|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Human Genetics Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Chile, Av. Independencia 1027, PO Box 70061, Santiago, Chile; and 2 Laboratory of Genetic Epidemiology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile;
* corresponding author, rblanco{at}med.uchile.cl
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: STR non-syndromic cleft lip/palate association linkage disequilibrium
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent years, a role for MSX1 in craniofacial development is emerging as an especially strong candidate gene supported by studies in both mice and humans. The predominant phenotype in mice homozygous for an Msx1-null allele is cleft palate. In addition, abnormalities of nasal, frontal, and parietal bones were observed, and teeth failed to develop (Satokata and Maas, 1994; Kaartinen et al., 1995). These findings suggest that MSX1 plays an important role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during craniofacial development. Association and linkage studies further support a role for MSX1 in different populations. Case-control studies have reported both positive (Blanco et al., 2001) as well as negative results. Parametric linkage studies also have communicated positive (Stein et al., 1995) and negative (Scapoli et al., 2002) results. Some studies using non-parametric methods (Transmission Disequilibrium Test [TDT] and Affected Family-Based Association Control [AFBAC]) have reported positive linkage disequilibrium (Lidral et al., 1998; Beaty et al., 2002; Fallin et al., 2003; Vieira et al., 2003), while others have not (Jugessur et al., 2003). Recently, Jezewski et al.(2003) reported the complete sequencing of the MSX1 gene, demonstrating that some mutations in this gene are potentially etiological in NSCLP.
Our purpose in this study was to test the hypothesis that MSX1, located in 4p16.2, is involved in the etiology of NSCLP, using the case-parent trio design to determine if this gene is in linkage disequilibrium with NSCLP in the Chilean population.
| SUBJECTS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA Analysis
For every individual participating in the present study, an informed written consent was requested. The informed consent had been previously approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Medicine of the University of Chile. In the case of children under ten years of age, authorization was requested from their parents or from the individual legally in charge of the child. After the informed consent was given, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood cells (Poncz et al., 1982). The microsatellite markers were two dinucleotide repeats: the intragenic marker, MSX1-CA (4p16.2) (Padanilam et al., 1992); and the extragenic marker, D4S432 (4p16.3) (Gyapay et al., 1994), located at 0.8 cM from the MSX1 gene. Polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) was carried out in a total volume of 25 µL containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 50 mM of KCl, 10 mM of Tris-HCl (pH = 9.0), 0.2 mM of DNTPs, 1.5 units of Taq polymerase, and 10 pmol of each primer. For this study, the amplification reaction was performed with the use of a fluorescent-dye-labeled forward primer. Thirty-three cycles of amplification were performed, one included 1 min at 94°C for denaturation, 1 min at 55°C for alignment of primers, and 30 sec at 72°C for extension by the Taq polymerase for the two microsatellites. The products were analyzed by means of capillary electrophoresis in an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). This method allows for the co-loading of different dye-labeled PCR products, with a size standard, in the same capillary. The electrophoretic results were processed by GENESCAN 3.1.2 software, and allele assignation was carried out with the use of Genotyper software, version 2.5.
