|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 School of Dental Medicine, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glückstr. 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
2 Dept. of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, USA;
3 Dept. of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany;
4 Dept. of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; and
5 Smell & Taste Clinic, Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden, Germany;
* corresponding author, siegfried.heckmann{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: dysgeusia gustatory function mood zinc therapy
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blinding and Randomization
Before patient recruitment, blinding and randomization were performed by an independent individual using a special computer software program (RANDOM by Joern Loetsch, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Frankfurt, Germany). To this end, enrollment numbers were established, and the subjects to be investigated were randomized by being grouped. Each group was made up of four patients, i.e., two were assigned zinc, and two were assigned placebo.
Screw-top bottles were prepared containing either 100 zinc gluconate tablets (140 mg, "Zink Verla"®) or 100 placebo tablets (lactose, "Placebo Lichtenstein 10 mm"). The bottles were sealed and labeled with the study code and the enrollment number. After the initial investigation for the baseline data, each patient was given an enrollment number and the corresponding screw-top bottle. The zinc and placebo showed no significant difference in taste. Neither patient nor investigator had any knowledge during the study as to whether the patient was being treated with zinc or placebo. When the study was complete, this information was then revealed by the independent individual.
Treatment
Zinc gluconate (140 mg/day, equivalent to 20 mg/day of elemental zinc; cf. Henkin et al., 1999) and placebo were given to the patients, with 26 subjects receiving zinc (five men, 21 women; mean age, 61.1 yrs; age range, 4182 yrs) and 24 subjects receiving placebo (two men, 22 women; mean age, 61.0 yrs; age range, 4778 yrs). Patients were advised to swallow the drug whole on an empty stomach with ample water. The therapy lasted for 3 mos.
Primary and Secondary Endpoints
The two primary endpoints were the scores of the taste test and self-rated dysgeusia. Gustatory sensitivity was assessed by means of the taste test. To this end, filter paper strips impregnated with 4 different concentrations of 4 taste qualities were placed on the left and right sides of the anterior third of the patients tongue, resulting in a total number of 32 paper strips (Müller et al., 2003).
Before each administration of a taste strip, the patients mouth was rinsed with water. The taste strips were presented in increasing concentrations. Taste qualities were applied in a randomized fashion at each of the 4 levels of concentration. With the tongue still extended, the subject was asked to identify the taste from a list with the 4 descriptorsi.e., sweet, sour, salty, bitterand the respective 4 concentrations (sweet = 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05 g/mL sucrose; sour = 0.3, 0.165, 0.09, 0.05 g/mL citric acid; salty = 0.25, 0.1, 0.04, 0.016 g/mL NaCl; bitter = 0.006, 0.0024, 0.0009, 0.0004 g/mL quinine-hydrochloride). The correlation coefficient for test and re-test in healthy subjects was 0.68 (Müller et al., 2003).
The self-rated impairment due to dysgeusia was recorded by means of a visual analogue scale (10-cm length is equivalent to 100%; no impairment = 0 units; extremely impaired = 10 units).
Secondary endpoints were the results of psychological tests related to depression (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI; Beck et al., 1961) and mood (von Zersen mood scale, ZMS; Heimann et al., 1975). In addition, the levels of zinc, sodium, calcium, potassium, and chloride in both the serum and saliva were analyzed. All measurements were taken before and after therapy.
Based on our clinical experience (Müller et al., 2003), an improvement by 6 points in the taste test can be regarded as substantial, which typically also corresponds to the subjective feeling of an improved sense of taste.
Statistical Analysis
The results were evaluated with the use of SPSS 11 for WindowsTM. For the primary endpoints, an analysis of variance for repeated measurements was performed with the two within-subject factors session (before, after therapy) and test (taste test, self-rated dysgeusia), and the between-subject factor treatment (zinc, placebo). Group comparisons were also performed with t tests for independent samples. For reasons of normalization, differences between the data obtained before and those obtained after therapy were computed. In addition, correlations (Pearson) were calculated between the variables of interest. The alpha level was set at 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
When the secondary endpoints were reviewed, signs of depression or lowered mood were found to have improved in the zinc group (BDI score, t = 2.60, p = 0.012; ZMS, t = 2.13, p = 0.039). No significant group differences were seen for the other parameters investigated, with the exception of the salivary calcium level, which was higher in zinc patients than in controls (t = 2.18, p = 0.034). Interestingly, treatment with zinc had no significant effect on levels of zinc measured in serum (t = 0.83, p = 0.41) or saliva (t = 0.46, p = 0.65).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatment with zinc in cases of dysgeusia is frequently recommended (Heyneman, 1996), although the results of published studies are equivocal. Reasons for these discrepancies are, among other things, the small sample size, the open trial design, inhomogeneous patient diagnosis involving patients with smell disorder or symptomatic dysgeusia, and the inclusion of zinc-deficient patients (Schechter et al., 1972; Henkin et al., 1976, 1999; Stoll and Oepen, 1994; Sakai et al., 2002). To prevent bias and to ensure that the groups of patients studied were homogeneous, we enrolled only patients with idiopathic dysgeusia and, hence, a normal serum zinc level.
In the study at hand, there was a striking gender imbalance, with more females than males suffering from dysgeusia. This is consistent with the clinical experience of our unit for the care of patients with orofacial diseases (Heckmann et al., 2001). It has been suggested that, among other things, hormonal changes may be responsible for the initiation of this symptom (Levenson, 2002).
No significant increase in serum zinc was found in the zinc group. This may be due to the fact that zinc is a trace element and is rapidly transferred into the cells. Zinc is of particular significance, especially in cells with a high-rate turnover, such as cells of the taste buds (Henkin, 1994; Umeta et al., 2000). Thus, for the zinc dosage used, the insignificant change in serum zinc can be explained.
No side-effects were reported in the present study. At higher dosages, however, several side-effects can occur, such as gastrointestinal or hematological disorderse.g., anemia, leukopenia, and neutropenia (Salzman et al., 2002)and zinc intoxication can occur in cases of extreme dosage (Chobanian, 1981).
The presence of elevated salivary calcium in the zinc-treated patients is difficult to interpret. Our speculations center on an increased calcium secretion due to the influence of zinc. In previous studies, a salivary calcium-zinc exchange was observed, whereby the absorption of zinc led to a release of calcium (Ingram et al., 1992).
Several basic scientific studies indicate that zinc is an extremely important factor in gustation. For example, zinc appears to be of significance for the regeneration of taste bud cells (Henkin et al., 1999). Zinc also seems to be crucial in the regulation of metalloprotein expression and, in turn, for the synthesis of growth hormones. Finally, zinc is assumed to influence the activity of carbonic anhydrase VI, and thus, the level of gustin, an important metalloprotein which has been reported to act as a growth factor for taste bud cells (Henkin et al., 1988). However, since the exact role that zinc plays in gustation is not fully understood, further research is necessary to explore the molecular and biological mechanisms underlying the effects of zinc on taste (Seiden, 1997). Nevertheless, from an empirical point of view, analysis of the current data suggests that treatment with zinc is helpful in treating patients with idiopathic dysgeusia.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received October 1, 2003; Last revision October 4, 2004; Accepted November 1, 2004
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Beck AT, Ward CH, Medelson M (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561571.
Brand JG (2000). Within reach of an end to unnecessary bitterness. Lancet 356:13711372.[ISI][Medline]
Chobanian SJ (1981). Accidental ingestion of liquid zinc chloride: local and systemic effects. Ann Emerg Med 10:9193.[ISI][Medline]
Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG, Moore-Gillon V, Shaman P, Mester AF, et al. (1991). Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:519528.[Abstract]
Heckmann JG, Heckmann SM, Lang CJG, Hummel T (2003). Neurological aspects of taste disorders. Arch Neurol 60:667671.
Heckmann SM, Heckmann JG, Hilz MJ, Popp M, Marthol H, Neundörfer B, et al. (2001). Oral mucosal blood flow in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Pain 90:281286.[ISI][Medline]
Heimann H, Bobon-Schrod H, Schmocker AM, Bobon DP (1975). Self-rating of mood using a list of adjectives, Zersens Befindlichkeits-Skala (BS). Encephale 1:165183.[Medline]
Henkin RI (1994). Drug-induced taste and smell disorders. Incidence, mechanisms and management related primarily to treatment of sensory receptor dysfunction. Drug Safety 11:318377.[ISI][Medline]
Henkin RI, Schechter PJ, Friedewald WT, Demets DL, Raff MS (1976). A double blind study of the effects of zinc sulfate on taste and smell dysfunction. Am J Med Sci 272:285299.[ISI][Medline]
Henkin RI, Law JS, Nelson NR (1988). The role of zinc on the trophic growth factors nerve growth factor and gustin. In: Trace elements in man and animals. Hurley LS, Keen CL, Lonnerdal B, Rucker RB, editors. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 385-388.
Henkin RI, Martin BM, Agrawal RP (1999). Efficacy of exogenous oral zinc in treatment of patients with carbonic anhydrase VI deficiency. Am J Med Sci 31:392404.
Heyneman CA (1996). Zinc deficiency and taste disorders. Ann Pharmacother 30:186187.[Abstract]
Ingram GS, Horay CP, Stead WJ (1992). Interaction of zinc with dental mineral. Caries Res 26:248253.[ISI][Medline]
Levenson D (2002). Study finds stroke symptoms differ between the sexes. Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res 13:12, 5.
Müller C, Kallert S, Renner B, Stiassny K, Temmel AFP, Hummel T, et al. (2003). Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated "taste strips". Rhinology 41:26.[Medline]
Sakai F, Yoshida S, Endo S, Tomita H (2002). Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of zinc picolinate for taste disorders. Acta Otolaryngol 546(Suppl):129133.
Salzman MB, Smith EM, Koo C (2002). Excessive oral zinc supplementation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:582584.[Medline]
Schechter PJ, Friedewald WT, Bronzert D, Raff MS, Henkin RJ (1972). Idiopathic hypogeusia: a description of the syndrome and a single-blind study with zinc sulfate. In: International review of neurobiology. Pfeiffer C, editor. New York: Academic press, pp. 125-140.
Schiffman SS (1983). Taste and smell in disease (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 308:12751279.[ISI][Medline]
Seiden AM (1997). The initial assessment of patients with smell and taste disorders. In: Taste and smell disorders. Seiden AM, editor. New York: Thieme, pp. 4-19.
Stoll AL, Oepen G (1994). Zinc salts for the treatment of olfactory and gustatory symptoms in psychiatric patients: a case series. J Clin Psychiatry 55:309311.[Medline]
Umeta M, West CE, Haidar J, Deurenberg P, Hautvast JG (2000). Zinc supplementation and stunted infants in Ethiopia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:20212026.[ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |