JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeredo, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeredo, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, K.

Nature of Neck Motor Unit Activities Evoked by Different Trigeminal Inputs in Rats

J.L. Zeredo1,2,*, K. Toda2, and K. Soma1

1 Orthodontic Science, Department of Orofacial Development and Function, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan; and
2 Division of Integrative Sensory Physiology, Department of Developmental and Reconstructive Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan;



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Short-latency, phasic SPL motor unit responses evoked by (A) Me5 and (B) 5Gn electrical stimulation (1.5 times the response threshold). (A) Me5 electrical stimulation at 20 µA evoked ipsilateral (top) SPL spikes with 1.3-ms latency, but failed to evoke contralateral (bottom) spike responses. (B) Ipsi- and contralateral SPL discharges with 2.2-ms latency, evoked by 5Gn electrical stimulation at 50 µA. Arrows indicate stimulus artifacts.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the Me5 drawn from coronal sections of the brainstem, -9.1 mm posterior to bregma. An asterisk indicates the stimulated site. 4V, fourth ventricle; IRt, intermediate reticular nucleus; LC, locus coeruleus; Me5, trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus; Pr5, principal sensory trigeminal nucleus; py, pyramidal tract; sp5, spinal trigeminal tract; ts, tectospinal tract.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Latency histograms of spike responses generated from SPL motor units (30 bins of 0.1 ms each). (A) Responses evoked by above-threshold Me5 (ipsilateral, 390 responses), and (B) 5Gn electrical stimulation (ipsi- 2.3 ms ± 0.05 SD, 100 responses; contralateral 2.3 ms ± 0.05 SD, 53 responses).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. SPL motor unit responses were evoked by 5Gn electrical stimulation (A) before and (B) after injection of Xylocaine into the ipsilateral Me5. No difference was observed in the onset latency or stimulus threshold. Arrows indicate stimulus artifacts.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines