|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Department of Periodontology and
2 Research Group for Microbial adhesion, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; and
3 Holder of the P.-I. Brånemark chair in osseointegration;
* corresponding author, Marc.Quirynen{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: chlorhexidine dental plaque periodontal disease periodontal therapy root caries
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we undertook a longitudinal examination of whether initial periodontal therapy causes an intra-oral microbial shift, both supra- and subgingivally, from a periopathogenic to a more cariogenic flora, and if so, whether such a shift can be prevented. [The clinical observations will be discussed in a separate paper (Quirynen et al., 2005).]
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
the root length) was present. All subjects were in good general health, and none of them had used antimicrobial agents 4 mos prior to the study. After an explanation of the therapy, all participants signed an informed consent. The protocol was approved by the Clinical Trials Committee of the University Hospital.
Experimental Design
A clinician who was informed about the baseline clinical data (but not about the content of the treatment strategies) randomly allocated the participants consecutively to one of the following groups:
|
|
Microbiological Parameters
Just prior to the first session of scaling and root planing (baseline), and after 2, 4, and 8 mos, microbial samples were taken from:
The samples were dispersed in Reduced Transport Fluid (Syed and Loesche, 1973), homogenized by being vortexed for 30 sec, transferred to the Laboratory of Microbiology, and processed in under 24 hrs. The samples were cultured under aerobic and anaerobic conditions in specific and
-specific media, including a TYCSB medium for the isolation of S. mutans (Van Palenstein-Helderman et al., 1983) and a Rogosa medium for lactobacilli (Rogosa et al., 1951; Schüpbach et al., 1995). Details concerning the growth conditions, colony selection, pure culturing, and final identification of specific species (cariogenic species as well as periopathogens) have been summarized previously (Quirynen et al., 1999a). The microbiological evaluation was performed blindly.
Statistical Analysis
A linear mixed model was fitted. The repeated character of the data was modeled in the error matrix, of which the Akaike's Information Criterion showed that a compound error structure was the best fit. Residual analysis required the data to be log-transformed. P-values for the multiple comparisons were corrected for simultaneous hypotheses according to the Tukey-Kramer method. For all data, corrections for differences between and among groups at baseline were carried out, even though these differences were never statistically significant. For statistical significance, P-value was set at p
0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The detection frequency for periopathogens in subgingival plaque samples decreased over time in all groups, with the largest reductions for the CHX+F group (Table 3A
). The reductions were most obvious and longstanding for P. gingivalis, but were negligible for F. nucleatum. The number of CFU for black-pigmented bacteria (Table 3B
) in pockets around single-rooted teeth showed a significant reduction (p
0.05, borderline for NC) over time for all treatment groups. Also, for multi-rooted teeth, reductions were observed up to month 8, but these reductions reached a level of statistical significance only for the CHX and the CHX+F groups, respectively. For the FRP and F groups, the reduction was statistically significant up to month 2 only.
Numbers of CFU for Anaerobic Bacteria
Compared with baseline, the FRP, CHX, and CHX+F groups showed significant reductions in the numbers of CFU in supragingival plaque (p always < 0.01; up to month 2 for CHX, and up to month 8 for FRP and CHX+F), for both single- and multi-rooted teeth (Table 3B
). For the subgingival flora around single- and multi-rooted teeth, significant reductions (p < 0.01) were observed in all groups up to month 8, except in the NC group. The changes in the numbers of anaerobic species in tongue samples were generally negligible. Compared with baseline, only CHX+F (p < 0.001, entire period) and CHX (p = 0.002; month 2) were successful in reducing the number of anaerobic bacteria. No significant changes were detected in the saliva.
Numbers of CFU for Aerobic Bacteria
Compared with baseline, only the FRP, CHX, and CHX+F groups showed significant reductions in the numbers of CFU in supragingival plaque (p always < 0.01; up to month 2 for CHX and month 8 for FRP and CHX+F), from both single- and multi-rooted teeth (Table 3B
). For the subgingival flora around single- and multi-rooted teeth, significant reductions (p < 0.01) were observed for all groups, but with the smallest changes for the NC group. These changes could be maintained up to month 8 for all treatment strategies. The changes in the numbers of aerobic species in tongue samples were negligible. Compared with baseline, only CHX+F (p < 0.01, entire period) and CHX (p = 0.002, month 2) were successful in reducing the numbers of aerobic bacteria. No significant changes were detected in the saliva.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The changes in detection frequency of lactobacilli were less impressive. In contrast to S. mutans, this species showed a decrease in detection frequency for all groups.
Analysis of the data from the antiseptic groups gave some indications of how this overgrowth of S. mutans could be prevented. It was shown that chlorhexidine is a very potent antimicrobial against S. mutans. In both groups where chlorhexidine was used, S. mutans was decreased below detection levels in all sample locations within the oral cavity, at least as long as the antiseptic was used. This finding is in agreement with those from several other studies that evaluated only saliva and/or supragingival plaque samples (for review, see Emilson, 1994). The beneficial impact of amine fluoride/stannous fluoride on the suppression of S. mutans is in accordance with findings reported in several papers on the suppression of S. mutans by stannous fluoride alone (Zickert et al., 1987; Wallman et al., 1998). Moreover, other clinical studies clearly showed significant reductions of S. mutans after subjects rinsed with a stannous-amine fluoride rinse (Meurman et al., 1989).
The differences between the CHX and CHX+F groups seem to indicate that the subgingival colonization by S. mutans is influenced by the supragingival area. The only difference between these groups, after month 2, was the use of amine fluoride/stannous fluoride in the CHX+F group for the remaining 6 mos. The mouthrinses could have an impact only on the supragingival plaque, since they cannot penetrate subgingivally (Eakle et al., 1986). Thus, in the CHX group, S. mutans probably could re-establish itself supragingivally after cessation of the chlorhexidine, followed by subgingival colonization. This hypothesis must be confirmed by new studies designed for this purpose.
The improved supragingival plaque control could also have played a role, although the impact of the supragingival environment on subgingival recolonization after periodontal therapy is still controversial (Petersilka et al., 2002). It is obvious, however, from our data, that the groups with significantly better plaque control (CHX+F and CHX, the latter up to month 2 only; Quirynen et al., 2005) harbored the lowest numbers of S. mutans.
The relative proportions of S. mutans in the supra- and subgingival samples were quite similar, indicating that this species can grow in habitats providing different conditions. Surprisingly, the microbial load on the tongue did not show major changes after periodontal therapy, including toothbrushing, except when the patients rinsed with chlorhexidine. Probably the extreme roughness of the tongue, with its deep fissures, prevented significant removal of bacteria, thus enhancing regrowth. This observation is in accordance with our previous observations (Quirynen et al., 2004).
In comparison with the 4 other treatment modalities with a more global approach, the inferiority of the NC group in reducing the numbers of anaerobic species, as well as specific periopathogens subgingivally, confirms the importance of one-stage, full-mouth disinfection as we previously reported (Quirynen et al., 1999b). The fact that the NC group, together with the CHX+F group, had slightly more severe (statistically insignificant) periodontal destruction initially, when compared with the other groups, does not explain these differences.
The observation period of this study was too short for significant clinical differences in root caries prevalence to be determined. The microbiological observations from this study, together with the data from previous papers, suggest the need for a caries-preventive program after periodontal therapy.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received February 3, 2004; Last revision October 13, 2004; Accepted October 15, 2004
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eakle WS, Ford C, Boyd RL (1986). Depth of penetration in periodontal pockets with oral irrigation. J Clin Periodontol 13:3944.[ISI][Medline]
Ellen RP, Banting DW, Fillery ED (1985). Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus detection in the assessment of dental root surface caries risk. J Dent Res 64:12451249.
Emilson CG (1994). Potential efficacy of chlorhexidine against mutans streptococci and human dental caries. J Dent Res 73:682691.
Emilson CG, Klock B, Sanford CB (1988). Microbial flora associated with presence of root surface caries in periodontally treated patients. Scand J Dent Res 96:4049.[ISI][Medline]
Hellyer PH, Beighton D, Heath MR, Lynch EJ (1990). Root caries in older people attending a general dental practice in East Sussex. Br Dent J 169:201206.[ISI][Medline]
Hunt RJ, Drake CW, Beck JD (1992). Streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli and caries experience in older adults. Spec Care Dentist 12:149152.[Medline]
Keltjens HMAM, Schaeken MJM, van der Hoeven JS, Hendriks JCM (1987). Microflora of plaque from sound and carious root surfaces. Caries Res 21:193199.[ISI][Medline]
Klock B, Svanberg M, Petersson LG (1990). Dental caries, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and saliva secretion rate in adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 18:249252.[ISI][Medline]
Meurman JH, Jousimies-Somer H, Suonala P, Alaluusua S, Torkko H, Asikainen S (1989). Activity of amine-stannous fluoride combination and chlorhexidine against some aerobic and anaerobic oral bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol 4:117119.[ISI][Medline]
Papapanou PN (1996). Periodontal diseases: epidemiology. Ann Periodontol 1:136.[Medline]
Petersilka GJ, Ehmke B, Flemmig TF (2002). Antimicrobial effects of mechanical debridement. Periodontol 2000 28:5671.
Quirynen M, Bollen CML, Vandekerckhove BNA, Dekeyser C, Papaioannou W, Eyssen H (1995). Full- versus partial-mouth disinfection in the treatment of periodontal infections: short-term clinical and microbiological observations. J Dent Res 74:14591467.
Quirynen M, Gizani S, Mongardini C, Declerck D, Vinckier F, van Steenberghe D (1999a). The effect of periodontal therapy on the number of cariogenic bacteria in different intra-oral niches. J Clin Periodontol 26:322327.[ISI][Medline]
Quirynen M, Mongardini C, Pauwels M, Bollen CML, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D (1999b). One stage full- vs. partial mouth disinfection in the treatment of patients with chronic adult or early-onset periodontitis. Part II: Long-term impact on microbial load. J Periodontol 70:646656.[ISI][Medline]
Quirynen M, Avontroodt P, Soers C, Zhao H, Pauwels M, van Steenberghe D (2004). Impact of tongue cleansers on microbial load and taste. J Clin Periodontol 31:506510.[ISI][Medline]
Quirynen M, De Soete M, Bosmans G, Dekeyser C, Coucke W, van Steenberghe D (2005). Clinical outcome of different one-stage, full-mouth disinfection strategies in the treatment of chronic adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol (submitted).
Ravald N (1994). Root surface caries. Curr Opin Periodontol 78-86.
Ravald N, Hamp SE (1981). Prediction of root surface caries in patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 8:400414.[ISI][Medline]
Ravald N, Birkhed D, Hamp SE (1993). Root caries susceptibility in periodontally treated patients. Results after 12 years. J Clin Periodontol 20:124129.[ISI][Medline]
Reiker J, van der Velden U, Barendregt DS, Loos BG (1999). A cross-sectional study into the prevalence of root caries in periodontal maintenance patients. J Clin Periodontol 26:2632.[ISI][Medline]
Rogosa M, Mitchell JA, Wiseman RF (1951). A selective medium for the isolation and enumeration of oral lactobacilli. J Dent Res 30:682689.
Schüpbach P, Osterwalder V, Guggenheim B (1995). Human root caries: microbiota in plaque covering sound, carious and arrested carious root surfaces. Caries Res 29:382395.[ISI][Medline]
Syed SA, Loesche WJ (1973). Survival of human dental plaque flora in various transport media. Appl Microbiol 24:120127.
Tenovuo J, Lehtonen OP, Aaltonen AS (1990). Caries development in children in relation to the presence of mutans streptococci in dental plaque and of serum antibodies against whole cells and protein antigen I/II of Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 24:5964.[ISI][Medline]
Van der Reijden WA, Dellemijn-Kippuw N, Stijne-van Nes AM, de Soet JJ, van Winkelhoff AJ (2001). Mutans streptococci in subgingival plaque of treated and untreated patients with periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 28:686691.[ISI][Medline]
Van Palenstein-Helderman WH, Ijsseldijk M, Huis in't Veld JHJ (1983). A selective medium for the two major subgroups of the bacterium Streptococcus mutans isolated from dental plaque and saliva. Arch Oral Biol 28:599603.[ISI][Medline]
Wallman C, Krasse B, Birkhed D, Diacono S (1998). The effect of monitored chlorhexidine gel treatment on mutans streptococci in margins of restorations. J Dent 26:2530.[ISI][Medline]
Zickert D, Emilson CG, Ekblom K, Krasse B (1987). Prolonged oral reduction of Streptococcus mutans in humans after chlorhexidine disinfection followed by fluoride treatment. Scand J Dent Res 95:315319.[ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |