JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ebisu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ebisu, S.

In vitro Estrogenicity of Resin Composites

H. Wada, H. Tarumi, S. Imazato, M. Narimatsu, and S. Ebisu*

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relative luciferase activities of eluates from cured composite disks. The bar represents the standard deviation of 3 replicates, and the differences between the samples and the negative control, D-MEM, were analyzed by ANOVA and Scheffé’s F test at a significance level of 0.05. Eluates of 6 composites showed significantly greater luciferase activity than the negative controls (*p < 0.05, shaded bars). The other specimens showed no significant differences from the control (p > 0.05, open bars). **D-MEM as negative control.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relative luciferase activities of the 3 estrogenic components and biphenol-A (BPA). HMBP (a) and DMPA (b) showed significantly greater luciferase activity than the negative controls at a concentration = 1 µmol/L (*p < 0.05, shaded bars). BHT (c) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) from the controls at a concentration = 50 µmol/L (*p < 0.05, shaded bars), while BPA (d) showed estrogenicity at a concentration = 100 nmol/L (*p < 0.05, shaded bars). **The negative control contained D-MEM with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relationship between concentration of HMBP (a) or DMPA (b), leached after 24 hrs of immersion of cured composite disks in distilled water, and the minimum estrogenic concentrations of each chemical. HMBP eluted from 12 cured composite disks at concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 0.35 mg/L, and the values for Revolution, Spectrum, Surefil, and Charisma exceeded the minimum estrogenic concentration (a, shaded bars). DMPA leached from Charisma and Flowline at 0.31 and 0.28 mg/L, respectively, which exceeded the minimum estrogenic concentrations (b).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines