JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, X.
Right arrow Articles by Amar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, X.
Right arrow Articles by Amar, S.
J Dent Res 81(6): 399-405, 2002
© 2002 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biological

Identification of Genes Differentially Expressed in Cultured Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts vs. Human Gingival Fibroblasts by DNA Microarray Analysis

X. Han, and S. Amar,*

Department of Periodontology & Oral Biology, Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, 100 East Newton Street, G05, Boston, MA, 02118, USA;

*corresponding author, samar{at}bu.edu


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite their similar spindle-shaped appearance, periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and gingival fibroblasts (GF) appear to display distinct functional activities in the maintenance of tissue integrity and during inflammatory/immune responses. We postulated that different characteristics of PDLF and GF are defined by the differential expression of specific genes. To test this, we investigated the possible variance of gene expression profile between cultured PDLF and GF, using DNA microarray technology. One hundred sixty-three genes were found differentially expressed by at least three-fold between PDLF and GF. Genes encoding transmembrane proteins and cytoskeleton-related proteins tended to be up-regulated in PDLF, whereas genes encoding cell-cycle regulation proteins and metabolism-related proteins tended to be up-regulated in GF. We concluded that PDLF and GF appear to display different gene expression patterns that may reflect intrinsic functional differences of the two cell populations and may well coordinate with their tissue-specific activities.

KEY WORDS: periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) • gingival fibroblasts (GF) • periodontium • DNA microarray • differential gene expression


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and gingival fibroblasts (GF) appeared to be heterogeneous in vivo (Lekic et al., 1997) and displayed distinct functional activities in the regeneration and repair of the periodontal tissues (Nishimura and Terranova, 1996) as well as during inflammatory periodontal diseases (Kasasa and Soory, 1996). Recent studies have demonstrated that PDLF and GF displayed unique differences with respect to proliferation and wound fill (Oates et al., 2001), and they responded differently to growth factors during wound-healing processes (Mumford et al., 2001). We speculated that despite their similar spindle-shaped appearance, PDLF and GF differ in their biological functions that should mirror into a differential expression of specific genes.

While some efforts have been made recently to identify and characterize the functional differences between PDLF and GF by scanning electron microscopy and subtractive hybridization (Giannopoulou and Cimasoni, 1996; Park et al., 2001), the accurate pattern of differential gene expression between PDLF and GF remain unknown. Significant strides in analysis of gene expression have been made by means of DNA microarray technology. The technique has recently been successfully used in identifying host molecular pathways by comparative analysis of the host transcriptional response to infection (Detweiler et al., 2001), gaining insights into the mechanisms that control life-span and age-related phenotypes (Ly et al., 2000), as well as delineating differences in gene expression that might account for the discordant phenotype in autoimmune diseases (Wilson et al., 2000). In the present study, we analyzed differentially expressed genes between PDLF and GF, and clustered them according to their biological functions.


   MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture
PDLF and GF were obtained from explanted cultures of healthy human gingival and periodontal ligament tissues. PDLF samples were isolated from premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons. GF samples were isolated from gingival distal wedge biopsies derived from dental surgical procedures aimed at elongating dental crowns. Tissues were obtained from six Caucasian male patients (three for each tissue type) with matching ages (24-48 yrs old). All procedures were performed with appropriate informed consent, and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board on the Use of Human Subjects. Both fibroblast cell cultures were established as described previously (Nishimura and Terranova, 1996) with slight modification. Briefly, small pieces of gingival and periodontal ligament tissues were plated and cultured in Alpha Minimum Essential Medium (Gibco-BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 2.5 µg/mL fungizone) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. When confluent, the cells surrounding the explants were subcultured and maintained under the same conditions, which allowed for moderate growth. Cells collected between the fourth and eighth passages were used for subsequent experiments.

RNA Isolation
After cells became subconfluent, they were immediately subjected to lysis in solution RNA STAT-60 (TEL-TEST, Friendswood, TX, USA), and the total cellular RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Poly A+ RNA was purified with OligoTex mRNA isolation columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). PDLF and GF RNA samples used for subsequent experiments were pooled from cells from three subjects for each tissue type. Equal amounts of RNA were used from each cell passage. We checked the integrity of RNA samples by evaluating total cellular RNA on denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis, and further measured the purity and quantity of RNA samples by spectrophotometry.

Microarray Construction and Image Processing
Each mRNA sample (1 µg at 50 ng/µL) was used in triplicate for cDNA array hybridization. Fluorescent-tagged nucleotides were used to label cDNAs from PDLF (Cy5-dCTP) and GF (Cy3-dCTP) mRNAs during oligo-primed reverse transcription (RT). The microarray was spotted with a collection of a cDNA library containing 9018 unique human cDNA clones (IncyteGenomics, St. Louis, MO, USA). After hybridization, the array was imaged by modified scanning confocal fluorescent microscopy.

Microarray Data Analysis
Further analysis, such as data normalization, data filtering, and pattern identification, was conducted with GEMTools 2.5 (IncyteGenomics, St. Louis, MO, USA). Two criteria were taken into account: (1) the element's signal to background ratio and (2) the area percentage representing the hybridization size of an element on the microarray. The default values are 2.5 for signal-to-background ratio and 40% area. The level of detectable differential expression is 1.75-fold, which is the minimum threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.05). The results for chip validation and significance determination study can be accessed at: http://dentalschool.bu.edu/research/lifearray/. Given that false-positive observations may still occur when the levels of differential expression are low, or the signal-to-background ratios are small (Tusher et al., 2001), we further filtered the data with a more stringent threshold (three-fold differential expression), to ensure both statistical and biological significance.

Northern Analysis
Total RNA (20 µg each) were separated by 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis and transferred onto Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The cDNA fragments to be hybridized were generated from RT-PCR reaction with the use of gene-specific primers designed by Primer 3 software (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1998). Each probe was hybridized with the membrane for 2 hrs at 68°C. Radioactive signals were quantified with a PhosphorImager and IMAGEQUANT software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA probe was used as an internal control. The Student paired-sample t test was used to analyze the data, and the significance was defined as P < 0.05.


   RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Validation of Characteristic Phenotypes between Cultured PDLF and GF
Prior to performing the microarray, we tested the total RNAs extracted from the cultured PDLF and GF by Northern blot to validate their specific phenotypes. Periostin mRNA was found in abundance in total RNA from PDLF but was not detectable in RNA samples from GF. A higher level of S100A4 transcripts was also observed in total RNA from PDLF compared with that from GF, whereas CD40 was selectively expressed in total RNA from GF compared with PDLF (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression of periostin, S100A4, and CD40 in PDLF and GF analyzed by Northern blot. A pool of total RNA (20 µg) was isolated from cultured PDLF or GF from three donors. Equal amounts of RNAs were used from each cell passage. RNAs were blotted and hybridized serially with each cDNA probe for periostin, S100A4, and CD40. Blot was finally hybridized with a probe for human glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal standard. The results were representative of three independent repeats (n = 3).

 
Identification of Differences in Gene Expression Patterns between PDLF and GF
The transcript levels of the majority (around 94.2%) of genes remained unchanged between PDLF and GF, exhibiting less than 1.75-fold differential expression (Fig. 2Go). About 1.8% (163 genes) of all genes were found differentially expressed by at least three-fold. Among them, 84 gene transcripts (0.93%) were found to be comparatively more abundant in PDLF, whereas 79 genes (0.87%) were expressed at higher levels in GF (Fig. 2Go). To analyze the differences in expression pattern more thoroughly, we sorted all 163 of these genes according to their biological function (TableGo). We noticed that there were significant differences between PDLF and GF on several functional groups. First, 20 genes encoding transmembrane proteins were more abundantly expressed in PDLF compared with GF. Half of these genes have been up-regulated over five-fold, with the most significant one, milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 (MFG-E8), having a 31.5-fold differential expression. However, only 9 genes in the same functional group were up-regulated in GF, with comparatively low differential expression ratios (less than 4.5-fold). Furthermore, 14 cytoskeleton-related proteins were overexpressed in PDLF, whereas only 2 genes showed slightly higher expression in GF. On the other hand, many more cell-cycle regulation proteins (11 vs. 3) and metabolism-related proteins (14 vs. 3) were expressed at higher level in GF than in PDLF.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Differential expression between PDLF and GF of the 9018 unique human cDNAs represented in the microarray. mRNA from PDLF was labeled with Cy5; mRNA from GF was labeled with Cy3. Forward gridlines indicate expression ratios between the two probes. Each dot represents a gene. Genes differentially expressed by at least three-fold were indicated as those above or below red dashed lines.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table. Differentially Expressed Genes between PDLF and GF by DNA Microarraya
 
Verification of Array Results by Northern Analysis
To confirm the microarray data, we selected 4 genes (MFG-E8, TPM2, STK15, and MRPL3) with various levels of differential expression, and representing different functional groups, for analysis by Northern blot (Fig. 3AGo). The relative amount of MFG-E8 mRNA to GAPDH was 33-fold higher in PDLF than in GF, while the relative amount of STK15 mRNA was 4.1-fold higher in GF than in PDLF (Fig. 3BGo), concordant with their 31.5- and 4.7-fold differential expression, respectively, observed in microarray results. The relative ratio of TPM2 to GAPDH in PDLF was 2.2-fold higher than in GF, whereas the transcript level of MRPL3 showed 1.9-fold increase in GF than in PDLF (Fig. 3BGo). These were comparable with the three-fold differential expression for both of the genes observed in microarray.




View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Confirmation of differentially expressed genes observed in microarray results. (A) Four genes (MFG-E8, MRPL3, TMP2, and STK) selected from array results were analyzed by Northern blot as described in Fig. 1Go. (B) Radioactive signals were quantified by PhosphorImager with IMAGEQUANT software (Molecular Dynamics). Human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA probe was used as an internal control. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and expressed as ratios relative to GAPDH values (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n = 3).

 

   DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, we used DNA microarray technology to determine the pattern of gene expression between PDLF and GF. It was essential first to verify that our cultured cells maintain their phenotypes in vitro. We selected 3 genes for verification: periostin, S100A4, and CD40. Periostin was observed to be preferentially expressed in the periosteum and periodontal ligament, indicating its tissue specificity and a potential role in maintenance of tissue structure (Horiuchi et al., 1999). Also, S100A4 was reported as an extracellular inhibitor of mineralization and may be one of the factors responsible for keeping PDL space free of mineralization (Duarte et al., 1999). On the other hand, it has been observed that GF displayed up to a 13-fold higher constitutive level of CD40 than PDLF (Sempowski et al., 1997). The detection of these 3 genes according to their known expression and distribution in the RNAs extracted from our cultured PDLF and GF confirmed that they represented the original tissues and validated their use for subsequent investigations of gene expression profiling. This also corroborated the existence of a differential gene expression between PDLF and GF.

It was observed that transmembrane proteins were strongly up-regulated in PDLF compared with GF (TableGo). Most strikingly, MFG-E8 was markedly up-regulated in PDLF compared with GF, with a 31.5-fold differential expression. MFG-E8 has been known as a major glycoprotein of the milk fat globule membrane and may promote cell adhesion by binding to integrin receptors through its N-terminus and to phospholipids through its C-terminus (Andersen et al., 2000). Recently, an antimicrobial function has been conferred on MFG-E8 in phagosomes that participate in tissue remodeling, apoptotic cell clearance, and restriction of the spread of intracellular pathogens (Garin et al., 2001). This would substantiate the participation of PDLF in tissue remodeling, apoptosis, and restriction of pathogen spread through regulation of membrane surface proteins. Syndecan 4 (SDC4), a selectively enriched and widespread focal adhesion component and a regulator of growth factor signaling (Woods et al., 2000), was also up-regulated in PDLF, which substantiates the role of PDLF in site-specific responses to the extracellular signals. Sortilin (SORT1) was observed as another gene significantly up-regulated in PDLF, with a differential expression ratio of -17.4. Sortilin is a transmembrane type-I receptor (Mazella, 2001) that may regulate the function of cells involved in immune response and inflammation (Mazella et al., 1998). Taken together, the preferential expression of these specific cell-surface glycoproteins and proteoglycans on PDLF provides further suggestion of a role of PDLF in the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses by modulating cell-surface molecules. This could also help us understand the role of PDLF in the responses to periodontal pathogens and its ultimate contribution to wound-healing processes.

Another interesting observation in this study was the up-regulation of cytoskeleton-related proteins in PDLF compared with that in GF (14 vs. 2). Transgelin (TAGLN) is a transformation- and shape-change-sensitive protein found in fibroblasts (Lawson et al., 1997). Although its precise function is still unknown, its abundance in PDLF may contribute to the physiology and structural integrity of periodontal tissue. The expression of desmoplakin (DSP) in the PDLF has been considered to protect gap junctions in the PDLF against cell transformation caused by cell contraction, which may relate to tooth movement and repair of periodontal tissues (Yamaoka et al., 1999). Given the adaptive role of the periodontium, the presence of these specific cytoskeletal molecules suggests a central role of PDLF in the maintenance of periodontal tissue homeostasis and in tooth movement.

We also noticed that genes encoding cell-cycle regulation proteins and metabolism-related proteins tended to be more abundantly expressed in GF than in PDLF. Serine/threonine kinase 15 (STK15) is associated with centrosomes and plays a key role in mitosis (Zhou et al., 1998). The expression of STK15 mRNA was specifically observed at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle during proliferation (Kawasaki et al., 2001). CDC25B is a mitotic inducer controlling transition from the G2 to the M phase of the cell cycle (Korner et al., 2001). It has been shown that over-expression of Cdc25B enhances the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells, resulting in hyperplasia (Ma et al., 1999). Up-regulation of these genes may indicate faster progression of GF through the cell cycle and may facilitate fibroblast proliferation, an event important for tissue repair. In addition, significant up-regulation of metabolism-related genes involved in the synthesis of proteins and fatty acids and the processing of nucleic acids in GF compared with PDLF may further corroborate the enhanced GF proliferation compared with PDLF. There has been evidence that GF has a significantly greater proliferation rate (Larjava et al., 1989) than PDLF. Therefore, the increased expression of cell-cycle regulation and metabolism-related genes may partially explain enhanced GF proliferation compared with PDLF observed in periodontal wound healing (Oates et al., 2001).

Interestingly, IL-8 mRNA was found to be highly expressed in GF compared with PDLF, with a differential expression of 85.1-fold. Previous studies have shown that constitutively high levels of IL-8 are observed in cultured human gingival fibroblasts (Kent et al., 1996). Several reasons can be proposed for this observation: (i) GF is more engaged to respond to inflammatory stimuli than PDLF; (ii) neutrophil-mediated pro-inflammatory processes may be regulated in part by GF in the cytokine network of immuno-participant cells (Takashiba et al., 1992); and (iii) GF may play a role in the regulation of IL-8 production in the formation of the cytokine network (Takigawa et al., 1994). Further studies are warranted to elucidate the present role of IL-8 in GF compared with PDLF.

Recent studies of fibroblast cell lines from different donors identified an age-related difference with regard to differential gene expression (Ly et al., 2000). This concern has no bearing on our data, since we were careful in selecting our samples only from age-matched donors. However, due to the sample selection of this study, it has by no means represented the overall populations in regard to age, gender, and genetic background. Caution must be exercised in extrapolating the present data to the general population, since they reflect differential gene expression in healthy Caucasian adults (24-48 yrs old). Further studies aimed at determining whether the observations in this study can be generalized to other populations are warranted.

Due to limitations intrinsic to the array technology, currently available dot-printed chips include only a subset of human genes. Therefore, it is likely that some important genes may be missing from the set of cDNAs present on the chip. Indeed, the expression of S100A4 and CD40 was absent in the present array profile but was well-characterized by Northern analysis.

In summary, the present study compared the gene expression profile between cultured PDLF and GF by means of DNA microarray. PDLF and GF appear to display different gene expression patterns that may reflect intrinsic functional differences of the two cell populations. This differential expression of genes may well coordinate with their tissue-specific activities during inflammatory/immune responses and in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Anne-Laure Bolcato for expert technical assistance and data analysis. This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Grant DE 12482 to SA.

Received November 12, 2001; Last revision February 25, 2002; Accepted April 3, 2002


   REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Andersen MH, Graversen H, Fedosov SN, Petersen TE, Rasmussen JT (2000). Functional analyses of two cellular binding domains of bovine lactadherin. Biochemistry 39:6200–6206.[Medline]

Detweiler CS, Cunanan DB, Falkow S (2001). Host microarray analysis reveals a role for the Salmonella response regulator phoP in human macrophage cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5850–5855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Duarte WR, Iimura T, Takenaga K, Ohya K, Ishikawa I, Kasugai S (1999). Extracellular role of S100A4 calcium-binding protein in the periodontal ligament. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 255:416–420.[Medline]

Garin J, Diez R, Kieffer S, Dermine JF, Duclos S, Gagnon E, et al. (2001). The phagosome proteome: insight into phagosome functions. J Cell Biol 152:165–180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Giannopoulou C, Cimasoni G (1996). Functional characteristics of gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Dent Res 75:895–902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Horiuchi K, Amizuka N, Takeshita S, Takamatsu H, Katsuura M, Ozawa H, et al. (1999). Identification and characterization of a novel protein, periostin, with restricted expression to periosteum and periodontal ligament and increased expression by transforming growth factor beta. J Bone Miner Res 14:1239–1249.[Medline]

Kasasa SC, Soory M (1996). The effect of interleukin-1 (IL-1) on androgen metabolism in human gingival tissue (HGT) and periodontal ligament (PDL). J Clin Periodontol 23:419–424.[Medline]

Kawasaki A, Matsumura I, Miyagawa J, Ezoe S, Tanaka H, Terada Y, et al. (2001). Downregulation of an AIM-1 kinase couples with megakaryocytic polyploidization of human hematopoietic cells. J Cell Biol 152:275–287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kent LW, Dyken RA, Rahemtulla F, Allison AC, Michalek SM (1996). Effect of in vitro passage of healthy human gingival fibroblasts on cellular morphology and cytokine expression. Arch Oral Biol 41:263–270.[Medline]

Korner K, Jerome V, Schmidt T, Muller R (2001). Cell cycle regulation of the murine cdc25B promoter: essential role for nuclear factor-Y and a proximal repressor element. J Biol Chem 276:9662–9669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Larjava H, Heino J, Kahari VM, Krusius T, Vuorio E (1989). Characterization of one phenotype of human periodontal granulation-tissue fibroblasts. J Dent Res 68:20–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lawson D, Harrison M, Shapland C (1997). Fibroblast transgelin and smooth muscle SM22alpha are the same protein, the expression of which is down-regulated in many cell lines. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 38:250–257.[Medline]

Lekic PC, Pender N, McCulloch CA (1997). Is fibroblast heterogeneity relevant to the health, diseases, and treatments of periodontal tissues? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 8:253–268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ly DH, Lockhart DJ, Lerner RA, Schultz PG (2000). Mitotic misregulation and human aging. Science 287(5462):2486–2492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ma ZQ, Chua SS, DeMayo FJ, Tsai SY (1999). Induction of mammary gland hyperplasia in transgenic mice over-expressing human Cdc25B. Oncogene 18:4564–4576.[Medline]

Mazella J (2001). Sortilin/neurotensin receptor-3: a new tool to investigate neurotensin signaling and cellular trafficking? Cell Signal 13:1–6.[Medline]

Mazella J, Zsurger N, Navarro V, Chabry J, Kaghad M, Caput D, et al. (1998). The 100-kDa neurotensin receptor is gp95/sortilin, a non-G-protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem 273:26273–26276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mumford JH, Carnes DL, Cochran DL, Oates TW (2001). The effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on periodontal cells in an in vitro wound model. J Periodontol 72:331–340.[Medline]

Nishimura F, Terranova VP (1996). Comparative study of the chemotactic responses of periodontal ligament cells and gingival fibroblasts to polypeptide growth factors. J Dent Res 75:986–992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oates TW, Mumford JH, Carnes DL, Cochran DL (2001). Characterization of proliferation and cellular wound fill in periodontal cells using an in vitro wound model. J Periodontol 72:324–330.[Medline]

Park JC, Kim YB, Kim HJ, Jang HS, Kim HS, Kim BO, et al. (2001). Isolation and characterization of cultured human periodontal ligament fibroblast-specific cDNAs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282:1145–1153.[Medline]

Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (1998). Primer3. Code available at http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/genome_software/other/primer3.html

Sempowski GD, Chess PR, Moretti AJ, Padilla J, Phipps RP, Blieden TM (1997). CD40 mediated activation of gingival and periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Periodontol 68:284–292.[Medline]

Takashiba S, Takigawa M, Takahashi K, Myokai F, Nishimura F, Chihara T, et al. (1992). Interleukin-8 is a major neutrophil chemotactic factor derived from cultured human gingival fibroblasts stimulated with interleukin-1 beta or tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect Immun 60:5253–5258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takigawa M, Takashiba S, Myokai F, Takahashi K, Arai H, Kurihara H, et al. (1994). Cytokine-dependent synergistic regulation of interleukin-8 production from human gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol 65:1002–1007.[Medline]

Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001). Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5116–5121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilson SB, Kent SC, Horton HF, Hill AA, Bollyky PL, Hafler DA, et al. (2000). Multiple differences in gene expression in regulatory Valpha 24Jalpha Q T cells from identical twins discordant for type I diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7411–7416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Woods A, Longley RL, Tumova S, Couchman JR (2000). Syndecan-4 binding to the high affinity heparin-binding domain of fibronectin drives focal adhesion formation in fibroblasts. Arch Biochem Biophys 374:66–72.[Medline]

Yamaoka Y, Sawa Y, Ebata N, Yoshida S, Kawasaki T (1999). Desmosomal proteins in cultured and intact human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Tissue Cell 31:605–609.[Medline]

Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, Kuo WL, Gray JW, Sahin A, et al. (1998). Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet 20:189–193.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Burstein, E. Libby, A. Calderone, and S. Nattel
Differential Behaviors of Atrial Versus Ventricular Fibroblasts: A Potential Role for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor in Atrial-Ventricular Remodeling Differences
Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1630 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. A. Kues, B. Petersen, W. Mysegades, J. W. Carnwath, and H. Niemann
Isolation of Murine and Porcine Fetal Stem Cells from Somatic Tissue
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 1020 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
G. N. Belibasakis, A. Johansson, Y. Wang, C. Chen, S. Kalfas, and U. H. Lerner
The Cytolethal Distending Toxin Induces Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Ligand Expression in Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Periodontal Ligament Cells
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2005; 73(1): 342 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
P. C. Trackman and A. Kantarci
CONNECTIVE TISSUE METABOLISM AND GINGIVAL OVERGROWTH
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 165 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Han and S. Amar
Secreted Frizzled-related Protein 1 (SFRP1) Protects Fibroblasts from Ceramide-induced Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 2832 - 2840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
X. Han and S. Amar
IGF-1 Signaling Enhances Cell Survival in Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts vs. Gingival Fibroblasts
J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2003; 82(6): 454 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
C. M. Milner and A. J. Day
TSG-6: a multifunctional protein associated with inflammation
J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2003; 116(10): 1863 - 1873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, X.
Right arrow Articles by Amar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, X.
Right arrow Articles by Amar, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)