JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michelotti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martina, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michelotti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martina, R.

Effect of Occlusal Interference on Habitual Activity of Human Masseter

A. Michelotti1,*, M. Farella1, L.M. Gallo2, A. Veltri1, S. Palla2, and R. Martina1

1 Department of Dental and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Section of Orthodontics and Clinical Gnathology, School of Dentistry, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini, 5.I-80131, Italy; and
2 Clinic for Masticatory Disorders and Complete Dentures, Center for Oral Medicine, Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Zürich, Switzerland;



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Description of the study design. IFC = interference-free condition; DIC = dummy interference condition; AIC = active interference condition.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Number of events/hr (mean and standard error of the mean, N = 11) for conditions IFCbefore, DIC, AIC, and IFCafter. Student’s t test; * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plots of N/hr for events with amplitudes 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40% MVC vs. event duration, for the conditions IFCbefore, DIC, AIC, and IFCafter. Data presented in the charts (dots = mean values, N = 11) were averaged across subjects, conditions, and recording days. Two-factor (dental condition, amplitude level) repeated-measurements analysis of variance was computed on the log values of areas under the curves (AUC) of each individual data point (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; p > 0.05): The conditions differed with statistical significance (F = 12.1; p < 0.001), with lower values during AIC (Student-Newman-Keuls test; p < 0.001). At higher amplitude levels, a significant negative trend of AUC was found for the activity periods recorded during AIC (test for linear trend; p < 0.001). N/hr = number of activity periods per hour; MVC = maximal voluntary contraction; IFC = interference-free condition; DIC = dummy interference condition; AIC = active interference condition.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2005 Institutional Access Guidelines