|
|
||||||||
PROCEEDINGS |
Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California at San Francisco, 707 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; jdbf{at}itsa.ucsf.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: dental caries demineralization remineralization acidogenic bacteria
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| CATEGORIES OF DENTAL CARIES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| CARIES MECHANISM |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In root caries, the same mechanism occurs as outlined above, initially causing demineralization and exposure of the collagen fibrils (Wefel et al., 1985). Once the collagen is exposed, it is open to breakdown by bacterially derived enzymes, leading to rapid cavitation and breakdown of the dentin in the tooth root (Clarkson et al., 1986; Kawasaki and Featherstone, 1997).
The bacteria that produce the acids fall into the category of acidogenic bacteria and are also aciduric, which means that they can live preferentially under acid conditions (Loesche, 1986). In normal dental plaque, these acidogenic bacteria occupy less than 1% of the total flora. As caries becomes progressive and more aggressive, the environment in the plaque becomes more frequently acidic, and these aciduric bacteria survive at the expense of the other benign bacteria. The most important aspect for the current discussion is that all acids produced by the bacteriaincluding lactic, acetic, formic, and propionic acidscan readily dissolve tooth mineral (Featherstone and Rodgers, 1981). Two major groups of bacteria produce such acids, namely, the mutans streptococci (including Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus) and the lactobacilli species (Loesche, 1986; Leverett et al., 1993). There are undoubtedly other acidogenic organisms involved in dental caries. Until fairly recently, it was considered that early childhood caries, a particularly rampant form of caries manifested in young children, had a different etiology. However, it is now obvious that the same bacteria are involved, but the reasons for the rapid progression of the disease in these children are still uncertain (Alaluusua et al., 1987; Caufield et al., 1993). Pit and fissure caries now occupies much of the caries seen in Western countries, since it appears that common therapeutic measures such as fluoride in the drinking water and in fluoride products is not as effective in these surfaces.
Wherever bacteria have niches in which to live, these acidogenic/aciduric bacteria preferentially survive well. Therefore, orthodontic subjects who have brackets or bands are at high risk of caries, because the bacteria live well in the surrounding edges of these appliances (OReilly and Featherstone, 1987). The same applies to restorations with poor margins and pits and fissures.
| THE CARIES BALANCE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacteria
Antibacterial therapy such as treatment by chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse has been shown to be effective in reducing the cariogenic bacteria (Krasse, 1988). If the bacterial challenge is reduced, then the protective factors have a greater chance of taking over and halting or reversing dental caries (Featherstone, 2000). The natural antibacterial substances in saliva, such as lactoferrin and the immunoglobulins, are obviously not sufficiently active in cases where caries progresses.
Fermentable Carbohydrates
One of the most significant contributions to dental caries is the frequency of ingestion of fermentable carbohydrates. Reducing the frequency of ingestion is a behavioral matter. However, substituting non-cariogenic sweeteners such as xylitol for the fermentable carbohydrates such as glucose, sucrose, and fructose has been shown to be effective in reducing the pathological challenge (Hildebrandt and Sparks, 2000; Söderling et al., 2000).
| SALIVARY FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FLUORIDE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| THE CONTINUUM OF DENTAL CARIES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The process of dental decay can be modeled in the laboratory in chemical or microbiological systems to produce the early manifestation of caries, namely, the white spot lesion, decay around orthodontic brackets, secondary decay around restorations, decay on smooth surfaces or on occlusal surfaces, root caries, and dentinal caries. In general, in the mouth, the process takes much longer than in the laboratory models. The advantage of the models is that much can be learned about processes involved in a much shorter period of time (Featherstone, 1995; ten Cate and Mundorff-Shrestha, 1995). The thousands of experiments that have been conducted and reported in the literature for both in vitro and in vivo experiments readily confirm that the caries lesion is formed by a continuous process starting at the atomic level on the crystal surface in the subsurface of the tooth, and progressing deeper and deeper into the enamel, or, in the case of root caries, starting in the cementum and eventually ending up in the dentin.
The dynamic nature of the process has been modeled in numerous laboratories by various pH cycling models (ten Cate and Duijsters, 1982; Featherstone et al., 1990). To review these studies is beyond the scope of the space of the present article. Suffice it to summarize that these models can produce a continuum of the dental decay process with end results ranging from an almost imperceptible white spot to a cavity. For example, a recent study (unpublished) in our laboratory examined pH cycling (alternating demineralization/remineralization) over a period of 3 wks with 6 hrs of demineralization daily in a pH 4.3 partially saturated calcium and phosphate demineralizing solution and 17 hours of remineralization during every 24 hours, according to methods reported previously (Featherstone et al., 1990). In between each of the de- and remineralization steps, the crowns were subjected to treatment in dentifrice slurries made from a range of products containing, respectively, 2800 ppm F, 1100 ppm F, 250 ppm F as NaF, and a placebo product with no added fluoride. At the end of the experimental time, the teeth were hemi-sectioned and assessed by cross-sectional micro-hardness (Featherstone et al., 1990). The relative mineral loss (volume % x µm) as
Z was linearly related to the negative logarithm of the fluoride content of the products (p < 0.01). The lesion profiles are shown in Fig. 2
. The placebo product contained less than 1 ppm F. In the case of the treatment by the placebo, cavitation occurred in some parts of some lesions, the lesions were deep (
Z approximately 4000) for the period of treatment, and the mineral content remaining in the outer portion of the lesion was on the order of 30% volume mineral (Fig. 2
). On the other hand, the group treated with the 2800-ppm-F product produced lesions that were barely visibly perceptible as white spots, with a low
Z value (approximately 500). This model clearly illustrates the continuum from almost no effect of the strong acid challenge when treated with the high-F product, to major demineralization and cavitation with the placebo dentifrice. These results parallel those of clinical trials involving similar products.
|
Since it has been established that the caries process is a continuum, albeit one that is interrupted numerous times daily, it is therefore possible to intervene at any stage with a therapeutic product or an intervention methodology. If detection methods are accurate and objective enough, then the disease can be followed over time, the rate of progress measured, or the rate of reversal measured (Stookey, 1999).
In summary, dental caries covers the continuum from the first atomic level of demineralization, through the initial white spot (or its equivalent in the tooth root), often through dentinal involvement, to eventual cavitation. All of the steps can be modeled in the laboratory or in the mouth. The dynamic balance between demineralization and remineralization, as determined by pathological factors and protective factors, determines the end result. The disease of dental caries is reversible, if detected early enough. It may be necessary to use antibacterial methods as well as methods that enhance remineralization or inhibit demineralization. With the sophisticated knowledge we now have of the dental caries mechanism and our ability to quantify demineralization at early stages, rather than wait for frank cavitation, intervention methods can be tested by short-term clinical trials.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Caufield PW, Cutler GR, Dasanayake AP (1993). Initial acquisition of mutans streptococci by infants: evidence for a discrete window of infectivity. J Dent Res 72:3745.
Clarkson BH, Hall D, Heilman JR, Wefel JS (1986). Effect of proteolytic enzymes on caries lesion formation in vitro. J Oral Pathol 15:423429.[ISI][Medline]
Dreizen S, Brown L, Daly T, Drane J (1977). Prevention of xerostomia related dental caries in irradiated cancer patients. J Dent Res 56:99106.
Featherstone JD (1983). Diffusion phenomena and enamel caries development. In: Cariology today. Int. Congr., 1984. Zürich: Karger.
Featherstone JD, editor (1995). Clinical aspects of de/remineralization of teeth. Adv Dent Res 9:1340.
Featherstone JD (1999). Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27:3140.[ISI][Medline]
Featherstone JD (2000). The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 131:887899.
Featherstone JD, Rodgers BE (1981). The effect of acetic, lactic and other organic acids on the formation of artificial carious lesions. Caries Res 15:377385.[ISI][Medline]
Featherstone JD, Goodman P, MacLean JD (1979). Electron microscope study of defect zones in dental enamel. J Ultrastruct Res 67:117123.[ISI][Medline]
Featherstone JD, Nelson DG, McLean JD (1981). An electron microscope study of modifications to defect regions in dental enamel and synthetic apatites. Caries Res 15:278288.[ISI][Medline]
Featherstone JD, Glena R, Shariati M, Shields CP (1990). Dependence of in vitro demineralization and remineralization of dental enamel on fluoride concentration. J Dent Res 69:620625.
Hildebrandt GH, Sparks BS (2000). Maintaining mutans streptococci suppression with xylitol chewimg gum. J Am Dent Assoc 131:909916.
Jenkins GN (1985). Recent changes in dental caries. Br Med J 291:12971298.
Kawasaki K, Featherstone JD (1997). Effects of collagenase on root demineralization. J Dent Res 76:588595.
Krasse B (1988). Biological factors as indicators of future caries. Int Dent J 38:219225.[Medline]
LeGeros RZ (1991). Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. Basel: Karger.
Leverett DH, Proskin HM, Featherstone JD, Adair SM, Eisenberg AD, Mundorff-Shrestha SA, et al. (1993). Caries risk assessment in a longitudinal discrimination study. J Dent Res 72:538543.
Loesche WJ (1986). Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 50:353380.
Mandel ID (1974). Relation of saliva and plaque to caries. J Dent Res 53:246266.
Mandel ID (1989). The role of saliva in maintaining oral homeostasis. J Am Dent Assoc 119:298304.[Abstract]
OReilly MM, Featherstone JD (1987). De- and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod 92:3340.[ISI]
Øgaard B, Rølla G (1992). The in vivo orthodontic banding model and the in situ orthodontic banding model for hard tissue slabs. J Dent Res 71:832835.
Radike AW (1972). Criteria for diagnosis of dental caries. In: Conference on clinical testing of cariostatic agents, 1968. Chicago, IL: American Dental Association.
Söderling E, Isokangas P, Pienihakkinen K, Tenovuo J (2000). Influence of maternal xylitol consumption on acquisition of mutans streptococci by infants. J Dent Res 79:882887.
Stookey GK (1999). Practical applications of early caries detection methods. In: Early detection of dental caries II. Indiana Conference 1999. Stookey GK, editor. Indianapolis: Indiana University, pp. 357363.
ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP (1982). Alternating demineralisation and remineralisation of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res 16:201210.[ISI][Medline]
ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP (1983). Influence of fluoride in solution on tooth demineralization. II. Microradiographic data. Caries Res 17:513519.[ISI][Medline]
ten Cate JM, Featherstone JD (1991). Mechanistic aspects of the interactions between fluoride and dental enamel. CRC Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2:283296.
ten Cate JM, Mundorff-Shrestha SA (1995). Working group report: laboratory models for caries (in vitro and animal models). Adv Dent Res 9:332334.[Medline]
Wefel JS, Clarkson BH, Heilman JR (1985). Natural root caries: a histologic and microradiographic evaluation. J Oral Pathol 14:615623.[ISI][Medline]
Zero DT (1995). In situ caries models. Adv Dent Res 9:214230.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Barberia, M. Maroto, M. Arenas, and C. C. Silva A Clinical Study of Caries Diagnosis With a Laser Fluorescence System J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2008; 139(5): 572 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.M. H. Nainar and L. H. Straffon Predoctoral Dental Student Evaluation of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry's Caries-Risk Assessment Tool. J Dent Educ., March 1, 2006; 70(3): 292 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chaussain-Miller, F. Fioretti, M. Goldberg, and S. Menashi The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) in Human Caries J. Dent. Res., January 1, 2006; 85(1): 22 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Kornman Diagnostic and Prognostic Tests for Oral Diseases: Practical Applications J Dent Educ., May 1, 2005; 69(5): 498 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.B. Pitts and J.W. Stamm Preface J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C4 - C5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.B. Pitts Modern Concepts of Caries Measurement J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C43 - C47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |