JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Featherstone, J.D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Featherstone, J.D.
J Dent Res 87(3):224-227, 2008
© 2008 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Effects of Fluoride Dentifrices on Enamel Lesion Formation

S. Toda1, and J.D. Featherstone2,*

1 Division of Oral Health, Department of Health Science, Kanagawa Dental College, Japan; and
2 Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Box 0758, 707 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0758, USA

* corresponding author, jdbf{at}ucsf.edu

An in vitro pH cycling model was used to test the hypothesis that the effects of 3 different fluoride compounds on de/remineralization are a function of the free fluoride ion concentration. Groups of 10 human enamel specimens were treated with one of: (a) amine fluoride (AmF), 1250 ppm F; (b) sodium monofluorophosphate (NaMFP), 1000 ppm F; (c) sodium fluoride (NaF), 1100 ppm F; (d) NaF, 250 ppm F; (e) Placebo (< 1 ppm F) dentifrices; or with aqueous solutions (f) NaF 900 ppm F or (g) NaF 30 ppm F. Lesions were assessed by cross-sectional microhardness. Mean ± SEM {Delta}Z (vol.% x µm) values of 3 dentifrices were: (a) 344 ± 155, (b) 4259 ± 257, and (c) 591 ± 83. The AmF (1250 ppm F) was not statistically significantly different from the NaF (1100 ppm F) dentifrice in this model. The NaMFP (1000 ppm F) dentifrice, without hydrolysis, had only the same efficacy as the NaF (30 ppm F) aqueous solution.

KEY WORDS: fluoride dentifrice • pH cycling • dental enamel • in vitro study







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2008 Institutional Access Guidelines