JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 3. Pooled in-house µTBS data. (a) Statistical analysis of pooled enamel µTBS data per adhesive class, as gathered at the Leuven BIOMAT research cluster during the period 2001–2004, always using the same experimental protocol (Fig. 2). The central circle/rectangle represents the mean value, and vertical bars denote 95% confidence intervals. Adhesive classes in which the µTBS was not significantly different are connected by a horizontal line. (b) Statistical analysis of pooled dentin µTBS data per adhesive class, as gathered at the Leuven BIOMAT research cluster during the period 2001–2004, always using the same experimental protocol (Fig. 2). The central circle/rectangle represents the mean value, and vertical bars denote 95% confidence intervals. Adhesive classes in which the µTBS was not significantly different are connected by a horizontal line.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)