JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szpaderska, A.M.
Right arrow Articles by DiPietro, L.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szpaderska, A.M.
Right arrow Articles by DiPietro, L.A.

Differential Injury Responses in Oral Mucosal and Cutaneous Wounds

A.M. Szpaderska, J.D. Zuckerman, and L.A. DiPietro*

Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153;



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Inflammatory cell infiltrate in excisional wounds in oral mucosa and skin. (A) Neutrophil content as measured by total wound MPO level. Each bar represents the mean ± SE of 6 independent measurements. (B) The mean macrophage number per high power field (HPF) ± SE in wounds. Macrophage infiltration was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining of wound sections and quantitation of MOMA-2 immunopositive cells (n = 6). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t test.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RT-PCR of IL-6, KC, and IL-10. RT-PCR was performed on RNA isolated from normal tissues or wound samples at indicated times post-injury. To determine relative changes in mRNA levels during development, we corrected densitometry values for each gel to ß actin expression at each time and normalized them by setting the highest value to 1. (A–C) The results are depicted graphically as the mean ± SE; n = 3. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post-test. (D) A representative PCR is shown. NS = normal skin.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RT-PCR of TGF-ß1, LTBP-1, and fibromodulin. RT-PCR was performed on RNA isolated from normal tissues or wound samples at indicated times post-injury. To determine relative changes in mRNA levels during development, we corrected densitometry values for each gel to ß actin expression at each time and normalized them by setting the highest value to 1. (A–C) The results are depicted graphically as the mean ± SE; n = 3. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post-test. (D) A representative PCR is shown. NS = normal skin.

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Wound histology and re-epithelialization. White arrows demarcate wound margins. Black boxes on low power (A,C,E) indicate the region shown in the right panels. (A) Partially re-epithelialized dermal wound 24 hrs after injury. (B) The boxed region shows the advancing edge of the epithelium (yellow arrow). (C,D) Fully re-epithelialized dermal wound at 60 hrs post-injury, at 10x and 20x, respectively. (E,F) The oral mucosal wound shows complete re-epithelialization by 24 hrs after injury, 10x and 20x, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines