JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meerbeek, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meerbeek, B.
J Dent Res 84(12):1160-1164, 2005
© 2005 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Hydrolytic Stability of Self-etch Adhesives Bonded to Dentin

S. Inoue1,2, K. Koshiro3, Y. Yoshida4, J. De Munck2, K. Nagakane5, K. Suzuki4, H. Sano3, and B. Van Meerbeek2,*

1 Division for General Dentistry, Center for Dental Clinics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 13 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan;
2 Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Kita 13 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan;
4 Department of Biomaterials, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, and Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8525, Japan; and
5 Department of Biomaterials Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan;

* corresponding author, bart.vanmeerbeek{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Functional monomers chemically interact with hydroxyapatite that remains within submicron hybrid layers produced by mild self-etch adhesives. The functional monomer 10-MDP interacts most intensively with hydroxyapatite, and its calcium salt appeared most hydrolytically stable, as compared with 4-MET and phenyl-P. We investigated the hypothesis that additional chemical interaction of self-etch adhesives improves bond stability. The micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) of the 10-MDP-based adhesive did not decrease significantly after 100,000 cycles, but did after 50,000 and 30,000 cycles, respectively, for the 4-MET-based and the phenyl-P-based adhesives. Likewise, the interfacial ultrastructure was unchanged after 100,000 thermocycles for the 10-MDP-based adhesive, while that of both the 4-MET- and phenyl-P-based adhesives contained voids and less-defined collagen. The findings of this study support the concept that long-term durability of adhesive-dentin bonds depends on the chemical bonding potential of the functional monomer.

KEY WORDS: hydrolytic stability • self-etch adhesive • durability • functional monomer • dentin


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Self-etch adhesives are widely used, mainly because of their ease-of-use, low technique-sensitivity, and good performance in class V clinical trials (Inoue et al., 2000, 2001, 2003; Peumans et al., 2005; Van Meerbeek et al., 2005). Nevertheless, characterization of in vivo-aged adhesive-dentin interfaces revealed signs of bond degradation (Sano et al., 1999; Hashimoto et al., 2000; Takahashi et al., 2002; Koshiro et al., 2005).

Besides micro-mechanical interlocking through hybridization, the potential benefit of additional chemical interaction between the functional monomer and residual hydroxyapatite has regained attention (Yoshida et al., 2004). Specific functional monomers as part of ‘mild’ two-step self-etch adhesives were shown to interact chemically, within a clinically reasonable time, with hydroxyapatite that remains available within the submicron hybrid layer. The specific molecular nature of the functional monomer and the subsequent dissolution rate of its calcium salt have been shown to determine actual chemical bonding efficacy and stability. From the 3 functional monomers investigated, 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) appeared not only to interact most intensively with hydroxyapatite, but also to have the most hydrolytically stable bond with calcium, as compared with 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic acid (4-MET) and 2-methacryloxyethyl phenyl hydrogen phosphate (phenyl-P). We hypothesize that improved monomer-tooth substrate interaction enhances the degradation resistance of the adhesive-dentin bond and thus extends the bond longevity. We therefore determined the hydrolytic stability of 3 self-etch adhesives that each contains one of the 3 functional monomers, through measurement of their micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin, and characterization of the aged adhesive-dentin interface by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), both after long-term thermocycling.


   MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Adhesives and Bonding Procedures
The 3 two-step self-etch adhesives used were Clearfil MegaBond (marketed as Clearfil SE Bond outside Japan), which contains the phosphate-based functional monomer 10-MDP (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan: CMB), Unifil Bond, which contains the carboxyl-based functional monomer 4-MET (GC, Tokyo, Japan: UFB), and Clearfil Liner Bond II, which contains the phosphate-based functional monomer phenyl-P (Kuraray: LBII) (for composition and application instructions of the 3 adhesives investigated, consult the Appendix Table [online]).

Fifty-four extracted human third molars (gathered following consent approved by the Commission for Medical Ethics of Hokkaido University), stored at 4°C in an aqueous solution of 0.5% chloramine, were used. The occlusal enamel was removed by means of an Isomet low-speed diamond saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA), perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth, to expose a flat mid-coronal dentin surface. A standard smear layer was manually produced by wet-sanding the dentin surface with 600-grit silicon carbide sandpaper for 60 sec. The dentin surface was thoroughly washed with water, and immediately dried with moisture-free air. The 3 adhesives were then applied strictly according to the manufacturer’s instructions, after which the bonded surfaces were incrementally built up with composite to a height of 5–6 mm, with Z-100 (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA).

Thermocycling and Micro-tensile Bond Strength Testing
After storage overnight at 37°C, the specimens were sectioned into 3–6 slabs, each approximately 0.7 mm thick, with the diamond saw used with water-cooling, and further trimmed into an hourglass shape by means of a high-speed super-fine diamond bur, ensuring that the narrowest portion was located at the bonding interface (interface area of approximately 1 mm2). The specimens were left untouched (control) or were thermocycled (60 sec of immersion, alternatively, in a 5 and 55°C water bath) during 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 50,000, or 100,000 cycles (3 teeth each adhesive, per thermocycling session).

The control and thermocycled specimens were then pulled apart, following a µTBS protocol, with the use of a desktop material tester (EZ-test, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The µTBS was expressed in MPa, as derived from dividing the imposed force (in N) at the time of fracture by the bond area (in mm2). One-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer test were used to analyze the µTBS data statistically at a significance level of {alpha} = 0.05.

TEM
Two specimens per adhesive, of which one was not (control) and the other was subjected to 100,000 thermocycles, were processed for TEM analysis of the adhesive-dentin interface, according to established specimen preparation procedures, including fixation, dehydration, and embedding in epoxy resin (Van Meerbeek et al., 1998). Ultrathin sections (70–90 nm) were cut by means of a diamond knife (Diatome, Bienne, Switzerland) in an ultra-microtome (Ultracut UCT, Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria). Unstained as well as stained (5% uranyl acetate [UA] for 20 min and saturated lead citrate [LC] for 3 min) non-demineralized sections were observed with a transmission electron microscope (H-800, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 75 kV.


   RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The µTBS of the 10-MDP-based adhesive (CMB) to dentin after 100,000 thermocycles (35.3 ± 7.5 MPa) was not significantly different from that of the control µTBS (40.8 ± 7.9 MPa) (TableGo). The 4-MET-based adhesive (UFB) revealed a µTBS statistically similar to that of the control (37.9 ± 5.9 MPa), up to 50,000 cycles, but after 100,000 cycles, its µTBS was significantly lower (22.5 ± 7.7 MPa, or a reduction of 41%). For the phenyl-P-based adhesive (LBII), the µTBS was already, after 30,000 cycles, significantly lower (reduction of 28%) than the control µTBS (44.7 ± 13.2 MPa), and further decreased to 23.2 ± 7.6 MPa after 100,000 cycles (reduction of 48%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table. Micro-tensile Bond Strength of Three Adhesives after Respective Thermocycles
 
For all 3 adhesives, TEM interfacial characterization revealed the formation of a shallow (0.5–1.0 µm) hybrid layer, with residual hydroxyapatite (HAp) crystals remaining around collagen fibrils. HAp crystals remained most in the hybrid layer formed by CMB (Fig. 1aGo), followed by UFB (Fig. 2aGo), and were only at the bottom of the hybrid layer formed by LBII (Fig. 3aGo). After staining, the submicron hybrid layers of all self-etch adhesives stained heavily electron-dense (Figs. 1bGo, 2bGo, 3bGo). Banded collagen fibrils could more clearly be detected within the hybrid layer produced by LBII (Fig. 3bGo).



View larger version (191K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. TEM photomicrographs of resin-dentin interfaces produced by Clearfil Mega Bond (Kuraray). The photomicrograph in (a) represents an unstained section and that in (b) a stained section of the control specimens that were not thermocycled. The image in (c) represents an unstained section and that in (d) a stained section of specimens that were exposed to 100,000 thermocycles. All sections are non-demineralized. B = bonding resin; H = hybrid layer; U = unaffected dentin.

 


View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. TEM photomicrographs of resin-dentin interfaces produced by Unifil Bond (GC). The photomicrograph in (a) represents an unstained section and that in (b) a stained section of the control specimens that were not thermocycled. The image in (c) represents an unstained section and that in (d) a stained section of specimens that were exposed to 100,000 thermocycles. All sections are non-demineralized. B = bonding resin; H = hybrid layer; U = unaffected dentin.

 


View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. TEM photomicrographs of resin-dentin interfaces produced by Clearfil LinerBond II (Kuraray). The photomicrograph in (a) represents an unstained section and that in (b) a stained section of the control specimens that were not thermocycled. The image in (c) represents an unstained section and that in (d) a stained section of specimens that were exposed to 100,000 thermocycles. All sections are non-demineralized. B = bonding resin; H = hybrid layer; U = unaffected dentin.

 
After 100,000 thermocycles, no difference in interfacial morphology was observed for CMB (Figs. 1c, 1dGo), as compared with non-thermocycled CMB interfaces (Figs. 1a, 1bGo). For UFB, voids were observed at the bottom of the hybrid layer in non-stained sections (Fig. 2cGo), and fewer collagen fibrils (lacking cross-banding) were observed in stained sections (Fig. 2dGo), as compared with non-thermocycled UFB interfaces (Figs. 2a, 2bGo). Although there was no clear difference in interfacial morphology between the unstained LBII sections prepared without and those prepared after thermocycling (Fig. 3cGo), the stained sections clearly revealed a more vaguely organized and significantly less stained hybrid layer with fewer cross-banded collagen fibrils (Fig. 3dGo).


   DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
According to a meta-analysis review (Leloup et al., 2001), thermocycling is not thought to affect bond strength significantly when the specimens are subjected to only 2000 thermocycles. In this study, we aged adhesive-dentin interfaces for many more thermocycles than have ever been reported. Since 100,000 thermocycles took almost 6 mos, and since the resin-dentin interfaces were directly exposed to water (without surrounding enamel protection), the bond was expected to degrade (De Munck et al., 2003; Shirai et al., 2005) and the bond strength to weaken. Likewise, the interfacial ultrastructure should have been altered due to this rather severe aging process. Nevertheless, after 100,000 thermocycles, no reduction in µTBS was recorded for the 10-MDP-based adhesive, in contrast to the µTBS of the 4-MET-based and phenyl-P-based adhesives, which were significantly reduced after 50,000 and 30,000 cycles, respectively.

Micro-tensile bond strengths to dentin and TEM observations after long-term thermocycling in this study suggest that chemical bonding at the interface, as demonstrated by Yoshida et al.(2004), may contribute to the long-term stability of the adhesive bond. The data well reflect the differences in chemical bonding efficiency of the respective functional monomers to HAp, as previously measured by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (Yoshida et al., 2004). That study revealed that, within a clinically relevant application time of 30 sec, the functional monomer 10-MDP was capable of chemically interacting with an intensity that did not further increase with a longer application time. The chemical bonding capacity of 4-MET was doubtful in a short application time, while phenyl-P appeared hydrolytically unstable and showed very weak chemical interaction with HAp, even when applied for 30 min. Besides having an intense chemical bonding capacity, the resultant binding should be stable with time. From the 3 functional monomers tested, the Ca-salt of 10-MDP was hardly soluble, indicating its superior stability.

TEM did not reveal any ultramorphologic difference in interfacial ultrastructure after 100,000 thermocycles for CMB, while some voids and less distinct collagen in the hybrid layer were clearly observed within the 100,000 thermocycled interfaces of UFB and LBII. These results also confirmed the so-called AD-concept (Adhesion-Decalcification concept), meaning that the less soluble the calcium salt of the acidic molecule, the more intense and stable the molecular adhesion to a HAp-based substrate (Yoshida et al., 2001; Yoshioka et al., 2002). At the interface of CMB, numerous HAp crystals were observable (Fig. 1Go). This must be attributed to its functional monomer, 10-MDP, that bonded to HAp and kept it there, thus resulting in a less distinct demineralization effect. Even after 100,000 thermocycles, the stained sections (Fig. 1dGo) showed many HAp crystals within the submicron hybrid layer. This phenomenon indicates that resin appeared to have infiltrated the partially demineralized dentin very well, keeping HAp crystals around collagen fibrils, and therefore preventing collagen fibrils from being stained (and disclosing their typical cross-banding pattern). Keeping HAp around collagen may better protect collagen against hydrolysis, e.g., degradation of the bond (Sano et al., 1999; Hashimoto et al., 2000, 2002; Van Meerbeek et al., 2003).

The other 2 adhesives clearly presented hybrid layers that do not contain many residual HAp crystals as compared with CMB. This means that they demineralized dentin much more and had a lower adhesion capacity (Yoshida et al., 2004). After long-term thermocycling, some voids at the bottom of the hybrid layer (Fig. 2cGo) and fewer and non-banded collagen fibrils within the hybrid layer (Fig. 2dGo) were observed for UFB. For LBII, collagen fibers could still be observed, but were less organized and much less present at the bottom of the hybrid layer (Fig. 3dGo). This indicates that HAp and collagen must have been less protected by the monomers, and more prone to degradation.

To date, a demineralized dentin zone that was insufficiently infiltrated by resin at the bottom of the hybrid layer produced by etch-and-rinse adhesives is thought to be the site where interfacial degradation is expected to begin (Nakabayashi and Takarada, 1992; Sano et al., 1994, 1995). However, with two-step self-etch adhesives (as in this study), the risk of leaving demineralized dentin that was insufficiently infiltrated by resin is thought to be much smaller. Following a self-etch approach, acidic monomers simultaneously demineralize and infiltrate dentin (Nakabayashi and Pashley, 1998). Recent studies, however, have called this assumption into question, since some discrepancies between the depth of demineralization and the depth of resin infiltration were reported for some mild self-etch adhesives (Carvalho et al., 2005). Nevertheless, any remaining insufficiently resin-infiltrated demineralized dentin is considered as the weak point of the resin-dentin bond. Unprotected and incompletely resin-coated collagen fibrils are more easily affected by hydrolysis, enzymatic attack, and functional and thermal stress, eventually resulting in the degradation of the bond (Pashley et al., 2004). Moreover, because the preservation of HAp crystals within the hybrid layer is reported to serve as a receptor for additional chemical bonding (Van Meerbeek et al., 2003; Yoshida et al., 2004), the chemical interaction potential of functional monomers to HAp around collagen fibrils within the hybrid layer may better protect collagen against degradation, as was confirmed by means of bond strength determination and interfacial TEM characterization in this study.

In conclusion, the hypothesis advanced was rejected, because the long-term durability of the dentin-adhesive interface of two-step self-etch adhesives differed, depending on the particular adhesive, and appeared to be related to the hydrolytic stability of the functional monomer itself and of its interaction with dentin. The adhesive that contained the functional monomer 10-MDP, which effectively interacts chemically with HAp within a clinically reasonable time, and the calcium salt of which is hardly soluble, showed no signs of degradation in bond strength and interfacial ultrastructure. Intimate monomer-dentinal tissue interaction is therefore expected to extend bond longevity.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (#15592013), and by the Toshio Nakao Chair for Adhesive Dentistry, inaugurated at the Catholic University of Leuven (B. Van Meerbeek and P. Lambrechts, Chairholders). We thank GC and Kuraray for providing the adhesives.


   FOOTNOTES
 
A supplemental appendix to this article is published electronically only at http://www.dentalresearch.org.

Received May 2, 2005; Last revision August 3, 2005; Accepted August 28, 2005


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR (2005). A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 26:1035–1042.[ISI][Medline]

De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, et al. (2003). Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 82:136–140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H (2000). In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 79:1385–1391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga M, Kudou Y, et al. (2002). Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res 63:306–311.[ISI][Medline]

Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2000). Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. In: Advanced adhesive dentistry. Proceedings of the 3rd International Kuraray Symposium, Dec. 3–4, 1999, Granada, Spain. Tagami J, Toledano M, Prati CA, editors. Cirimido, Italy: Grafiche Erredue, pp. 131–148.

Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al. (2001). Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:237–245.[Medline]

Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al. (2003). Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 16:329–334.[ISI][Medline]

Koshiro K, Inoue S, Sano H, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2005). In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds produced by a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 113:341–348.[ISI][Medline]

Leloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J (2001). Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 80:1605–1614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH (1998). Hybridization of dentinal hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing, pp. 54–56.

Nakabayashi N, Takarada K (1992). Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 8:125–130.[ISI][Medline]

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, et al. (2004). Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 83:216–221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005). Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881.[ISI][Medline]

Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H (1994). Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent 19:59–64.[ISI][Medline]

Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH (1995). Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:18–25.[ISI][Medline]

Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, et al. (1999). Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res 78:906–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, et al. (2005). Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 21:110–124.[ISI][Medline]

Takahashi A, Inoue S, Kawamoto C, Ominato R, Tanaka T, Sato Y, et al. (2002). In vivo long-term durability of the bond to dentin using two adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 4:151–159.[Medline]

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke ES, Eick JD, et al. (1998). A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77:50–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargus M, Vijay P, et al. (2003). Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235.[ISI][Medline]

Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M (2005). A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 21:375–383.[ISI][Medline]

Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Yoshioka M, Snauwaert J, Abe Y, et al. (2001). Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res 80:1565–1569.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. (2004). Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshioka M, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Nomura Y, et al. (2002). Adhesion/decalcification mechanisms of acid interactions with human hard tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 59:56–62.[ISI][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
K.L. Van Landuyt, Y. Yoshida, I. Hirata, J. Snauwaert, J. De Munck, M. Okazaki, K. Suzuki, P. Lambrechts, and B. Van Meerbeek
Influence of the Chemical Structure of Functional Monomers on Their Adhesive Performance
J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 757 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
D. Fukegawa, S. Hayakawa, Y. Yoshida, K. Suzuki, A. Osaka, and B. Van Meerbeek
Chemical interaction of phosphoric Acid ester with hydroxyapatite.
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 941 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meerbeek, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Meerbeek, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)