JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Essick, G.K.
Right arrow Articles by Zuniga, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Essick, G.K.
Right arrow Articles by Zuniga, J.
J Dent Res 86(6):571-575, 2007
© 2007 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Effect of Facial Sensory Re-training on Sensory Thresholds

G.K. Essick1,2,*, C. Phillips3, and J. Zuniga4

1 Department of Prosthodontics,
2 Center for Neurosensory Disorders, and
3 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, 2110 Old Dental Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA; and
4 Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA

* corresponding author, greg_essick{at}dentistry.unc.edu

Nearly 100% of patients experience trauma to the trigeminal nerve during orthognathic surgery, impairing sensation and sensory function on the face. In a recent randomized clinical trial, people who performed sensory re-training exercises reported less difficulty related to residual numbness and decreased lip sensitivity than those who performed standard opening exercises only. We hypothesized that re-training reduces the impaired performance on neurosensory tests of tactile function that is commonly observed post-surgically. We analyzed thresholds for contact detection, two-point discrimination, and two-point perception, obtained during the clinical trial before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, to assess tactile detection and discriminative sensitivities, and subjective interpretation of tactile stimulation, respectively. Post-surgery, the retrained persons exhibited less impairment, on average, than non-retrained persons only in two-point perception (P < 0.025), suggesting that retrained persons experienced or interpreted the tactile stimuli differently than did non-retrained persons.

KEY WORDS: sensory impairment • orthognathic surgery • sensory thresholds • sensory re-training • trigeminal nerve injury







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2007 Institutional Access Guidelines