|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Molecular Signalling Group, Clinical Sciences Research Centre, and
2 Department of Endocrinology, Barts & the London, Queen Marys School of Medicine & Dentistry, Suite 12, Dominion House, Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BE, UK;
* corresponding author, j.p.hinson{at}qmul.ac.uk
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: adrenomedullin saliva salivary gland oral mucosa
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Until recently, the mucosal lining of the mouth was regarded as a simple physical barrier, preventing bacterial invasion and the escape of body fluids. Considering the hostile environment of the mouth, being awash with food particles and commensal micro-organisms, there is surprisingly little incidence of bacterial infection in the oral cavity under normal circumstances. It is clear that the saliva contains a range of antimicrobial substances. We hypothesize that adrenomedullin may be an additional antimicrobial factor in saliva.
The present study was designed to investigate the adrenomedullin content of saliva and to determine the contributions made by different salivary glands. Adrenomedullin receptors in salivary cell lines were investigated by ligand-binding studies to establish whether there may be a case for adrenomedullin having a paracrine or autocrine role in these tissues.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurement of Adrenomedullin in Saliva and Serum by Enyme-linked Immune Assay
Saliva was obtained from adult donors (male, n = 8; female, n = 9; 2160 yrs of age). Donors were free of periodontal inflammation and other oral pathologic conditions, as assessed by clinical examination, and had no medical abnormalities that affect the salivary glands. Stimulated whole saliva (5 mL; subject chewed on neutral-based gum) and stimulated parotid and submandibular/sublingual saliva (5 mL; subject sucked on lemon candy) were collected on ice. Whole saliva was centrifuged for removal of bacterial and cellular debris (10,000 rpm, 4°C for 5 min). Parotid saliva was secured by means of Curby cups placed over the parotid papilla (Sreebny, 1996). Submandibular/sublingual secretions (referred to as submandibular saliva) were obtained with collection devices placed in the anterior floor of the mouth. Saliva samples were stored at -70°C until required.
Blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers, the serum extracted, and kept at -70°C until analyzed. Samples were thawed on ice, mixed with an equal volume of 0.1% alkaline-treated casein (Martínez et al., 1997), and extracted through C-18 Sep-Pak 400 mg cartridges (Waters-Millipore, Milford, MA, USA). The proteins were eluted with 80% isopropanol. The eluate was then lyophilized and stored at -20°C until required.
On the day of assay, samples were reconstituted in 500 µL EIA buffer, separated into 50-µL aliquots, and assayed according to the manufacturers instructions (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals Inc., Belmont, CA, USA). The minimal amount of adrenomedullin detected in this assay was 0.2 ng/mL. The assay does not cross-react with human CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide), PAMP (pro-adrenomedullin N-terminal 20-peptide), amylin, or calcitonin (data supplied by manufacturer).
Immunoblotting of AM in Saliva
Lyophilized saliva samples were reconstituted in buffer. A 50-µg quantity of protein was heated to 99°C for 4 min, loaded into sample wells, resolved on a 1020% tricine SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Novex, San Diego, CA, USA), and run at 120 V for 2 hrs. Transfer blotting was accomplished with the use of the same apparatus, and proteins were transferred to a PDVF membrane (Immobilin, Millipore) at 30 V for 4 hrs. Membranes were blocked overnight in a solution of 5% dried milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 at 4°C. Membranes were then washed and then incubated for 60 min at room temperature in a 1:500 dilution of rabbit anti-human AM antibody (Allaker and Kapas, 2003), washed 3 times in PBS, and incubated in 1:200 goat anti-rabbit biotinylated IgG (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) for 60 min at room temperature. Membranes were washed 3 times in PBS and the signal amplified/detected by means of ECL according to the manufacturers instructions (Amersham International plc, UK).
Immunohistochemical Staining of Adrenomedullin in Salivary Tissues
Adrenomedullin was identified in 5-µm-thick tissue sections of formalin-fixed submandibular and parotid glands as described previously (Taichman et al., 1998). Previously characterized rabbit antibodies to human adrenomedullin were used at a concentration of 1:1000 (Allaker and Kapas, 2003). We performed antigen retrieval by subjecting the tissue sections to microwaving (750 W, 20 min) while in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0. After this, the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method was used as described previously (Taichman et al., 1998). Bound antibodies were visualized by Vector Red (Vector Labs, Peterborough, UK). Sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. Pre-incubation of the antiserum with 10 nmol/mL synthetic antigen was used as a negative control.
Maintenance of Salivary Cell Lines
Two epithelial cell lines established from submandibular (HSG) and parotid (HSY) salivary glands (Myoken et al., 1996; Sato et al., 1996) were used in this study. HSY was established from an adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland. Based on its morphological and immunocytochemical properties, it is thought to originate from the intercalated duct or acinar region (Hayashi et al., 1987). HSG was established from the submandibular gland of a patient with squamous cell carcinoma. Based on its morphological and immunocytochemical characteristics, it is considered to originate from the intercalated duct (Shirasuna et al., 1981). Cells were maintained in T75 cm2 flasks in MEM (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 10% FBS and routine antibiotics in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C. Cells were allowed to grow to 80% confluence before being passaged in trypsin-EDTA solution. Twenty-four hours before experiments were carried out, 70% confluent T75 cm2 flasks of cells were rendered quiescent by being placed in serum-free MEM (sfMEM). On the day of experiments, cells were washed in sterile PBS, and a 3-mL quantity of fresh sfMEM was placed on the cells, after which the flasks were incubated overnight. The cell culture supernatant was harvested, lyophilized, and stored at 4°C until required for adrenomedullin assay. Adrenomedullin was assayed as described above, without the extraction step.
Adrenomedullin Receptor Binding Assays of Salivary Cells
Adrenomedullin receptors were measured with the use of [125I] adrenomedullin. Briefly, HSG or HSY cells were incubated at room temperature for 60 min with 0.1 nmol/L [125I] adrenomedullin and increasing concentrations of unlabeled human adrenomedullin, CGRP, PAMP, calcitonin, or amylin, in binding buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L NaCl, 4 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA). Cells were solubilized in 0.1 mol/L NaOH, and tracer bound to the cells was determined by gamma spectroscopy.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is noteworthy, however, that the concentration of adrenomedullin in whole saliva was significantly greater than that found in submandibular or parotid saliva alone. It is very likely that other cell types in the oral cavity contribute to salivary adrenomedullin levels. Recently, we have shown that oral epithelial cells (keratinocytes), in vitro, secrete adrenomedullin, and that production is increased in response to a wide variety of agents such as cytokines and steroid hormones (Kapas et al., 2001b). It is probable that these cells contribute to salivary adrenomedullin concentrations.
It is not clear what the functions of adrenomedullin in saliva might be. Adrenomedullin is known to exert a wide range of effects in a wide range of tissues, including stimulation of angiogenesis (Zhao et al., 1998), influencing vascular permeability (Chu et al., 2001), bactericidal actions (Allaker et al., 1999), causing vasodilatation, and both increases and decreases in cell division (for a review, see Hinson et al., 2000). The concentration of adrenomedullin found in saliva, although higher than in plasma, is not high enough to exert a significant bactericidal effect on the main oral pathogens, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis. This organism is killed by concentrations of adrenomedullin above 500 pmol/L (Allaker et al., 1999), around eight-fold higher than the levels found in these studies of around 60 pmol/L. However, there is evidence that adrenomedullin expression in oral keratinocytes is up-regulated in response to challenge with live oral pathogens (Kapas et al., 2001a). Such a response may conceivably bring salivary adrenomedullin concentrations within the bactericidal range. It is also possible that adrenomedullin may act in concert with other salivary factors to enhance their antimicrobial effects, although this hypothesis remains to be tested. It is unlikely that salivary adrenomedullin activates adrenomedullin receptors in oral tissues, since the binding affinity of adrenomedullin receptors is in the nanomolar range (Hinson et al., 2000). It is likely that adrenomedullin is exerting very local effects in the oral cavity and salivary glands, as in other tissues.
Using the cell lines derived from the submandibular (HSG) and parotid (HSY) glands, we investigated the presence of specific receptors for adrenomedullin. The single binding site proposed by Scatchard analysis, and that fact that CGRP did not displace adrenomedullin binding to HSG cells, suggests that there are specific adrenomedullin receptors on these cells (Fig. 4
). To a certain extent, this was also true of HSY cells, except that these cells also appear to have a small population of CGRP receptors, since CGRP displaced up to 20% of radiolabeled adrenomedullin (Fig. 5). One clear conclusion of these binding data is that circulating levels, or even salivary concentrations, of adrenomedullin are not high enough to activate these specific receptors. It is therefore most likely that locally produced adrenomedullin has an autocrine or paracrine effect on adrenomedullin receptors within the salivary gland. The nature of this effect has not been investigated.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received May 1, 2003; Last revision January 27, 2004; Accepted January 30, 2004
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allaker RP, Zihni C, Kapas S (1999). An investigation into the antimicrobial effects of adrenomedullin on members of the skin, oral, respiratory tract and gut microflora. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 23:289293.[ISI][Medline]
Cameron VA, Fleming AM (1998). Novel sites of adrenomedullin gene expression in mouse and rat tissues. Endocrinology 139:22532264.
Caron KM, Smithies O (2001). Extreme hydrops fetalis and cardiovascular abnormalities in mice lacking a functional adrenomedullin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:615619.
Caron KM, Smithies O (2002). Multiple roles of adrenomedullin revealed by animal models. Microsc Res Tech 57:5559.[ISI][Medline]
Chu DQ, Smith DM, Brain SD (2001). Studies of the microvascular effects of adrenomedullin and related peptides. Peptides 22:18811886.[ISI][Medline]
Hinson JP, Kapas S, Smith DM (2000). Adrenomedullin, a multifunctional regulatory peptide. Endocr Rev 21:138167.
Hayashi Y, Yanagawa T, Yoshida H, Azuma M, Nishida T, Yura Y, et al. (1987). Expression of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and amylase in a human parotid gland adenocarcinoma cell line in culture. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:10251037.
Kapas S, Bansal A, Bhargava V, Maher R, Malli R, Hagi-Pavli E, et al. (2001a). Adrenomedullin expression in pathogen challenged oral epithelial cells. Peptides 22:14851489.[ISI][Medline]
Kapas S, Tenchini ML, Farthing PM (2001b). Regulation of adrenomedullin secretion in cultured human skin and oral keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 171:353359.
Martínez A, Miller MJ, Unsworth EJ, Siegfried JM, Cuttitta F (1995). Expression of adrenomedullin in normal human lung and in pulmonary tumors. Endocrinology 136:40994105.[Abstract]
Martínez A, Elsasser TH, Muro-Corcho C, Moody TW, Miller MJ, Macri CJ, et al. (1997). Expression of adrenomedullin and its receptor in normal and malignant human skin: a potential pluripotent role in the integument. Endocrinology 138:55975604.
Marutsuka K, Nawa Y, Asada Y, Hara S, Kitamura K, Eto T, et al. (2001). Adrenomedullin and proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP) are present in human colonic epithelia and exert an antimicrobial effect. Exp Physiol 86:543545.[Abstract]
Myoken Y, Myoken Y, Okamoto T, Kan M, McKeehan WL, Sato JD, et al. (1996). Expression of fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1), FGF-2 and FGF receptor-1 in a human salivary-gland adenocarcinoma cell line: evidence of growth. Int J Cancer 65:650657.[ISI][Medline]
Sato N, Kyakumoto S, Sawano K, Ota M (1996). Proliferative signal transduction by epidermal growth factor (EGF) in the human salivary gland adenocarcinoma (HSG) cell line. Biochem Mol Biol Int 38:597606.[ISI][Medline]
Shirasuna K, Sato M, Miyazaki T (1981) A neoplastic epithelial duct cell line established from an irradiated human salivary gland. Cancer 48:745752.[ISI][Medline]
Sreebny LM (1996). Xerostomia: diagnosis, management and clinical complications. In: Saliva and oral health. 2nd ed. Edgar WM, OMullane DM, editors. London: British Dental Association, pp. 4366.
Taichman NS, Cruchley AT, Fletcher LM, Hagi-Pavli EP, Paleolog EM, Abrams WR, et al. (1998). Vascular endothelial growth factor in normal human salivary glands and saliva: a possible role in the maintenance of mucosal homeostasis. Lab Invest 78:869875.[ISI][Medline]
Welsch U, Unterberger P, Hofter E, Cuttitta F, Martinez A (2002). Adrenomedullin in mammalian and human skin glands including the mammary gland. Acta Histochem 104:6572.[ISI][Medline]
Zhao Y, Hague S, Manek S, Zhang L, Bicknell R, Rees MC (1998). PCR display identifies tamoxifen induction of the novel angiogenic factor adrenomedullin by a nonestrogenic mechanism in the human endometrium. Oncogene 16:409415.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Zudaire, S. Portal-Nunez, and F. Cuttitta The central role of adrenomedullin in host defense J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 80(2): 237 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |