JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Letra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, A.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Letra, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, A.R.
J Dent Res 86(10):986-991, 2007
© 2007 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Defining Subphenotypes for Oral Clefts Based on Dental Development

A. Letra1,2, R. Menezes1, J.M. Granjeiro3, and A.R. Vieira1,*

1 Department of Oral Biology and Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, School of Dental Medicine, 614 Salk Hall, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA;
2 Department of Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, and Bolsista CAPES/BEX, Brasília, Brazil; and
3 Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Biology Institute, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil

* corresponding author, arv11{at}dental.pitt.edu

Individuals with clefts present considerably more dental anomalies than do individuals without clefts. We used dental development to subphenotype clefts with the goal of identifying cleft subgroups that could have specific genetic contributions. We examined 1000 individuals, 500 with clefts and 500 without. We used several clinical features, such as cleft completeness or incompleteness, laterality, and the presence of dental anomalies to assess each individual’s cleft status. We performed chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to compare the frequencies of observed anomalies between individuals with and individuals without clefts, and among individuals with different cleft subphenotypes. Agenesis of the lateral incisor on the non-cleft side was the most remarkable observation, and may suggest that such cases could be considered incomplete forms of bilateral clefts of the lip.

KEY WORDS: oral clefts • subphenotype • dental anomalies • agenesis • cleft palate • cleft lip




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A.R. Vieira
Unraveling Human Cleft Lip and Palate Research
J. Dent. Res., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 119 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2007 Institutional Access Guidelines