JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seedorf, H.
Right arrow Articles by Açil, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seedorf, H.
Right arrow Articles by Açil, Y.
J Dent Res 83(8): 608-612, 2004
© 2004 International and American Associations for Dental Research

RESEARCH REPORT
Biological

Amelogenesis Imperfecta in a New Animal Model—a Mutation in Chromosome 5 (human 4q21)

H. Seedorf1, I.N. Springer2,*, E. Grundner-Culemann3, H.-K. Albers4, A. Reis5, H. Fuchs3, M. Hrabe de Angelis3, and Y. Açil2

1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany;
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and
3 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 16, D-24105 Kiel, Germany;
4 GSF National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany; and
5 Gene Mapping Centre, Max-Delbruck-Centre, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, D-13092 Berlin;

* corresponding author, springer{at}mkg.uni-kiel.de


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Candidate genes for amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) and dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI) are located on 4q21 in humans. We tested our hypothesis that mutations in the portion of mouse chromosome 5 corresponding to human chromosome 4q21 would cause enamel and dentin abnormalities. Male C3H mice were injected with ethylnitrosourea (ENU). Within a dominant ENU mutagenesis screen, a mouse mutant was isolated with an abnormal tooth enamel (ATE) phenotype. The structure and ultrastructure of teeth were studied. The mutation was located on mouse chromosome 5 in an interval of 9 cM between markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10. Homozygotic mutants showed total enamel aplasia with exposed dentinal tubules, while heterozygotic mutants showed a significant reduction in enamel width. Dentin of mutant mice showed a reduced content of mature collagen cross-links. We were able to demonstrate that a mutation on chromosome 5 corresponding to human chromosome 4q21 can cause amelogenesis imperfecta and changes in dentin composition.

KEY WORDS: amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) • structure • collagen cross-links • pyridinoline • hydroxyproline


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
AI is a genetic disorder with autosomal-dominant, autosomal-recessive, or X-linked variants (Aldred et al., 2003). The classification of different types of amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) used to be based on the phenotype as a primary discriminator with hypoplastic and hypomineralized subtypes (Winter and Brook, 1975; Sundell and Valentin, 1986; Gibson et al., 1991; Shore et al., 2002). Recent suggestions have centered around the classification of AI on the basis of the mode of inheritance until the molecular genetic basis was clarified (Aldred and Crawford, 1995; Aldred et al., 2003). Clinical and radiographic appearances serve as secondary discriminators (Aldred et al., 2003).

Candidate genes for autosomal-dominant AI include tuftelin (1q), albumin (4q), ameloblastin (4q), and enamelin (4q) (Aldred and Crawford, 1997; Hu et al., 2001; Kida et al., 2002; Mardh et al., 2002). Candidate genes for dentinogenesis imperfecta, like dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), map to the same region, 4q21 (MacDougall et al., 1999; Xiao et al., 2001; Malmgren et al., 2004).

An animal model has been reported regarding X-linked AI in mice, and it has been suggested that a study of these mice could aid our understanding of the function of the protein amelogenin during enamel formation and for developing therapeutic approaches for treating this developmental defect (Gibson et al., 2001).

We hypothesized that a mutation in chromosome 5 of mice could lead to enamel and/or dentin abnormalities. Within the dominant ENU mutagenesis screen, a mouse mutant was isolated with an abnormal tooth enamel (ATE) phenotype. In the course of the present study, we attempted to localize the mutation and to perform an analysis of the microscopic and ultramicroscopic structure of the teeth of mutant mice and to compare them with the teeth of wild-type mice.


   MATERIALS & METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and DNA Preparation
Male C3HeBFeJ mice were injected intraperitoneally with ethylnitrosourea (ENU, 3 x 90 mg/kg body weight; GSF National Research Center for Environment and Health GmbH, Helmholtz Association) at the age of 10 wks. Seven wks later, treated mice were mated with untreated female C3H mice at the GSF Research Center according to the German law governing the protection of animals. From each treated male, 100 F1 (first filial generation) offspring were produced and examined within the ENU mouse mutagenesis screen consortium (Hrabe de Angelis and Balling, 1998; Hrabe de Angelis et al., 2000). Animals found to have an altered phenotype were genetically confirmed by being back-crossed to wild-type C3HeBFeJ animals. The mutation was mapped according to an out-cross/back-cross breeding scheme on a C57BL/6J background. DNA was prepared from tail tips of offspring showing an abnormal tooth phenotype according to standard procedures. For the genome-wide linkage analysis, several markers were used for each chromosome indicating linkage to chromosome 5 between the markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10.

In the present experiment, we examined 2 wild-type mice, 2 heterozygous ATE mutants, and 2 homozygous ATE mutants. All mice were male and 22 wks of age. Mice were formalin-fixed under general anesthesia by vascular perfusion with 4% phosphate-buffered formalin. The jaws were post-fixed at room temperature in the same fixative for an additional 4 days. ATE mutants are reported here for the first time. This animal experiment was approved by German government authorities and was carried out according to the German law for the protection of animals, a protocol that ensures the best humane practices.

Histology
Undecalcified specimens were prepared according to the method described by Donath and Breuner (1982). Frontal sections were prepared for microradiography (3 mAs, 25 kv; time of exposure, 10 min; material, high-resolution plates, Kodak, USA; Faxitron, Hewlett-Packard, Reno, NV, USA) and toluidine blue staining (Springer et al., 2002).

Preparation and Hydrolysis of Samples
Extracted incisor and molar teeth were immediately stored in normal saline solution containing 0.1% sodium azide. The samples were dehydrated in 100% ethanol overnight (room temperature) and dried at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were weighed and dissolved in 1 mL of 6 M hydrochloric acid and hydrolyzed at 110°C for 24 hrs and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min. A 10-µL quantity of each hydrolysate was taken for the assessment of hydroxyproline (see below). One mL of each hydrolysate was added to a mixture of 1 mL acetic acid, 2 mL n-butan-1-ol, and 5 mL 10% CF-1-slurry (fibrous cellulose powder, Whatman, Maidstone, England). We prepared a column by adding the mixture of hydrolysate and CF-1-slurry described above to an econo-column polyprop (40 x 8 mm, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany), and the resin was washed 3 times with 5 mL of the mobile phase. The pyridinium-containing eluate was eluted from the column with 3 x 2 mL of distilled water into a 15-mL plastic tube, and traces of n-butan-1-ol were removed from the surface of the eluate. The lyophilized eluate was redissolved in 1 mL 0.22% (v/v) n-heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA) and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min. A 200-µL quantity of the sample was analyzed. The hydroxylysylpyridinoline (HP) and lysylpyridinoline (LP) content was quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with the use of external standards as previously described (Açil and Müller, 1994; Açil et al., 2002; Springer et al., 2003). The variations within and between the series were 2% and 4.8%, respectively.

Analysis of Hydroxyproline
The assay was performed in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate. A 10-µL quantity of each hydrolysate was diluted with distilled water (1/5 to 1/40). Standard solutions of hydroxyproline ranging from 1 to 5 µg/mL were formulated. A 13-µL quantity of sample or standard solution was pipetted into the wells of the plate, after which a 69-µL quantity of 2:1 propan-2-ol:distilled water was added to all wells. To each well, a 48-µL quantity of chloramine T reagent (5.6 mg/mL acetate-citrate buffer, pH = 6.0) was added. The plate was sealed with a plate-sealer and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Then, a 125-µL quantity of Ehrlich’s reagent (24 g dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, 36 mL 60% perchloric acid, and 200 mL propan-2-ol) was added. The plate was sealed with a plate-sealer and incubated at 70°C in a water bath for 10 min. Absorption was measured on a flow-through spectrophotometer at 550 nm.

Statistics
A correlation coefficient of the dental concentrations of HP and LP, HP and Hyp, as well as LP and Hyp was calculated according to Spearman (Sachs, 1992). Correlation was defined to be significant at p < 0.01 (two-tailed).

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol (from 50% to 100%, 10% steps). Before observation under a scanning electron microscope (Phillips XL 30, Eindhoven, Netherlands), they were critical-point-dried with liquid CO2 and coated with gold.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Within a dominant ENU mutagenesis screen, a mouse mutant was isolated with an abnormal tooth enamel phenotype. In a genome-wide linkage analysis, the mutation was mapped to mouse chromosome 5 in an interval of 9 cM between the markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10. A list of genes located between these markers is provided in the DISCUSSION section of this paper. Heterozygous mutants showed easily identifiable lighter-colored upper incisors in contrast to the wild-type controls. In homozygous animals, the phenotype was obvious.

Microradiographs and toluidine-blue staining of non-decalcified sections showed complete loss of enamel in the front and molar teeth of homozygotic ATE mutants, cracked enamel of reduced width (approx. 50%) in incisor and molar teeth of heterozygotic ATE mutants, and regular structure of incisor and molar teeth of wild-type mice (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Toluidine-blue-stained non-decalcified sections. Regular structure of a tooth of a wild-type mouse (top). Enamel (E) of reduced width of a tooth of a heterozygotic ATE mutant (middle). Complete loss of the enamel of a tooth of a homozygotic ATE mutant (bottom). D, tubular dentin; A, crack (artefact).

 
Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of teeth of homozygotic ATE mutants showed loss of enamel with exposed dentinal tubules (Fig. 2Go). SEMs of teeth of heterozygotic ATE mutants (Fig. 2Go) showed cracked enamel surfaces, while SEMs of teeth of wild-type mice appeared normal (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs showing the intact enamel surface of the tooth of a wild-type mouse (top), the cracked enamel surface of the tooth of an heterozygotic ATE mutant (middle), and the loss of the enamel of a tooth of an homozygotic ATE mutant with exposed dentinal tubules (bottom).

 
Only slight differences were observed between heterozygous and homozygous ATE mutants with regard to dental concentrations of Hyp, HP, and LP. There was a 1.08- to 2.59-fold increase of concentrations of Hyp, HP, and LP in incisors of heterozygous and homozygous ATE mutants as compared with incisors of wild-type mice. There was a 1.37- to 5.63-fold increase of dental concentrations of Hyp, HP, and LP in molar teeth of heterozygous or homozygous ATE mutants as compared with molar teeth of wild-type mice. Dental concentrations of HP and LP showed a significant correlation (correlation coefficient, 0.776, P = 0.003). Also, dental concentrations of HP and Hyp (correlation coefficient, 0.930, P < 0.001) and concentrations of LP and Hyp (correlation coefficient, 0.755, P = 0.005) showed a significant correlation (Fig. 3Go, TableGo).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Chromatogram of pooled probes of 1st molars of homozygotic ATE1 mutants (a) and chromatogram of pooled probes of 1st molars of wild-type mice (b). The fluorescence was monitored with excitation at 297 nm and emission at 397 nm. The HP peak arose at 17.5 min after injection, followed by the LP peak. The HP and LP peaks in 1a are increased compared with those in 1b. Please note that the peaks appear to be of the same size, but that the scale of magnitude is different.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table. Concentrations of Dental Hydroxyproline (Hyp), Hydroxlysylpyridinoline (HP), and Lysylpyridinoline (LP)
 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
We hypothesized that mutations in chromosome 5 of mice can lead to significant alterations of the structure of enamel and dentin. Within a dominant ENU mutagenesis screen, a mouse mutant was isolated with an abnormal tooth enamel phenotype. In the present study, microradiography and toluidine-blue staining of non-decalcified sections as well as scanning electron microscopy were chosen to ensure a precise judgment of the structure (Donath and Breuner, 1982; Gibson et al., 2001; Springer et al., 2002). These techniques have been used previously by the authors who first introduced a mouse model for X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (Gibson et al., 2001). In our study, microradiography and toluidine-blue-stained sections showed that the thickness of enamel was reduced by approximately 50% in heterozygous ATE mutants, which compares with human hypoplastic AI (Wright et al., 1991).

Mapping the mutant line revealed an interval of 9 cM on mouse chromosome 5 between the markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10. According to the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI)© database of The Jackson Laboratory© (09.02.2004), the following genes are located on mouse chromosome 5 between markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10 (Position 45–54 in cM): casein gene family (Csn, position 45.0 cM), modifier of curly bare (Mcub, position 45.0 cM), diabesity 2 (Dbsty2, position 45.0 cM), MMMTV LTR integration site 5 (Pad 5, position 45.0 cM), seizure susceptibility 6 (Szs 6, position QTL), zinc finger protein 469 (Zfp469, position 45.1 cM), casein kappa (Csnk, position 45.2 cM), ameloblastin (Ambn, position 46.0 cM), marcel (Mc, position 48.0 cM), mammary tumor virus locus 32 (Mtv32, position 48.0 cM), ornithine decarboxylase related sequence 21 (Odc-rs21, position 48.0 cM), alpha fetoprotein (Afp, position 50.0 cM), albumin 1 (Alb 1, position 50.0 cM), betacellulin (Btc, position 51.0 cM), amphiregulin (Areg, position 51.0 cM), ADP-ribosyltransferase 3 (Art3, position 52.0 cM), shroom (Shrm, position 52.0 cM), annexin A3 (Anxa 3, position 54.0 cM), and WD repeat and FYVE (Wdfy3, position 54.0 cM).

Of these genes, Mcub, Dbsty2, and Szs6 can be excluded as candidate genes causing the phenotype observed in the present study, since their expression is known and differs from that of the phenotype noted. Ameloblastin, located on position 46 cM, appears to be the strongest candidate (MacDougall et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2003; Nagano et al., 2003). The potential of the rest of the genes listed above of inducing the phenotype observed in this study is considered low, although the impact on the phenotype has not yet been described.

Our findings are supported by human studies showing that a nonsense mutation within the enamelin gene and the ameloblastin gene, both mapping to the corresponding region 4q21 in humans, causes hypoplastic autosomal-dominant AI (Rajpar et al., 2001; Kida et al., 2002; Mardh et al., 2002; Hart et al., 2003). The mice were exposed to ENU, which causes point mutations. The authors suggest that a deletion may be unlikely. A point mutation may lead to changes of the tertiary structure of the protein. Also, it might be possible that exchange of one single base causes alternate splicing, premature chain abortion, or changes of the promoter region.

After Gibson and co-workers (2001) introduced a new mouse model for X-linked AI, this study introduces a new mutant for autosomal-dominant hypoplastic AI.

We were able to show that the concentration of collagen cross-links hydroxylysylpyridinoline (HP) and lysylpyridinoline (LP) is markedly increased in teeth of heterozygotic and homozygotic ATE mutants compared with concentrations in wild-type mice. HP and LP are two non-reducible cross-links of mature collagen, which are formed by a sequence of post-translational modifications. HP is a derivative of 3 residues of hydroxylysine and is present in virtually all mature tissues (tendon, vessel wall, cartilage, dentin, and bone). LP is a derivative of 2 residues of hydroxylysine and 1 residue of lysine and is found principally in dentin and bone (Eyre, 1992; Açil and Müller, 1994; Açil et al., 2002; Springer et al., 2003). The measurement of the dentinal concentration of mature collagen cross-links HP and LP is a reliable method showing reproducible concentrations independent of the kind of tooth (incisor/molar, etc.) and age (Açil et al., 2002). Collagen is considered to be the predominant protein within the organic content of this mineralized tissue (Dai et al., 1991).

Mouse teeth are extremely small (length approx. 2 mm). Based on pilot experiments, we decided not to separate enamel from dentin, since we believed that the small proportion of enamel would barely influence the concentrations of HP and LP measured. We suggest that alterations of the concentration of HP and LP may be due to alterations in the content of collagen in the dentin of mice after mutation in chromosome 5 between markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10. Candidate genes for dentinogenesis imperfecta, like the dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) gene, map to 4q21 in humans (MacDougall et al., 1999; Malmgren et al., 2004). To date, to the best of our knowledge, none of the genes located between D5Mit18 and D5Mit10 has been associated with dentinogenesis imperfecta. We cannot explain the differences in the concentrations of collagen cross-links between affected and non-affected mice. We suggest that one of the genes mentioned participates in dentinogenesis. On this basis, it must be assumed that, in the model presented, the presumed ameloblastin mutation must have effects on enamel and dentin.

Alterations in the collagenous structure of teeth of patients suffering from dentinogenesis imperfecta might influence restorative techniques (Perdigão et al., 2000).

We were able to verify our hypothesis. A mutation in chromosome 5 of mice between markers D5Mit18 and D5Mit10 results in certain features of AI. The identification of the mutated gene between these markers will be the aim of a further study. An animal model for AI with known genotype facilitates the development of standardized conditions for the study of the possible influence of nutritional habits on the phenotype. Knowledge concerning the clinical features and dental complications of each variant of AI assists in the diagnosis of the condition and possibly results in the implementation of early preventive measures (Perdigão et al., 2000). The authors suggest that the ATE1 mutant with a mutation in 5E provides an animal model for the study of the phenotype of autosomal-dominant hypoplastic AI and the investigation of possible preventive measures to influence the outcome of this genetic condition.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We express our gratitude to our laboratory technicians, under the leadership of Mrs. Gisela Otto, for their assistance with the performance of the analytical procedures. Financial support was provided by each of the institutions involved in the present publication. We are grateful for the assistance of M. Suhr, FRCS, FDSRCS in the revision of this manuscript.

Received August 28, 2003; Last revision May 28, 2004; Accepted June 2, 2004


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Açil Y, Müller PK (1994). A rapid method for the isolation of the mature collagen cross-links, hydroxylysylpyridinoline (HP) and lysylpyridinoline (LP). J Chromatogr A 664:183–188.

Açil Y, Springer ING, Prasse JG, Hedderich J, Jepsen S (2002). Concentration of collagen cross-links in human dentin bears no relation to the individual age. Int J Legal Med 116:340–343.[ISI][Medline]

Aldred MJ, Crawford PJ (1995). Amelogenesis imperfecta—towards a new classification. Oral Dis 1:2–5.[Medline]

Aldred MJ, Crawford PJ (1997). Molecular biology of hereditary enamel defects. Ciba Found Symp 205:200–209.[Medline]

Aldred MJ, Savarirayan R, Crawford PJ (2003). Amelogenesis imperfecta: a classification and catalogue for the 21st century. Oral Dis 9:19–23.[ISI][Medline]

Dai XF, Ten Cate AR, Limeback H (1991). The extent and distribution of intratubular collagen fibrils in human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 36:775–778.[ISI][Medline]

Donath K, Breuner G (1982). A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 11:318.[ISI][Medline]

Eyre D (1992). New biomarkers of bone resorption. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:470A–470C.

Gibson C, Golub E, Herold R, Risser M, Ding W, Shimokawa H, et al. (1991). Structure and expression of the bovine amelogenin gene. Biochemistry 30:1075–1079.[Medline]

Gibson CW, Yuan ZA, Hall B, Longenecker G, Chen E, Thyagarajan T, et al. (2001). Amelogenin-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype. J Biol Chem 276:31871–3185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hart TC, Hart PS, Gorry MC, Michalec MD, Ryu OH, Uygur C, et al. (2003). Novel ENAM mutation responsible for autosomal recessive amelogenesis imperfecta and localised enamel defects. J Med Genet 40:900–906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hrabe de Angelis M, Balling R (1998). Large scale ENU screens in the mouse: genetics meets genomics. Mutat Res 400:25–32.[ISI][Medline]

Hrabe de Angelis MH, Flaswinkel H, Fuchs H, Rathkolb B, Soewarto D, Marschall S, et al. (2000). Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nat Genet 25:444–447.[ISI][Medline]

Hu JC, Zhang CH, Yang Y, Karrman-Mardh C, Forsman-Semb K, Simmer JP (2001). Cloning and characterization of the mouse and human enamelin genes. J Dent Res 80:898–902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kida M, Ariga T, Shirakawa T, Oguchi H, Sakiyama Y (2002). Autosomal-dominant hypoplastic form of amelogenesis imperfecta caused by an enamelin gene mutation at the exon-intron boundary. J Dent Res 81:738–742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee SK, Kim SM, Lee YJ, Yamada KM, Yamada Y, Chi JG (2003). The structure of the rat ameloblastin gene and its expression in amelogenesis. Mol Cells 15:216–225.[ISI][Medline]

MacDougall M, DuPont BR, Simmons D, Reus B, Krebsbach P, Karrman C, et al. (1997). Ameloblastin gene (AMBN) maps within the critical region for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta at chromosome 4q21. Genomics 41:115–118.[ISI][Medline]

MacDougall M, Jeffords LG, Gu TT, Knight CB, Frei G, Reus BE, et al. (1999). Genetic linkage of the dentinogenesis imperfecta type III locus to chromosome 4q. J Dent Res 78:1277–1282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Malmgren B, Lindskog S, Elgadi A, Norgren S (2004). Clinical, histopathologic, and genetic investigation in two large families with dentinogenesis imperfecta type II. Hum Genet 114:491–498.[ISI][Medline]

Mardh CK, Backman B, Holmgren G, Hu JC, Simmer JP, Forsman-Semb K (2002). A nonsense mutation in the enamelin gene causes local hypoplastic autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH2). Hum Mol Genet 11:1069–1074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nagano T, Oida S, Ando H, Gomi K, Arai T, Fukae M (2003). Relative levels of mRNA encoding enamel proteins in enamel organ epithelia and odontoblasts. J Dent Res 82:982–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L (2000). New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 13(Spec Iss):25D–30D.[ISI][Medline]

Rajpar MH, Harley K, Laing C, Davies RM, Dixon MJ (2001). Mutation of the gene encoding the enamel-specific protein, enamelin, causes autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mol Genet 10:1673–1677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sachs L (1992). Angewandte Statistik. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 510–515.

Shore RC, Backman B, Brookes SJ, Kirkham J, Wood SR, Robinson C (2002). Inheritance pattern and elemental composition of enamel affected by hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. Connect Tissue Res 43:466–471.[ISI][Medline]

Springer ING, Suhr M, Fleiner B (2002). Adaptive adjustment of the adolescent porcine mandibular condyle. Bone 31:1190–1195.

Springer ING, Terheyden H, Dunsche A, Czech N, Tiemann M, Hedderich J, Açil Y (2003). Collagen crosslink excretion and staging of oral cancer. Br J Cancer 88:1105–1110.[ISI][Medline]

Sundell S, Valentin J (1986). Hereditary aspects and classification of hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 14:211–216.[ISI][Medline]

Winter GB, Brook AH (1975). Enamel hypoplasia and anomalies of the enamel. Dent Clin North Am 19:3–24.[ISI][Medline]

Wright JT, Robinson C, Shore R (1991). Characterization of the enamel ultrastructure and mineral content in hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72:594–601.[ISI][Medline]

Xiao S, Yu C, Chou X, Yuan W, Wang Y, Bu L, et al. (2001). Dentinogenesis imperfecta 1 with or without progressive hearing loss is associated with distinct mutations in DSPP. Nat Genet 27:201–204.[ISI][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seedorf, H.
Right arrow Articles by Açil, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seedorf, H.
Right arrow Articles by Açil, Y.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)