JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Groot, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Groot, K.

Preparation and Characterization of Electrodeposited Calcium Phosphate/Chitosan Coating on Ti6Al4V Plates

J. Wang1,2,3,*, J. de Boer1, and K. de Groot1,2

1 IsoTis S.A., Prof. Bronkhorstlaan 10-D, 3723 MB Bilthoven, The Netherlands;
2 Biomaterials Research Group, Leiden University, The Netherlands; and
3 School of Stomatology, Wuhan University, People’s Republic of China;



View larger version (141K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of the ELD and ELDC coatings (0.1 g/L chitosan in solution). (a) In the ELD coating, note Ca-P globules and small plate-like crystals. (b,c,d) In the ELDC coating, note many chitosan aggregates around the Ca-P globules and interconnected to form a net (b). Some of them spread and integrated with calcium phosphate crystals (c,d). Ch, chitosan; CaP, calcium phosphate.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Critical load forces of the ELD and ELDC coatings. The bars indicated the means ± SD (n = 3), and numbers in the brackets represent the chitosan concentration in solution. Note that the ELDC coatings exhibited lightly varied critical load forces at the first crack (Lc1) but higher critical load forces at the complete delamination (Lc2). No statistical differences were found on Lc1 or Lc2 (P > 0.05).

 


View larger version (210K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of goat bone marrow stromal cells attached to the ELD and ELDC coatings (0.2 g/L chitosan in solution) after 1 day’s (a,b) or 3 days’ (c,d,e,f) culture. Note cells differentiated to a polygonal shape with extending cytoplasmic processes adhering to the ELDC coating (c,d), in contrast to cells presenting flat and shaped more regularly attached to the ELD coating (a,b). Particularly, cells were found favorably attached to chitosan at higher magnification (e,f). C, cells; Ch, chitosan.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines