|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
1 Asahi University School of Dentistry, Dental Materials and Technology, 1851-1 Hozumi, Hozumi-cho, Motosu-gun, Gifu 501-0296, Japan;
2 University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Los Angeles, CA, USA; anad
3 present address, DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson company, PO Box 988, 700 Orthopaedic Drive, Warsaw, IN 46581-0988, USA;
*corresponding author, iijima{at}dent.asahi-u.ac.jp
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: amelogenins enamel crystal OCP crystal elongation
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since amelogenins occupy more than 90% of the matrix proteins (Eastoe, 1965; Termine et al., 1980), enamel crystals grow under the influence of amelogenins. Although little was known about the effects of amelogenins on the growth of OCP, some recent studies revealed that amelogenins affect the morphology of OCP in a manner that provides some clues about the growth of tooth enamel crystals. From 1 to 2% porcine amelogenins incorporated into a gelatin gel resulted in elongation of OCP crystals (Wen et al., 2000). In 10% bovine amelogenin gel, enclosed in a micro-space where ionic diffusion was controlled by a cation-selective membrane and a dialysis membrane, the morphology of OCP crystals changed from ribbon-like to prismatic and cylindrical fibers (Iijima et al., 2001). In both systems, however, heterogeneous amelogenin fractions from in vivo sources were used; therefore, the majority of the components were the molecules without the hydrophilic C-terminal region.
For a better understanding of the mechanisms of modulation of OCP morphology, we focused, in the present study, on the effects of highly purified and homogenous amelogenins free of non-amelogenin proteins. For this purpose, two types of recombinant murine amelogenins were used: (a) rM179, which has the hydrophilic C-terminal residues and lacks an amino terminal methionine and a phosphorylated serine residue; and (b) rM166, which lacks the hydrophilic C-terminal residues present in rM179. Furthermore, the microstructure of 10% rM179 gel used for OCP crystallization was analyzed, and the effects of amelogenins on OCP growth were compared with those of other gel systems, such as polyacrylamide and agarose.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sample Preparation for Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
The 10% rM179 amelogenin gel-like matrix was prepared under conditions resembling those of OCP crystallization. Approximately 1.1 mg of lyophilized protein was dissolved in 12 µL of cold ammonium phosphate (10 mM, pH 6.5). The procedure was performed directly on a freshly cleaved mica surface. The thin film of amelogenin gel-like matrix (1 mm thick and 10 mm in diameter) was fixed for 2 hrs at 37°C by means of Karnovsky fixative. This procedure has been shown to preserve the microstructural features of the nanosphere containing gel matrix (Wen et al., 1999, 2001). The fixed gel was then equilibrated in ascending series of ethanol, air-dried, and immediately taken for AFM observation via a Nanoscope IIIa Scanning Probe Microscope System (Digital Instruments, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA). We obtained the images by operating a Tapping mode Etched Silicon Probe (model OTESPA-10) in air at a scanning rate of 0.5-1.0 Hz.
Crystal Growth Experiment
All chemicals used were reagent grade, and all solutions were prepared with de-ionized and double-distilled water (DDW). Reaction was carried out at 37°C for 3 days in a dual-membrane system, where a cation-selective membrane (CMVTM, Asahi Glass Co., Tokyo, Japan) and a dialysis membrane (Visking Cellulose Tubing; Union Carbide Co.) were used to enclose about 15 µL of reaction solution containing the proteins (Iijima et al., 2001). Ca2+ and PO43- ions were allowed to diffuse into the reaction space from mutually opposite sides through the cation-selective membrane and the dialysis membrane, respectively. A 100-mL quantity of NH4H2PO4 + (NH4)2HPO4 (10 mM, 1:1 molar ratio) was used as a PO4 solution reservoir and 1.8 mL of 10 mM Ca(CH3COO)2 H2O as a Ca solution reservoir, which were adjusted to pH 6.5 at 37°C by dilute HCl solution. About 1.4 mg of amelogenin weighed by a microbalance was mixed with 13 µL of cold DDW to make a 10% solution on a cold dish floated on ice-water. Some parallel reactions were carried out in 10% polyacrylamide (PAA) gel, containing 0.5% cross-linking reagent (N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide), and 0.5% agarose (Sigma) and 10% bovine albumin (Sigma) for comparison. In the present study, % wt was used to unify the total amount of protein in solution. In the case of agarose, since 10% agarose gel was much harder than other gels, 0.5% was used, which showed hardness close to that of other gels.
After the reaction, the gel still fixed on the membrane was rinsed superficially with distilled water, frozen quickly at -80°C, and lyophilized. Crystals were identified by an x-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Rigaku, RINT 2500). The morphology of crystals was observed by means of a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, S4500). Crystal sizes were measured on the SEM photographs, in which crystal faces were properly situated for dimension measurement. The number of data points was in the range of 10 to 78 for each dimension. Their mean values and standard deviations (SD) were calculated. Mean values were compared by Student's t test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
The length-to-width ratio (L/W) (Fig. 3a
) and the width-to-thickness ratio (W/T) (Fig. 3b
) show unique changes caused by amelogenins: Both rM179 and rM166 resulted in crystals with L/W ratios larger than those of any other crystals, except gelatin, and W/T ratios smaller than those of any other crystals. Although the L/W ratio of crystals grown in gelatin was similar to that of crystals grown in amelogenins, the W/T ratio was 3 times larger than that in amelogenins.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The degree of crystal size reduction (L/Lo, W/Wo, and T/To in the Table
) indicates that rM179 and rM166 interacted strongly with the (010), then with the (001), and weakly with the (100) face of the OCP crystal (for crystal faces, see Fig. 3c
). This tendency was also observed in 10% bovine amelogenins (Iijima et al., 2001). Thus, the mode of the interaction was common among rM179, rM166, and bovine amelogenins, regardless of the existence of the hydrophilic C-terminal and the homogeneity of molecular weight. This suggests that some common factors among these amelogenins regulated the interaction in 10% gels. The most plausible factor is hydrophobicity. Since the reduction in thickness caused by rM179 (T/To = 0.41) was almost the same as those caused by bovine amelogenins (T/To = 0.45) and rM166 (T/To = 0.37), the distribution of the hydrophilic C-terminal in nanospheres in 10% gel might differ from that in diluted solution, thus giving rise to the hydrophobic property. Hydrophobic nanospheres would not react strongly with the (100) face, which exposes water molecules, preferring to react with the (010) face, which does not expose water molecules (Iijima et al., 2001). Indeed, in gelatin, albumin, polyacrylamide gel, and agarose gel, which are rather hydrophilic, prismatic and cylindrical crystals were not obtained (Fig. 2
).
Furthermore, the L/Lo value indicates that the interaction of rM166 and rM179 with the (001) face was weaker than that of bovine amelogenins. In other words, the inhibitory effects of rM166 and rM179 on the growth in the c-axis direction of OCP were smaller than those of bovine amelogenins. This may well be connected to the initial elongated growth of enamel crystals. In the secretory stage, the full-length amelogenin molecules, which correspond to rM179, are secreted, the hydrophilic C-terminal is soon removed, and amelogenin becomes shorter, like rM166. In the enamel matrix, when it is full of those amelogenins, enamel crystals grow drastically in length. Although it is well-accepted that enamel crystals grow as carbonate-containing hydroxyapatite, it is proposed that they initially deposit as OCP-like precursors (Brown, 1965; Nelson et al., 1989; Iijima et al., 1992; Miake et al., 1993).
Regarding the interaction mechanism with amelogenin gel and crystal faces, one of the problems that remain but should be clarified relates to molecular conformation and/or the arrangement of a functional group, such as Ser residue, near the surfaces of nanospheres, because such a group could determine the property of the nanosphere surface and hence the interactionwith crystal faces.
Although this system does not perfectly simulate the in vivo condition, such as nucleation points and the directions of Ca and PO4 ion flow, it can deal with growth under one directional ionic supply, and this is its peculiarity. As has been established, the one-directional Ca ion flow enhances the elongation of OCP crystals, when growth was compared with that in calcium phosphate solutions (Iijima, 2001).
In summary, the morphological change of OCP in 10% rM179 and rM166 gels was unique, regardless of the existence of the hydrophilic C-terminal, when compared with that in gelatin, albumin, PAA gel, and agarose gel. The inhibitory effects of both rM179 and rM166 in the directions of length and width of OCP crystals were less effective than that of a heterogeneous mixture of degraded bovine amelogenins. The present experimental evidence supports our hypothesis that, in addition to other enamel extracellular matrix proteins (such as enamelins; Doi et al., 1984), amelogenin nanospheres are directly involved in controlling the morphology of crystals during enamel biomineralization (Fincham et al., 1995).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received February 19, 2001; Last revision November 9, 2001; Accepted November 28, 2001
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brown WE, Smith JP, Lehr JR, Frazier AW (1962). Octacalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite. Nature 196:10481055.
Doi Y, Eanes ED, Shimokawa H, Termine JD (1984). Inhibition of seeded growth of enamel apatite crystals by amelogenins and enamelin proteins in vitro. J Dent Res 63:98105.
Eastoe JE (1965). The chemical composition of bone and tooth. Adv Fluorine Res Dent Caries Prev 3:516.
Fincham AG, Moradian-Oldak J, Sarte PE (1994). Mass-spectrographic analysis of a porcine amelogenin identifies a single phosphorylated locus. Calcif Tissue Int 55:398400.[Medline]
Fincham AG, Moradian-Oldak J, Diekwisch TGH, Lyaruu DM, Wright JT, Bringas P, et al. (1995). Evidence for amelogenin "nanospheres" as functional components of secretory-stage enamel matrix. J Struct Biol 115:5059[Medline]
Iijima M (2001). Formation of octacalcium phosphate in vitro. In: Monographs in oral science. Vol. 18. Octacalcium phosphate. Basel, Switzerland: Karger AG, pp. 17-49.
Iijima M, Tohda H, Suzuki H, Yanagisawa T, Moriwaki Y (1992). Effect of F- on apatite-octacalcium phosphate intergrowth and crystal morphology in a model system of tooth enamel formation. Calcif Tissue Int 50:357361.[Medline]
Iijima M, Moriwaki Y, Takagi T, Moradian-Oldak J (2001). Effects of bovine amelogenins on the crystal growth of octacalcium phosphate in a model system of tooth enamel formation. J Cryst Growth 222:615626.
Leytin V, Arad T, Matlis S, Daphni L, Mao Z, Shay B, et al. (1998). Cryo-transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy of the recombinant human amelogenin protein, self-assembled into nanospheres. In: Workshop on the structure and development of dental enamel. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
Miake Y, Shimoda S, Fukae M, Aoba T (1993). Epitaxial overgrowth of apatite crystals on the thin-ribbon precursor at early stages of porcine enamel mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 53:249256.[Medline]
Moradian-Oldak J (2001). Amelogenins, assembly, processing and control of crystal morphology. Matrix Biol 20:293305.[Medline]
Moradian-Oldak J, Simmer JP, Lau EC, Sarte PE, Slavkin HC, Fincham AG (1994). Detection of monodisperse aggregates of a recombinant amelogenin by dynamic light scattering. Biopolymers 34:13391347.[Medline]
Nelson DGA, Barry JC, Shields SCP, Glena R, Featherstone JDB (1989). Crystal morphology, composition, and dissolution behavior of carbonated apatites prepared at controlled pH and temperature. J Colloid Interf Sci 130:467479.
Nylen MU, Eanes ED, Omnell KÅ (1963). Crystal growth in rat enamel. J Cell Biol 18:109123.
Ronnholm E (1962). The amelogenesis of human teeth as revealed by electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 6:249303.[Medline]
Ruchel R, Brager MD (1975). Scanning electron microscopic observations of polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 68:415428.[Medline]
Simmer JP, Lau EC, Hu CC, Bringas P, Santos V, Aoba T, et al. (1994). Isolation and characterization of a mouse amelogenin expressed in Escherichia coli. Calcif Tissue Int 54:312319.[Medline]
Termine JD, Belcourt AB, Christener PJ, Conn MK, Nylen MU (1980). Properties of dissociatively extracted fetal tooth matrix proteins. I. Principal molecular species in developing bovine enamel. J Biol Chem 255:97609768.
Wen HB, Moradian-Oldak J, Leung W, Bringas P Jr, Fincham AG (1999). Microstructure of an amelogenin gel matrix. J Struct Biol 126:4251.[Medline]
Wen HB, Moradian-Oldak J, Fincham AG (2000). Dose-dependent modulation of octacalcium phosphate crystal habit by amelogenins. J Dent Res 79:19021906.
Wen HB, Moradian-Oldak J, Fincham AG (2001). Progressive accretion of amelogenin molecules during nanosphere assembly revealed by atomic force microscopy. Matrix Biol 20:387395.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |