JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Zlobin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, S.O.
Right arrow Articles by Zlobin, N.

Estimating Rates of New Root Caries in Older Adults

S.O. Griffin1,*, P.M. Griffin2, J.L. Swann2, and N. Zlobin2

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Division of Oral Health/Surveillance, Investigations, and Research Branch, 4770 Buford Highway, MSF10, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA; and
2 School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205, USA;



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Annual root caries incidence and 95% confidence interval by study. Australia, Canada, Sweden, USA-FL (Florida), USA-IA (Iowa)-1, and USA-NC (North Carolina) met the validity criteria (Appendix Table 3). USA-NY (New York) and USA-WA (Washington) reported findings for both control and treatment groups in caries-prevention trials, because incidence was not statistically different between groups.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Annual mean root caries increment and 95% confidence interval by study. Australia, Canada, Sweden, USA-AL (Alabama), USA-FL, USA-IA-1, and USA-NC met the validity criteria (Appendix Table 3). USA-IA-2 included both controls and treatment groups in fluoridated toothpaste clinical trials. USA-AL included missing surfaces.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Annual mean total caries (root plus coronal) increment and 95% confidence interval by study. Australia, Canada, Sweden, USA-FL, USA-IA-1, and USA-NC met the validity criteria (Appendix Table 3). USA-IA-2 included both controls and treatment groups in fluoridated toothpaste clinical trial.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines