JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hunziker, E.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hunziker, E.B.

Delivery Mode and Efficacy of BMP-2 in Association with Implants

Y. Liu1,2, R.O. Huse1,4, K. de Groot3, D. Buser4, and E.B. Hunziker1,*

1 ITI Research Institute for Dental and Skeletal Biology, University of Bern, Switzerland;
2 ACTA, Section of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Department of Oral Function, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
3 Department of Science and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands; and
4 Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1A. Bone formation in association with coatings bearing adsorbed BMP-2, expressed as a function of time and the amount of BMP-2 adsorbed. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) are represented.

 

Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1B. Bone formation in association with coatings bearing incorporated BMP-2, 2 and 5 wks after implantation, expressed as a function of the amount of BMP-2 incorporated. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) are represented. *P < 0.001.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2A. Bone formation in association with coatings bearing different amounts of incorporated BMP-2 and a fixed dose of adsorbed BMP-2 (7.5 µg per implant), 2 wks after implantation, expressed as a function of the incorporated dose of BMP-2. Mean values ± SEM (n = 6) are represented. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2B. Coating degradation in the various experimental groups, 2 wks after implantation.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Light micrographs of titanium-alloy discs 2 weeks after implantation. (A) Low-magnification light micrograph of an implanted titanium-alloy disc (Ti) bearing a layer of calcium phosphate (C) into which BMP-2 has been incorporated. At this two-week juncture, the disc is surrounded by a growing mass of woven bone (B). (B) High-magnification view of the specimen illustrated in Fig. 3A. The coating (C) is being degraded by osteoclasts (arrows). This degradative activity occurs concomitantly with the deposition of woven bone (B). A = artefactual space between the coating (C) and the titanium-alloy disc (Ti), generated by shrinkage during tissue processing. (C) Low-magnification light micrograph of a naked (uncoated) titanium-alloy disc (Ti) bearing no BMP-2, 2 wks after implantation. The disc is surrounded by a connective tissue capsule (S) from which it has become artefactually separated (arrows) during tissue processing. No bone formation has occurred.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2007 Institutional Access Guidelines