JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deguchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takano-Yamamoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deguchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takano-Yamamoto, T.

Increase of Galanin in Trigeminal Ganglion during Tooth Movement

T. Deguchi1, T. Yabuuchi1, R. Ando1, H. Ichikawa3, T. Sugimoto3, and T. Takano-Yamamoto1,2,*

1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan;
2 Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Okayama University, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan; and
3 Department of Oral Function and Anatomy, and Biodental Research Center, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic drawing indicates the method of experimental tooth movement. A piece of elastic band (E) was inserted between the mandibular first (M1) and second (M2) molars.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Galanin-immunoreactive trigeminal ganglion neurons (arrows) in the mandibular division of (a) controls and (b) 5 days after experimental tooth movement. Bar = 50 µm (a).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Change in the proportion of galanin-immunoreactive neurons in the trigeminal ganglion in each experimental stage after experimental tooth movement (n = 6 for each stage). Each value represents the mean ± SE. *Significant difference in the proportion of GAL-positive neurons at the p < 0.05 level.

Figure 3b. Change in the number of galanin-immunoreactive trigeminal ganglion neurons in different cell size ranges in controls, at 5 days, and at 14 days after experimental tooth movement (n = 6). Each value represents the mean ± SE. *Significant difference in the number of galanin-immunoreactive neurons at the p < 0.05 level.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (108K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunofluorescent micrographs for CGRP (a,d,g), galanin (b,e,h), and both (c,f,i) of the trigeminal ganglion of controls (a,b,c), and at 5 (d,e,f) and 14 (g,h,i) days after experimental tooth movement. In the controls and at 14 days, galanin immunoreactivity was observed mainly in small neurons, whereas at 5 days, medium-sized to large neurons also expressed galanin. Arrows point to CGRP and galanin-immunoreactive neurons. Arrowheads indicate CGRP-positive but galanin-negative neurons. Bar = 10 µm (i). All panels are at the same magnification.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines