JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdelis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Boskey, A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdelis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Boskey, A.L.
J Dent Res 82(9): 697-702, 2003
© 2003 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Spectroscopic Imaging of Mineral Maturation in Bovine Dentin

K. Verdelis1,2, M.A. Crenshaw2, E.P. Paschalis1, S. Doty1, E. Atti1, and A.L. Boskey1,*

1 Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA;
2 Dental Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA;

* corresponding author, boskeya{at}hss.edu


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dentin is a useful model for the study of mineral maturation. Using Fourier Transform Infrared Imaging (FTIRI), we characterized distinct regions in developing dentin at 7-µm spatial resolution. Mineral-to-matrix ratio and crystallinity in bovine dentin from cervical and incisal parts of 3rd-trimester fetal compared with one-year-old incisor crowns showed that virtually all maturation stages in dentin could be spectroscopically isolated and analyzed. In the fetal incisors, mantle and circumpulpal dentin presented distinct patterns of mineral maturation. Gradients in both mineral properties examined were observed at the mineralization front and at the dentino-enamel junction.

KEY WORDS: FTIR imaging • mineralization • dentinogenesis


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dentin presents an excellent model for the study of mineral maturation during biomineralization, since samples for experimental studies are abundant, and dentin, as distinct from bone, is not remodeled. Both predentin (the unmineralized precursor) and the mature mineralized tissue have been previously characterized as homogenates (Butler, 1984; Linde, 1984). Using spectroscopic, x-ray, and biomechanical microanalysis methods (Wentrup-Byrne et al., 1997; Tesch et al., 2001), investigators have shown dentin to present a wide variation of properties dependent on location. At the same time, details on the origin of this spatial variation and data showing its evolution with tissue maturation are lacking. Within mineralized dentin, there are two distinct dentin tissue compartments: The first formed is mantle dentin, which is adjacent to the enamel, and the remainder is circumpulpal dentin. These two compartments have distinct matrix composition and physical and biomechanical properties (Ten Cate, 1994). Patterns of biomineralization and mineral maturation should also be distinct in each. The existing anatomical variation within dentin (Pashley, 1989) mandates a comprehensive analysis of the components of both non-homogenized mantle and circumpulpal dentin (from the mineralization front to the dentino-enamel junction). In this study, we used Fourier Transform Infrared Imaging (FTIRI) to characterize the mineral in anatomically distinct regions of bovine dentin to provide insight into the developmental stages of mineral maturation.


   MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Specimen Preparation
Dentin samples from 6 developing unerupted incisors of 3rd-trimester calves and from 3 mature bovine incisors (year-old animals) were analyzed. Bovine jaws were obtained from a commercial source (Aries Scientific, Dallas, Tx, USA) and stored at -70°C prior to use, at which time teeth were extracted from the jaws. The IRB of the Hospital for Special Surgery has determined that materials obtained from an abbatoir are exempt from their review. The specimens were partially fixed in absolute methanol, dehydrated through a series of ethanol and acetone gradients, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Teeth were bisected longitudinally with a diamond wafer wheel saw, and non-decalcified 2-µm-thick sections of the incisor crowns were produced from one half by means of a Jung Polycut E microtome (Reichert-Jung, Heidelberg, Germany). The sections were mounted between 2 barium fluoride windows for FTIR imaging.

FTIR Imaging Analysis
We obtained FTIRI images from 20–40 fields per section using a BioRad (Cambridge, MA, USA) "Sting-Ray"TM system, as described in detail elsewhere (Mendelsohn et al., 1999). This instrument couples an FTIR microscope with a 64 x 64 element array Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride (MCT) focal plane array detector, providing 4096 spectra at ~ 7 µm spatial resolution in a 400 µm x 400 µm area. This FTIR microscope is coupled to an optical microscope for visual selection of the fields for analysis and acquisition of optical micrographs for reference. The average signal-to-noise ratio of the detector in the spectral region examined is approx. 50:1. Spectral data for the analysis were collected with a 4 cm-1 spectral resolution and 80 frames per step of the step-scan interferometer. All 4096 spectra from each field were processed for calculation of mineral and matrix parameters and creation of images with the use of a BioRad WinIR-Pro (BioRad Laboratories, Cambridge, MA, USA) and Microcal Origin (Microcal Software Inc., Northhampton, MA, USA) programs. Before parameter calculation, the PMMA contribution was spectrally subtracted based on its 1729 cm-1 component. The spectra were then baselined. In some cases, individual spectra were extracted from selected areas for more detailed analysis. Parameters examined were: (1) mineral:matrix ratio (the ratio of the integrated areas of the phosphate {nu}1,{nu}3 contour (900–1200 cm-1) to the Amide I band (1585–1700 cm-1); and (2) crystallinity determined as the 1030 cm-1 to 1020 cm-1 peak height ratio. This ratio reflects phosphate in stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric environments and is related to the crystal size and perfection as determined by x-ray diffraction (Gadaleta et al., 1996). Calculation was not performed for enamel pixels, since parameters were out of scale. We combined images by superimposing overlapping regions of each 400 µm x 400 µm dataset.


   RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Specimen Preparation
Typical sections of bovine teeth used for FTIR analyses are shown in Figs. 1aGo and 1bGo. FTIR images and spectroscopic information are shown from these specimens, but they are representative of all results obtained. The cervical (young tissue), mid-crown, and incisal (mature tissue) areas that were analyzed are indicated in Fig. 1Go. Only cervical and incisal areas were analyzed for the year-old incisor, for comparison of mineral and matrix properties and validation of the assumption that variation in dentin properties as a function of cervical/incisal location on the mature incisor is practically negligible.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Areas analyzed by FTIRI in bovine incisors: 3rd-trimester I2 developing incisor (a) and year-old I4 incisor (b). Young dentin (cervical) and older dentin (mid-crown and incisal) areas are noted. Rectangles indicate areas analyzed. Cervical and incisal areas analyzed as controls also indicated on year-old incisor (c). Spectra extracted from mantle dentin area of fields analyzed in incisor (a) at various distances from the cervix of the tooth [as indicated in (a)] and in incisor (b, stippled spectrum). {nu}1,{nu}3 PO43+ and Amide I bands noted. Pulp, dentin, and enamel are shown in (a). Bar = 0.5 mm.

 
Fig. 1cGo shows selected superimposed spectra acquired from the fetal incisor section of Fig. 1aGo (continuous-line spectra), and from the cervical area of the mature year-old incisor (stippled spectrum). These spectra were extracted from images of the mantle dentin area ~ 50 µm from the DEJ at different distances from the cervix (as indicated). With tissue maturation, a continuous increase in the total area of {nu}1,{nu}3 phosphate bands is obvious, suggesting a respective increase in relative mineral content, while, in parallel, there is a small decrease in the Amide I area. A distinct change in the {nu}1,{nu}3 phosphate band contour is also visible.

FTIR Imaging
Typical composite images of cervical, mid-crown, and incisal areas of the fetal calf incisor are presented in Fig. 2Go. Micrographs of fields are presented in Fig. 2aGo and respective color-coded images of mineral:matrix in Fig. 2bGo and crystallinity in Fig. 2cGo. Similar composites are shown in Fig. 3Go for the year-old incisor. For the very young tissue (fetal-cervical), both mineral:matrix and crystallinity values are higher adjacent to the dentino-enamel junction, in the region coinciding with mantle dentin. At more mature stages, mineral:matrix values in this area are lower, while crystallinity values are not different for most of the circumpulpal dentin (fetal-middle and incisal). Investigators using Raman microspectroscopy (Wentrup-Byrne et al., 1997), FTIR microscopic mapping, and quantitative back-scattered electron imaging (Tesch et al., 2001) have reported similar findings supporting a lower mineral content next to the DEJ in human teeth. The mineral:matrix ratio in the present study plateaus for the narrow strip of mantle dentin tissue, while the rest of the dentin matrix still shows increases in the mineral:matrix ratio. At later stages of development (fetal-incisal), mineral:matrix values and crystallinity in circumpulpal dentin show a wider distribution for locations at different distances from the mineralization front. This distribution persists through late maturity (one-year incisal). Overall values for the parameters examined are almost equal in cervical and incisal areas of the year-old incisor. Crystallinity values still increase after complete mineralization (evidenced by the constant mineral:matrix ratio) of both mantle and circumpulpal dentin.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. FTIR imaging analysis of 400 x 400 µm consecutive fields from cervical, mid-crown, and incisal parts of the fetal calf incisor shown in Fig. 1aGo. Composites of (a) actual field optical micrographs, (b) mineral:matrix ratio FTIR images, and (c) crystallinity FTIR images. Distribution of mineral:matrix and crystallinity values along a predentin-to-enamel line for the field marked with an asterisk is shown in Fig. 4aGo. P = Pulp, D = Dentin, E = Enamel. Bar represents 0.5 mm.

 


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. FTIR imaging analysis of 400 x 400 µm consecutive fields from cervical and incisal parts for the year-old incisor shown in Fig. 1bGo. (a) Optical micrographs, (b) mineral:matrix ratio FTIR images, and (c) crystallinity FTIR images. Distribution of mineral:matrix and crystallinity values along a predentin-to-dentin line for the field marked with an asterisk is shown in Fig. 4bGo. P = Pulp, D = Dentin. Bar represents 1 mm.

 
Fig. 4Go shows the distribution of values for the mineral:matrix ratio and crystallinity along the predentin-enamel line, represented by the white arrows on the cervical field from the fetal bovine incisor (Fig. 4aGo), and proximal to the pulp cervical field of the year-old incisor (Fig. 4bGo), noted with an asterisk in Figs. 2aGo and 3aGo, respectively. The whole range of dentin (predentin through enamel) is covered in the distribution shown in Fig. 4aGo, whereas only the mineralization front and part of circumpulpal dentin is covered in Fig. 4bGo. In the mineralization front region for the fetal and year-old incisors, there is no sharp line demarcating the mineralized and non-mineralized matrix; rather, there is a zone of transition between the two (taking place within approximately 30 µm in young teeth). This transition is obvious in the mineral:matrix value distributions and partly evidenced in the crystallinity value distributions along the line analyzed. Adjacent to the DEJ in the fetal incisor, another transition occurs, from dentin mineral:matrix values to those characteristic of enamel. Enamel crystallinity is not shown, since the parameter cannot be calculated, because there is no "non-stoichiometric apatite" component, and crystallinity values for these pixels have been omitted. In mature teeth, the same distributions cannot be analyzed for the DEJ area, since enamel fractured away during sectioning.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Changes in spectral parameters across selected regions of the fetal (a) and year-old incisor (b), shown by white lines in the Fig., show significant linear mineral:matrix increases in the mineralization front and the DEJ, with only a slight increase in the crystallinity parameter in the same areas. The linear regions analyzed are shown in the micrographs of the fields marked with an asterisk in Figs. 2aGo and 3aGo. P = Pulp, D = Dentin, E = Enamel. Crystallinity values for enamel pixels were not computed.

 

   DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study demonstrates the usefulness of both FTIR imaging and the fetal bovine tooth for characterizing changes in mineral properties of dentin during tooth development. Specifically, age- and site-dependent changes in relative mineral content, as well as relative crystal maturity, are demonstrated in the whole incisors. FTIRI as an analytical imaging method has been used to obtain qualitative and quantitative information on both mineral and matrix of bone (Marcott et al., 1999; Mendelsohn et al., 1999; Boskey et al., 2002b), calcifying cartilage cultures (Boskey et al., 2002a), and cartilage (Bhargava and Levin, 2001; Camacho et al., 2001), with a spatial resolution of ~ 7 µm. The two spectroscopic parameters, mineral:matrix ratio and crystallinity, were selected for dentin analysis because, as ratios, they are independent of sectioning artifacts, and they represent important properties. The mineral:matrix ratio is linearly related to the chemically measured ash weight (Pienkowski et al., 1997). Crystallinity reflects both the mineral crystallite size along the c-axis and the crystal perfection as determined by x-ray diffraction (Gadaleta et al., 1996).

In the present study, incisors from year-old animals were selected as the mature controls, because, with age, attrition of the incisors introduces pathology into the dentinal tissues, making older samples impractical for study. A notable point from the results shown is that enamel in the 3rd-trimester incisors could be sectioned intact, facilitating study of the DEJ and developing enamel in the same sections.

The FTIRI data allowed for visualization of the two distinct dentin compartments, demonstrating an earlier initiation of mineralization and crystal growth in mantle dentin and a more prolonged crystal growth period in circumpulpal dentin, that finally reaches overall higher mineral:matrix ratios. It is also interesting to note that crystallinity continues to increase after complete mineralization (constant mineral:matrix ratio) in both mantle and circumpulpal dentin. While the mineral:matrix values are very similar between cervical and incisal regions in the year-old incisor (Fig. 3bGo), both mantle and circumpulpal dentin show higher crystallinity levels in the incisal compared with the cervical region (Fig. 3cGo). Similar changes have been observed in bone maturation (Bonar et al., 1983).

Mantle dentin evolves as a separate entity from the rest of dentin. The amount of mantle dentin, whether hypo- or hypermineralized, as well as its relative content is controversial (Moss, 1974; Herr et al., 1986). The distribution of mineral content and crystallinity, with respect to that in the circumpulpal dentin, can be clearly defined by FTIRI. The distinct pattern in mineral maturation that appears in mantle dentin implies a separate mineralization mechanism in this area. Mantle dentin mineralization is believed to be initiated in matrix vesicles (Katchburian, 1973). The highly phosphorylated proteins, which are believed to regulate biomineralization in circumpulpal dentin (Butler, 1998), are less abundant in mantle dentin (Rahima et al., 1988). Minor circumpulpal dentin constituents, such as osteopontin and osteocalcin, are prominent in mantle dentin (McKee et al., 1996).

Spatial variations in mineral properties are caused both by the presence of mantle and circumpulpal dentin and by variations in peritubular dentin density. This shows clearly in the distribution of values within circumpulpal dentin in the year-old incisor. Previous studies have also shown mineral variation as a function of location in mature teeth (Kinney et al., 1996, 2001). Tesch et al. (2001), using various methods, including FTIR microspectroscopy, also showed variations in the structural and mechanical properties of the mineral as a function of location in the mature human tooth. This variation is due in part to the decrease in dentinal tubule density and a respective decrease in peritubular dentin density in areas farther from the mineralization front (Pashley, 1989). Since the mineral concentration and, most likely, the nature of the organic matrix in peritubular dentin differ from those in intertubular dentin (Weiner et al., 1999), a spatial variation is anticipated.

The linear gradients of mineral or matrix properties at the mineralization front and the DEJ shown in the present study also agree with observations made by other less-highly-resolved techniques. The extensive predentin-to-dentin transition was observed in the rat, both morphologically and by histochemical methods (Goldberg et al., 1998). The existence of a DEJ mineral gradient was hypothesized based on observations of biomechanical properties (White et al., 2000; Marshall et al., 2001)). A protein continuum is also hypothesized to exist at the DEJ (Bodier-Houllé et al., 2000).

The fetal bovine model presented covers a maturation span for the tissue from very early stages to near-maturity. With tissue maturation, mineral proliferates through secondary nucleation, growth, and perfection of individual crystals and crystal agglomeration (Heywood et al., 1990), while the matrix is thought to be degraded after it is laid down in the predentin (Veis, 1993). In this way, each mineral:matrix value within dentin represents a single time point in the development of the particular tissue. A slight reduction in the relative matrix content while the relative mineral content is still increasing, as found in this study, is consistent with previous data from the analysis of dentin matrix in whole fetal incisors at different gestation stages (Lee et al., 1983). As the results from the year-old bovine incisor show, in the mature incisors, values for mineral and matrix content and mineral maturation from cervical-area dentin are at comparable levels with those of the incisal area, and the two areas are most likely eventually equivalent in properties. This validates the assumption that, in the 3rd trimester, differences in the tissue properties of fetal incisors between cervical and incisal areas, for comparable locations of tissue points from the pulp or the DEJ, are due to tissue age difference. Conversely, as images for the the mature tooth show, differences in spatial distribution do not necessarily represent temporal differences.

FTIRI studies of dentin mineral and matrix maturation provide an opportunity for the analysis of the complex interactions between mineral and matrix of tissues during the biomineralization process. The model and technique evaluated here show the development of mantle and circumpulpal dentin as separate entities, the contribution of histologic variation in the properties of each, and the creation of histologic structures with characteristic properties, such as tissue interfaces in the mineralization front and DEJ area.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was funded by NIH grants K08 DE00467 and R01 DE04141. FTIR imaging was performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery IR Imaging Core, sponsored by NIH grant AR046121. This work was done in partial fulfillment of Dr. Verdelis’ requirements for a PhD in Oral Biology, Univ. of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. The authors are grateful to Dr. J.T. Wright for his suggestions and comments.

Received January 17, 2003; Last revision May 5, 2003; Accepted June 3, 2003


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bhargava R, Levin IW (2001). Fourier transform infrared imaging: theory and practice. Anal Chem 73:5157–5167.[Medline]

Bodier-Houllé P, Steuer P, Meyer JM, Bigeard L, Cuisinier FJ (2000). High resolution electron microscopic study of the relationship between human enamel and dentin crystals at the dentinoenamel junction. Cell Tissue Res 301:389–395.[ISI][Medline]

Bonar LC, Roufosse AH, Sabine WK, Grynpas MD, Glimcher MJ (1983). X-ray diffraction studies of the crystallinity of bone mineral in newly synthesized and density fractionated bone. Calcif Tissue Int 35:202–209.[ISI][Medline]

Boskey AL, Paschalis EP, Binderman I, Doty SB (2002a). BMP-6 accelerates both chondrogenesis and mineral maturation in differentiating chick limb-bud mesenchymal cell cultures. J Cell Biochem 84:509–519.[ISI][Medline]

Boskey AL, Spevak L, Paschalis E, Doty SB, McKee MD (2002b). Osteopontin deficiency increases mineral content and mineral crystallinity in mouse bone. Calcif Tissue Int 71:145–154.[ISI][Medline]

Butler WT (1984). Dentin collagen: chemical structure and role in mineralization. In: Dentin and dentinogenesis. Vol. II. Linde A, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Butler WT (1998). Dentin matrix proteins. Eur J Oral Sci 106(Suppl 1):204–210.

Camacho NP, West P, Torzilli PA, Mendelsohn R (2001). FTIR microscopic imaging of collagen and proteoglycan in bovine cartilage. Biopolymers 62:1–8.[ISI][Medline]

Gadaleta SJ, Camacho NP, Mendelsohn R, Boskey AL (1996). Fourier transform infrared microscopy of calcified turkey leg tendon. Calcif Tissue Int 58:17–23.[ISI][Medline]

Goldberg M, Septier D, Torres-Quintana M, Lecolle S, Hall R, Gafni G, et al. (1998). New insights on the dynamics of dentin formation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Chemistry and Biology of Mineralized Tissues. Vittel, France.

Herr P, Holz J, Baume LJ (1986). Mantle dentin in man—a quantitative microradiographic study. J Biol Buccale 14:139–146.[ISI][Medline]

Heywood BR, Sparks NH, Shellis RP, Weiner S, Mann S (1990). Ultrastructure, morphology and crystal growth of biogenic and synthetic apatites. Connect Tissue Res 25:103–119.[ISI][Medline]

Katchburian E (1973). Membrane-bound bodies as initiators of mineralization of dentine. J Anat 116:285–302.[ISI][Medline]

Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, Weihs TP (1996). Hardness and Young’s modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentine. Arch Oral Biol 41:9–13.[ISI][Medline]

Kinney JH, Pople JA, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ (2001). Collagen orientation and crystallite size in human dentin: a small angle x-ray scattering study. Calcif Tissue Int 69:31–37.[ISI][Medline]

Lee S, Kossiva D, Glimcher MJ (1983). Phosphoproteins of bovine dentin: evidence for polydispersity during tooth maturation. Biochemistry 22:2596–2601.[Medline]

Linde A (1984). Non-collagenous proteins and proteoglycans in dentinogenesis. In: Dentin and dentinogenesis. Vol. II. Linde A, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Marcott C, Reeder RC, Paschalis EP, Boskey AL, Mendelsohn R (1999). Infrared microspectroscopic imaging of biomineralized tissues using a mercury-cadmium-telluride focal plane array detector. Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon & Related Elements 146:417–420.

Marshall GW Jr, Balooch M, Gallagher R, Gansky SA, Marshall SJ (2001). Mechanical properties of the dentinoenamel junction: AFM studies of nanohardness, elastic modulus and fracture. J Biomed Mater Res 54:87–95.[ISI][Medline]

McKee MD, Zalzal S, Nanci A (1996). Extracellular matrix in tooth cementum and mantle dentin: localization of osteopontin and other noncollagenous proteins, plasma proteins and glycoconjugates by electron microscopy. Anat Rec 245:293–312.[Medline]

Mendelsohn R, Paschalis EP, Boskey AL (1999). Infrared spectroscopy, microscopy and microscopic imaging of biomineralizing tissues. Spectra-structure correlations from human iliac crest biopsies. J Biomed Optics 4:14–21.

Moss ML (1974). Studies on dentin. I. Mantle dentin. Acta Anat 87:481–507.[ISI][Medline]

Pashley DH (1989). Dentin: a dynamic substrate—a review. Scanning Microsc 3:161–176.[ISI][Medline]

Pienkowski D, Doers TM, Monier-Faugere MC, Geng Z, Camacho NP, Boskey AL, et al. (1997). Calcitonin alters bone quality in beagle dogs. J Bone Miner Res 12:1936–1943.[ISI][Medline]

Rahima M, Tsay TG, Andujar M, Veis A (1988). Localization of phosphophoryn in rat incisor dentin using immunocytochemical techniques. J Histochem Cytochem 36:153–157.[Abstract]

Ten Cate AR (1994). Oral histology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book.

Tesch W, Eidelman N, Roschger P, Goldenberg F, Klaushofer K, Fratzl P (2001). Graded microstructure and mechanical properties of human crown dentin. Calcif Tissue Int 69:147–157.[ISI][Medline]

Veis A (1993). Mineral-matrix interactions in bone and dentin. J Bone Miner Res 8(Suppl 2):S493–S497.

Weiner S, Veis A, Beniash E, Arad T, Dillon JW, Sabsay B, et al. (1999). Peritubular dentin formation: crystal organization and the macromolecular constituents in human teeth. J Struct Biol 126:27–41.[ISI][Medline]

Wentrup-Byrne E, Armstrong CA, Armstrong RS, Collins BM (1997). Fourier transform Raman microscopic mapping of the molecular components in a human tooth. J Raman Spectrosc 28:151–158.

White SN, Paine ML, Luo W, Sarikaya M, Fong H, Yu A, et al. (2000). The dentino-enamel junction is a broad transitional zone uniting dissimilar bioceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc 83:238–240.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdelis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Boskey, A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdelis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Boskey, A.L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)