JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 2. Comparison of immature and very old rat molars. (A,B) The Fluoro-Gold label of odontoblasts (arrows) was widespread and intense for first (M1) and second (M2) molars 3 days after placement on the mesial side of M1 in juvenile rats. The third molar (B) was not yet erupted and was unlabeled. (C) Year-old molars have much less odontoblast labeling (arrow) compared with immature teeth (AB), and Fluoro-Gold did not reach the posterior side of either the first or the second molar. (D,E) Differences in odontoblast height and labeling for young and old molars are shown in these higher-magnification views from Figs. 2A and 2C. Scale bars: A, C, 0.5 mm; B, D, E, 0.2 mm.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)