JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holliday, L.S.
Right arrow Articles by Dolce, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holliday, L.S.
Right arrow Articles by Dolce, C.

Effects of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors on Bone Resorption and Orthodontic Tooth Movement

L.S. Holliday, A. Vakani, L. Archer, and C. Dolce*

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Box 100444, JHMHC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0444;



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Bone resorption triggered by various agents is sensitive to inhibition by the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor 44463, but not its ineffective stereo-isomer, 44201. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 4). The asterisk indicates p < 0.05 using Student’s t test.

 


View larger version (74K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pre-coating dentin slices with a short RGD-containing peptide rescues bone resorption by mouse marrow from inhibition by the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor 44463. Mouse marrow osteoclasts were grown in the presence of 10 nM calcitriol for 6 days. Dentin slices were coated with either an RGD-containing peptide or vehicle as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. The marrow cultures were loaded onto the coated or uncoated dentin slices in the presence of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor 44463 or its ineffective stereo-isomer, 44201. After 5 days, the dentin slices were prepared for scanning electron microscopy. (A) The bar graph presents quantitative analysis of the experiment. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 4). The asterisk indicates p < 0.05 using Student’s t test. (B–E) Representative electron micrographs from the experiment described above. (B) Uncoated dentin slice, control inactive MMPI; (C) uncoated dentin slice, plus active MMPI; (D) RGDcoated dentin slice, inactive MMPI; and (E) RGD-coated dentin slice, active MMPI. The size bar for B–E equals 25 µM.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Tooth movement kinetics in the control or Ilomastat-treated rats. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 5–7 animals. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for testing the significance between the groups. *p < 0.01.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines