JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Götrick, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tobin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Götrick, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tobin, G.

Oral Pilocarpine for Treatment of Opioid-induced Oral Dryness in Healthy Adults

B. Götrick1,*, S. Åkerman2, D. Ericson3, R. Torstenson4, and G. Tobin5

1 Department of Hospital Dentistry and
4 Hospital Pharmacy, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden;
2 Department of Oral Diagnostics and
3 Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, SE-205 06 Malmö, Sweden; and
5 Department of Pharmacology, Göteborg University, Box 431, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden;



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean flow rates of unstimulated whole saliva in the pilocarpine group ({blacksquare} ; n = 17), placebo group (• ; n = 17), and control group ({circ} ; n = 14) before (baseline, day 1), after the tramadol regime (50 mg x 5; dryness, day 3) and after pilocarpine/placebo treatment (5 mg x 1; treatment, day 3) or no further treatment (control). Tablet containing pilocarpine/placebo was administered on day 3 at –15 min (arrow). Values are mean ± SEM.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes in the flow of saliva (the mean flow rate over the periods; i.e., baseline, dryness, and active treatment periods) vs. the subjects’ own estimations of changes in the flow of saliva after (a) tramadol treatment (dryness level compared with baseline level) in 60 subjects (n = 48 in "Decrement group"; n = 12 in "No change group") and after (b) pilocarpine/placebo treatment (treatment level compared with dryness level) in 34 subjects (n = 5 in "Decrement group"; n = 13 in "No change group"; n = 16 in "Increment group"). Each symbol represents one individual.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines