JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sano, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sano, H.

Components of Dentinal Adhesives Modulate Heat Shock Protein 72 Expression in Heat-stressed THP-1 Human Monocytes at Sublethal Concentrations

M. Noda1,*, J.C. Wataha2, M. Kaga3, P.E. Lockwood2, K.R. Volkmann2, and H. Sano1

1 Department of Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Kita 13, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan;
2 Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1260; and
3 Department of Oral Functional Science, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. SDH activity of THP-1 monocytes exposed to HEMA and TEGDMA for 7 hrs and measured by the MTT method, with (open circles) and without (solid circles) heat stress at 43°C for 1 hr. Upper-case letters indicate statistical comparisons between concentrations within the no-heat group (ANOVA, Tukey, {alpha} = 0.05). Lower-case letters show statistical comparisons among the heat-stressed groups. Heat-stressed vs. unstressed controls at the highest concentrations of HEMA and TEGDMA exposure were statistically different (two-tailed t test, p = 10-10 for HEMA, 10-7 for TEGDMA).

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. HSP72 expression shown in a typical SDS-PAGE gel and Western blotting for TEGDMA with and without 1 hr of heat stress and recovery for 2, 4, or 6 hrs. The expression of HSP72 with silver stain is denoted on the gel (arrow), and the Western blot of HSP72 is shown at the bottom.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. HSP72 expression after HEMA and TEGDMA exposure as a percentage of the six-hour, no-resin controls (arbitrarily set to 100%). Cells were heat-stressed for 1 hr, followed by 2, 4, or 6 hrs of recovery. The letter ‘D‘ indicates a statistical comparison among the heat-stressed groups with six-hour recovery and various resin concentrations. Lower-case letters denote a statistical difference from the no-resin (upper-case) control (ANOVA, Dunnett's, {alpha} = 0.05). The letter ‘C’ compares the four-hour recovery groups at various resin concentrations, whereas ‘B‘ compares two-hour recovery, and ‘A‘ compares the no-heat-stress groups.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2002 Institutional Access Guidelines