JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hobson, K.A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Hobson, K.A.
J Dent Res 87(3):283-287, 2008
© 2008 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Age and Third Molar Extraction as Risk Factors for Temporomandibular Disorder

G.J. Huang1,*, M.T. Drangsholt2, T.C. Rue3, D.C. Cruikshank4, and K.A. Hobson4

1 Department of Orthodontics, Box 357446,
2 Departments of Oral Medicine and Dental Public Health Sciences, and
3 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105-7446, USA; and
4 private practice, Portland, OR, USA

* corresponding author, ghuang{at}u.washington.edu

This study investigated third molar removal as a risk factor for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) in all age groups. We compared 2217 Kaiser Permanente Northwest health plan enrollees with a history of third molar extraction with 2217 age-and gender-matched enrollees with radiographic confirmation of no lifetime third molar removal. Common Dental Terminology codes were used to identify information on third molar removal, and International Classification of Disease codes were used to identify TMD. Relative risks were calculated overall, and by each decade of life, in univariate and multivariate analyses. The incidence of TMD in subjects with and without third molar removal were 7 and 5 per thousand person-years, respectively. Third molar removal among subjects of all ages resulted in a statistically insignificant increased relative risk for TMD (1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9–2.2). The relative risk was slightly higher in those under 21, but was also not statistically significant (1.6, CI: 0.8–3.1).

KEY WORDS: third molar extraction • age • TMD • risk factors







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2008 Institutional Access Guidelines