This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clarkson, J.E. Articles by Pitts, N.B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Changing Clinicians’ Behavior: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fees and Education

¹ DHSRU, Mackenzie Building, University of Dundee, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4BF, UK;
² University of Ottawa, ON, Canada;
³ University of Aberdeen, UK;
⁴ University of Melbourne, QLD, Australia;
⁵ University of Edinburgh, UK; and
⁶ University of Glasgow, UK

Correspondence: ^* corresponding author, s.turner{at}chs.dundee.ac.uk

The fissure-sealing of newly erupted molars is an effective caries prevention treatment, but remains underutilized. Two plausible reasons are the financial disincentive produced by the dental remuneration system, and dentists’ lack of awareness of evidence-based practice. The primary hypothesis was that implementation strategies based on remuneration or training in evidence-based healthcare would produce a higher proportion of children receiving sealed second permanent molars than standard care. The four study arms were: fee per sealant treatment, education in evidence-based practice, fee plus education, and control. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. Analysis was based on 133 dentists and 2833 children. After adjustment for baseline differences, the primary outcome was 9.8% higher when a fee was offered. The education intervention had no statistically significant effect. ‘Fee only’ was the most cost-effective intervention. The study contributes to the incentives in health care provision debate, and led to the introduction of a direct fee for this treatment.

Key Words: prevention • sealant • incentives

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Carey, H. Buchan, and R. Sanson-Fisher The cycle of change: implementing best-evidence clinical practice Int. J. Qual. Health Care, November 6, 2008; (2008) mzn049v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]