Statistical Methods
We used the ETDT for multiple alleles to evaluate association due to linkage disequilibrium between MSX1-CA and D4S432 markers with NSCLP (Sham and Curtis, 1995). When unrelated affected children are sampled, associations between the genetic markers and the disease cause the probability of transmission to differ from the expected value (probability of transmission = 0.5), avoiding the distorting effect of population stratification by ethnicity. Given the relatively reduced sample size of our study and the low a priori statistical power to detect weak associations, we have also computed p-values based on simulations (10,000 per marker) through the Monte Carlo ETDT program (MCETDT) (Zhao et al., 1999). MCETDT avoids the problems of p-values based on chi-square distributions applied to sparse transmission tables. After the evaluation of different statistical approaches, including goodness-of-fit tests, we have focused on allele rather than genotype analysis. Additionally, individual transmission of each allele with respect to the rest of the alleles was evaluated (this procedure would imply applying a correction for multiple comparisons). We evaluated exact p-values to assess the significance of individual alleles (Cleves et al., 1997), using a method implemented in the statistical package STATA 8.2 (Stata Statistical Software, 2004).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study was based on case-parent trios with unrelated cases as probands. Such trios were used to assess the association between the intragenic marker MSX1-CA and the extragenic marker D4S432 located at 0.8 centiMorgans from MSX1. The results for the multi-allele TDT (all alleles simultaneously) showed significant association between NSCLP and D4S432 (p = 0.01). Nevertheless, the results for the intragenic marker MSX1-CA did not reach significance (p= 0.09). However, only the 169-bp allele of the intragenic marker showed a preferential transmission (p = 0.03). The observation that the 169-base-pair allele, of the MSX1-CA marker, is preferentially transmitted in our case-parent study is concordant with the results reported by Vieira et al.(2003). It must be noted that Vieira et al. used a sample of 217 mother-child pairs ascertained through the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC), whereas our sample of case-parent trios was smaller. Nonetheless, our results and those of Vieira et al. suggest a possible common genetic origin of NSCLP in different South America regions. The significant association with D4S432 provides additional support for the involvement of MSX1 in the etiology of NSCLP.
It is worth noting that the interpretation of the results of case-parent studies relies on the assumption that the proportions of offspring genotypes follow Mendelian probabilities. However, a word of caution is necessary, since it has been recently suggested that transmission distortions occur in some human genome loci (Zollner et al., 2004).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received March 2, 2004; Last revision July 14, 2004; Accepted July 19, 2004
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blanco R, Chakraborty R, Barton S, Carreño H, Paredes M, Jara L (2001). Evidence of a sex-dependent association between the MSX1 locus and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in the Chilean population. Hum Biol 73:8189.[ISI][Medline]
Caporaso N, Rothman N, Wacholder S (1999). Case-control studies of common alleles and environmental factors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 26:2530.
Carinci F, Pezzetti F, Scapli L, Martinelli M, Carinci P, Tognon M (2000). Genetics of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate: a review of international studies and data regarding the Italian population. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37:3340.[ISI][Medline]
Cleves MA, Olson JM, Jacobs KB (1997). Exact transmission disequilibrium test with multiallelic markers. Genet Epidemiol 14:337347.[ISI][Medline]
Fallin M, Hetmanski J, Park J, Scott A, Ingersoll R, Fuernkranz H, et al. (2003). Family-based analysis of MSX1 haplotypes for association with oral clefts. Genet Epidemiol 25:168175.[ISI][Medline]
Gyapay G, Morissette J, Vignal A, Dib C, Fizames C, Millaseau P, et al. (1994). The 199394 généthon human genetic linkage map. Nat Genet 7:246249.[ISI][Medline]
Jezewski PA, Vieira AR, Nishimura C, Ludwig B, Johnson M, OBrien SE (2003). Complete sequencing shows a role for MSX1 in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. J Med Genet 40:399407.
Jugessur A, Lie RT, Wilcox AJ, Murray JC, Taylor JA, Sugstad OD, et al. (2003). Variants of developmental genes (TGFA, TGFB3, and MSX1) and their associations with orofacial clefts: a case-parent triad analysis. Genet Epidemiol 24:230239.[ISI][Medline]
Kaartinen V, Voncken JW, Shuler C, Warburton D, Bu D, Heisterkamp N (1995). Abnormal lung development and cleft palate in mice lacking TGF-beta 3 indicates defects of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction. Nat Genet 11:415421.[ISI][Medline]
Kanno K, Suzuki Y, Yang X, Yamada A, Aoki Y, Kure S, et al. (2002). Lack of evidence for a significant association between nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate and the retinoic acid receptor alpha gene in the Japanese population. J Hum Genet 47:269274.[ISI][Medline]
Khoury MJ (1999). Human genome epidemiology: translating advances in human genetics into population-based data for medicine and public health. Genet Med 1:7173.[ISI][Medline]
Lidral AC, Romitti PA, Basart AM, Doetschman T, Leysens NJ, Daack-Hirsch S, et al. (1998). Association of MSX1 and TGFB3 with nonsyndromic clefting in humans. Am J Hum Genet 63:557568.[ISI][Medline]
Marazita ML, Field L, Cooper M, Tobias R, Maher B, Peanchitlertkajorn S, et al. (2002a). Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in China: assessment of candidate regions. Cleft Pal Craniofac J 39:149156.
Marazita ML, Field L, Cooper M, Tobias R, Maher B, Peanchitlertkajorn S, et al. (2002b). Genome scan for loci involved in cleft lip with or without cleft palate, in Chinese multiplex families. Am J Hum Genet 71:349364.[ISI][Medline]
Moreno L, Arcos-Burgos M, Marazita M, Krahn K, Maher B, Cooper M, et al. (2004). Genetic analysis of candidate loci in non-syndromic cleft lip families from Antioquia-Colombia and Ohio. Am J Med Genet 125(A):135144.
Murray JC (1995). Face facts: genes, environment and clefts (invited editorial). Am J Hum Genet 57:227232.[ISI][Medline]
Murray JC (2002). Gene/environment causes of cleft lip and/or palate. Clin Genet 61:248256.[ISI][Medline]
Padanilam BJ, Stadler HS, Mills KA, McLeod LB, Solursh M, Lee B (1992). Characterization of the human HOX7 cDNA and identification of polymorphic markers. Hum Mol Genet 1:407410.
Poncz M, Solowiejcyk D, Harvel B, Mory Y, Schwartz E, Surrey S (1982). Construction of human gene libraries from small amounts of peripheral blood: analysis of beta-like globin genes. Hemoglobin 6:2736.[ISI][Medline]
Satokata I, Maas R (1994). Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nat Genet 6:348356.[ISI][Medline]
Scapoli L, Martinelli M, Pezzetti F, Carinci F, Bodo M, Tognon M, et al. (2002). Linkage disequilibrium between GABRB3 gene and nonsyndromic familial cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Hum Genet 110:1520.[ISI][Medline]
Schultz RE, Cooper ME, Daack-Hirsch S, Shi M, Nepomucena B, Graf KA, et al. (2004). Targeted scan of fifteen regions for nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate in Filipino families. Am J Med Genet 125A:1722.
Sham PC, Curtis D (1995). An extended transmission disequilibrium test for multi-allele marker loci. Ann Hum Genet 59:323336.[ISI][Medline]
Stata Statistical Software (computer program) (2004). StataCorp. Release 8.2. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Stein J, Mulliken JB, Stal S, Gasser DL, Malcolm S, Winter R, et al. (1995). Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: evidence of linkage to BCL3 in 17 multigenerational families. Am J Hum Genet 57:257272.[ISI][Medline]
Valenzuela CY (1988). On sociogenetic clines. Ethol Sociobiol 9:259268.
Vieira AR, Orioli IM, Castilla EE, Cooper ME, Marazita ML, Murray JC (2003). MSX1 and TGFB3 contribute to clefting in South America. J Dent Res 82:289292.
Wyszynski DF, Maestri N, McIntosh I, Smith EA, García-Delgado C, Vinageras-Guarneros E, et al. (1997). No evidence of linkage for cleft lip with or without cleft palate to a marker near the transforming growth factor alpha locus in two populations. Hum Hered 47:101109.[ISI][Medline]
Zhao JH, Sham PC, Curtis D (1999). A program for the Monte Carlo evaluation of significance of the extended transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 64:14841485.[ISI][Medline]
Zollner S, Wen X, Hanchard N, Hervert M, Ober C, Pritchard K (2004). Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 74:6272.[ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |