm2) of periapical bone resorption in the different experimental groups. SCID animals infected with T. denticola showed periapical lesions of greater size compared with those in SCID and WT animals infected with red complex (p < 0.05). Sham controls presented significantly smaller periapical lesions compared with all other groups (p < 0.01). *p < 0.05. White boxes, SCID mice with T. denticola infection (n = 10; T = 4.555; 0.307 ± 0.132) (n, number of animals; T, variability; mean ± standard deviation). Grey boxes, SCID mice with red complex (RC) infection (n = 9; T = 8.492; 0.203 ± 0.073); checkered boxes, WT mice with T. denticola infection (n = 8; T = 9.58; 0.253 ± 0.091); black boxes, WT mice with RC infection (n = 10; T = 13.67; 0.192 ± 0.045). Sham control (n = 2; T = 7248; 0.115 ± 0.002).





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)