|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Department of Operative Dentistry, Study of Biofunctional Recovery and Reconstruction, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Okayama 700-8525, Japan;
2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China;
3 Department of Oral Biology and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA; and
4 Office of Biostatistics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA;
* corresponding author, dpashley{at}mail.mcg.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: dentin caries tensile strength dentinal tubules.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anisotropy of the matrix UTS was recently shown to extend to completely demineralized dentin matrix (Miguez et al., 2004), indicating that differences in the orientation of collagen fibrils and dentinal tubules modify the tensile strength of the matrix. When demineralized dentin is stressed perpendicular to the long axis of the tubules, the collagen fibrils are largely loaded in tension parallel to their long axis, in their strongest direction. If they are stressed parallel to the long axis of the tubules, they are more likely to be loaded perpendicular to their long axis, which would tend to tear the collagen fibril meshwork apart.
A recent report indicated that the matrix of caries-affected dentin has a UTS lower than that of normal dentin (Yoshiyama et al., 2002). The authors found a positive correlation between the UTS of caries-affected dentin and the Knoop hardness of those same specimens. That is, the more demineralized the caries-affected dentin was, the lower was its UTS. Resin-dentin bonds made to caries-affected dentin are lower than bonds made to normal dentin (Nakajima et al., 1995, 1999, 2000; Yoshiyama et al., 2000). The lower bond strengths to caries-affected dentin were attributed to the paucity of resin tags in mineral-filled tubules, and to the weakness of the demineralized matrix (Yoshiyama et al., 2002).
It is possible that the collagen matrix in caries-affected dentin has been weakened by bacterial or host (Pashley et al., 2004) hydrolases. Even though caries-affected dentin contains few bacteria, it may be exposed to soluble bacterial enzymes that could attack the collagen matrix. The purpose of this study was to compare the UTS of mineralized normal and caries-affected dentin matrix, and the UTS of the same tissues after complete demineralization, as a function of tubule orientation, a variable known to affect UTS.
The null hypothesis that was tested was that there is no difference in the UTS of mineralized vs. demineralized normal vs. caries-affected dentin, when the same tubule direction is tested.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-amino-n-caproic acid (50), N-ethylmaleimide (0.5), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.3). After demineralization of the center section for 6 days at 25°C with constant stirring, the varnish on the mineralized ends was scraped off prior to tensile testing. The trimmed specimens were glued to a Bisco microtensile test jig by means of cyanoacrylate cement (Zapit, Dental Ventures of America, Corona, CA, USA). The jig was pulled in tension at 0.6 mm/min in a Vitrodyne tester (John Chatillon & Sons, Greensboro, NC, USA).
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because caries-affected dentin had a UTS lower than that of normal dentin (Yoshiyama et al., 2003), many had assumed that the collagen matrix might have been weakened. However, others contend that, since caries-affected dentin matrix is capable of remineralizing, the collagen must be normal and would be expected to have the same UTS as normal demineralized dentin. Whether the data were evaluated in the raw or ranked UTS, there was no significant difference between the UTS for normal demineralized dentin vs. caries-affected demineralized dentin when tested parallel to the tubule axis (7.95 ± 2.06 vs. 7.27 ± 1.86 MPa raw, or 11.50 ± 5.95 vs. 9.50 ± 6.02 MPa on ranked data, respectively). When tested perpendicular to the tubule axis, the UTS for normal demineralized dentin vs. caries-affected demineralized dentin matrix was 16.39 ± 5.26 vs. 18.53 ± 2.97 MPa in raw values and 28.60 ± 6.90 vs. 32.40 ± 4.27 MPa in ranked data (Table
). Our raw UTS data are very similar to those obtained by Miguez et al.(2004).
Thus, it is clear that while the UTS for "mineralized" caries-affected dentin is less than half that for normal dentin, this difference is lost after the matrices are completely demineralized. The lower bond strengths of adhesive resins to caries-affected dentin (Nakajima et al., 1995, 1999; Yoshiyama et al., 2000, 2002) cannot be due to weakened matrices, but must be associated with a lack of mineral around and within the collagen fibrils (Kinney et al., 2003).
The relative contributions of the mineral and collagen phases to the overall UTS of dentin can be determined by examination of the interaction of dentin and mineralization, independent of tubule orientation (Table
). In normal dentin, the ranked demineralized dentin UTS divided by the ranked mineralized UTS equals 0.287. This means that 28.7% of the total strength of normal dentin was due to the contribution of the collagen matrix, while the remaining (10028.7) 71.3% was due to the mineral phase of dentin. However, in carious dentin, the ranked UTS of partially demineralized dentin (as evidenced by the ranked UTS for mineralized carious dentin being 51.2 MPa instead of 69.9 MPa in normal dentin) was already lower than normal. Since the demineralized carious matrix had a normal ranked UTS (i.e., 20.9 MPa), the ratio of the demineralized to "mineralized" ranked UTS was 0.410 (Table
). That is, in caries-affected dentin, 41% of the UTS was due to the collagen matrix, and 59% was due to the mineral phase.
If resin does not infiltrate demineralized matrices as far as did the acid etchant, then the retention of bonded resin composites would be limited to the weakest link in the substrate, namely, the residual naked matrix at about 2021 MPa, depending on whether the substrate was normal or carious.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received April 27, 2005; Last revision July 21, 2005; Accepted July 24, 2005
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bowen RE, Rodriguez MS (1962). Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 64:378387.
Carvalho RM, Fernandes CA, Villanueva R, Wang L, Pashley DH (2001). Tensile strength of human dentin as a function of tubule orientation and density. J Adhes Dent 3:309314.[Medline]
Craig RG, Peyton FA (1958). Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 37:710718.
Doi J, Itota T, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2004). Bonding to root caries by a self-etching adhesive system containing MDPB. Am J Dent 17:8993.[ISI][Medline]
Inoue S, Pereira PN, Kawamoto C, Nakajima M, Koshiro K, Tagami J, et al. (2003). Effect of depth and tubule direction on ultimate tensile strength of human coronal dentin. Dent Mater J 22:3947.[ISI][Medline]
Kinney JH, Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW (2003). The importance of intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen on the mechanical properties of dentin. J Dent Res 82:957961.
Lehman ML (1967). Tensile strength of human dentin. J Dent Res 46:197201.
Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JEA, Messer HH (2001). Anisotropy of tensile strength of root dentin. J Dent Res 80:453456.
Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Atsawasuwan P, Yamauchi M (2004). Collagen cross-linking and ultimate tensile strength of dentin. J Dent Res 83:807810.
Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, et al. (1995). Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesive. J Dent Res 74:16791688.
Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, Tagami J, Pashley DH (1999). Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. caries-affected dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus. J Dent Res 78:12981303.
Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH (2000). Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25:210.[ISI][Medline]
Pashley DH, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Ito S (2004). Degradation of dentin collagen by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 83:216221.
Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH (1994). Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 73:12051211.
Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH (1995). Tensile properties of resin-infiltrated demineralized human dentin. J Dent Res 74:10931102.
Sögaard-Pedersen B, Boye H, Matthiessen ME (1990). Scanning electron microscope observations on collagen fibers in human dentin and pulp. Scand J Dent Res 98:8995.[ISI][Medline]
Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH (2000). Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25:163169.[ISI][Medline]
Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, et al. (2002). Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 81:556560.
Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Torii Y, Nishitani Y, Doi J, Itou K, et al. (2003). Resin adhesion to carious dentin. Am J Dent 16:4752.[ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |