JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frencken, J.E.
Right arrow Articles by Holmgren, C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frencken, J.E.
Right arrow Articles by Holmgren, C.J.

Effectiveness of Single-surface ART Restorations in the Permanent Dentition: A Meta-analysis

J.E. Frencken1,*, M.A. van ’t Hof2, W.E. van Amerongen3, and C.J. Holmgren1

1 WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Care Planning and Future Scenarios, University of Nijmegen, College of Dental Sciences, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands;
2 Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, College of Dental Sciences, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and
3 Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, the Netherlands;



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Difference in survival percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between single-surface amalgam and ART restorations per country and combined for the early and the late groups of studies after 1 yr.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Difference in survival percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between single-surface amalgam and ART restorations per country and combined for the early and the late groups of studies after 2 yrs.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Difference in survival percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between single-surface amalgam and ART restorations per country and combined for the early and the late groups of studies after 3 yrs.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2004 Institutional Access Guidelines