JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takashiba, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takashiba, S.

Isolation and Expression of FIP-2 in Wounded Pulp of the Rat

M. Oyama, F. Myokai, T. Ohira, N. Shiomi, K. Yamashiro, H. Arai, F. Nishimura, and S. Takashiba*

Department of Pathophysiology-Periodontal Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan;



View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Histology of pulp, detection of cDNAs, and reverse Northern analysis. (A) Histology of pulp tissues. The wounded and healthy teeth were fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, demineralized with 10% EDTA for 4 wks, and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on serial sections 7 µm thick. The pulps 1 wk after cavity preparation (a,b) and healthy pulp (c,d) are shown. Pulpal cells underneath the cavity are indicated by the arrow, and neither reparative dentin formation nor apparent disruption of the odontoblast layer is observed (a,b). Bar equals 300 µm.

(B) Procedure of subtractive hybridization. The target and driver single-stranded (ss) cDNAs bound to the beads were synthesized from the total RNA (100 ng) isolated from the wounded and healthy pulp tissues. The target complementary sscDNA (c-sscDNA) was synthesized from the target sscDNA-beads with an EcoRI-dT primer (5'-GGCGAATTCTGCAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3'). After auto-subtraction, the target c-sscDNA was subtracted twice from the driver sscDNA beads. The subtracted c-sscDNA was amplified by polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) with use of the EcoRI-dT primer, and was displayed on a 3% agarose gel. The procedure is described in detail in the Appendix.

(C) Display of amplified cDNAs. The wounded pulp cDNA subtracted from the healthy pulp cDNA was used as WIN cDNA, while the healthy pulp cDNA subtracted from the wounded pulp cDNA was used as WSP cDNA. The subtracted cDNA was amplified, and the product underwent gel electrophoresis. Lanes: 1, wound-inductive (WIN) cDNA; 2, wound-suppressive (WSP) cDNA; M, 100-bp DNA ladder.

(D) Messenger RNA expression of genes in pulp tissues. The cDNAs (WIN-2, 6, 10, 11, 13, WSP-1, 2, 6, 7, GAPDH) underwent electrophoresis on an agarose gel (Ag). They were then transferred to a membrane, and hybridized with the probe from wounded pulp tissue (Wo) and healthy pulp tissue (He). Relative signal intensity (each cDNA/GAPDH) is shown in the upper panel. *WIN-11 was used as a probe for screening of the cDNA library. Two independent hybridizations were performed, and a typical result is shown.

(E) WIN-11 mRNA in adult rat tissues. WIN-11 mRNA was detected in the tissues shown by an arrow in the upper panel, while ß-actin mRNA was detected in the tissues shown by an arrow in the lower panel. Lanes: 1, heart; 2, brain; 3, spleen; 4, lung; 5, liver; 6, skeletal muscle; 7, kidney; 8, testis. Three independent hybridizations were performed, and a typical result is shown.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Identification and structure of 2 FIP-2s and their expression. (A) Clones obtained by cDNA library screening and RACE studies. WIN-11 (0.35 kb), pX105-2 (1.8 kb), and clone #1 (2.2 kb) significantly overlapped; therefore, they have been submitted to DDJB and assigned accession no. AB050777. Clones #2 (0.9 kb) and #3 (3.0 kb) were completely overlapped; therefore, they have been submitted to DDJB and assigned accession no. AB069907. *WIN-11 displaying the greatest difference in mRNA expression between the wounded and healthy pulp tissues by reverse Northern analysis; {842_ent1}, common region in rFIP-2A and rFIP-2B; {842_ent2}, region of rFIP-2B different from that of rFIP-2A. {leftrightarrow}, cDNA containing the specific region for rFIP-2A or rFIP-2B was cloned and used as a template for riboprobes of in situ hybridization. The procedure is described in detail in the Appendix. (B) Structure of rFIP-2s. Deduced amino acid sequences of rFIP-2s and hFIP-2 are shown. The signal peptide domain is boxed in green, the putative leucine-zipper domains are boxed in black, and the zinc-finger domain is boxed in blue. The putative bZIP motif is boxed in red. *Same amino acid as the sequence above; , missing amino acid. (C) Expression of rFIP-2 mRNA. Complementary DNA was amplified by PCR with the primers as described below. The PCR products for rFIP-2A, B, and ß-actin underwent electrophoresis on a gel. The specific primers were designed: rFIP-2A sense, 5'-TGCCCAGCCAGCCTCCTACC-3'; rFIP-2B sense, 5'-ATCTCTGTGGCCGGACCTGTTACC-3'; and rFIP-2A and rFIP-2B antisense, 5'-CCACTTCGATTCCCACACTC-3'. For an internal control, specific primers for rat ß-actin were designed: sense, 5'-TTGTAACCAACTGGGACGATATGG-3'; and antisense, 5'-GATCTTGATCTTCATGGTGCTAGG-3'. Two independent PCRs were performed, and typical results are shown. Lane M, 100-bp DNA ladder. Relative signal intensity (each mRNA from/ß-actin mRNA) is shown in the lower panel. {842_ent2}, healthy pulp; {842_ent1}, wounded pulp.

 


View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Expression of the 2 rFIP-2s during rat embryogenesis. (A) Histology of the rat embryo at 17 days. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on the sagittal section from the rat embryo. Bar equals 200 µm. mx, maxilla; md, mandible; tg, tongue. (B) In situ hybridization in rat embryo at 17 days. Using rFIP-2A or B anti-sense riboprobe, we observed strong signals for the rFIP-2A and B mRNA in condensing mesenchymal cells of the palatal process (a,b,c,d) and surrounding Meckel’s cartilage (e,f,g,h), while they are absent in the neighboring chondrogenic cells (a to h). The results are shown as bright- (a,c,e,g) and dark-field (b,d,f,h) views. The hybridization signals of rFIP-2A (a,b,e,f) and rFIP-2B (c,d,g,h) were detected by autoradiography at 1 wk, and similar results were obtained after three-week exposure (data not shown). No significant signal was detected on any sections in the case of sense riboprobe for rFIP-2A or B (data not shown). Bar equals 50 µm.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2005 Institutional Access Guidelines