|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
Division of Dermatology, University of California San Diego; and VA San Diego Healthcare Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA;
*corresponding author, rgallo{at}vapop.ucsd.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: oral mucosa CRAMP LL-37 innate immunity
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-) (Zhao et al., 1996), and the histatins (Oppenheim et al., 1988). When studied in vitro, these peptides have distinct and overlapping antimicrobial activity (Bals, 2000; Yang et al., 2001). Cathelicidins are a widely expressed family of mammalian antimicrobial peptides that contain a highly conserved signal sequence and cathelin domain but show substantial heterogeneity in the C-terminal domain encoding the mature active peptide (Zanetti et al., 1995). Cathelicidins are found in many mammals, including primates, ungulates, rodents, and rabbits (Zaiou and Gallo, 2002). The murine cathelicidin CRAMP (Cathelin-related Antimicrobial Peptide) (Gallo et al., 1997) closely resembles human LL-37, first isolated from human granulocytes (Gudmundsson et al., 1996). Both CRAMP and LL-37 antimicrobial domains show considerable structural homology, are synthesized as preproproteins (Zanetti et al., 1995), and are processed from an inactive precursor form to an active mature peptide to kill bacteria. In skin, these antimicrobial peptides show identical patterns of expression and are greatly increased after wounding occurs (Dorschner et al., 2001).
Cathelicidins have broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi and envelope viruses (Bals et al., 1998; Johansson et al., 1998; Turner et al., 1998; Dorschner et al., 2001). Histatin peptides are microbicidal, possibly involved in maintaining the acquired enamel pellicle, and enhance the glycolytic activity of certain oral micro-organisms. Histatin and calprotectin have antimicrobial activity against Candida (Oppenheim et al., 1988; Eversole et al., 1993). ß-defensins have antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, some Gram-positive bacteria, and Candida albicans (Dale and Krisanaprakornkit, 2001; Lehrer and Ganz, 2002). ß-defensins have also been specifically investigated with respect to their activity against oral bacteria; Capnocytophaga spp. are sensitive to oxygen-independent killing by human defensins, whereas the A. actinomycetemcomitans and E. corrodens strains were resistant (Miyasaki et al., 1990). Therefore, the co-expression of cathelicidins and ß-defensins in saliva with peptides such as histatin and calprotectin provides a powerful combined natural antibiotic barrier.
In the oral cavity, antimicrobial peptides of the ß-defensin and histatin families have been described (vanderSpek et al., 1990; Weinberg et al., 1998). ß-defensins and histatins have antimicrobial activity distinct from that of cathelicidins, but are also active against certain Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses (Weinberg et al., 1998; Huttner and Bevins, 1999). In contrast to the expression of human beta-defensins hBD-1 and hBD-2 described in gingiva, LL-37 has been found in lesser amounts and mostly within neutrophils (Dale et al., 2001). Since cathelicidins and ß-defensins act synergistically to kill several strains of bacteria (Nagaoka et al., 2000), we evaluated the oral cavity for constitutive expression of cathelicidins in salivary glands as a potential additional mode of delivery of antimicrobial peptides under non-inflammatory conditions.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human Saliva
For Western-blot analysis, human saliva was collected from two healthy volunteers. Crude saliva (500 µL) was twice centrifuged at 15,000 r.p.m. for 10 min, then supernatant-acidified by the addition of 500 µL of 1 M HCl/1%TFA, concentrated by lyophilization, and re-suspended in 50 µL of doubly-glass-distilled water (DDW). All samples were stored at -20°C until use. Total protein concentration of the collected saliva was evaluated by BCA assay (protein assay reagent, Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
Reverse-transcription/Polymerase Chain-reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from freshly dissected tissues by means of an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). cDNA was prepared from 1 µg of total RNA by means of a RETROscript kit (Ambion, Woodward, Austin, TX, USA). PCR protocol for amplification of CRAMP cDNA was as previously described, with 35 cycles (Dorschner et al., 2001). PCR amplification of CRAMP was performed with the forward primer (5'-AGGAGATCTTGGGAACCATGCAGTT-3') and the reverse primer (5'-GCAGATCTACTGTCCGGCTGAGGTA-3') for a 532-bp product. Each of these primers has a Bgl-II restriction enzyme before both 5' ends. Amplification of 18S rRNA was performed in parallel for all samples with a QuantumRNA classic 18S internal standard kit (Ambion, Woodward, Austin, TX, USA). For a positive control template, mouse bone marrow total RNA was used, and the PCR product was directly sequenced and found to be identical to CRAMP.
In situ Hybridization
For in situ probes, a PCR product of CRAMP mature form (CRmf, 159 bp) was amplified and sequenced for confirmation of identity, then inserted into the PCR II-TOPO vector (TOPO TA Cloning version M, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Plasmid DNA was purified by means of a DNA Extraction Maxi Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and linearized with restriction enzymes (BglII and XbaI) for anti-sense and sense RNA probe. Digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes were prepared on linearized plasmid by means of the digoxigenin (DIG) RNA labeling kit (SP6/T7, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). To confirm the specificity of the labeled probes, we blotted 2 µL of the plasmid cDNA for CRmf on nitrocellulose filters (OSMONICS, Westborough, MA, USA).
Fresh-frozen sections were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min at room temperature, and pre-treated with 1 µg/mL proteinase K in PBS for 15 min at 37°C. Sections were treated with a 1 M triethanolamine solution (pH 8.0) containing 0.25% acetic anhydride for 15 min at 37°C, washed with PBS at least 3 times, then treated with 100% ethanol for 5 min, and dried. Pre-hybridization was performed with 50% formamide in 2x sodium saline citrate (SSC: 3 M sodium chloride, 0.03 M sodium citrate) for 30 min at 45°C. Sections were then hybridized for 16 hrs at 45°C with sense or antisense DIG-labeled cRNA probes (1 µg/mL) in hybridization solution (1 mg/mL yeast tRNA, 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer [pH 8.0], 2.5 mM EDTA, 1x Denhardt's solution, 0.3 M NaCl, 50% de-ionized formamide, 50% dextran sulfate). Stringent washing was done for 60 min at 45°C with 50% formamide in 2x SSC, and for 10 min at 37°C with 2x SSC; samples were then treated with RNase-A (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C. After being washed with the 2x SSC for 30 min at 37°C, sections were reacted with anti-DIG alkaline phosphate Fab fragment antibody (1:500, in PBS, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) for 5 hrs at RT. Alkaline phosphate was visualized by incubation with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (X-phosphate) and nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) with addition of levamisole solution (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA) overnight at room temperature (RT). Methyl green stain was used for nuclear counterstain. RNA preservation in tissues was confirmed by similar hybridizations by means of a keratin 14 antisense probe (insert 175 bp).
Immunohistochemistry
For CRAMP protein, rabbit anti-CRAMP polyclonal antibody was used as previously described (Dorschner et al., 2001; Pestonjamasp et al., 2001). Tissue sections were immersed in PBS after 4% PFA fixation for 20 min, and endogenous peroxidase activity blocked with a 30-minute incubation in 0.3% H2O2 in methanol. Sections were blocked with 2% goat serum in PBS for 30 min, and incubated with primary antibody, rabbit anti-CRAMP polyclonal antibody (0.8 µg/mL) in PBS, 3% bovine serum albumin for 60 min. Signal was detected with a Vectorstain ABC Elite Rabbit kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and processed by means of an ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). As a negative control, the polyclonal antibody was replaced by normal rabbit pre-immune IgG diluted with PBS containing 3% BSA at the same protein concentration as the primary antibody. Finally, sections were incubated in 0.02% diaminobenzidine with 0.05% H2O2 in PBS for 5 min and counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin for 30 sec. The specificity of the primary antibody reaction has been confirmed in separate experiments by absorption of the anti-CRAMP with excess amounts of synthetic peptide.
Western-blot Analysis
Rabbit anti LL-37 polyclonal antibody for immunostaing was kindly provided by Dr. Birgitta Agerberth (Microbiology and Tumorbiology Center, Stockholm, Sweden). This antibody was derived against the entire LL-37 peptide (Agerberth et al., 1995; Frohm et al., 1997).
Chicken polyclonal antibodies were derived against LL-37 mature form and cathelin domain (CATH) peptides by Aves Labs. (Tigard, OR, USA). Peptide amino acid sequences used for immunization were CZQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES and CZNLYRLLDLDPRPTMD for LL-37 and CATH, thus identifying domains in the C-terminal antimicrobial peptide and the precursor protein, respectively. IgY fractions were affinity-purified with the respective immunizing peptides. The stock concentrations of the antibodies were 1.25 mg/mL and 1.62 mg/mL for LL-37 and cathelin.
Samples were separated by 4-20% gradient SDS/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Express gels, ISC BioExpress, Kaysville, VT, USA), and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (OSMONICS, Westborough, MA, USA). Membrane was blocked (0.1% TTBS: 5% non-fat milk in 0.1% Tween 20/Tris buffered saline ([BS: 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris Base, pH 7.4]) for 60 min at RT, and then rabbit anti-LL37 polyclonal antibody (1:3000 in the blocking solution) was incubated with the membrane for 60 min at RT. After the membrane was washed 3x with 0.1% TTBS, horseradish-peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit goat polyclonal antibody (1:5000 in the blocking solution) was incubated with the membrane for 60 min at RT. After the membrane was washed with 0.1% TTBS, it was immersed in ECL solution (Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagents Plus, New Lifescience Products, Boston, MA, USA) for 60 sec, then exposed to x-ray film (Kodak). Synthetic LL-37 peptide derived by Synpep Corporation (Dublin, OR, USA) was used for positive control of Western blot.
For confirmation of the identity of the band detected by Western blot, the filter was stripped of antibody (62.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 100 mM ß-mercaptoethanol) at 50°C for 30 min, then reacted with a newly derived chicken anti-cathelin antibody (1:10000) and horseradish-peroxidase-labeled goat anti-chicken IgY (1:10000; Aves Labs.). The filter was again stripped of antibody, then reacted with a newly derived chicken anti-LL37 antibody (1:2000) and horseradish-peroxidase-labeled goat anti-chicken IgY according to the same method described above.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
LL-37 protein expression was detectable in crude extracts of human saliva (Fig. 4
). Three bands were detected with rabbit anti-LL37, two with chicken anti-cathelin domain, and two with chicken anti-LL37 used for further confirmation of the identity of the proteins seen by Western blot. Bands at 18 kDa correspond to the full-length cathelicidin, and additional 14-kDa bands were detectable with all three antibodies. Bands at 5 kDa correspond with the mature LL-37 peptide. Chicken anti-LL-37 had lower sensitivity than rabbit anti-LL-37, as seen by comparison of reactivity to the LL-37 synthetic peptide.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To explore the expression of cathelicidin, we microdissected individual tissues from the mouth and performed semi-quantitative PCR. These results suggested that cathelicidin mRNA was present in the oral cavities of mice from the late embryonic period to adult. The high sensitivity and potential for false-positive results with PCR necessitated further analysis by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Both techniques confirmed expression of cathelicidin in secretory epithelia and mucosal structures. CRAMP mRNA was detected only in acinar cells, and CRAMP protein in both acinar and ductal cells. In contrast, hBD-1 had been previously shown in the minor salivary gland and ductal cells, with no expression found in acinar cells (Sahasrabudhe et al., 2000). These results show that secretion of cathelicidin and defensin differs in the salivary glands, with a possibility of distinct regulation as well as mutual cooperation against oral pathogens.
To confirm that these observations in mouse salivary glands are relevant to human oral defense, we investigated human saliva. Using a combination of distinct antibodies against different domains of human cathelicidin LL-37, we showed that this peptide is abundantly present and apparently processed into several forms. Using antibodies derived against the mature peptide and the 18-kDa immature form, we could see a 14-kDa band and the mature 37-amino-acid peptide. However, analysis of human saliva with a chicken anti-LL-37 antibody derived against a carboxy-terminal peptide fragment from LL-37 could not detect the 18-kDa immature form. This likely reflects epitope masking in the mature form, since both antibodies could detect the mature form of LL-37, and a third antibody directed against the cathelin domain detected both the 18- and 14-kDa forms. The function of these various processed forms of cathelicidin remains unknown.
In the oral cavity, multiple peptides and proteins with antimicrobial action have been described. For example, lysozyme (Tobgi et al., 1988), calprotectin (Eversole et al., 1993), ß-defensins (Mathews et al., 1999; Dale and Krisanaprakornkit, 2001; Dunsche et al., 2001), and histatin (Oppenheim et al., 1988; vanderSpek et al., 1990) have been identified. Cathelicidin expression has been previously described in tongue and buccal mucosa (Frohm Nilsson et al., 1999). However, although cathelicidins are essential in the defense of skin against bacterial invasion (Nizet et al., 2001), there have been no reports of cathelicidin expression in salivary glands. The significance of the current observations of cathelicidin expression is therefore the recognition of a natural antibiotic previously shown to be essential to skin defense as an additional antimicrobial peptide participating in oral protection.
Like all reports of in vitro antimicrobial activity, the interpretation of antimicrobial results depends on the assay system used. For example, oral bacteria such as A. actinomycetemcomitans, C. sputigena, C. gingivalis, and C. ochracea have been shown to be sensitive to LL-37 in 10 mM sodium phosphate with 1% TSB solution, but not in high salt (Tanaka et al., 2000). LL-37 has been reported as ineffective in tryptic soy broth (TSB)-based medium for oral bacteria such as A. actinomycetemcomitans, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, S. sanguis, C. albicans, C. kurusei, and C. tropicalis, with no correlation with salt concentration (Guthmiller et al., 2001). Such conflicting results suggest that caution be applied to extrapolation of data from the in vitro system to conclusions regarding in vivo immune defense of the mouth. Nevertheless, the synergistic action of the previously described oral antimicrobial peptides supports their role in host defense (Nagaoka et al., 2000; Dale and Krisanaprakornkit, 2001).
Further study of the combined activities and regulation of oral antimicrobial peptides will greatly advance our understanding of this system of epithelial defense. Direct analysis of the individual contribution of each peptide to antimicrobial action is needed. As information continues to accumulate, it has become clear, however, that unique systems of gene regulation and protein processing contribute to the functions of these molecules in different tissues. In mammals, cathelicidins are likely to play an important role in host defense at multiple epithelial surfaces and may provide important diagnostic and therapeutic advances toward disease resistance. These observations have led to an associated human periodontal disease. A deficiency in salivary LL-37 correlates with severe periodontal disease in morbus Kostmann (Putsep et al., 2002)
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received March 7, 2002; Last revision August 16, 2002; Accepted September 23, 2002
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bals R (2000). Epithelial antimicrobial peptides in host defense against infection. Respir Res 1:141150.[Medline]
Bals R, Wang X, Zasloff M, Wilson JM (1998). The peptide antibiotic LL-37/hCAP-18 is expressed in epithelia of the human lung where it has broad antimicrobial activity at the airway surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:95419546.
Dale BA, Krisanaprakornkit S (2001). Defensin antimicrobial peptides in the oral cavity. J Oral Pathol Med 30:321327.[Medline]
Dale BA, Kimball JR, Krisanaprakornkit S, Roberts F, Robinovitch M, O'Neal R, et al. (2001). Localized antimicrobial peptide expression in human gingiva. J Periodontal Res 36:285294.[Medline]
Dorschner RA, Pestonjamasp VK, Tamakuwala S, Ohtake T, Rudisill J, Nizet V, et al. (2001). Cutaneous injury induces the release of cathelicidin anti-microbial peptides active against group A Streptococcus. J Invest Dermatol 117:9197.[Medline]
Dunsche A, Acil Y, Siebert R, Harder J, Schroder JM, Jepsen S (2001). Expression profile of human defensins and antimicrobial proteins in oral tissues. J Oral Pathol Med 30:154158.[Medline]
Eversole LR, Miyasaki KT, Christensen RE (1993). Keratinocyte expression of calprotectin in oral inflammatory mucosal diseases. J Oral Pathol Med 22:303307.[Medline]
Frohm M, Agerberth B, Ahangari G, Stahle-Backdahl M, Liden S, Wigzell H, et al. (1997). The expression of the gene coding for the antibacterial peptide LL-37 is induced in human keratinocytes during inflammatory disorders. J Biol Chem 272:1525815263.
Frohm Nilsson M, Sandstedt B, Sorensen O, Weber G, Borregaard N, Stahle-Backdahl M (1999). The human cationic antimicrobial protein (hCAP18), a peptide antibiotic, is widely expressed in human squamous epithelia and colocalizes with interleukin-6. Infect Immun 67:25612566.
Gallo RL, Kim KJ, Bernfield M, Kozak CA, Zanetti M, Merluzzi L, et al. (1997). Identification of CRAMP, a cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide expressed in the embryonic and adult mouse. J Biol Chem 272:1308813093.
Gudmundsson GH, Agerberth B, Odeberg J, Bergman T, Olsson B, Salcedo R (1996). The human gene FALL39 and processing of the cathelin precursor to the antibacterial peptide LL-37 in granulocytes. Eur J Biochem 238:325332.[Medline]
Guthmiller JM, Vargas KG, Srikantha R, Schomberg LL, Weistroffer PL, McCray PB Jr, et al. (2001). Susceptibilities of oral bacteria and yeast to mammalian cathelicidins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:32163219.
Huttner KM, Bevins CL (1999). Antimicrobial peptides as mediators of epithelial host defense. Pediatr Res 45:785794.[Medline]
Johansson J, Gudmundsson GH, Rottenberg ME, Berndt KD, Agerberth B (1998). Conformation-dependent antibacterial activity of the naturally occurring human peptide LL-37. J Biol Chem 273:37183724.
Lehrer RI, Ganz T (2002a). Defensins of vertebrate animals. Curr Opin Immunol 14:96102.[Medline]
Lehrer RI, Ganz T (2002b). Cathelicidins: a family of endogenous antimicrobial peptides. Curr Opin Hematol 9:1822.[Medline]
Mathews M, Jia HP, Guthmiller JM, Losh G, Graham S, Johnson GK, et al. (1999). Production of beta-defensin antimicrobial peptides by the oral mucosa and salivary glands. Infect Immun 67:27402745.
Miyasaki KT, Bodeau AL, Selsted ME, Ganz T, Lehrer RI (1990). Killing of oral, Gram-negative, facultative bacteria by the rabbit defensin, NP-1. Oral Microbiol Immunol 5:315319.[Medline]
Nagaoka I, Hirota S, Yomogida S, Ohwada A, Hirata M (2000). Synergistic actions of antibacterial neutrophil defensins and cathelicidins. Inflamm Res 49:7379.[Medline]
Nizet V, Ohtake T, Lauth X, Trowbridge J, Rudisill J, Dorschner RA, et al. (2001). Innate antimicrobial peptide protects the skin from invasive bacterial infection. Nature 414:454457.[Medline]
Oppenheim FG, Xu T, McMillian FM, Levitz SM, Diamond RD, Offner GD, et al. (1988). Histatins, a novel family of histidine-rich proteins in human parotid secretion. Isolation, characterization, primary structure, and fungistatic effects on Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 263:74727477.
Pestonjamasp VK, Huttner KH, Gallo RL (2001). Processing site and gene structure for the murine antimicrobial peptide CRAMP. Peptides 22:16431650.[Medline]
Putsep K, Carlsson G, Boman HG, Anderson M (2002). Deficiency of antibacterial peptides in patients with morbus Kostmann: an observation study. Lancet 360:11441149.[Medline]
Sahasrabudhe KS, Kimball JR, Morton TH, Weinberg A, Dale BA (2000). Expression of the antimicrobial peptide, human beta-defensin 1, in duct cells of minor salivary glands and detection in saliva. J Dent Res 79:16691674.
Tanaka D, Miyasaki KT, Lehrer RI (2000). Sensitivity of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Capnocytophaga spp. to the bactericidal action of LL-37: a cathelicidin found in human leukocytes and epithelium. Oral Microbiol Immunol 15:226231.[Medline]
Tobgi RS, Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW (1988). In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to lysozyme. Oral Microbiol Immunol 3:3539.[Medline]
Turner J, Cho Y, Dinh NN, Waring AJ, Lehrer RI (1998). Activities of LL-37, a cathelin-associated antimicrobial peptide of human neutrophils. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:22062214.
vanderSpek JC, Offner GD, Troxler RF, Oppenheim FG (1990). Molecular cloning of human submandibular histatins. Arch Oral Biol 35:137143.[Medline]
Weinberg A, Krisanaprakornkit S, Dale BA (1998). Epithelial antimicrobial peptides: review and significance for oral applications. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9:399414.
Yang D, Chertov O, Oppenheim JJ (2001). Participation of mammalian defensins and cathelicidins in anti-microbial immunity: receptors and activities of human defensins and cathelicidin (LL-37). J Leukoc Biol 69:691697.
Zanetti M, Gennaro R, Romeo D (1995). Cathelicidins: a novel protein family with a common proregion and a variable C-terminal antimicrobial domain. FEBS Lett 374:15.[Medline]
Zasloff M (2002). Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organism. Nature 415:389395.[Medline]
Zhao C, Wang I, Lehrer RI (1996). Widespread expression of beta-defensin hBD-1 in human secretory glands and epithelial cells. FEBS Lett 396:319322.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Diamond, N. Beckloff, and L.K. Ryan Host Defense Peptides in the Oral Cavity and the Lung: Similarities and Differences J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2008; 87(10): 915 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bucki, D. B. Namiot, Z. Namiot, P. B. Savage, and P. A. Janmey Salivary mucins inhibit antibacterial activity of the cathelicidin-derived LL-37 peptide but not the cationic steroid CSA-13 J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2008; 62(2): 329 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Huang, R. Y. Reins, R. L. Gallo, and A. M. McDermott Cathelicidin-Deficient (Cnlp / ) Mice Show Increased Susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 4498 - 4508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mookherjee, H. L. Wilson, S. Doria, Y. Popowych, R. Falsafi, J. Yu, Y. Li, S. Veatch, F. M. Roche, K. L. Brown, et al. Bovine and human cathelicidin cationic host defense peptides similarly suppress transcriptional responses to bacterial lipopolysaccharide J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 80(6): 1563 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ding, S. Cui, C. Li, S. Jothy, V. Haase, B. Steer, P. Marsden, J. Pippin, S. Shankland, M. Rastaldi, et al. Faulty Podocyte Hypoxia Sensing--A Novel Pathway for Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis: Loss of the Tumor Suppressor Vhlh Leads to Upregulation of Cxcr4 and Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis. Nat Med 12: 1081-1087, 2006 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3267 - 3272. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.T. Liu, S. Stenger, H. Li, L. Wenzel, B.H. Tan, S.R. Krutzik, M.T. Ochoa, J. Schauber, K. Wu, C. Meinken, et al. Vitamin D3-Triggered Antimicrobial Response--Another Pleiotropic Effect beyond Mineral and Bone Metabolism: Toll-Like Receptor Triggering of a Vitamin D-Mediated Human Antimicrobial Response. Science 311: 1770-1773, 2006 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 2949 - 2953. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bachrach, G. Chaushu, M. Zigmond, E. Yefenof, A. Stabholz, J. Shapira, J. Merrick, and S. Chaushu Salivary LL-37 Secretion in Individuals with Down Syndrome is Normal. J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 933 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Huang, T. D. Petkova, R. Y. Reins, R. J. Proske, and A. M. McDermott Multifunctional Roles of Human Cathelicidin (LL-37) at the Ocular Surface. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2369 - 2380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pochet, S. Tandel, S. Querriere, M. Tre-Hardy, M. Garcia-Marcos, M. De Lorenzi, M. Vandenbranden, A. Marino, M. Devleeschouwer, and J.-P. Dehaye Modulation by LL-37 of the Responses of Salivary Glands to Purinergic Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 2037 - 2046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Rodriguez-Martinez, M E Cancino-Diaz, and J C Cancino-Diaz Expression of CRAMP via PGN-TLR-2 and of {alpha}-defensin-3 via CpG-ODN-TLR-9 in corneal fibroblasts. Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2006; 90(3): 378 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mookherjee, K. L. Brown, D. M. E. Bowdish, S. Doria, R. Falsafi, K. Hokamp, F. M. Roche, R. Mu, G. H. Doho, J. Pistolic, et al. Modulation of the TLR-Mediated Inflammatory Response by the Endogenous Human Host Defense Peptide LL-37 J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2455 - 2464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tao, R. J. Jurevic, K. K. Coulton, M. T. Tsutsui, M. C. Roberts, J. R. Kimball, N. Wells, J. Berndt, and B. A. Dale Salivary Antimicrobial Peptide Expression and Dental Caries Experience in Children Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2005; 49(9): 3883 - 3888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Li, X. Luo, and S. Muallem Regulation of the P2X7 Receptor Permeability to Large Molecules by Extracellular Cl- and Na+ J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 26922 - 26927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Gombart, N. Borregaard, and H. P. Koeffler Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor and is strongly up-regulated in myeloid cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 FASEB J, July 1, 2005; 19(9): 1067 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iimura, R. L. Gallo, K. Hase, Y. Miyamoto, L. Eckmann, and M. F. Kagnoff Cathelicidin Mediates Innate Intestinal Defense against Colonization with Epithelial Adherent Bacterial Pathogens J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4901 - 4907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. A. Lee, T. Ohtake, M. Zaiou, M. Murakami, J. A. Rudisill, K. H. Lin, and R. L. Gallo From The Cover: Expression of an additional cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide protects against bacterial skin infection PNAS, March 8, 2005; 102(10): 3750 - 3755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zanetti Cathelicidins, multifunctional peptides of the innate immunity J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2004; 75(1): 39 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Concannon, T. D. Crowe, J. J. Abercrombie, C. M. Molina, P. Hou, D. K. Sukumaran, P. A. Raj, and K. -P. Leung Susceptibility of oral bacteria to an antimicrobial decapeptide J. Med. Microbiol., December 1, 2003; 52(12): 1083 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. E. Sorensen, L. Gram, A. H. Johnsen, E. Andersson, S. Bangsboll, G. S. Tjabringa, P. S. Hiemstra, J. Malm, A. Egesten, and N. Borregaard Processing of Seminal Plasma hCAP-18 to ALL-38 by Gastricsin: A NOVEL MECHANISM OF GENERATING ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES IN VAGINA J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28540 - 28546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Baev, A. Rivetta, X. S. Li, S. Vylkova, E. Bashi, C. L. Slayman, and M. Edgerton Killing of Candida albicans by Human Salivary Histatin 5 Is Modulated, but Not Determined, by the Potassium Channel TOK1 Infect. Immun., June 1, 2003; 71(6): 3251 - 3260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |