JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamanishi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kogo, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamanishi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kogo, M.
J Dent Res 87(2):164-168, 2008
© 2008 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

An Uncommon Cleft Subtype of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

T. Yamanishi1,*, C. Kobayashi1,2, I. Tsujimoto1, H. Koizumi1, S. Miya1, Y. Yokota1, R. Okamoto1, S. Iida1, T. Aikawa1, H. Kohara2, J. Nishio2, and M. Kogo1

1 First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan; and
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, 840 Murodocho, Izumi, Osaka, Japan

* corresponding author, yaman2{at}dent.osaka-u.ac.jp

The finding that the vomer plays a crucial role in maxillary growth suggests that the bilateral cleft configuration of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), in which the vomer is detached from the non-cleft-side secondary hard palate, negatively influences palatal development, and this hypothesis was tested. Sixty persons with complete UCLP, including those with the vomer detached from (n = 30, b-UCLP) and attached to (n = 30, u-UCLP) the secondary hard palate, were analyzed morphologically, with the use of cast models taken at 10 days, 3 mos, and 12 mos of age. The anterio-posterior palatal length at 12 mos of age in those with b-UCLP was significantly shorter than that in those with u-UCLP, by 8.7% (p < 0.05). In addition, palatal width development in the first year in those with b-UCLP was also significantly retarded. These results suggest that the uncommon bilateral cleft subtype in UCLP should be included in the cleft classification.

KEY WORDS: UCLP • cleft subtype • palatal development







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2008 Institutional Access Guidelines