JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article


Figure 2. Regulation of iNOS expression. (A) Ligation of adenosine receptor with 2CADO resulted in an increase of iNOS mRNA expression in HGEC. HGEC were cultured (1 x 106/well in a 60-mm culture dish) with or without 2CADO (100 µM) for 6 hrs at 37°C. HGEC were also cultured (1 x 106/well in a 60-mm culture dish) in the presence of IL-1ß (25 U/mL) plus TNF{alpha} (10 ng/mL) as a positive control. RT-PCR was then carried out for detection of iNOS and GAPDH mRNA expression in HGEC as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. Results of 1 representative experiment from among 5 identical experiments are shown. The number of PCR cycles is shown above each lane. The mean ratios ± SD, which were determined as described in MATERIALS & METHODS, of iNOS mRNA expression in untreated, IL-1ß plus TNF{alpha}-treated, and 2CADO-treated HGEC were 0.11 ± 0.16, 0.85 ± 0.25, and 0.64 ± 0.34, respectively. (B) Adenosine receptor antagonist abrogated 2CADO-induced iNOS expression in SV-40-transformed HGEC. SV-40-transformed HGEC (epi 4) were cultured (1 x 105/well in 24-well plates) in the presence or absence of 2CADO (100 µM) with or without XAC (10 µM), an adenosine receptor antagonist, for 2.5 hrs at 37°C, and then RT-PCR was carried out for the detection of iNOS and GAPDH mRNA expression in epi 4. Results of 1 representative experiment from among 3 identical experiments are shown. The number of PCR cycles is shown above each lane. The mean ratios ± SD, which were determined as described in MATERIALS & METHODS, of iNOS mRNA expression in untreated, 2CADO-treated, 2CADO plus XAC-treated, and XAC-treated epi4 were 0.02 ± 0.04, 0.98 ± 0.36, 0.07 ± 0.01, and 0.01 ± 0.02, respectively.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)