Journal of Dental Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, L.M.
Right arrow Articles by Palla, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 8, 726-730 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700810

Clinical

Relationship between Kinematic Center and TMJ Anatomy and Function

L.M. Gallo*, D.B. Gössi, V. Colombo and S. Palla

Clinic for Masticatory Disorders, Removable Prosthodontics and Special Care, Center for Oral Medicine, Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland

Correspondence: * corresponding author, luigi{at}zui.uzh.ch

The kinematic center (KC)—defined by coinciding jaw-opening/-closing and protrusion-retrusion trajectories—has been proposed in the literature as a reference point to represent TMJ movements. In this study, we tested whether the KC lies in a peculiar anatomical point and whether its trajectory reflects intra-articular distance. In 11 asymptomatic individuals (seven females, four males, aged 24–37 yrs), 4 openings/closings and 4 protrusions/retrusions were tracked with dynamic stereometry. In a 3D lattice (0.5 mm grid) constructed solidly around each condyle, the KC was the point with maximal cross-correlation between opening-closing and protrusion-retrusion paths. KC trajectories were more cranial on closing than on opening, consistent with intra-articular distances being smaller on closing than on opening. However, KCs were never located on condylar main axes (distance, 4.5 ± 2.9 mm), nor did they coincide with points best approximating fossa shapes (distance, 12.5 ± 6.4 mm). The kinematic center’s anatomical and functional significance therefore appears to be questionable.

Key Words: biomechanics • kinematics • kinematic point • MRI • temporomandibular disorders • temporomandibular joint


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?