JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, X.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, X.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, K.

Novel OK-432-conjugated Tumor Vaccines Induce Tumor-specific Immunity against Murine Tongue Cancer

X. Li1, H. Bukawa1,2,*, M. Hirota1, Y. Tsuyuki1, S. Omura1, and K. Fujita1

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; and
2 Division of Oral Surgery, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8677, Japan;



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Antitumor effects induced by immunization with KLN-205 vaccine. The mice were immunized with KLN-205 vaccine, B16 vaccine, Sq1979 vaccine, KLN-205 treated with GA, OK-432 treated with GA, or OK-432 alone by means of a 100-µL syringe and a 30-gauge needle, once a wk for 3 wks. Control-group mice were injected with saline in the same manner. *Significant difference between the groups of KLN-205 vaccine and saline (control) (p < 0.05). One wk after final injection, all mice were inoculated with KLN-205 cells. (A) Suppression of tumor incidence by the KLN-205 vaccine. (B) Suppression of tumor growth by the KLN-205 vaccine. We monitored tumor size by measuring the longest diameter (mm) and the perpendicular diameter (mm) of the mass, and scored it by using the formula 0.5 x a x b2 (mm3), a being the longer diameter and b being the shorter diameter. (C) Suppression of mortality rate by the KLN-205 vaccine. Kaplan-Meier curves showing the probability of survival were constructed for immunized mice groups and control mice groups. (D) Suppression of KLN-205 tumor growth by post-immunization with KLN-205 vaccine. Arrows represent each post-immunization. One day after inoculation with KLN-205, mice were post-immunized 3 times with KLN-205 vaccine, B16 vaccine, Sq1979 vaccine, KLN-205 treated with GA, OK-432 treated with GA, or OK-432 alone. Tumor size was then monitored as described above.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Histological findings after KLN-205 inoculation. (A–D) Histological sections of the KLN-205-vaccine group. (A,B) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the tongue from a mouse in the vaccine group at 24 hrs after KLN-205 inoculation. (C,D) H&E staining of the tongue in the vaccine group at 20 days. (E–H) Histological sections of the control group. (E,F) H&E staining of the tongue from a mouse in the control group at 24 hrs. (G,H) H&E staining of the tongue in the control group at 20 days. Scale bars = 100 µm (A,E,C,G), 50 µm (B,F), and 20 µm (D,H).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines