JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nalla, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, R.O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nalla, R.K.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, R.O.

Role of Alcohol in the Fracture Resistance of Teeth

R.K. Nalla1, J.H. Kinney2, A.P. Tomsia1, and R.O. Ritchie1,3,*

1 Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;
2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA; and
3 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Typical load-displacement data (N = 5 each) for chemically dehydrated dentin (in 200-proof ethanol and 86-proof Scotch whisky) and hydrated dentin (in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution, HBSS), based on three-point bending tests. The initial (elastic) portion of the load-displacement curve is a measure of the stiffness and reflects the Young’s modulus; the maximum point on each curve is a measure of the ultimate bending strength. It is apparent that soaking the dentin samples in whisky or alcohol to dehydrate them led to a significant increase in the stiffness and strength of the dentin.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Fracture toughness of dentin. (a) Fracture resistance data for dentin tested with continuously irrigation in whisky (N = 5), expressed in terms of crack-resistance curves (R-curves), measured on compact-tension, C(T) specimens. Each data point type represents a separate sample. The shaded regions on the R-curves indicate similar data obtained for hydrated dentin and dentin dehydrated in pure ethanol. The bar graphs (mean ± SD) show a significant increase in (b) crack initiation, (c) crack growth and (d) steady-state ("plateau") fracture toughness for dentin dehydrated in whisky and ethanol, as compared to hydrated dentin. Differences in the growth and plateau toughness were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Representative results for the "dehydrated/rehydrated/dehydrated" tests (N = 3) for whisky expressed in terms of the fracture toughness R-curve behavior. These experiments give a clear indication of how the toughness dropped when dehydrated dentin was exposed to water (HBSS), and that the fracture toughness of dentin was significantly higher in whisky. However, they also provide clear evidence that the effect was completely reversible.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Toughening by crack bridging in dentin. (a) An optical micrograph showing the development of crack bridging in dentin dehydrated using whisky. Microcracks ("daughter cracks"), initiated primarily at tubules, form ahead of the main crack ("mother crack"); their inability to link perfectly with the main crack leads to regions of uncracked material which spans the crack. Such "uncracked ligaments" carry load that would otherwise be used to drive the crack, and thereby act to toughen the dentin. (b) A three-dimensional x-ray tomography reconstruction of a section of the crack in (a), showing the three-dimensional nature of the uncracked-ligament bridging. The nominal direction of crack growth is indicated in both cases.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2006 Institutional Access Guidelines