|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Department of Dental Materials and
4 Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Chiba, Japan;
2 Department of Oral Biology and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA;
3 Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong SAR, China; and
5 Department of Research and Development, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan
* corresponding author, Franklintay{at}gmail.com
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: hydrolysis single-bottle 4-MET self-etching nuclear magnetic resonance
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is accumulating evidence showing that these simplified adhesives have poor shelf-lives. Alterations in the composition of a single-bottle self-etching primer at increased storage temperature or prolonged storage time resulted in reductions of resin-dentin bond strengths (Okazaki, 2000). The rate of hydrolysis of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) in acidic solutions increases with temperature (Kazantsev et al., 2003). Conventional methacrylate monomers undergo rapid hydrolysis under acidic aqueous conditions, with up to 90% degradation after 16 wks at 42°C (Salz et al., 2005). 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy revealed that 80% of an aqueous solution of HEMA, acidified to pH 0.94 to simulate the environment of self-etch adhesives, was hydrolyzed into methacrylic acid and ethylene glycol after incubation at 37°C for 14 days. Conversely, control mixtures of HEMA/water incubated at pH 5.57 did not exhibit hydrolysis over the 14-day period (Nishiyama et al., 2004). Hydrolysis of the methacryloxy ester portion of functional monomers was also confirmed when commercial single-bottle-type self-etching primers, containing acidic methacrylate monomers with phosphate or carboxyl functional groups, were stored at 37°C for 10 wks (Fujita and Nishiyama, 2006b). The protonated water clusters generated during the dissociation of the ionic monomers in water function as auto-catalysts for the degradation of the ester linkages within these monomers (Fujita and Nishiyama, 2006a).
Accelerated aging is important in degradation studies. However, since most clinicians or assistants faithfully follow manufacturers instructions by refrigerating these adhesives after use, confirmation of previous results is required with the use of a longer storage period and a lower storage temperature. Moreover, the functional and morphologic correlates of hydrolysis of methacrylate ester bonds are unknown. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine whether hydrolytic degradation could occur when a 4-methacryloxyethyltrimellitic acid (4-MET)-containing, ethanol-based, single-bottle self-etching primer was stored intermittently at 4°C. A one-year storage period was selected, being the half-life of the two-year shelf-life generally recommended for self-etch adhesives. The null hypothesis tested was that one year of intermittent refrigeration of a 4-MET-containing simplified self-etching primer does not result in hydrolytic changes that are identifiable with transmission electron microscopy and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For bonding purposes, non-carious human third molars that were stored in a 0.5% chloramine T solution at 4°C were used within one month following extraction. These teeth were collected after the patients informed consent had been obtained under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. The occlusal enamel was removed by means of a slow-speed saw with a diamond-impregnated disk (Isomet, Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) under water cooling. A 180-grit silicon carbide paper was used under running water to create a smear layer on the dentin surface.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Three teeth each were examined for both the fresh and aged adhesives. The "Self-etching Primer" was applied to dentin for 20 sec with agitation, then was air-dried for 5 sec. The "Bonding Agent" was left at room temperature for 5 min after removal from the refrigerator, applied to the primed dentin, and light-cured for 10 sec. This was followed by placement of a 2-mm-thick layer of light-cured, microfilled resin composite (Epic-TMPT, Parkell Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA).
Undemineralized, 1-mm-thick slabs containing the bonded interfaces were exposed to 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate (pH = 9.5) for 24 hrs according to a previously described protocol (Tay et al., 2002). The silver-impregnated slabs were then rinsed thoroughly and processed for TEM examination according to Tay et al.(1999). Demineralized, but not silver-impregnated, sections were also prepared by being double-stained with 2% uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate, for comparison of the conditions of the stained resin-dentin interfaces. The sections were examined under a TEM (EM208S, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) operating at 80 kV. Since the TEM procedures were performed one year apart, digitized TEM images taken from the two periods were blindly evaluated by two experienced examiners who were unaware of the period in which the adhesive was applied.
13C NMR Spectroscopy
The single-bottle UniFil Bond "Self-etching Primer" was examined immediately after being opened (0 days) and after storage at 4°C for 12 mos (365 days). For each observation period, 0.2 g of deuterium oxide was added to 0.8 g of the UniFil Bond Primer. A 600-mg quantity of the deuterated primer solution was used for each recording. 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K in an NMR spectrometer (EX-270; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), operating at 67.8 MHz, according to the method previously reported by Fujita and Nishiyama (2006a). A 45° pulse angle was used for the NMR observations, with data accumulation and repetition times being 5000 sec and 3.8 sec, respectively. Hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) was used as an external reference. The experiment was conducted twice for each of the two periods.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
,
, and ß were assigned respectively to the carbonyl carbon from the carboxyl group (
) in methacrylic acid, the ester carbonyl carbon (
), and the methylene carbon (ß) linked with the ester bond in ethyl methacrylate. The new peak circle g'assigned to the carbonyl carbon (circle g') linked between 2-hydroxyethyl ester and the benzene ring in 2-ethyl-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-trimellitate or 1-ethyl-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-trimellitatewas indicative of the hydrolysis of the methacryloxy ester bond in the 4-MET (Fig. 4
,
, and
that were respectively designated to the carbonyl carbon from the three carboxylic acid groups in trimellitic acid. In addition, the new peaks
were attributed to the two methylene carbons in ethylene glycol. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A plausible explanation for this phenomenon is summarized in Fig. 4
. 4-META, the acidic methacrylate anhydride, dissociates immediately in the presence of water to form 4-MET. Ester exchange of the carboxyl group of the meta- or para-portion in the 4-MET occurred initially in the presence of ethanol to form 1-ethyl- or 2-ethyl-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-trimellitate. This was followed by hydrolysis of both ester groups in 4-MET. Hydrolysis of the methacryloxy ester portion of the 4-MET and the esterified 4-MET resulted in the formation of methacrylic acid, ethyl methacrylate, and 1-ethyl- or 2-ethyl-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-trimellitate. Further hydrolysis of the ester portion (designated as circle g'), linked with the benzene ring of 1-ethyl- or 2-ethyl-4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-trimellitate, resulted in the formation of ethylene glycol and trimellitic acid. Whereas 4-MET is a polymerizable, moderately acidic dicarboxylic acid monomer, trimellitic acid (1,2,4 benzenetricarboxylic acid) lacks a polymerizable methacryloxy group and is a slightly stronger acid than 4-MET (Brown et al., 1955). The trimellitic acid may continue to etch beyond the original hybrid layer into the underlying mineralized dentin after polymerization of the adhesive (Carvalho et al., 2005). It should be mentioned that such a degradation mechanism was based upon NMR peak assignments of a mixture of degradation products only. Full-proof peak assignments require more detailed NMR analyses of each of the monomers present in the original product, as well as all potential degradation molecules. In the absence of these additional analyses, it is possible that alternative degradation mechanisms exist for 4-MET.
This study examined only the degradation of a commercial 4-MET-containing adhesive that was stored for 12 mos. Understandably, the impact of a 12-month storage period may not be clinically significant, since, in routine dental practices, adhesives are consumed at a very fast rate. However, in our more recent bond-strength analysis of an experimental 4-MET-containing single-bottle self-etch adhesive, we were able to control the commencement of the hydrolytic process by reconstituting the anhydrous adhesive components with water. Our results showed that decline in microtensile bond strength occurred as early as 3 mos when the adhesive was aged at 4°C, and as early as 1 mo when the adhesive was aged at 25°C and 37°C (Tay and Salz, unpublished results).
Since either ethanol or acetone may be used as a solvent in 4-MET-containing single-bottle self-etch adhesives, it is prudent to elaborate on the potential of degradation of 4-MET in acetone. The esterification reaction of the carboxylic acid in the 4-MET occurred in the present study because the UniFil Bond Primer was diluted by ethanol. This was necessary, since 4-MET is insoluble in water. Both the esterification reaction of the carboxylic acid and the hydrolysis reaction of the methacryloxy ester portion in the 4-MET may occur. However, the esterification reaction of the carboxylic acid takes precedence over the hydrolysis reaction of the methacryloxy ester portion in the 4-MET. Conversely, if acetone had been used in lieu of ethanol as the diluent solvent, the esterification reaction of the carboxylic acid would not occur. However, the methacryloxy ester portion in the 4-MET would be hydrolyzed because of the dissociation of the carboxylic acid in the 4-MET.
Apart from carboxylic acid esters, it is known that esters such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP), and HEMA-phosphate are hydrolytically degradable under acidic conditions (Moszner et al., 2005; Salz et al., 2005). It appears that the degradation mechanism of phosphate-ester-containing resin monomers may be even more complex than those of the carboxylic-acid-containing monomers (Fujita and Nishiyama, 2006a). Similar to the carboxylic acid esters, hydrolysis of both the methacrylate and phosphate ester bonds may occur in phosphoric acid esters. However, the hydrolytic stability of the phosphoric ester bonds depends on the level of substitution of the phosphoric acid, with dialkyl hydrogen phosphates being less stable than trialkyl phosphates, and with the latter being less stable than monoalkyl dihydrogen phosphates (Moszner et al., 2005).
Regardless of the acidic resin monomers and the solvent types, it appears that hydrolytic degradation is inevitable as long as methacrylate-based functional monomers are utilized in single-bottle-type self-etching primers and one-step self-etch adhesives. Conversely, amide derivatives of methacrylates were found to be more stable and did not undergo hydrolysis initially at pH 0.94, and began to hydrolyze only after 70 days (Nishiyama et al., 2004). Further studies should be performed on these methacrylamide- or phosphonic-acid-containing self-etch adhesives by correlating chemo-analytical data with ultrastructural findings.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received November 12, 2004; Last revision November 19, 2005; Accepted January 10, 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brown HC, McDaniel DH, Häfliger O (1955). Dissociation constants. In: Determination of organic structures by physical methods. Braude, EA, Nachod FC, eds. New York: Academic Press, pp. 567589.
Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR (2005). A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occur in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 26:10351042.[ISI][Medline]
Fujisawa S, Ito S (1999). 1H-NMR studies of the interaction of dental adhesive monomer, 4-META with calcium. Dent Mater J 18:5462.[Medline]
Fujita K, Nishiyama N (2006a). 13C NMR analysis of the etching efficacy of acidic monomers in self-etching primers. J Dent 34:123133.[ISI][Medline]
Fujita K, Nishiyama N (2006b). Alteration mechanisms and effects on self-etching primers effectuated by the primers storage period. Am J Dent (in press).
Kazantsev OA, Shirshin KV, Sivokhin AP, Telnov SV, Zhiganov IV, Kuznetsov AE, et al. (2003). Hydrolysis of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in concentrated aqueous solutions. Russian J Appl Chem 76:12961298.
Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2003). The effect of concentration and pH of silver nitrate solution on nanoleakage. J Adhes Dent 5:1925.[ISI][Medline]
Moszner N, Zeuner F, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V (1999). Monomers for adhesive polymers, 2. Synthesis and radical polymerization of hydrolytically stable acrylic phosphonic acids. Macromol Chem Phy 200:10621067.
Moszner N, Zeuner F, Angermann J, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V (2003). Monomers for adhesive polymers, 4. Macromol Mater Eng 288:621628.
Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005). Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21:895910.[ISI][Medline]
Nishiyama N, Suzuki K, Yoshida H, Teshima H, Nemoto K (2004). Hydrolytic stability of methacrylamide in acidic aqueous solution. Biomaterials 25:965969.[ISI][Medline]
Okazaki K (2000). A study of light-cured resins, influence of storage temperature of adhesive system on bond strength to bovine dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 43:11871196 (in Japanese).
Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N (2005). Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 7:107116.[ISI][Medline]
Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH (1999). Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699705.
Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003). Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 69:726731.
Tay FR, Moulding KM, Pashley DH (1999). Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid-conditioned dentin. J Adhes Dent 1:103117.[Medline]
Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M (2002). Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 81:472476.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |