|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORTS |
1 Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore;
2 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 4 Medical Drive, Block MD 10, Singapore 117597, Singapore; and
3 Division of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore;
* corresponding author, georgeyip{at}nus.edu.sg.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: chondroitin sulfate chlorate wound healing cell adhesion cell proliferation
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CS is a glycosaminoglycan, composed of alternating, differently-sulfated residues of ß-D-glucuronate and ß-D-N-acetylgalactosamine residues (Murata and Yokoyama, 1985). It can be found within intracellular organelles, on the cell surface, and in the extracellular matrix (Hook et al., 1984). CS has been implicated in the wound-healing process. Fibroblasts derived from granulation tissue, compared with normal gingival fibroblasts, have highly elevated expression levels of versican, a CS proteoglycan (Hakkinen et al., 1996). CS and other sulfated glycosaminoglycans are found in high concentrations in human wound fluid (Penc et al., 1998). Furthermore, injection of glycyl-histidyl-lysine-Cu2+, an activator of wound healing, into full-thickness rat skin wounds results in accumulation of CS and stimulates wound tissue production (Simeon et al., 2000). Together, these studies suggest that CS may be involved in regulating the wound-healing process.
The aim of this study was to examine the roles of CS in palatal wound healing, with the rabbit as a model organism. We investigated the effects of CS on palatal fibroblast proliferation, adhesion, and migration. We also determined if the position of the sulfate group on CS modulates its biological action.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Adhesion Assay
The palatal fibroblasts were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 60,000 cells/well and cultured for 8 hrs. The number of fibroblasts adhering to the culture plate was then determined by the CellTiter 96® AQueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Briefly, the tetrazolium compound 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) was incubated with cultured cells for 1 hr, during which metabolically active cells converted the MTS reagent to a soluble formazan dye. The amount of absorbance, which is proportional to the number of living cells in culture, was then measured at 490 nm.
Cell Proliferation Assay
Cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 30,000 cells/well and cultured for 7 days. The number of fibroblasts after culture was measured at Day 7 by the CellTiter 96® AQueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay as described above.
In vitro Wound Closure Model
Cells were grown in six-well plates until they achieved 90% confluence. Using a 100-µL plastic pipette tip, we scraped 3 horizontal lines across the bottom of each well (wounding). The distance between the wound edges was then determined at 0 and 18 hrs after wounding, as a measure of cell migration (Guo et al., 2003).
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Palatal fibroblasts were cultured on glass slides to 90% confluence, and were then wounded as described above. After culture continued for 18 hrs, the cells were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate for 30 min, followed by 2% osmium tetroxide. The cells were then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of methanol, transferred to acetone, and dried in a Balzers critical-point dryer with liquefied carbon dioxide as the transition fluid. Cells were coated with 20 nm gold by means of a Balzers sputter-coater and examined with a Philips XL-30 field-emission-gun scanning electron microscope.
Statistical Analysis
Cell proliferation, cell adhesion, and in vitro wound healing were compared among treatment groups by Students t test or one-way analysis of variance with Tukeys post-test or test for linear trend, with the use of GraphPad Prism v4.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Requirement for Sulfate Group for Biological Activity of Chondroitin Sulfate
Chlorate is an inhibitor of glycosaminoglycan sulfation, and has been used in cell, organ, and whole embryo cultures to inhibit sulfation with no significant effect on glycosaminoglycan or protein synthesis or on cell viability (Conrad, 1998; Yip et al., 2002). It acts by competing with sulfate in synthesis of 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate, the sulfate donor for glycosaminoglycan sulfation. We have previously shown that 30 mmol/L chlorate is sufficient to abolish chondroitin sulfation completely (Yip et al., 2002).
To determine if the sulfate group of CS is necessary for the biological activity of the molecule, we studied the effects on cell adhesion and cell proliferation of palatal fibroblasts treated with 30 mmol/L chlorate. Cells exposed to chlorate appeared healthy and had the same spindle-shaped morphology as those in the control group cultured in chlorate-free medium. However, there was a significant reduction in adhesion (Figs. 2A
, 2B
) and proliferation (Fig. 2C
) of chlorate-treated cells. The reduction was due to competitive inhibition of glycosaminoglycan sulfation, and was abolished by the addition of 10 mmol/L exogenous sulfate to culture medium containing chlorate (Fig. 2A
). Furthermore, supplementation of chlorate-containing culture medium with exogenous chondroitin-6-sulfate resulted in an increase in cell adhesion (Fig. 2B
) and cell proliferation (Fig. 2C
), as compared with cells exposed to chlorate alone. Together, these results show that the sulfate group is needed for the biological activity of CS.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chondroitin Sulfate and Cell Adhesion
Adhesion of fibroblast cells in granulation tissue is a fundamental process in wound healing (Hehenberger et al., 1998). Integrins are a family of transmembrane heterodimeric proteins that are important in cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion (Hynes, 1992). Integrin-mediated cell adhesion results in localization of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase, at focal adhesion points and the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK (LaFlamme and Auer, 1996; Schaller, 2001). A CS binding site has recently been reported in
4ß1 integrin (Iida et al., 1998). CS is required for
4ß1 integrin-mediated cell adhesion, and enhances FAK phosphorylation (Yang et al., 2004). This integrin-mediated cell adhesion is inhibited after degradation of CS (Iida et al., 1992).
Chondroitin Sulfate and Cell Proliferation
The FGF family consists of 22 members and is involved in regulating cell proliferation (Ornitz and Itoh, 2001). Binding of FGFs to their receptors results in dimerization and mutual tyrosine phosphorylation of these receptors, and is potentiated by heparan sulfate, a sulfated glycosaminoglycan (Bernfield et al., 1999). FGF-2 has been shown to stimulate proliferation of gingival fibroblasts in vitro (Fujisawa et al., 2003). Myofibroblasts in full-thickness palatal mucoperiosteal wounds express FGF receptors-1 and -2 (Kanda et al., 2003). Furthermore, topical application of FGF-2 results in faster healing of gingival ulcers in rabbits (Fujisawa et al., 2003). Although the role of other sulfated glycosaminoglycans in FGF signaling has been less extensively investigated relative to heparan sulfate, recent studies suggest that CS and dermatan sulfate are also able to bind to FGF-2 and help mediate FGF-2-induced cell proliferation (Milev et al., 1998; Penc et al., 1998).
Chondroitin Sulfate and Cell Migration
In addition to its role in cell adhesion, discussed above, FAK has been shown to facilitate cell spreading and cell migration by down-regulating RhoA activity (Ren et al., 2000; Arthur and Burridge, 2001; Wakatsuki et al., 2003). RhoA is a member of the Rho family of GTPases. Activation of RhoA results in formation of focal adhesions and stress fibers. Although some degree of RhoA activity is needed for cell adhesion to the substrate, a high RhoA activity level inhibits cell migration (Arthur and Burridge, 2001). Indeed, it has been suggested that melanoma CS proteoglycan enhances cell spreading and migration by activating FAK and inhibiting RhoA activity (Yang et al., 2004).
Specific Requirement for Sulfate Group in Chondroitin Sulfate
In rats, the degree of glycosaminoglycan sulfation changes with age (Weinstein et al., 1992). We have shown that the inhibition of chondroitin sulfation results in reduced cell adhesion and cell proliferation and a slower rate of wound gap closure. This is consistent with the findings in U-937 leukemia cells, where the number of sulfate groups on CS (as measured by the charge density) regulates cell proliferation and differentiation (Volpi et al., 1993). We have further shown that, depending on the position of the sulfate group, CS can either increase or decrease cell adhesion. We suggest that changes in the number and position of the sulfate groups affect binding of growth factors and other signaling molecules to CS. Although the mechanism of this interaction is not well-understood in CS, there is well-established evidence that the sulfate group specifically regulates binding of signaling molecules with heparan sulfate. For example, the biological responses of neural precursor cells to FGF-1 and FGF-2 differ, depending on the sulfation pattern of heparan sulfate (Brickman et al., 1998). Heparan sulfation also affects sonic hedgehog signaling during neural tube closure in the mouse embryo (Yip et al., 2002).
In conclusion, we have shown that CS plays an important role in palatal wound healing by regulating cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and cell migration. However, since chlorate inhibits sulfation of all glycosaminoglycans, we cannot exclude the possibility that heparan sulfate or other sulfated glycosaminoglycans may also be involved. Indeed, exogenous sulfate effectively abolishes the biological effects of chlorate on cell adhesion and proliferation, whereas supplementation by chondroitin-6-sulfate alone statistically improves, but does not fully restore to normal, these cellular processes. A combination of differently-sulfated CS species might lead to better improvement in wound healing compared with that achieved with chondroitin-6-sulfate alone. Studies are currently under way in our laboratory to determine this, as well as the possible involvement of other sulfated glycosaminoglycans in wound healing.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received April 2, 2004; Last revision September 3, 2004; Accepted September 7, 2004
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bernfield M, Gotte M, Park PW, Reizes O, Fitzgerald ML, Lincecum J, et al. (1999). Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu Rev Biochem 68:729777.[ISI][Medline]
Brickman YG, Ford MD, Gallagher JT, Nurcombe V, Bartlett PF, Turnbull JE (1998). Structural modification of fibroblast growth factor-binding heparan sulfate at a determinative stage of neural development. J Biol Chem 273:43504359.
Conrad HE (1998). Heparin-binding proteins. San Diego: Academic Press.
Cornelissen AM, Maltha JC, Von den Hoff JW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2000). Local injection of IFN-gamma reduces the number of myofibroblasts and the collagen content in palatal wounds. J Dent Res 79:17821788.
Fujisawa K, Miyamoto Y, Nagayama M (2003). Basic fibroblast growth factor and epidermal growth factor reverse impaired ulcer healing of the rabbit oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med 32:358366.[ISI][Medline]
Guo F, Gao Y, Wang L, Zheng Y (2003). p19Arf-p53 tumor suppressor pathway regulates cell motility by suppression of phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Rac1 GTPase activities. J Biol Chem 278:1441414419.
Hakkinen L, Westermarck J, Kahari VM, Larjava H (1996). Human granulation-tissue fibroblasts show enhanced proteoglycan gene expression and altered response to TGF-beta 1. J Dent Res 75:17671778.
Hehenberger K, Kratz G, Hansson A, Brismar K (1998). Fibroblasts derived from human chronic diabetic wounds have a decreased proliferation rate, which is recovered by the addition of heparin. J Dermatol Sci 16:144151.[ISI][Medline]
Hook M, Kjellen L, Johansson S (1984). Cell-surface glycosaminoglycans. Annu Rev Biochem 53:847869.[ISI][Medline]
Hurt-Camejo E, Rosengren B, Sartipy P, Elfsberg K, Camejo G, Svensson L (1999). CD44, a cell surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, mediates binding of interferon-gamma and some of its biological effects on human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 274:1895718964.
Hynes RO (1992). Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69:1125.[ISI][Medline]
Iida J, Skubitz AP, Furcht LT, Wayner EA, McCarthy JB (1992). Coordinate role for cell surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan and alpha 4 beta 1 integrin in mediating melanoma cell adhesion to fibronectin. J Cell Biol 118:431444.
Iida J, Meijne AM, Oegema TR Jr, Yednock TA, Kovach NL, Furcht LT, et al. (1998). A role of chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan binding site in alpha4beta1 integrin-mediated melanoma cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 273:59555962.
Kanda T, Funato N, Baba Y, Kuroda T (2003). Evidence for fibroblast growth factor receptors in myofibroblasts during palatal mucoperiosteal repair. Arch Oral Biol 48:213221.[ISI][Medline]
LaFlamme SE, Auer KL (1996). Integrin signaling. Semin Cancer Biol 7:111118.[ISI][Medline]
Milev P, Monnerie H, Popp S, Margolis RK, Margolis RU (1998). The core protein of the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan phosphacan is a high-affinity ligand of fibroblast growth factor-2 and potentiates its mitogenic activity. J Biol Chem 273:2143921442.
Mitchell JC, Wood RJ (2000). Management of cleft lip and palate in primary care. J Pediatr Health Care 14:1319.[Medline]
Murata K, Yokoyama Y (1985). Enzymatic analysis with chondrosulfatases of constituent disaccharides of sulfated chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate isomers by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem 149:261268.[ISI][Medline]
Ornitz DM, Itoh N (2001). Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol 2:reviews3005.1-3005.12.
Penc SF, Pomahac B, Winkler T, Dorschner RA, Eriksson E, Herndon M, et al. (1998). Dermatan sulfate released after injury is a potent promoter of fibroblast growth factor-2 function. J Biol Chem 273:2811628121.
Ren XD, Kiosses WB, Sieg DJ, Otey CA, Schlaepfer DD, Schwartz MA (2000). Focal adhesion kinase suppresses Rho activity to promote focal adhesion turnover. J Cell Sci 113(Pt 20):36733678.[Abstract]
Schaller MD (2001). Biochemical signals and biological responses elicited by the focal adhesion kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1540:121.[Medline]
Simeon A, Wegrowski Y, Bontemps Y, Maquart FX (2000). Expression of glycosaminoglycans and small proteoglycans in wounds: modulation by the tripeptide-copper complex glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine-Cu(2+). J Invest Dermatol 115:962968.[ISI][Medline]
Volpi N, Bolognani L, Conte A, Petrini M (1993). Effects of chondroitin sulfates with different structures on leukemia cells: U-937 cell proliferation and differentiation. Leuk Res 17:789798.[ISI][Medline]
Wakatsuki T, Wysolmerski RB, Elson EL (2003). Mechanics of cell spreading: role of myosin II. J Cell Sci 116:16171625.
Weinstein M, Liau YH, Slomiany A, Slomiany BL (1992). Glycosaminoglycan patterns in gingival proteoglycans of rat with age. Arch Oral Biol 37:323330.[ISI][Medline]
Yang J, Price MA, Neudauer CL, Wilson C, Ferrone S, Xia H, et al. (2004). Melanoma chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan enhances FAK and ERK activation by distinct mechanisms. J Cell Biol 165:881891.
Yip GW, Ferretti P, Copp AJ (2002). Heparan sulphate proteoglycans and spinal neurulation in the mouse embryo. Development 129:21092119.
Yokozeki M, Moriyama K, Shimokawa H, Kuroda T (1997). Transforming growth factor-beta 1 modulates myofibroblastic phenotype of rat palatal fibroblasts in vitro. Exp Cell Res 231:328336.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gotte, D. Spillmann, G. W. Yip, E. Versteeg, F. G. Echtermeyer, T. H. van Kuppevelt, and L. Kiesel Changes in heparan sulfate are associated with delayed wound repair, altered cell migration, adhesion and contractility in the galactosyltransferase I (ss4GalT-7) deficient form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2008; 17(7): 996 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |