JDR Sign up for ETOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article


Figure 1. Tropoelastin mRNA expression by HGF and HPLF. (A) Northern blotting analysis. HGF and HPLF were harvested at different times, as indicated. Total cell RNA was prepared, and 2 µg was analyzed by Northern blotting, as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. The top panel shows a representative Northern blot probed for tropoelastin mRNA expression, after which the blot was stripped and re-probed for ß-actin mRNA expression (bottom panel). (B) The bands in (A) were analyzed densitometrically, and the HGF tropoelastin mRNA to ß-actin mRNA ratios are plotted on a bar graph. The results are expressed as percentages relative to the four-week value and represent the means ± SD (standard deviation) of three independent experimental determinations. (C) Photograph of ethidium-bromide-stained 1% agarose electrophoresis gels showing the RT-PCR products of mRNAs extracted from HGF and HPLF after culture for 4 wks. A tropoelastin band from the HGF sample appearing at 1100-bp sites is present in lane 1. No detectable tropoelastin band was obtained from HPLF (lane 3). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) bands from HGF and HPLF samples appeared at 998-bp sites in lanes 2 and 4, respectively. The molecular mass standards (lane STD) were Lambda DNA/(EcoRI and HindIII) fragments.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)